Advertisement

Social vulnerability change assessment: monitoring longitudinal demographic indicators of disaster risk in Germany from 2005 to 2015

  • Alexander Fekete
Original Paper
  • 31 Downloads

Abstract

Social vulnerability assessments of disaster risks related to natural or man-made hazards have become state of the art, while not undisputed. One critique—that most assessments are static—is addressed here by analysing indicators over a 10-year period at a research area in Germany using county-level administrative units. The indicators (and an index) are displayed as maps using publicly available statistical data from a single government source to establish consistency. In addition, maps of changes in indicator values per 5 or 10 years are visualised. As a result, spatial regions within Germany that have received increases in, for instance, higher numbers of elderly citizens can be visualised. Maps visualise the increasing susceptibility to hazards such as floods, heatwaves, storms or technological accidents. At the same time, increases or decreases in capacities, such as hospital density or care homes, highlight regions that have adjusted or still have to adjust to demographic change demands. The main purpose of this paper is to test stability and heterogeneity of indicators over time and offer advice on a selection of indicators that are not only based on static and singular assessments but also take dynamics and related richness of additional temporal change information into account for longitudinal monitoring of disaster risk with a focus on vulnerability.

Keywords

Societal resilience Disaster risk management Vulnerability index Vulnerability dynamics Demographic change 

