Natural Hazards

, Volume 88, Issue 2, pp 1169–1195 | Cite as

Bonding, bridging, and linking: photovoice for resilience through social capital

Original Paper


Recognizing the social factors of resilience research, an increasing number of scholars have begun to investigate how social capital plays a role in achieving community resilience. These studies typically apply structured interviews and quantitative analyses to situate social capital in disaster management. However, such approaches often fail to present the grounded lens of disadvantaged populations. Through visual narratives, unstructured observations, and semi-structured interviews, this research illuminates how disadvantaged populations bond, bridge, and link social capital to prepare, respond, adapt, and rebuild facing ongoing disasters. In this research, I examine different types of social capital in three disadvantaged communities of metropolitan Manila and Cebu. The majority of disadvantage participants were female; participants from one of the involved communities were mostly deaf. This research applies a mixed-method qualitative analysis with an emphasis on the photovoice approach. The photovoice approach integrated with social media demonstrates an engaging local lens seldom revealed by other methods. It presents how social capital is generated and leveraged beyond the geographical boundaries and possibly the power structure. This project is perhaps the first photovoice research to visualize social capital for resilience studies. It explores social capital in disaster settings under the context of less-developed countries that have been rarely discussed in the current literature. The empirical guidance of utilizing social capital for resilience building, especially the forms of bridging and linking, fills one of the major knowledge gaps in the field. Furthermore, the application of photovoice offers rich insight about resilience studies, providing inclusive data collection as well as transparent resilience governance.


Social capital Community resilience Photovoice Disadvantaged populations Philippines 



This research project would not have been feasible without the generous support of the East-West Center Graduate Degree Fellowship, University of Hawai’i Foundation Grant and the Toyota Foundation Individual Research Grant.


