Advertisement

Does carbon emissions trading affect the financial performance of high energy-consuming firms in China?

  • Yue-Jun Zhang
  • Jing-Yue Liu
Original Paper

Abstract

Whether China’s carbon emissions trading (CET) has an impact on the financial performance of the market players of carbon trading, i.e., firms, is crucial to the sustainable development of national economy and carbon trading market. Based on the panel data of the listed firms in the seven high energy-consuming industries in China during 2010–2017, this paper uses the DID model to study the impact of CET on the firms’ financial performance. The empirical results show that the impact of CET on firms’ financial performance presents obvious industrial heterogeneity; CET policy reduces the financial performance of firms in the nonferrous metal industry but improves that in the power industry. In addition, with the implementation of CET policy, its impact on the financial performance of firms in the nonferrous metal and power industries is increasingly intensifying. Finally, there is a lag of 2–4 years on the impact of CET on the firms’ financial performance in the chemical, paper and aviation industries, and the effects change from negative to positive over time. That is, CET policy can hardly ensure that all firms are profitable in the short term, but there is still the possibility of profitability in the long term.

Keywords

Carbon emissions trading Financial performance Difference-in-differences model China 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 71273028, 71322103, 71774051), National Program for Support of Top-notch Young Professionals (No. W02070325), Changjiang Scholars Program of the Ministry of Education of China (No. Q2016154) and Hunan Youth Talent Program.

