Advertisement

Springer Nature is making Coronavirus research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Perceptions, behavioral expectations, and implementation timing for response actions in a hurricane emergency

Abstract

This study examined the perceived attributes, behavioral expectations, and expected implementation timing of 11 organizational emergency response actions for hurricane emergencies. The perceived attributes of the hurricane response actions were characterized by two hazard-related attributes (effectiveness for person protection and property protection) and five resource-related attributes (financial costs, required knowledge/skill, required equipment, required time/effort, and required cooperation). A total of 155 introductory psychology students responded to a hypothetical scenario involving an approaching Category 4 hurricane. The data collected in this study explain previous findings of untimely protective action decision making. Specifically, these data reveal distinctly different patterns for the expected implementation of preparatory actions and evacuation recommendations. Participants used the hazard-related and resource-related attributes to differentiate among the response actions and the expected timing of implementation. Moreover, participants’ behavioral expectations and expected implementation timing for the response actions were most strongly correlated with those actions’ effectiveness for person protection. Finally, participants reported evacuation implementation times that were consistent with a phased evacuation strategy in which risk areas are evacuated in order of their proximity to the coast. However, the late initiation of evacuation in risk areas closest to the coast could lead to very late evacuation of risk areas farther inland.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  1. Alexander D (2002) Principles of emergency planning and management. Oxford University Press, New York

  2. Badiru AB, Racz L (2013) Coordinated project systems approach to emergency response. In: Bariru AB, Racz L (eds) Handbook of emergency response: a human factors and systems engineering approach. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 413–438

  3. Baker EJ (1991) Hurricane evacuation behavior. Int J Mass Emerg Disasters 9:287–301

  4. Baker EJ (2000) Hurricane evacuation in the United States. In: Pielke R Jr, Pielke R Sr (eds) Storms, vol 1. Routledge, New York, pp 306–319

  5. Barnhill J (2013) The tyranny of time: the challenge of first response. In: Larsen JA (ed) Responding to catastrophic events. Palgrave Macmillan, New York, pp 29–49

  6. Basher R (2006) Global early warning systems for natural hazards: systematic and people-centred. Philos Trans R Soc A 364(1845):2167–2182

  7. Berg R (2009) Tropical cyclone report—hurricane ike. Final report 23 Jan 2009–18 Mar 2014. Report TCR-AL092008. Miami: National Hurricane Center

  8. Campbell DT, Fiske DW (1959) Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychol Bull 56(2):81–105

  9. Canestraro DS, Pardo TA, Raup-Kounovsky AN, Taratus D (2009) Regional telecommunication incident coordination: sharing information for rapid response. Inf Polity 14(1, 2):113–126

  10. Chen R, Sharman R, Rao HR, Upadhyaya S (2007) Design principles for emergency response management systems. J Inf Syst e-Bus Manag 5:81–98

  11. Conklin C, Edwards J (2000) Selection of protective action guides for nuclear incidents. J Hazard Mater 75:131–144

  12. Cova TJ, Dennison PE, Li D, Siebeneck LK, Lindell MK (in press) Warning triggers in environmental hazards: Who should be warned to do what and when? Risk Anal. doi: 10.1111/risa.12651

  13. Czajkowski J (2011) Is it time to go yet? Understanding household hurricane evacuation decisions from a dynamic perspective. Nat Hazards Rev 12:72–84

  14. Davis GL, Robbin A (2015) Network disaster response effectiveness: the case of ICTs and Hurricane Katrina. J Homel Secur Emerg Manag 12:437–467

  15. Drabek TE (1985) Managing the emergency response. Public Adm Rev 45:85–92

  16. Drabek TE (1986) Human system responses to disaster. Springer, New York

  17. Drews FA, Musters A, Siebeneck LK, Cova TJ (2014) Environmental factors that influence wildfire protective-action recommendations. Int J Emerg Manag 10:153–168

  18. Dunlap WP, Burke MJ, Smith-Crowe K (2003) Accurate tests of statistical significance for r WG and average deviation interrater agreement indexes. J Appl Psychol 88:356–362

  19. Dye KC, Eggers JP, Shapira Z (2014) Trade-offs in a tempest: stakeholder influence on hurricane evacuation decisions. Organ Sci 25:1009–1025

  20. Fu H, Wilmot C, Zhang H, Baker E (2007) Modeling the hurricane evacuation response curve. Transp Res Rec 2022:94–102

  21. Ge Y, Lindell MK (2016) County planners’ perceptions of land use planning tools for environmental hazard mitigation: a survey in the U.S. Pacific states. Environ Plan 3:716–736

  22. Horan TA, Schooley BL (2007) Time-critical information services. Commun ACM 50:73–78

  23. Huang S-K, Lindell MK, Prater CS, Wu H-C, Siebeneck LK (2012) Household evacuation decision making in response to hurricane ike. Nat Hazards Rev 13:283–296

  24. Huang S-K, Lindell MK, Prater CS (2016a) Who leaves and who stays? A review and statistical meta-analysis of hurricane evacuation studies. Environ Behav 48:991–1029

