Advertisement

Natural Hazards

, Volume 93, Issue 2, pp 1029–1047 | Cite as

Hazard evaluation of progressive Pawari landslide zone, Satluj valley, Himachal Pradesh, India

  • Vipin Kumar
  • Vikram Gupta
  • Imlirenla Jamir
Original Paper
  • 155 Downloads

Abstract

The Pawari landslide zone, located in the Satluj valley, Himachal Pradesh (India), is a progressive complex landslide zone that is ~ 900 m long and ~ 4000 m wide and encompasses an area of ~ 6 km2. It is observed that the frequency of the slope failure in the landslide zone and dimension of the landslide area have increased considerably in the last decade that pose threat to the human population of about 6000 residing in the vicinity of the landslide zone. The finite element method (FEM) and kinematic analysis are used for stability analyses, while high-resolution imagery, slope failure data and rain-gauge-based rainfall data are used to infer landslide activity. The FEM analysis involved numerical simulation of two slope models, i.e. S-1 (rockmass only) and S-2 (rockmass overlain by debris) that were chosen along the width of the landslide zone. The shear strength reduction method was incorporated in FEM to quantify the existing slope strength and to infer pattern of strain and displacement. The analyses results show that the main scarp of the landslide zone has increased ~ 7% between 2005 and 2014, and presently, major as well as minor scarps accommodate maximum shear strain (0.001–0.006) and displacement (0.08–0.20 m). The kinematic analysis reveals wedge failure in the rockmass that corroborates with the field evidences of rock failure. The present work intends to evaluate the hazard of landslide zone by analysing landslide activity pattern and determining shear strain and displacement of the slope.

Keywords

Pawari landslide Satluj valley Finite element method Higher Himalaya 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The Authors are thankful to the Director, Wadia Institute of Himalayan Geology (WIHG), Dehradun for all the necessary facilities to carry out the work. The soil and rock testings were carried out in Geotechnical laboratory of the WIHG and National Geotechnical Facility (NGF), Dehradun. The authors are also thankful to the Reckong Peo District administration and BRO (Pawari) for the help rendered during the field work. Authors acknowledge the Editor in Chief, Dr. Thomas Glade and anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments that helped to improve the manuscript. The study forms a part of doctoral (Ph.D.) work of Vipin Kumar.

