Interpersonal communication sources and natural hazard risk perception: a case study of a rural Chinese village
- 109 Downloads
This exploratory study contributes to our knowledge about the relationships between interpersonal communication sources and risk perception regarding natural hazards. Survey data (N = 186) from a small village in northwest China was used, and the correlations between eight types of interpersonal communication sources related to disaster risk reduction and the perceived severity and perceived likelihood of occurrence of eight types of natural hazards were explored. Past studies have suggested that interpersonal communication sources are more likely to influence individuals in their perceived severity of natural hazards than in their perceived likelihood of occurrence. The results of this study moderately corroborate this finding. The results indicated that different sources have different relationships to risk perception, as positive correlations were found between obtaining information via certain trained science professionals (science teachers, emergency responders, scientific experts) and certain natural hazard risk perceptions, while negative relationships were found between obtaining information via certain personal contacts (other villagers and relatives and friends) and certain natural hazard risk perceptions. However, the strength of these relationships was weak (− 0.197 ≥ r ≤ 0.245). Age showed statically significant correlations with the perceived severity of most of the natural hazards. Studies with more representative samples and controls for theoretical factors are needed to better understand how interpersonal communication sources affect individuals' natural hazard risk perceptions.
KeywordsRisk perception Natural hazards Interpersonal Information-seeking channel
This research was supported by the project “Pan-participatory Assessment and Governance of Earthquake Risks in the Ordos Area (PAGER-O)” (National Natural Science Foundation of China Grant No. is 41661134013). The project belongs to a UK–China Collaboration programme entitled “Increasing Resilience to Natural Hazards in Earthquake-Prone regions in China” which is jointly funded by the Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) and the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) of the UK, and by the National Natural Science Foundation of China.
- Arlikatti S, Lindell MK, Prater CS (2007) Perceived stakeholder role relationships and adoption of seismic hazard adjustments. Int J Mass Emerg Disasters 25:218–256Google Scholar
- Bai V (2009) Emergency management in China. In: Comp. Emerg. Manag. https://training.fema.gov/hiedu/downloads/compemmgmtbookproject/comparative%20em%20book%20-%20chapter%20-%20emergency%20management%20in%20china.doc. Accessed 17 May 2018
- Butler R, Stewart GS, Kanamori H (1979) The July 27, 1976 Tangshan, China earthquake—a complex sequence of intraplate events. Bull Seismol Soc Am 69:207–220Google Scholar
- Kasperson RE, Renn O, Slovic P et al (1988) The social amplification of risk: a conceptual framework. Risk Anal 8:177–187. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1988.tb01168.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lindell MK, Prater CS (2000) Household adoption of seismic hazard adjustments: a comparison of residents in two states. Int J Mass Emerg Disasters 18:317–338Google Scholar
- Slovic P, Fischhoff B, Lichtenstein S (1982) Why study risk perception? Risk Anal 2:83–93. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1982.tb01369.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wang F, Wei J, Huang S-K et al (2016) Public reactions to the 2013 Chinese H7N9 Influenza outbreak: perceptions of risk, stakeholders, and protective actions. J Risk Res 1–25:809–833Google Scholar