References

  1. Abadie A (2005) Semiparametric difference-in-difference estimators. Rev Econ Stud 72:1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beck T, Levine R, Levkov A (2010) Big bad banks? The winners and losers from bank deregulation in the United States. J Finance 65:1637–1667CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bel G, Holst M (2018) Evaluation of the impact of bus rapid transit on air pollution in Mexico City. Transp Policy 63:209–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bertrand M, Duflo E, Mullainathan S (2004) How much should we trust differences-in-differences estimates? Q J Econ 119:249–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. BP (2017) Statistical review of world energy. BP, LondonGoogle Scholar
  6. Branas CC, Cheney RA, Macdonald JM, Tam VW, Jackson TD, Ten Have TR (2011) A difference-in-differences analysis of health, safety, and greening vacant urban space. Am J Epidemiol 174:1296–1306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cavaco S, Crifo P (2014) CSR and financial performance: complementarity between environmental, social and business behaviours. Appl Econ 46:3323–3338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chen L, Wu H (2015) Research status and potential problems of differences-in-differences method in China. J Quant Tech Econ 7:133–148Google Scholar
  9. Choi J, Wang H (2009) Stakeholder relations and the persistence of corporate financial performance. Strateg Manag J 30:895–907CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cong R, Lo AY (2017) Emission trading and carbon market performance in Shenzhen, China. Appl Energy 193:414–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cong RG, Wei YM (2010) Potential impact of (CET) carbon emissions trading on China’s power sector: a perspective from different allowance allocation options. Energy 35:3921–3931CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cong RG, Wei YM (2012) Experimental comparison of impact of auction format on carbon allowance market. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 16:4148–4156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Deschenes O, Greenstone M, Shapiro JS (2013) Defensive investments and the demand for air quality: evidence from the NOx budget program and ozone reductions. Natl Bur Econ Res 107:2958–2989Google Scholar
  14. Dinardo J (2010) Natural experiments and quasi-natural experiments. In: Durlauf SN, Blume LE (eds) Microeconometrics. Palgrave Macmillan UK, LondonGoogle Scholar
  15. Fan Z, Li X (2014) Political connection of ministers and the allocation of fiscal transfer. Econ Res J 6:129–141Google Scholar
  16. Fang G, Tian L, Liu M, Fu M, Sun M (2018) How to optimize the development of carbon trading in China—enlightenment from evolution rules of the EU carbon price. Appl Energy 211:1039–1049CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Filipović S, Miljković M (2014) Transition economies during global economic crisis: a difference in differences approach. Industrija 42:23–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. García-Cornejo B, Pérez-Méndez JA (2018) Assessing the effect of standardized cost systems on financial performance. A difference-in-differences approach for hospitals according to their technological level. Health Policy 122:396–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gran JM, Wasmuth L, Amundsen EJ, Bo HL, Aalen OO (2008) Growth rates in epidemic models: application to a model for HIV/AIDS progression. Stat Med 28:221–239Google Scholar
  20. Griliches Z (1981) Market value, R&D, and patents. Econ Lett 7:183–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gupta K (2017) Do economic and societal factors influence the financial performance of alternative energy firms? Energy Econ 65:172–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. He W, Hao R, Deng P, Wang H (2014) An empirical analysis of production efficiency of the non-ferrous metal industry. J Sci Ind Res 73:505–509Google Scholar
  23. Heckman JJ, Ichimura H, Todd PE (1998) Matching as an econometric evaluation estimator. Rev Econ Stud 65:261–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hu YJ, Li XY, Tang BJ (2017) Assessing the operational performance and maturity of the carbon trading pilot program: the case study of Beijing’s carbon market. J Clean Prod 161:1263–1274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ionescu-Ittu R, Glymour MM, Kaufman JS (2015) A difference-in-differences approach to estimate the effect of income-supplementation on food insecurity. Prev Med 70:108–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jauregui A, Tidwell A, Hite D (2017) Sample selection approaches to estimating house price cash differentials. J Real Estate Financ Econ 54:117–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ji CJ, Hu YJ, Tang BJ (2018) Research on carbon market price mechanism and influencing factors: a literature review. Nat Hazards 92:761–782CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kor YY, Mahoney JT (2005) How dynamics, management, and governance of resource deployments influence firm-level performance. Strateg Manag J 26:489–496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lechner M (2002) Program heterogeneity and propensity score matching: an application to the evaluation of active labor market policies. Rev Econ Stat 84:205–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lechner M (2011) The estimation of causal effects by difference-in-difference methods. Department of Economics, University of St. Gallen working paper, vol 4, pp 165–224Google Scholar
  31. Li G, He Q, Shao S, Cao J (2018) Environmental non-governmental organizations and urban environmental governance: evidence from China. J Environ Manag 206:1296–1307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Liu R, Zhao R (2015) Western development: growth drive or policy trap—an analysis based on PSM-DID method. China Ind Econ 6:32–43Google Scholar
  33. Liu L, Chen C, Zhao Y, Zhao E (2015) China’s carbon-emissions trading: overview, challenges and future. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 49:254–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Luong H, Moshirian F, Nguyen L, Tian X, Zhang B (2017) How do foreign institutional investors enhance firm innovation? J Financ Quant Anal 52:1449–1490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lv J, Jiao SY (2011) Empirical study on the relations among environmental disclosure, environmental performance and financial performance. J Shanxi Financ Econ Univ 33:109–116Google Scholar
  36. Ma CQ, Ren YS, Zhang YJ, Sharp B (2018) The allocation of carbon emission quotas to five major power generation corporations in China. J Clean Prod 189:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Manrique S, Martí-Ballester CP (2017) Analyzing the effect of corporate environmental performance on corporate financial performance in developed and developing countries. Sustainability 9:1957CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Michalek J, Ciaian P, Pokrivcak J (2018) The impact of producer organizations on farm performance: the case study of large farms from Slovakia. Food Policy 75:80–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Misani N, Pogutz S (2015) Unraveling the effects of environmental outcomes and processes on financial performance: a non-linear approach. Ecol Econ 109:150–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Moser P, Voena A (2012) Compulsory licensing-evidence from the trading with the enemy act. Am Econ Rev 102:396–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Reguera-Alvarado N, Fuentes PD, Laffarga J (2017) Does board gender diversity influence financial performance? Evidence from Spain. J Bus Ethics 141:337–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Shi X (2010) Restructuring in China’s state-owned enterprises: evidence from the coal industry. China World Econ 18:90–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Shi X, Grafton RQ (2010) Efficiency impacts of the Chinese industrial transition: a quantitative evaluation of reforms in the coal industry. Econ Chang Restruct 43:1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Tan X, Wang X (2017) The market performance of carbon trading in China: a theoretical framework of structure-conduct-performance. J Clean Prod 159:410–424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Tan SH, Habibullah MS, Tan SK, Choon SW (2017) The impact of the dimensions of environmental performance on firm performance in travel and tourism industry. J Environ Manag 203:603–611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wang Q (2013) China has the capacity to lead in carbon trading. Nature 493:273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wang P, Dai HC, Ren SY, Zhao DQ, Masui T (2015) Achieving Copenhagen target through carbon emission trading: economic impacts assessment in Guangdong province of China. Energy 79:212–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wang K, Wei YM, Huang Z (2016) Potential gains from carbon emissions trading in China: a DEA based estimation on abatement cost savings. Omega 63:48–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Yang Z, Fan M, Shao S, Yang L (2017) Does carbon intensity constraint policy improve industrial green production performance in China? A quasi-DID analysis. Energy Econ 68:271–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. You J, Gao Z (2013) Can government environmental regulations be good for energy efficiency? An empirical study in Xinjiang. Resour Sci 35:1211–1219Google Scholar
  51. Zhang Z (2015) Carbon emissions trading in China: the evolution from pilots to a nationwide scheme. Clim Policy 15:104–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Zhang YJ, Hao JF (2017) Carbon emission quota allocation among China’s industrial sectors based on the equity and efficiency principles. Ann Oper Res 255(1–2):117–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Zhang YJ, Zhang KB (2018) The linkage of CO2 emissions for China, EU and USA: evidence from the regional and sectoral analyses. Environ Sci Pollut R 25(20):20179–20192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Zhang C, Wang Q, Shi D, Li P, Cai W (2016a) Scenario-based potential effects of carbon trading in China: an integrated approach. Appl Energy 182:177–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Zhang N, Wang B, Liu Z (2016b) Carbon emissions dynamics, efficiency gains, and technological innovation in China’s industrial sectors. Energy 99:10–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Zhang YJ, Peng YL, Ma CQ, Shen B (2017) Can environmental innovation facilitate carbon emissions reduction? Evidence from China. Energy Policy 100:18–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Zhao X, Jiang G, Nie D, Chen H (2016) How to improve the market efficiency of carbon trading: a perspective of China. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 59:1229–1245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Zhao XG, Wu L, Li A (2017) Research on the efficiency of carbon trading market in China. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 79:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Zheng X, Yang SE (2009) Research on the effect of Chinese listed companies’ reputation on their financial performance. Manage Rev 21:96–104Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Business SchoolHunan UniversityChangshaChina
  2. 2.Center for Resource and Environmental ManagementHunan UniversityChangshaChina

Personalised recommendations