  25. Huang S-K, Lindell MK, Prater CS (2016b) Multistage model of hurricane evacuation decision: empirical study of hurricanes Katrina and Rita. Nat Hazards Rev. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000237

  26. Irwin RL (1989) The Incident Command System. In: Auf der Heide E (ed) Disaster response: principles of preparation and coordination. Mosby, St. Louis, pp 133–163

  27. Kamarck E (2007) When first responders are victims: rethinking emergency response, Harvard Law and Policy, 1:1. Retrieved 31 Jul 2016 from: http://harvardlpr.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/1.1_8_Kamarck.pdf

  28. Kang JE, Lindell MK, Prater CS (2007) Hurricane evacuation expectations and actual behavior in hurricane Lili. J Appl Soc Psychol 37:887–903

  29. Kent EF (2006) Where’s the cavalry? Federal response to 21st century disasters. Suffolk Univ Law Rev 40:181–213

  30. Kerzner H (2013) Project management, 11th edn. Wiley, Hoboken NJ

  31. Kim T, Cova TJ, Brunelle A (2006) Exploratory map animation for post-event analysis of wildfire protective action recommendations. Nat Hazards Rev 7:1–11

  32. Knabb R, Brown DP, Rhome JR (2005) Tropical cyclone report—hurricane Katrina. Final Report 20 Dec 2005–14 Sept 2011. Report TCR-AL122005, Miami: National Hurricane Center

  33. Kreps GA (1991) Organizing for emergency management. In: Drabek TE, Hoetmer GJ (eds) Emergency management: principles and practice for local government. International City Management Association, Washington, pp 30–54

  34. LeBreton JM, Senter JL (2008) Answers to 20 questions about interrater reliability and interrater agreement. Organ Res Methods 11:815–852

  35. Lindell MK (2000) An overview of protective action decision making for a nuclear power plant emergency. J Hazard Mater 75:113–129

  36. Lindell MK (2008) EMBLEM2: an empirically based large-scale evacuation time estimate model. Transp Res A 42:140–154

  37. Lindell MK (2013) Evacuation planning, analysis, and management. In: Bariru AB, Racz L (eds) Handbook of emergency response: a human factors and systems engineering approach. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 121–149

  38. Lindell MK, Brandt CJ (2000) Climate quality and climate consensus as mediators of the relationship between organizational antecedents and outcomes. J Appl Psychol 85:331–348

  39. Lindell MK, Perry RW (1987) Warning mechanisms in emergency response systems. Int J Mass Emerg Disasters 5:137–153

  40. Lindell MK, Perry RW (1992) Behavioral foundations of community emergency planning. Hemisphere Press, Washington

  41. Lindell MK, Prater CS (2002) Risk area residents’ perceptions and adoption of seismic hazard adjustments. J Appl Soc Psychol 32:2377–2392

  42. Lindell MK, Prater CS (2007) A hurricane evacuation management decision support system (EMDSS). Nat Hazards 40:627–634

  43. Lindell MK, Whitney DJ (2000) Correlates of seismic hazard adjustment adoption. Risk Anal 20:13–25

  44. Lindell MK, Brandt CJ, Whitney DJ (1999) A revised index of interrater agreement for multi-item ratings of a single target. Appl Psychol Meas 23:127–135

  45. Lindell MK, Prater CS, Wu J-Y (2002) Hurricane evacuation time estimates for the Texas Gulf Coast. Texas A&M University Hazard Reduction & Recovery Center, College Station TX. www.txdps.state.tx.us/dem/downloadableforms.htm

  46. Lindell MK, Lu JC, Prater CS (2005) Household decision making and evacuation in response to hurricane Lili. Nat Hazards Rev 6:171–179

  47. Lindell MK, Prater CS, Perry RW (2006) Fundamentals of emergency management. Federal Emergency Management Agency Emergency Management Institute, Emmitsburg. www.training.fema.gov/hiedu/aemrc/booksdownload/fem/ or hrrc.arch.tamu.edu/publications/books%20and%20monographs/

  48. Lindell MK, Prater CS, Perry RW (2007) Introduction to emergency management. Wiley, Hoboken

  49. Lindell MK, Arlikatti S, Prater CS (2009) Why people do what they do to protect against earthquake risk: perceptions of hazard adjustments and their attributes. Risk Anal 29:1072–1088

  50. Lindell MK, Kang JE, Prater CS (2011) The logistics of household evacuation in hurricane Lili. Nat Hazards 58:1093–1109

  51. Lindell MK, Mumpower JL, Huang S-K, Wu H-C, Samuelson CD, Wei H-L (in press) Perceptions of protective actions for a water contamination emergency. J Risk Res. doi: 10.1080/13669877.2015.1121906

  52. McKenna TJ (2000) Protective action recommendations based upon plant conditions. J Hazard Mater 75:145–164

  53. Mileti D, Sorensen J, O’Brien J (1992) Towards an explanation of mass care shelter use in evacuations’. Int J Mass Emerg Disasters 10:25–42

