Natural Hazards

, Volume 83, Issue 1, pp 667–689 | Cite as

Reconstruction of 1852 Banda Arc megathrust earthquake and tsunami

  • TszMan L. Fisher
  • Ron A. Harris
Original Paper


In 1852, a 5-min long earthquake struck the Banda Arc region of Indonesia that was felt over most of Indonesia. It caused uplift of new islands and sent a tsunami across the Banda Sea that reached a height of 8 m at Banda Neira and was also registered at Ambon, Saparua and other islands. Records of the 1852 earthquake at multiple locations provide the constraints needed to reconstruct the disastrous event through numerical modeling using Clawpack. Tsunami heights at various locations are the primary observations we use to test modeling results. The best fit models indicate that the earthquake was most likely a megathrust event along the Tanimbar Trough of >Mw 8.4. At least 10–15 m of elastic strain has accumulated along the Tanimbar Through since the 1852 event, which is enough to cause an earthquake of similar size to the one in 1852. However, 10 times more people in the region are exposed to tsunami hazards than in the past.


Megathrust earthquake Tsunami modeling Eastern Indonesia Banda Arc Tanimbar Trough Historical earthquake 



This project was funded in part by National Science Foundation (Grant EAR 0948386) and the Department of Geological Science at Brigham Young University. We express appreciation to Breanyn MacInnes for valuable technical support and advice on the Clawpack software, and for revisions to the manuscript by Summer Rupper and Barry Bickmore. We also appreciate help from the local officials of the Banda Islands and Ambon for facilitating our field investigation.


