Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Estimation of the compound hazard severity of tropical cyclones over coastal China during 1949–2011 with copula function

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Natural Hazards Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In China, the intensity of a tropical cyclone (TC) is officially classified into six scales based on the 2-min sustained winds. However, the destructive potential of a TC is determined not only by winds, but also by other hazards such as rainfall. Therefore, the integration of the effects of all the various hazards to reflect the compound severity of a TC is of great importance. In this paper, the maximum wind speed (MWS) at landfall and total precipitation volume (TP) over land in China are obtained as two representative hazards. Copulas, having the capability to construct joint probability distributions of two or more random variables with an unidentified dependence structure among the variables, are utilized to construct the dependence of TC wind and rainfall. Firstly, the cumulative probability distribution functions (CDFs) are fitted separately based on four probability models with 218 historical TC records from 1985 to 2011 over China. Three copula functions are employed to construct the joint probability using the best-fitted marginal CDFs. The best probability functions are determined according to the OLS value. Secondly, the univariate return periods of MWS and TP, and two types of joint return period (\(RP_{ \cup }\) and \(RP_{ \cap }\)) are calculated. We found that the univariate return periods are discrepant for individual hazards and neither is a proper indicator for TC compound hazard severity. The joint return period \(RP_{ \cap }\) is found to be a better indicator of the compound hazard severity of TCs. Finally, the economic losses of 178 historical TCs from 1985 to 2010 are normalized by eliminating the impacts of inflation, increased assets, and population. We find that the joint return period \(RP_{ \cap }\) has a better capacity for representing TC-induced loss. This study highlights the improved capacity of multi-hazard joint return period over univariate return periods for representing the compound hazard severity and damage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bell GD, Halpert MS, Schnell RC, Higgins RW, Lawrimore J, Kousky VE, Tinker R, Thiaw W, Chelliah M, Artusa A (2000) Climate Assessment for 1999. Bull Am Meteor Soc 81:s1–s50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunner MI, Seibert J, Favre AC (2016) Bivariate return periods and their importance for flood peak and volume estimation. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Water 3(6):819–833

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CMA (China Meteorological Administration) (1972–1989) Yearbook of Typhoon 1971–1988. China Meteorological Press, Beijing (in Chinese)

  • CMA (China Meteorological Administration) (1986–2011) China meteorological disaster yearbook 1985–2010. China Meteorological Press, Beijing (in Chinese)

  • CMA (China Meteorological Administration) (1990–2012) Yearbook of Tropical Cyclone 1989–2011. China Meteorological Press, Beijing (in Chinese)

  • CMA (China Meteorological Administration) (2006) Grade of Tropical Cyclones, GB/T 19201–2006. Standards Press of China, Beijing

  • Corbella S, Stretch DD (2012) Multivariate return periods of sea storms for coastal erosion risk assessment. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 12(8):2699–2708

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Michele C, Salvadori G (2003) A generalized Pareto intensity–duration model of storm rainfall exploiting 2-copulas. J Geophys Res Atmos 108:D2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dong Sheng, Jiao Chun-Shuo, Tao Shan-Shan (2017) Joint return probability analysis of wind speed and rainfall intensity in typhoon-affected sea area. Nat Hazards 86(3):1193–1205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emanuel Kerry (2005) Increasing destructiveness of tropical cyclones over the past 30 years. Nature 436(7051):686–688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Favre AC, El Adlouni S, Perreault L, Thiémonge N, Bobée B (2004) Multivariate hydrological frequency analysis using copulas. Water Resour Res 40:1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grimaldi Salvatore, Serinaldi Francesco (2006) Asymmetric copula in multivariate flood frequency analysis. Adv Water Resour 29(8):1155–1167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gumbel Emil Julius (1941) The return period of flood flows. Ann Math Stat 12(2):163–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holland G J, Done J, NCAR Regional Climate Research Group (2011) A global index for tropical cyclone damage potential. In: AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts

  • Joe H (1997) Multivariate models and multivariate dependence concepts. CRC Press

  • Kantha Lakshmi (2006) Time to replace the Saffir-Simpson hurricane scale? Eos, Trans Am Geophys Un 87(1):3–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li N, Gu X, Liu X (2013a) Return period analysis based on joint distribution of three hazards in dust storm disaster. Adv Earth Sci 28(004):490–496 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Li N, Liu X, Xie W, Wu J, Zhang P (2013b) The return period analysis of natural disasters with statistical modeling of bivariate joint probability distribution. Risk Anal 33(1):134–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ming X, Xu W, Li Y, Du J, Liu B, Shi P (2015) Quantitative multi-hazard risk assessment with vulnerability surface and hazard joint return period. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 29(1):35–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NBS (National Bureau of Statistics) (1986–2001) China Statistical Yearbook 1986–2001. China Statistics Press, Beijing (in Chinese)

  • NBS (National Bureau of Statistics) (2010) China Compendium of Statistics 1949–2008. China Statistics Press, Beijing (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • NBS (National Bureau of Statistics) (2013) China Statistical Yearbook 2013. China Statistics Press, Beijing (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • NBS (National Bureau of Statistics) (2014) China Statistical Yearbook 2014. China Statistics Press, Beijing (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pielke RA Jr, Landsea CW (1998) Normalized hurricane damages in the United States: 1925–95. Weather Forecast 13(3):621–631

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pielke RA Jr, Gratz J, Landsea CW, Collins D, Saunders MA, Musulin R (2008) Normalized hurricane damage in the United States: 1900–2005. Nat Hazards Rev 9(1):29–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell Mark D, Reinhold Timothy A (2007) Tropical cyclone destructive potential by integrated kinetic energy. Bull Am Meteor Soc 88(4):513–526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shiau JT (2003) Return period of bivariate distributed extreme hydrological events. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 17(1):42–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shiau JT (2006) Fitting drought duration and severity with two-dimensional copulas. Water Resour Manage 20(5):795–815

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shiau JT, Modarres R (2009) Copula-based drought severity-duration-frequency analysis in Iran. Meteorol Appl 16(4):481–489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shiau JT, Feng S, Nadarajah S (2007) Assessment of hydrological droughts for the Yellow River, China, using copulas. Hydrol Process 21(16):2157–2163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Si Y (1998) The World’s most catastrophic dam failures. Qing (1998a), 25–38

  • Sraj M, Bezak N, Brilly M (2015) Bivariate flood frequency analysis using the copula function: a case study of the Litija station on the Sava River. Hydrol Process 29(2):225–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trepanier JC, Needham HF, Elsner JB, Jagger TH (2015) Combining surge and wind risk from hurricanes using a copula model: an example from Galveston, Texas. Prof Geogr 67(1):52–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Um MJ, Joo K, Nam W, Heo JH (2017) A comparative study to determine the optimal copula model for the wind speed and precipitation of typhoons. Int J Climatol 37(4):2051–2062

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu ZK, Zhao L, Ge YJ (2010) Statistical analysis of wind velocity and rainfall intensity joint probability distribution of Shanghai area in typhoon condition. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica 28(4):393–399

    Google Scholar 

  • Ying M, Zhang W, Yu H, Lu X, Feng J, Fan Y et al (2014) An overview of the China Meteorological Administration tropical cyclone database. J Atmos Oceanic Technol 31(2):287–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (NO. 2017YFA0604903), and Special Fund for Climate Change of China Meteorological Administration (Grant No. CCSF201719).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Weihua Fang.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (XLSX 348 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ye, Y., Fang, W. Estimation of the compound hazard severity of tropical cyclones over coastal China during 1949–2011 with copula function. Nat Hazards 93, 887–903 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-018-3329-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-018-3329-5

Keywords

Navigation