References

  1. adelphi, PRC, EURAC (2015) Vulnerabilität Deutschlands gegenüber dem Klimawandel Dessau-Roßlau: UmweltbundesamtGoogle Scholar
  2. Adger WN (1999) Social Vulnerability to Climate Change and Extremes in Coastal Vietnam. World Dev 27:249–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Adger WN (2006) Vulnerability. Glob Environ Change 16:268–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Adger WN, Kelly PM (1999) Social Vulnerability to Climate Change and the Architecture of Entitlements. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change. September 01;4:253-266Google Scholar
  5. Andrew MK, Mitnitski AB, Rockwood K (2008) Social Vulnerability, Frailty and Mortality in Elderly People. PLoS ONE 3:e2232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bankoff G (2001) Rendering the World Unsafe: Vulnerability‘as Western Discourse. Disasters. 25:19–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barnett J, Lambert S, Fry I (2008) The hazards of indicators: insights from the environmental vulnerability index. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 98:102–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. BBSR–Bundesinstitut für Bau- S-uR (2018) Raumordnungsbericht 2017. Daseinsvorsorge sichern BonnGoogle Scholar
  9. Birkmann J (ed) (2006) Measuring vulnerability to natural hazards: towards disaster resilient societies. United Nations University Press, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  10. Blaikie P, Cannon T, Davis I, Wisner B (1994) At risk—Natural hazards, people’s vulnerability and disasters, 2nd edn. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  11. Bohle HG, Downing TE, Watts MJ (1994) Climate change and social vulnerability: toward a sociology and geography of food insecurity. Glob Environ Change 4:37–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Costa L, Kropp JP (2013) Linking components of vulnerability in theoretic frameworks and case studies. Sustain Sci 8:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cutter SL (1996) Vulnerability to environmental hazards. Prog Hum Geogr 20:529–539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cutter SL, Finch C (2008) Temporal and spatial changes in social vulnerability to natural hazards. Proc Natl Acad Sci 105:2301–2306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cutter SL, Boruff BJ, Shirley WL (2003) Social vulnerability to environmental hazards. Soc Sci Q 84:242–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Damm M (2008) A socio-ecological vulnerability assessment for Germany. In: Simonovic SP, Bourget PG, Blanchard SF (eds) Proceedings of the proceedings of the 4th international symposium on flood defence 6–8 may 2008 managing flood risk, reliability & vulnerability; Institute for Catastrophic Loss Reduction, TorontoGoogle Scholar
  17. de Sherbinin A (2014) Mapping the unmeasurable? Spatial analysis of vulnerability to climate change and climate variability Enschede: University of TwenteGoogle Scholar
  18. Depietri Y, Welle T, Renaud FG (2013) Social vulnerability assessment of the Cologne urban area (Germany) to heat waves: links to ecosystem services. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 6:98–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. European Commission (2008) COUNCIL DIRECTIVE 2008/114/EC of 8 December 2008 on the identification and designation of European critical infrastructures and the assessment of the need to improve their protection, Official Journal of the European Union, pp 75-82Google Scholar
  20. Fekete A (2009a) The interrelation of social vulnerability and demographic change in Germany. Paper accepted for the IHDP OpenMeeting 2009Google Scholar
  21. Fekete A (2009b) Validation of a social vulnerability index in context to river-floods in Germany. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 9:393–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fekete A (2010a) Assessment of social vulnerability for river-floods in Germany University of BonnGoogle Scholar
  23. Fekete A (2010b) Assessment of social vulnerability to river-floods in Germany. UNU-EHS graduate series, vol 4, Bonn. ISBN: 978-3-939923-48-0Google Scholar
  24. Fekete A (2012a) Safety and security target levels: opportunities and challenges for risk management and risk communication. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 2:67–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fekete A (2012b) Spatial disaster vulnerability and risk assessments: challenges in their quality and acceptance. Nat Hazards 61:1161–1178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fekete A, Hufschmidt G (eds) (2016) Atlas der Verwundbarkeit und Resilienz—Pilotausgabe zu Deutschland, Österreich, Liechtenstein und Schweiz; Köln & Bonn| Atlas of Vulnerability and Resilience—Pilot version for Germany, Austria, Liechtenstein and Switzerland. Cologne & BonnGoogle Scholar
  27. Fekete A, Damm M, Birkmann J (2010) Scales as a challenge for vulnerability assessment. Nat Hazards 55:729–747CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Fendrich K, Hoffmann W (2007) More than just aging societies: the demographic change has an impact on actual numbers of patients. J Public Health 15:345–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Fritzsche K, Schneiderbauer S, Bubeck P, Kienberger S, Buth M, Zebisch M, Kahlenborn W (2014) Vulnerability sourcebook—guidelines for assessments. Bonn and EschbornGoogle Scholar
  30. Geipel R (1982) Disaster and Reconstruction: Friuli, Italy—The Earthquakes of 1976: Allen & UnwinGoogle Scholar
  31. German Federal Office of Cartography (2017) Verwaltungsgebiete von Deutschland. www.bkg.bund.de
  32. German Federal Office of Statistics (2017) Regionaldatenbank Deutschland. https://www.regionalstatistik.de/genesis/online/
  33. Gibson C, Clark C, Ostrom E, Ahn T-K (2000) The concept of scale and the human dimensions of global change: a survey. Ecol Econ 32:217–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. US Government (1996) The president’s commission on critical infrastructure protection (PCCIP), executive order 13010. Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  35. Hamm I, Seitz H, Werding M (eds) (2008) Demographic change in Germany. The economic and fiscal consequences. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  36. Heesen J, Lorenz DF, Nagenborg M, Wenzel B, Voss M (2014) blind spots on Achilles’ Heel: the limitations of vulnerability and resilience mapping in research. Int J Disaster Risk Sci 5:74–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hewitt K (1983) Interpretations of calamity: from the viewpoint of human ecology (The Risks & Hazards Series, 1) Winchester: Allen & Unwin IncGoogle Scholar