  1. Amante C, Eakins BW (2009) ETOPO1 1 arc-minute global relief model: procedures, data sources and analysis. In: NOAA technical memorandum NESDIS NGDC-24, 19 pp, March 2009Google Scholar
  2. Arcas D, Titov V (2006) Sumatra tsunami; lessons from modeling. Surv Geophys 27(6):679–705. doi: 10.1007/s10712-006-9012-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Atwater BF, Cisternas MV, Bourgeois J, Dudley WC, Hendley II JW, Stauffer PH (2005). Surviving a tsunami—lessons from Chile, Hawaii and Japan. USGS.
  4. Berger MJ, George DL, LeVeque RJ, Mandli KT (2011) The GeoClaw software for depth-averaged flows with adaptive refinement. Adv Water Resour 34(9):1195–1206. doi: 10.1016/j.advwatres.2011.02.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. BMKG (2011). Katalog: Gempabumi Signfikan & Merusak 1821–2010, 149 pGoogle Scholar
  6. Geist E (2010) The Chilean tsunami and uncertainty in tsunami modeling. Sound waves, USGS.
  7. Harris RA (1991) Temporal distribution of strain in the active Banda orogen: a reconciliation of rival hypotheses. In: Hall R, Nichols G, Rangin C (eds) Orogenesis in action, Spec V J Asian Earth Sci 6(3/4):373–386Google Scholar
  8. Harris R (2011) The nature of the Banda Arc–continent collision in the Timor Region. In: Arc-continent collision, Springer, Berlin, pp 163–211Google Scholar
  9. Harris R, Major J (2016) Waves of destruction in the East Indies: the Wichmann catalogue of earthquakes and tsunami in the Indonesian region from 1538 to 1877. In: Cummins PR, Meilano I (eds) Geohazards in Indonesia: earth science for disaster risk reduction. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, p 441. doi: 10.1144/SP441.2
  10. Kelleher J, Sykes L, Oliver J (1973) Possible criteria for predicting earthquake locations and their application to major plate boundaries of the Pacific and the Caribbean. J Geophys Res 78(14):2547–2585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kreemer C, Holt WF, Goes S, Govers R (2000) Active deformation in eastern Indonesia and the Philippines from GPS and seismic data. J Geophys Res 105(B1):663–680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lape PV (2000) Political dynamics and religious change in the late pre-colonial Banda Islands. World Archaeol 32(1):138–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Latief H, Puspito NT, Imamura F (2000) Tsunami catalog and zones in Indonesia. J Nat Disaster Sci 22(1):25–43.
  14. LeVeque RJ, Berger MJ et al (2013) Clawpack software 4.6.3. Mar 26, 2013
  15. Liu ZY-C, Harris RA (2013) Discovery of possible mega-thrust earthquake along the Seram Trough from records of 1629 tsunami in eastern Indonesian region. Nat Hazard 72(3):1311–1328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. MacInnes B, Weiss R, Bourgeois J, Pinegina T (2007) Earthquake slip distribution from tsunami deposits and tsunami simulations; the 1952 Kamchatka event. Abstracts with programs—Geological Society of America, 39(6):158.
  17. MacInnes BT, Gusman AR, LeVeque RJ, Tanioka Y (2013) Comparison of earthquake source models for the 2011 tohoku event using tsunami simulations and near-field observations. Bull Seismol Soc Am 103(2):1256–1274. doi: 10.1785/0120120121 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Minoura K, Imamura F, Sugawara D, Kono Y, Iwashita T (2001) The 869 Jogan tsunami deposit and recurrence interval of large-scale tsunami on the Pacific coast of northeast Japan. J Nat Disaster Sci 23(2):83–88Google Scholar
  19. Monecke K, Finger W, Klarer D, Kong W, McAdoo B, Moore AL, Sudrajat SU (2008) A 1000-year sediment record of tsunami recurrence in northern Sumatra. Nature. doi: 10.1038/nature07374 Google Scholar
  20. Mori N, Takahashi T, Yasuda T, Yanagisawa H (2011) Survey of 2011 Tohoku earthquake tsunami inundation and run-up. Geophys Res Lett 38(8):0-Citation L00G14. doi: 10.1029/2011GL049210
  21. Newcomb KR, McCann WR (1987) Seismic history and seismotectonics of the sunda arc. J Geophys Res 92:421–439. doi: 10.1029/JB092iB01p00421 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Nugroho H, Harris R, Lestariya AW, Maruf B (2009) Plate boundary reorganization in the active Banda arc-continent collision: insights from new GPS measurements. Tectonophysics 479(1–2):52–65. doi: 10.1016/j.tecto.2009.01.026 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. NASA Earth Observatory (2013) Earthquake births new island off Pakistan.
  24. Okada Y (1985) Surface deformation due to shear and tensile faults in a half-space. Bull Seismol Soc Am 75(4):1135–1154.
  25. Rangin C, Le Pichon X, Mazzotti S, Pubellier M, Chamot-Rooke N, Aurelio M, Quebral R (1999) Plate convergence measured by GPS across the Sundaland/Philippine sea plate deformed boundary; the Philippines and eastern Indonesia. Geophys J Int 139(2):296–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ryan WBF, Carbotte SM, Coplan JO, O’Hara S, Melkonian A, Arko R, Weissel RA, Ferrini V, Goodwillie A, Nitsche F, Bonczkowski J, Zemsky R (2009) Global multi-resolution topography synthesis. Geochem Geophys Geosyst 10:Q03014. doi: 10.1029/2008GC002332 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Soloviev SL, Go CN (1984) A catalogue of tsunamis on the western shore of the Pacific Ocean. Translated by the Canada Institute for Scientific and Technical Information, National Research Council, Ottawa, Canda KIA OS2Google Scholar
  28. Stein S, Geller RJ, Liu M (2012) Why earthquake hazard maps often fail and what to do about it. Tectonophysics 562–563:1–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Synolakis CE, Okal EA (2005) 1992–2002; perspective on a decade of post-tsunami surveys. Adv Nat Technol Hazards Res 23:1–29.
  30. van Vlief L (1853) Prorvo van de beantwoording der vraag: welken invloed moeten do laatste aard. En zeebevingen in de Molukken gencht worden te hebben gehad op de prodnetie der specsrijen. Amsterdam 1853:24–27Google Scholar
  31. Wells DL, Coppersmith KJ (1994) New empirical relationships among magnitude, rupture length, rupture width, rupture area, and surface displacement. Bull Seismol Soc Am 84(4):974–1002Google Scholar
  32. Wichmann A (1918) Die erdbeben des Indischen Archipels bis zum Jahre 1857 (Earthquakes of the Indian Archipelago Until the Year 1857), in Afdeling Natuurkunde Nederlandse Verhandelingen, 20 (1918): 193pGoogle Scholar
  33. Yeates R (2012) Active faults of the world. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. ISBN 9780521 190855Google Scholar
  34. Zachariasen J, Sieh K, Taylor F, Edwards L, Hontoro WS (1999) Submergence and uplift associated with the giant 1833 Sumatran subduction earthquake: evidence from coral microatolls. J Geophys Res 104(B1):895–919CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Brigham Young UniversityProvoUSA

Personalised recommendations