Advertisement

GIS-based vulnerability mapping of the coastal stretch from Puri to Konark in Odisha using analytical hierarchy process

  • Rashmisikha BeheraEmail author
  • Abhipsa Kar
  • Manas Ranjan Das
  • Prachi Prava Panda
Original Paper
  • 76 Downloads

Abstract

The 485-km-long coastline of Odisha, a state in the northeastern part of the Indian peninsula, is potentially vulnerable to several disaster events that take place frequently. In addition to threats due to natural hazards, these coastal regions also face immense population and developmental pressures. The increase in the intensity and frequency of cyclones and accelerated sea level rise related to increased sea surface temperature have led to flooding, coastal erosion and shoreline retreat causing damage to coastal ecosystems and resources in these regions. In recognition of these risks, the present work demonstrates a GIS-based approach to assess the vulnerability of the 187-km stretch from Puri to Konark out of the total 485-km coastline using analytical hierarchy process (AHP). The present study focuses on computation of integrated coastal vulnerability index which is an integration of physical vulnerability index, geotechnical vulnerability index and social vulnerability index using AHP taking nine risk variables into consideration. An attempt has been made to demonstrate the state-of-the-art microzonation of the coastal stretch between Puri and Konark based on the vulnerability indices using geographical information system.

Keywords

AHP GVI PVI SVI ICVI Microzonation GIS 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Coordinates of the sampling locations have been collected by field surveys through GPS. All data sources are duly acknowledged. Maps prepared for this study have been completed with the free software QGIS, Arc GIS, Arc View3.2a.

References

  1. Basheer Ahammed KK, Mahendra RS, Pandey AC (2016) Coastal vulnerability assessment for Eastern Coast of India, Andhra Pradesh by using geo-spatial technique. Geoinform Geostat: Overv 4:3., A Scitechnol JGoogle Scholar
  2. EC: Climate Change and the European Water Dimension A Report to the European Water Directors (2005). EU Report No. 21553., European Commission-Joint Research Centre (Publisher), Ispra, Italy.Google Scholar
  3. EEA: The changing faces of Europe’s coastal areas. EEA Report No 6/2006. European Environment Agency, Copenhagen, available at: www.eea.europa.eu/publications/eea report 2006
  4. Gornitz V, Kanciruk P (1989) Assessment of global coastal hazards from sea-level rise. In: Proceedings of the 6th symposium on coastal and Ocean management, ASCE, July 1114, 1989, Charleston, SCGoogle Scholar
  5. Kumar TS, Mahendras RS, Nayak S, Radhakrishnan K et al (2010) Coastal vulnerability assessment for Orissa State, East Coast of India. Proc J Coast Res 26(3):523–534.  https://doi.org/10.2112/09-1186 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Mani Murali R, Ankita M, Amrita S et al (2013) Coastal vulnerability assessment of Puducherry Coast, India, using the analytical hierarchy process. Proc J Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 13:3291–3331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Nicholls RJ, Cazenave A (2010) Sea-level rise and its impact on coastal zones. Science 328:1517.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1185782 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Pendleton EA, Barras JA, Twichel DC (2010) Coastal vulnerability assessment of Northern Gulf of Mexico to sea-level rise and coastal change. US Geological Survey Open-File Report 2010-1146Google Scholar
  9. Saaty TL (2008) Decision making with the analytical hierarchy process. Proc Int J Serv Sci 1(1):83–98Google Scholar
  10. Sudha NNV, Satyanarayana ANV, Bhaskaran P (2015) Coastal vulnerability assessment studies Over India: a review. Proc J Nat Hazards 5:2.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-015-1597-x Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rashmisikha Behera
    • 1
    Email author
  • Abhipsa Kar
    • 1
  • Manas Ranjan Das
    • 1
  • Prachi Prava Panda
    • 1
  1. 1.ITERSiksha O’ Anusandhan UniversityBhubaneswarIndia

Personalised recommendations