  38. IPCC (2007) Climate change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of working group II to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  39. Keller S, Atzl A (2014) Mapping natural hazard impacts on road infrastructure—the extreme precipitation in Baden-Württemberg, Germany, June 2013. Int J Disaster Risk Sci 5:227–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. King D (2001) Uses and limitations of socioeconomic indicators of community vulnerability to natural hazards: data and disasters in northern Australia. Nat Hazards 24:147–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kronenberg T (2009) The impact of demographic change on energy use and greenhouse gas emissions in Germany. Ecol Econ 68:2637–2645CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kropp JP, Block A, Reusswig F, Zickfeld K, Schellnhuber HJ (2006) Semiquantitative assessment of regional climate vulnerability: the north-rhine westphalia study. Clim Change 76:265–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kuhlicke C, Scolobig A, Tapsell S, Steinführer A, De Marchi B (2011) Contextualizing social vulnerability: findings from case studies across Europe. Nat Hazards 58:789–810CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lass W, Reusswig F, Kühn K-D (1998) Disaster vulnerability and “sustainable development”. Integrating disaster vulnerability in the CSD’s list of Indicators: Measuring Sustainable Development in Germany. BonnGoogle Scholar
  45. Lüchters G, Menkhoff L (1996) Human development as statistical artifact. World Dev 24:1385–1392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Martine R, Helmut M, Olivier D, Dirk S, Karl G, Jürgen PK, Anette M (2006) Heat and drought 2003 in Europe: a climate synthesis. Ann For Sci 63:569–577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Meentemeyer V (1989) Geographical perspectives of space, time, and scale. Landscape Ecol 3:163–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Nardo M, Saisana M, Saltelli A, Tarantola S, Hoffman A, Giovannini E (2005) Handbook on constructing composite indicators: methodology and user guideGoogle Scholar
  49. Nelson KS, Abkowitz MD, Camp JV (2015) A method for creating high resolution maps of social vulnerability in the context of environmental hazards. Appl Geogr 63:89–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Openshaw S (1984) The modifiable areal unit problem Norwich: Geo BooksGoogle Scholar
  51. Prahl BF, Rybski D, Kropp JP, Burghoff O, Held H (2012) Applying stochastic small-scale damage functions to German winter storms. Geophys Res Lett 39:n/a–n/aCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Rothman KJ, Greenland S, Lash TL (2008) Modern epidemiology Philadelphia: 3rd edn, Lippincott Williams & WilkinsGoogle Scholar
  53. Rufat S, Tate E, Burton CG, Maroof AS (2015) Social vulnerability to floods: review of case studies and implications for measurement. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 14(4):470–486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Saisana M, Tarantola S (2002) State-of-the-art report on current methodologies and practices for composite indicator development. IspraGoogle Scholar
  55. Sinus Sociovision (2007) Informationen zu den Sinus-Milieus®. Sinus Sociovision GmbH, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  56. Steinführer A, Kuhlicke C (2007) Social vulnerability and the 2002 flood. Country Report Germany (Mulde River) LeipzigGoogle Scholar
  57. Stephan C, Norf C, Fekete A (2017) How “Sustainable” are post-disaster measures? Lessons to Be Learned a Decade After the 2004 Tsunami in the Indian Ocean. Int J Disaster Risk Sci pp 1–13Google Scholar
  58. Tapsell S, McCarthy S, Faulkner H, Alexander M (2010) Social vulnerability to natural hazards. CapHaz-Net WP4 reportGoogle Scholar
  59. Tate E (2012) Social vulnerability indices: a comparative assessment using uncertainty and sensitivity analysis. Nat Hazards 63:325–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Thieken A, Kreibich H, Müller M, Merz B (2007) Coping with floods: preparedness, response and recovery of flood-affected residents in Germany in 2002. Hydrol Sci J 52:1016–1037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. UN/HABITAT (2016) HABITAT III. Draft new urban Agenda. 28 July 2016Google Scholar
  62. UNISDR (2005) Hyogo Framework for Action 2005–2015. Building the Resilience of Nations and Communities to DisastersGoogle Scholar
  63. United Nations (2015) Sendai framework for disaster risk reduction 2015–2030. GenevaGoogle Scholar
  64. Weichselgartner J, Kelman I (2014) Geographies of resilience: Challenges and opportunities of a descriptive concept. Prog Hum Geogr 39:249–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Welle T, Birkmann J (2015) The world risk index—an approach to assess risk and vulnerability on a global scale. J Extreme Events 02:1550003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Welle T, Depietri Y, Angignard M, Birkmann J, Renaud F, Greiving S (2014) Chapter 5—vulnerability assessment to heat waves, floods, and earthquakes using the MOVE framework: test case cologne, Germany. In: Assessment of vulnerability to natural hazards. Elsevier, pp 91–124Google Scholar
  67. Werner E (1997) Vulnerable but invincible: high-risk children from birth to adulthood. Acta Paediatr 86:103–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Werner E, Smith R (2001) Journeys from childhood to midlife. Risk, resilience, and recovery. Cornell University Press, IthacaGoogle Scholar
  69. Witte JC, Wagner GG (1995) Declining Fertility in East Germany after unification: a demographic response to socioeconomic change. Popul Dev Rev 21:387–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Zebisch M, Grothmann T, Schröter D, Hasse C, Fritsch U, Cramer W (2005) Climate change in Germany. Vulnerability and adaptation of climate sensitive sectorsGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.TH Köln University of Applied SciencesCologneGermany

Personalised recommendations