References

  1. Barton NR (1974) A review of the shear strength of filled discontinuities in rock. Norw Geotech Inst Publ 105:38Google Scholar
  2. Bhasin R, Kaynia AM (2004) Static and dynamic simulation of a 700-m high rock slope in western Norway. Eng Geol 71(3):213–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Borrelli L, Antronico A, Gullà G, Sorriso-Valvo GM (2014) Geology, geomorphology and dynamics of the 15 February 2010 Maierato landslide (Calabria, Italy). Geomorphology 208:50–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bowles JE (1996) Foundation analysis and design, 5th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York, p 750Google Scholar
  5. Burchfiel BC, Zhiliang C, Hodges KV, Yuping L, Royden LH, Changrong D, Jiene X (1992) The South Tibetan detachment system, Himalayan orogen: extension contemporaneous with and parallel to shortening in a collisional mountain belt. Geol Soc Am Spec Pap 269:1–41Google Scholar
  6. Cai M, Kaiser PK, Uno H, Tasaka Y, Minami M (2004) Estimation of rock mass deformation modulus and strength of jointed hard rock masses using the GSI system. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 41(1):3–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cai M, Kaiser PK, Tasaka Y, Minami M (2007) Determination of residual strength parameters of jointed rock masses using the GSI system. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 44(2):247–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Census of India (2011) District Census Handbook; Kinnaur. Directorate of Census Operations, Himachal PradeshGoogle Scholar
  9. Crowder JJ, Bawden WF (2004) Review of post-peak parameters and behaviour of rock masses: current trends and research. Rocnews, 13Google Scholar
  10. Cruden DM, Varnes DJ (1996) Landslides: investigation and mitigation. Chapter 3-Landslide types and processes. Transportation Research Board Special Report (247)Google Scholar
  11. Diederichs MS, Carvalho JL, Carter TG (2007) A modified approach for prediction of strength and post yield behaviour for high GSI rockmasses in strong, brittle ground. First Canada-US Rock Mechanics Symposium, Vancouver, pp 249–257Google Scholar
  12. Dimri AP, Niyogi D, Barros AP, Ridley J, Mohanty UC, Yasunari T, Sikka DR (2015) Western disturbances: a review. Rev Geophys 53(2):225–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fisher GB, Amos CB, Bookhagen B, Burbank DW, Godard V (2012) Channel widths, landslides, faults, and beyond: the new world order of high-spatial resolution Google Earth imagery in the study of earth surface processes. Geol Soc Am Spec Pap 492:1–22Google Scholar
  14. Fredlund DG, Krahn J (1977) Comparison of slope stability methods of analysis. Can Geotech J 14(3):429–439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Geological Survey of India, Ministry of Mines, Government of India, www.gsi.gov.in, retrieved on 02nd March 2016
  16. Griffiths DV, Lane PA (1999) Slope stability analysis by finite elements. Geotechnique 49(3):387–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gupta V (2005) Application of lichenometry to slided material in the Higher Himalaya landslide zone. Curr Sci 89(6):1032–1036Google Scholar
  18. Gupta V, Sah MP (2008) Spatial Variability of Mass Movements in the Satluj Valley, Himachal Pradesh during 1990–2006. J Mt Sci 5:38–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gupta V, Bhasin RK, Kaynia AM, Kumar V, Saini AS, Tandon RS, Pabst T (2016a) Finite element analysis of failed slope by shear strength reduction technique: a case study for Surabhi Resort Landslide, Mussoorie Township, Garhwal Himalaya. Geomat Nat Hazard Risk 7(5):1677–1690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gupta V, Nautiyal H, Kumar V, Jamir I, Tandon RS (2016b) Landslides hazards around Uttarkashi township, Garhwal Himalaya, after the tragic flash flood in June 2013. Nat Hazards 80:1689–1707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gupta V, Jamir I, Kumar V, Devi M (2017) Geomechanical characterisation of slopes for assessing rockfall hazards in the Upper Yamuna Valley, Northwest Higher Himalaya, India. Himal Geol 38(2):156–170Google Scholar
  22. Guzzetti F, Carrara A, Cardinali M, Reichenbach P (1999) Landslide hazard evaluation: a review of current techniques and their application in a multi-scale study, Central Italy. Geomorphology 31(1):181–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Guzzetti F, Mondini AC, Cardinali M, Fiorucci F, Santangelo M, Chang KT (2012) Landslide inventory maps: new tools for an old problem. Earth Sci Rev 112(1):42–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hoek E (1994) Strength of rock and rock masses. ISRM News J 2(2):4–16Google Scholar
  25. Hoek E, Bray JW (1981) Rock slope engineering, revised, 3rd edn. London, Taylor and FrancisGoogle Scholar
  26. Hoek E, Brown ET (1997) Practical estimates of rock mass strength. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 34(8):1165–1186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. IS: 2720, Part 4 (1985) Methods of test for soils: Grain size analysis. In: Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  28. IS: 2720, Part 13 (1986) Method of test for soils: direct shear test. In: Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  29. IS: 2720, Part 10 (1991) Method of test for soils: determination of unconfined compressive strength. In: Bureau of Indian Standards, Delhi, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  30. IS: 9143 (1979) Method for the determination of unconfined compressive strength of rock materials. In: Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  31. Jamir I, Gupta V, Kumar V, Thong GT (2017) Evaluation of potential surface instability using finite element method in Kharsali