Advertisement

Natural Hazards

, Volume 84, Issue 1, pp 335–350 | Cite as

A classification method for pulse-like ground motions based on S-transform

  • H. GhaffarzadehEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

This article presents a new identification procedure to detect pulse-like ground motion based on the S-transform. The S-transform is utilized as an effective tool for time-frequency representation of ground motions. It is shown that plots of the S-transform in the time-frequency domain named as the S-feature provide useful information for initial detection of pulses in the velocity time history of the ground motions. To perfect identification of pulse-like motions, a method is presented for extraction of pulses from original ground motions based on the convolution theorem. The proposed procedure is applied for classification of pulse-like near-fault ground motions owing to directivity effects in a data set of selective earthquakes. The period of velocity pulses, as an important parameter in structural engineering, is also determined from extracted pulses. The results of this study provide a suitable platform for selecting pulse-like records, when seismic analyses of structures in near-fault areas are of primary interest.

Keywords

Pulse-like ground motion Near fault S-transform S-feature Filtering Extraction 

References

  1. Aki K (1968) Seismic displacement near a fault. J Geophys Res 73:5359–5376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alavi B, Krawinkler H (2001) Effects of near-fault ground motions on frame structures. Blume Center Report 138. Stanford, California, p 301Google Scholar
  3. Anderson JC, Bertero VV (1987) Uncertainties in establishing design earthquakes. J Struct Eng 113(8):1709–1724CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baker JW (2007) Quantitative classification of near-fault ground motions using wavelet analysis. Bull Seismol Soc Am 97:1486–1501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. BHRC (2004) The Urgent Preliminary report on Bam earthquake of Dec. 26, 2003. Building and Housing Research Centre, IranGoogle Scholar
  6. Bray JD, Rodriguez-Marek A (2004) Characterization of forward directivity ground motions in the near-fault region. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 24(11):815–828CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dai JW, Tong M, Lee GC, Qi XZ (2004) Dynamic responses under the excitation of pulse sequences. Earthq Eng Eng Vib 3(2):157–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ditommaso R, Mucciarelli M, Ponzo FC (2010) S-Transform based filter applied to the analysis of non-linear dynamic behaviour of soil and buildings. In: Proceedings of 14th European conference on earthquake engineering, Republic of Macedonia, OhridGoogle Scholar
  9. Ditommaso R, Mucciarelli M, Ponzo FC (2012) Analysis of non-stationary structural systems by using a band-variable filter. Bull Earthq Eng 10(3):895–911CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Douglas A (1997) Bandpass filtering to reduce noise on seismograms: is there a better way? Bull Seismol Soc Am 87(3):770–777Google Scholar
  11. Hall JF, Heaton TH, Halling MW, Wald DJ (1995) Near source ground motion and its effects on flexible buildings. Earthq Spectra 11(4):569–605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Haskell NA (1969) Elastic displacements in the near—field of propagating fault. Bull Seismol Soc Am 59(2):865–908Google Scholar
  13. Kalkan E, Kunnath SK (2006) Effects of fling-step and forward directivity on the seismic response of buildings. Earthq Spectra 22(2):367–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mavroeidis GP, Papageorgiou AS (2000) Analysis and simulation of the near-source motion recorded at Aigion during the Ms—6.2, 15 June 1995 Aigion earthquake (Greece). In: Proceedings of the sixth international conference on seismic zonation (6ICSZ), Palm Springs, California, pp 12–15Google Scholar
  15. Mavroeidis GP, Papageorgiou AS (2003) A mathematical representation of near-fault ground motions. Bul Seism Soc Am 93(3):1099–1131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mavroeidis GP, Dong G, Papageorgiou AS (2004) Nearfault ground motions, and the response of elastic and inelastic single degree of-freedom (SDOF) systems. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 33(9):1023–1049CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mena B, Mai PM (2011) Selection and quantification of near-fault velocity pulses owing to source directivity. Georisk 5(1):25–43Google Scholar
  18. Menun CA, Fu Q (2002) An analytical model for near-fault ground motions and the response of SDOF systems. In: Proceedings of the 7th US national conference on earthquake engineering, BostonGoogle Scholar
  19. Mylonakis G, Reinhorn AM (2001) Yielding oscillator under triangular ground acceleration pulse. J Earthq Eng 5:225–251Google Scholar
  20. Parolai S (2009) Denoising of seismograms using the S transform. Bull Seismol Soc Am 99(1):226–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sasani M, and Bertero VV (2000) Importance of severe pulse-type ground motions in performance-based engineering: historical and critical review. In: Proceedings of the 12th world conference on earthquake engineering (12WCEE), AucklandGoogle Scholar
  22. Shoja-Taheri J, Anderson JG (1988) The 1978 Tabas, Iran, earthquake: an interpretation of the strong motion records. Bul Seism Soc Am 78(1):142–171Google Scholar
  23. Somerville PG (1997) The characteristics and quantification of near fault ground motion. In: Proceedings of the FHWA/NCEER workshop on the national representation of seismic ground motion for new and existing highway facilities. Technical Report No. NCEER-97-0010Google Scholar
  24. Somerville PG (2003) Magnitude scaling of the near fault rupture directivity pulse. Phys Earth Planet Int 137(1–4):201–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Stockwell RG, Mansinha L, Lowe RP (1996) Localization of the complex spectrum: the S transform. IEEE Trans Signal Process 44(4):998–1001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Talebian M, Fielding EJ, Funning GJ, Ghorashi M, Jackson J, Nazari H, Parsons B, Priestley K, Rosen PA, Walker R, Wright TJ (2004) The 2003 Bam (Iran) earthquake: rupture of a blind strike-slip fault. Geophys Res Lett 31(11):506–526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Zhang Y, Iwan WD (2002) Active interaction control of tall buildings subjected to near-field ground motions. J Struct Eng ASCE 128:69–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringUniversity of TabrizTabrizIran

Personalised recommendations