  54. Murray-Tuite P, Wolshon B (2013) Evacuation transportation modeling: an overview of research, development, and practice. Transp Res Part C 27:25–45

  55. National Research Council (2001) Standing operating procedures for developing acute exposure guideline levels for hazardous chemicals. National Academy Press, Washington

  56. National Response Team (1987) Hazardous materials emergency planning guide. National Response Team, Washington

  57. Nolan B (2005) Katrina takes aim. The Times-Picayune (New Orleans), p 1. 28 Aug 2005

  58. Perry RW (1991) Managing disaster response operations. In: Drabek TE, Hoetmer GJ (eds) Emergency management: principles and practice for local government. International City Management Association, Washington, pp 201–223

  59. Perry M (2007) Natural disaster management planning: a study of logistics managers responding to the tsunami. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manag 37:409–433

  60. Perry RW, Lindell MK (2007) Emergency planning. Wiley, Hoboken

  61. Quarantelli EL (1995) Patterns of sheltering and housing in US disasters. Disaster Prev Manag Int J 4:43–53

  62. Ruch C (1984) Human response to vertical shelters: an experimental note. Int J Mass Emerg Disasters 2:389–401

  63. Ruch CE, Miller HC, Haflich M, Farber NM, Berke PR, Stubbs N (1991) The feasibility of vertical evacuation: behavioral, legal, political, and structural considerations. University of Colorado Institute of Behavioral Science, Boulder

  64. Sorensen JH (2000) Hazard warning systems: review of 20 years of progress. Nat Hazards Rev 1:119–125

  65. Sorensen JH, Rogers GO (1988) Local preparedness for chemical accidents: a survey of U.S. communities. Ind Crisis Q 2:89–108

  66. Sorensen JH, Shumpert BL, Vogt BM (2004) Planning for protective action decision making: evacuate or shelter-in-place. J Hazard Mater 109:1–11

  67. Sorenson JH (1991) When shall we leave: factors affecting the timing of evacuation departures. Int J Mass Emerg Disasters 9:153–164

  68. Spencer ML (2013) Resilience to WMD: Communication and active participation are key. In: Bariru AB, Racz L (eds) Handbook of emergency response: a human factors and systems engineering approach. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 339–360

  69. Terpstra T, Lindell MK (2013) Citizens’ perceptions of flood hazard adjustments: an application of the protective action decision model. Environ Behav 45:993–1018

  70. Tummala R, Schoenherr T (2011) Assessing and managing risks using the supply chain risk management process (SCRMP). Supply Chain Manag Inter J 16:474–483

  71. USNRC/FEMA—U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission/Federal Emergency Management Agency (1980) Criteria for preparation and evaluation of radiological emergency response plans and preparedness in support of nuclear power plants. NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1. USNRC/FEMA—U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission/Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington

  72. Wei J-C Wang F, Huang S-K, Lindell MK, Ge Y, Wei H-L (in press) Public reactions to the 2013 Chinese H7N9 influenza outbreak: Perceptions of risk, stakeholders, and protective actions. J Risk Res

  73. Weiler M, Engel A (2012) Risk management processes—a quantitative model for fusing cost and time of risks and risk response actions. Bernard M Gordon Center (BMGC), The Technion—Israel Institute of Technology

  74. Whitehead JC (2003) One million dollars per mile? The opportunity coasts of hurricane evacuation. Ocean Coast Manag 46:1069–1083

  75. Wilson T, Dantas A, Cole J (2009) Livestock evacuation or not: an emergency response assessment of natural disasters. J East Asia Soc Transp Stud. https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/eastpro/2009/0/2009_0_8/_pdf

  76. Wood N, Jones J, Schelling J, Schmidtlein M (2014) Tsunami vertical-evacuation planning in the US Pacific Northwest as a geospatial, multi-criteria decision problem. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 9:68–83

  77. Wu H-C, Lindell MK, Prater CS (2012) Logistics of hurricane evacuation in hurricanes Katrina and Rita. Transp Res Part F 15:445–461

  78. Wu H-C, Lindell MK, Prater CS, Huang S-K (2013) Logistics of hurricane evacuation in hurricane Ike. In: Cheung J, Song H (eds) Logistics: perspectives, approaches and challenges. Nova Publishers, New York, pp 127–140

  79. Wu H-C, Lindell MK, Prater CS (2015a) Strike probability judgments and protective action recommendations in a dynamic hurricane tracking task. Nat Hazards 79:355–380

  80. Wu H-C, Lindell MK, Prater CS (2015b) Process tracing analysis of hurricane information displays. Risk Anal 35:2202–2220

Download references

Acknowledgements

This article is based on work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grants IIS1212790, and IIS-1540469. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.

Author information

Correspondence to Shih-Kai Huang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Huang, S., Wu, H., Lindell, M.K. et al. Perceptions, behavioral expectations, and implementation timing for response actions in a hurricane emergency. Nat Hazards 88, 533–558 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-017-2877-4

Download citation

Keywords

  • Preparatory actions
  • Evacuation
  • Response action attributes
  • Trigger timing
  • Hurricane