  1. Adger WN (2003) Social capital, collective action, and adaptation to climate change. Econ Geogr 79(4):387–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aldrich DP (2011) The power of people: social capital’s role in recovery from the 1995 Kobe earthquake. Nat Hazards 56(3):595–611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aldrich DP (2012) Building resilience: social capital in post-disaster recovery. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aldrich DP (2015) Social capital in post disaster recovery: strong networks and communities create a resilient east asian community. In: Aldrich DP, Oum S, Sawada Y (eds) Resilience and recovery in asian disasters. Springer, New York, pp 19–34Google Scholar
  5. Aldrich DP, Smith RE (2015) Social capital and resilience. World Humanitarian Summit (WHS) Policy Brief.
  6. Annang L, Wilson S, Tinago C, Sanders LW, Bevington T, Carlos B, Cornelius E, Svendsen E (2016) Photovoice assessing the long-term impact of a disaster on a community’s quality of life. Qual Health Res 26(2):241–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bankoff G, Hilhorst D (2009) The politics of risk in the Philippines: comparing state and NGO perceptions of disaster management. Disasters 33(4):686–704CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bennett NJ, Dearden P (2013) A picture of change: using photovoice to explore social and environmental change in coastal communities on the Andaman Coast of Thailand. Local Environ 18(9):983–1001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Blanchard A, Horan T (1998) Virtual communities and social capital. Soc Sci Comput Rev 16(3):293–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Boyd DM, Ellison NB (2007) Social network sites: definition, history, and scholarship. J Comput Mediat Commun 13(1):210–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bukowski K, Buetow S (2011) Making the invisible visible: a photovoice exploration of homeless women’s health and lives in central Auckland. Soc Sci Med 72(5):739–746CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bullard R, Wright B (2007) Black New Orleans: before and after Hurricane Katrina. In: Bullard R (ed) The black metropolis in the twenty-first century: race power and politics of places. Rowman and Littlefield Publishers Inc, Lanham, pp 173–198Google Scholar
  13. Chamlee-Wright E (2010) The cultural and political economy of recovery: social learning in a post-disaster environment, 2nd edn. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. Chamlee-Wright E, Storr VH (2011) Social capital as collective narratives and post-disaster community recovery. Sociol Rev 59(2):266–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chiua CM, Hsub MH, Wang ET (2006) Understanding knowledge sharing in virtual communities: an integration of social capital and social cognitive theories. Decis Support Syst 42(3):1872–1888CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Crabtree C, Braun K (2015) PhotoVoice: a community-based participatory approach in developing disaster reduction strategies. Prog Commun Health Partnerships Res Educ Act 9(1):31–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Crowe PR, Foley K, Collier MJ (2016) Operationalizing urban resilience through a framework for adaptive co-management and design: five experiments in urban planning practice and policy. Environ Sci Policy 62:112–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cutter S, Boruff B, Shirley WL (2003) Social vulnerability to environmental hazards. Soc Sci Q 84(2):242–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dynes R (2006) Social capital: dealing with community emergencies. Homel Secur Affairs 2(2):1–26Google Scholar
  20. Dyson ME (2006) Come hell or high water: Hurricane Katrina and the color of disaster. Basic Civitas, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. Elliott JR, Haney TJ, Sams-Abiodun P (2010) Limits to social capital: comparing network assistance in two New Orleans neighborhoods devastated by Hurricane Katrina. Sociol Q 51(4):624–648CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Enjolras B, Steen-Johnsen K, Wollebæk D (2013) Social media and mobilization to offline demonstrations: Transcending participatory divides? N Med Soc 15(6):890–908CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fournier B, Bridge A, Kennedy AP, Alibhai A, Konde-Lule J (2014) Hear our voices: a photovoice project with children who are orphaned and living with HIV in a Ugandan group home. Child Youth Serv Rev 45:55–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fredericks J, Foth M (2013) Augmenting public participation: enhancing planning outcomes through the use of social media and web 2.0. Aust Plan 50(3):244–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gitell RV, Vidal A (1998) Community organizing: building social capital as a development strategy. Sage Publications, Newbury ParkGoogle Scholar
  26. González ER, Lejano RP, Vidales G, Conner RF, Kidokoro Y, Fazeli B, Cabrales R (2007) Participatory action research for environmental health: encountering Freire in the urban barrio. J Urb Affairs 29(1):77–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Goodhart FW, Hsu J, Coleman AL, Maresca F, Miller MB (2006) A view through a different lens: photovoice as a tool for student advocacy. J Am Coll Health 55:53–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hampton K, Wellman B (2003) Neighboring in Netville: how the internet supports community and social capital in a wired suburb. City Commun 2(4):277–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hasan S, Zhan X, Ukkusuri SV (2013) Understanding urban human activity and mobility patterns using large-scale location-based data from online social media. In: Proceedings of the 2nd ACM SIGKDD international workshop on urban computing. ACM, p 6Google Scholar
  30. Hawkins RL, Maurer K (2010) Bonding, bridging and linking: how social capital operated in New Orleans following Hurricane Katrina. Br J Soc Work 40:1777–1793CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Krieg B, Roberts L (2007) Photovoice: insights into marginalisation through a “community lens” in Saskatchewan, Canada. In: Kindon S, Pain R, Kesby M (eds) Participatory action research approaches and methods: connecting people, participation and place. Routledge, New York, pp 150–159Google Scholar
  32. Luna EM (2001) Disaster mitigation and preparedness: the case of NGOs in the Philippines. Disasters 25(3):216–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mehta AM, Bruns A, Newton J (2016) Trust, but verify: social media models for disaster management. Disasters. doi: 10.1111/disa.12218 Google Scholar
  34. Minkler M (2000) Using participatory action research to build healthy communities. Publ Health Rep 115:191–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mora J, Diaz RD (2005) Participatory action research: a new vision and practice in Latino communities. In: Mora J, Diaz RD (eds) Latino social policy: a participatory research model. The Haworth Press, New York, pp 1–21Google Scholar
  36. Murphy BL (2007) Locating social capital in resilient community-level emergency management. Nat Hazards 41(2):297–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Nakagawa Y, Shaw R (2004) Social capital: a missing link to disaster recovery. Int J Mass Emerg Disasters 22(1):5–34Google Scholar
  38. Roberts D (2010) Prioritizing climate change adaptation and local level resilience in Durban, South Africa. Environ Urban 22(2):397–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Saavedra C, Budd WW (2009) Climate change and environmental planning: working to build community resilience and adaptive capacity in Washington State, USA. Habitat Int 33(3):246–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sharma M (2010) Editorial: photovoice in alcohol and drug education. J Alcohol Drug Educ 54(1):1–5Google Scholar
  41. Storr VH, Haeffele-Balc S, Grube LE (2015) How entrepreneurship promotes community recovery: the cases of Hurricanes Katrina and Sandy Community revival in the wake of disaster. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  42. Strack RW, Magill C, McDonagh K (2004) Engaging youth through photovoice. Health Promot Pract 5(1):49–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Streng JM, Rhodes SD, Ayala GX, Eng E, Arceo P, Phipps S (2004) Realidad Latina: Latino adolescence, their school, and a university use photovoice to examine and address the influence of immigration. J Interprof Care 18(4):403–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Szreter S, Woolcock M (2004) Health by association? Social capital, social theory, and the political economy of public health. Int J Epidemiol 33(4):650–667CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Van Aalst MK, Cannon T, Burton I (2008) Community level adaptation to climate change: the potential role of participatory community risk assessment. Glob Environ Change 18(1):165–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wang CC (1999) Photovoice: a participatory action research strategy applied to women’s health. J Women’s Health 8(2):185–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wang CC, Burris MA (1997) Photovoice: concept, methodology, and use for participatory needs assessment. Health Educ Behav 24(3):369–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wang CC, Pies CA (2004) Family, maternal, and child health through photovoice. Matern Child Health J 8(2):95–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wellman B, Haase AQ, Witte J, Hampton K (2001) Does the internet increase, decrease, or supplement social capital? Am Behav Sci 45(3):436–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Woolcock M (1998) Social capital and economic development: toward a theoretical synthesis and policy framework. Theory Soc 27(2):151–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Woolcock M, Narayan D (2000) Social capital: implications for development theory, research, and policy. World Bank Res Obs 15(2):225–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Urban and Regional PlanningUniversity of Hawai’i at ManoaHonoluluUSA

Personalised recommendations