Village, Yamuna Valley, Northwest Himalaya. J Mt Sci 14(8):1666–1676CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Jing L (2003) A review of techniques, advance and outstanding issues in numerical modelling for rock mechanics and rock engineering. Int J Rock Mech Miner Sci 40:283–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kanungo DP, Pain A, Sharma S (2013) Finite element modeling approach to assess the stability of debris and rock slopes: a case study from the Indian Himalayas. Nat Hazards 69(1):1–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kawagoe S, Kazama S, Sarukkalige PR (2009) Assessment of snowmelt triggered landslide hazard and risk in Japan. Cold Reg Sci Technol 58(3):120–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kirschbaum D, Adler R, Adler D, Peters-Lidard C, Huffman G (2012) Global distribution of extreme precipitation and high-impact landslides in 2010 relative to previous years. J Hydrometeorol 13(5):1536–1551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kumar V, Gupta V, Sundriyal YP (2018) Spatial interrelationship of landslides, litho-tectonic and climate regime, Satluj valley, Northwest Himalaya. Geol J.  https://doi.org/10.1002/gj.3204 Google Scholar
  37. Landslide Mapping and Vulnerability Assessment, Indian Meteorological Department, Ministry of Earth Science, Govt. of India, www.imd.gov.in, retrieved 20th Jan 2016
  38. Martha TR, Roy P, Govindharaj KB, Kumar KV, Diwakar PG, Dadhwal VK (2015) Landslides triggered by the June 2013 extreme rainfall event in parts of Uttarakhand state, India. Landslides 12(1):135–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mathew J, Babu DG, Kundu S, Kumar KV, Pant CC (2014) Integrating intensity–duration-based rainfall threshold and antecedent rainfall-based probability estimate towards generating early warning for rainfall-induced landslides in parts of the Garhwal Himalaya, India. Landslides 11(4):575–588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Matsui T, San KC (1992) Finite element slope stability analysis by shear strength reduction technique. Soils Found 32(1):59–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Nian TK, Chen GQ, Wan SS, Luan MT (2011) Non-convergence criterion on slope stability FE analysis by strength reduction method. J Converg Inf Technol 6:78–88Google Scholar
  42. Rahardjo H, Lee TT, Leong EC, Rezaur R (2005) Response of a residual soil slope to rainfall. Can Geotech J 42(2):340–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Ribacchi R (2000) Mechanical tests on pervasively jointed rock material: insight into rock mass behaviour. Rock Mech Rock Eng 33(4):243–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Roscoe KH (1970) The influence of strains in soil mechanics, Tenth Rankine Lecture. Geotechnique 20:129–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sah MP, Mazari RK (1998) Anthropogenically accelerated mass movement, Kulu Valley, Himachal Pradesh, India. Geomorphology 26(1):123–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sato PH, Harp EL (2009) Interpretation of earthquake induced landslides triggered by the 12 May 2008 M7.9 Wenchuan earthquake in the Beichuan area, Sichuan Province, China using satellite imagery and Google Earth. Landslides 6:153–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sharma KK (1977) A contribution to the geology of Satluj Valley, Kinnaur, Himachal Pradesh, India. Collques Int du CNRS 268:369–378Google Scholar
  48. Sharma S, Chand G (1981) A geological report on Telangi landslide district Kinnaur, Himachal Pradesh. GSI Special Publ 6:109–118Google Scholar
  49. Shroder JF (1998) Slope failure and denudation in the western Himalaya. Geomorphology 26(1):81–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Singh TN, Verma AK, Sarkar K (2010) Static and dynamic analysis of a landslide. Geomat Nat Hazards Risk 1(4):323–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Srikantia SV, Bhargava ON (1998) Geology of Himachal Pradesh. Geological Society of India, BangaloreGoogle Scholar
  52. Valdiya KS (1973) Lithological sub-divisions and tectonics of the Central Crystalline Zone of Kumaon Himalaya. In: Proceedings of symposium on geodynamics of the Himalayan region: Hyderabad, India. National Geophysical Research Institute, pp 204–205Google Scholar
  53. Vannay JC, Grasemann B (2001) Himalayan inverted metamorphism and syn-convergence extension as a consequence of a general shear extrusion. Geol Mag 138(03):253–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Volkwein A, Schellenberg K, Labiouse V, Agliardi F, Berger F, Bourrier F, Dorren LK, Gerber W, Jaboyedoff M (2011) Rockfall characterisation and structural protection-a review. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 11:2617–2651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Whitmeyer SJ, Bailey JE, De Paor DG and Ornduff T (2012) Google earth and virtual visualizations in geoscience education and research. Special Paper 492, Geological Society of America, USAGoogle Scholar
  56. Yadav OP (2000) An evaluation report on investigation, instrumentation and monitoring of landslides in Himachal Pradesh. Department of Science and Technology, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  57. Yang W, Lingling S, Peijun S (2015) Mapping landslide risk of the world. In: Shi P, Kasperson R (eds) World atlas of natural disaster risk. Springer, Berlin, pp 57–66Google Scholar
  58. Zheng H, Liu DF, Li C (2005) Slope stability analysis based on elasto-plastic finite element method. Int J Numer Methods Eng 64(14):1871–1888CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Wadia Institute of Himalayan GeologyDehradunIndia
  2. 2.HNB Garhwal UniversitySrinagarIndia
  3. 3.Nagaland UniversityMeriemaIndia

Personalised recommendations