Natural Hazards

, Volume 92, Supplement 1, pp 95–107 | Cite as

Livestock productivity as indicator of vulnerability to climate hazards: a Mongolian case study

  • F. JolyEmail author
  • R. Sabatier
  • B. Hubert
  • B. Munkhtuya
Original Paper


Mongolia is subject to regular peaks of livestock winter mortality called dzuds. Several kinds of dzud exist and the ‘white dzud’, characterized by heavy stochastic snowfalls preventing livestock to access forage, is considered the most common. Droughts and high livestock densities are thought to be part of the dzud process by affecting body condition, which increases vulnerability to snowfalls. Guided by the equilibrium/nonequilibrium framework, we studied how rainfall, animal numbers and pasture health (defined as the integrity of ecological processes sustaining grass growth) impact livestock body condition in a case study of West Mongolia. We studied this parameter through livestock productivity (LP) as a proxy, defined as the annual number of newborns per breeding-age female. We found no significant impact of rainfall or livestock numbers, alone or combined. We found through the study of pasture use, defined as the ratio forage consumed/forage available, an impact of the combined effect of rainfall, animal numbers and pasture health. We observed in addition sharp LP decreases prior to dzuds, which suggests that the above-mentioned drivers interact to weaken livestock which increases its vulnerability to winter hazards. This tends to show that in our case study, dzuds are not the simple consequence of stochastic hazards striking randomly, but instead, the final stage of a chain of events that involves dry years, high livestock densities and pasture degradation. This also indicates that dzud early warning indicators could be designed based on LP monitoring.


Dzud Equilibrium/nonequilibrium Pasture use NDVI Early warning indicator 



This research was part of a study carried out by ‘Association pour le cheval de Przewalski: TAKH’ within the framework of a project on the coexistence of sympatric wild and domestic ungulates in Khomyn Tal, primarily funded by the MAVA foundation. The authors thank the foundation for its long-term support.


  1. Begzsuren S, Ellis JE, Ojima DS et al (2004) Livestock responses to droughts and severe winter weather in the Gobi Three Beauty National Park, Mongolia. J Arid Environ 59:785–796CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Desta S, Coppock DL (2002) Cattle population dynamics in the southern Ethiopian rangelands, 1980–97. J Range Manag 55(5):439–451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ellis J (1995) Climate variability and complex ecosystem dynamics: implications for pastoral development. In: Living with uncertainty. Intermediate Technology Publications Ltd, Ian ScoonesCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ellis JE, Swift D (1988) Stability of African pastoral ecosystems: alternate paradigms and implications for development. J Range Manag 41:450–459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fijn N (2011) Living with herds: human-animal coexistence in Mongolia. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gaillard J-M, Festa-Bianchet M, Yoccoz NG et al (2000) Temporal variation in fitness components and population dynamics of large herbivores. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 31:367–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hempson GP, Illius AW, Hendricks HH et al (2015) Herbivore population regulation and resource heterogeneity in a stochastic environment. Ecology 96:2170–2180. doi: 10.1890/14-1501.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hilbig W (1995) The vegetation of Mongolia. SPB Academic Publishing bv, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  9. Hu HL, Liu YZ, Li YK et al (2014) Use of the n-alkanes to estimate intake, apparent digestibility and diet composition in sheep grazing on Stipa breviflora desert steppe. Journal of Integrative Agriculture 13:1065–1072. doi: 10.1016/S2095-3119(13)60502-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Illius AW, O’connor TG (1999) On the relevance of nonequilibrium concepts to arid and semiarid grazing systems. Ecol Appl 9:798–813CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Joly F (2015) Dynamics of a pastoral system of the Mongolian Gobi exposed to climate hazards: a resilience-based case study in a viability framework. Ph.D. Thesis, AgroParisTechGoogle Scholar
  12. Joly F, Samdanjigmed T, Cottereau V, Feh C (2013) Ecological constraints on and consequences of land use heterogeneity: a case study of the Mongolian Gobi. J Arid Environ 95:84–91. doi: 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2013.03.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Middleton N, Rueff H, Sternberg T et al (2015) Explaining spatial variations in climate hazard impacts in western Mongolia. Landsc Ecol 30:91–107. doi: 10.1007/s10980-014-0091-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Nandintsetseg B, Shinoda M (2011) Seasonal change of soil moisture in Mongolia: its climatology and modelling. Int J Climatol 31:1143–1152. doi: 10.1002/joc.2134 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. NSOM (2011) Mongolian statistical yearbook 2010. NSOM, UlaanbaatarGoogle Scholar
  16. NSOM (2015) Statistical information. Accessed 30 Sep 2015
  17. Parker KL, Barboza PS, Gillingham MP (2009) Nutrition integrates environmental responses of ungulates. Funct Ecol 23:57–69. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2009.01528.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Retzer V (2007) Forage competition between livestock and Mongolian Pika (Ochotona pallasi) in Southern Mongolian mountain steppes. Basic Appl Ecol. doi: 10.1016/j.baae.2006.05.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Reynolds JF, Smith DMS, Lambin EF et al (2007) Global desertification: building a science for dryland development. Science 316:847–851. doi: 10.1126/science.1131634 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Scoones I (1995) Living with uncertainty. Intermediate Technology Publications, Ian ScoonesCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Smart AJ, Derner JD, Hendrickson JR et al (2010) Effects of grazing pressure on efficiency of grazing on North American Great Plains rangelands. Rangel Ecol Manag 63:397–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Staff B on A, Staff NRC (1994) Rangeland health new methods to classify, inventory, and monitor rangelands. National Academies Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  23. Suttie JM, Reynolds SG, Batello C, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (eds) (2005) Grasslands of the world. Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations, RomeGoogle Scholar
  24. Tachiiri K, Shinoda M, Klinkenberg B, Morinaga Y (2008) Assessing Mongolian snow disaster risk using livestock and satellite data. J Arid Environ 72:2251–2263. doi: 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2008.06.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ulgiit E, Steward T (2006) In: Mercy C (ed) The Mongolian farm management notebook, 1st ednGoogle Scholar
  26. UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (2010) Mongolia: severe winter—Dzud (Jun 2010)—Snapshot. In: ReliefWeb. Accessed 30 Sep 2016
  27. Vetter S (2005) Rangelands at equilibrium and non-equilibrium: recent developments in the debate. J Arid Environ 62:321–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. von Wehrden H, Hanspach J, Kaczensky P et al (2012) Global assessment of the non-equilibrium concept in rangelands. Ecol Appl 22:393–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Walker BH, Carpenter SR, Rockstrom J, Crépin AS, Peterson GD (2012) Drivers, “slow” variables, “fast” variables, shocks, and resilience. Ecol Soc 17(3):30CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Association pour le cheval de Przewalski: TAKHArlesFrance
  2. 2.INRA, SADAPTParisFrance
  3. 3.INRAAvignonFrance
  4. 4.Association pour le cheval de Przewalski: TAKH (Mongolian office)UlaanbaatarMongolia

Personalised recommendations