Advertisement

Natural Hazards

, Volume 81, Issue 2, pp 887–907 | Cite as

Developing an early warning system for a very slow landslide based on displacement monitoring

  • Renato Macciotta
  • Michael Hendry
  • C. Derek Martin
Original Paper

Abstract

The Ripley Landslide is a soil slide moving on a fully developed, sub-horizontal, shear surface. The landslide represents a hazard for two important railway lines across its toe. The landslide is being monitored by an array of displacement measurement systems including GPS units, a ShapeAccelArray (SAA), satellite InSAR, and crack extension metres, as well as an array of piezometers targeting pore water pressures in the vicinity of the shear surface. The displacement monitoring system shows an annual cycle of slope deformations most active between September and May. Annual horizontal displacements range between 60 and 100 mm. Vertical displacements range between 20 and 80 mm of settlement. The average horizontal velocities during the active displacement period are between 0.2 and 0.35 mm/day, with maximum velocities of up to 0.6 mm/day. This paper describes the development of an early warning system based on landslide displacement measurements. The system is based on GPS and SAA measurements, which provide near real-time displacement data. The early warning system focuses on detecting changes in landslide annual displacement cycles and potential accelerations, as well as the effects of slope deformation on the railway alignment. As such, the system monitors both the integrity and performance of the slope.

Keywords

Landslide Landslide monitoring Early warning Hazard management 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was made possible by the (Canadian) Railway Ground Hazard Research Program, which is funded by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC), Canadian Pacific Railway, Canadian National Railway, and Transport Canada. Both BGC Engineering and Ian Chadwick from EDH Consulting contributed greatly to this analysis through the results of their investigations and monitoring. The authors thank the Cooks Ferry Indian Band for allowing access to Basque Ranch during this study. The corner reflectors were acquired and installed with funding from the Geological Survey of Canada and Transport Canada.

References

  1. Alonso E, Pinyol N, Puzrin A (eds) (2010) A constrained creeping landslide: Brattas-St. Moritz Landslide, Switzerland. In: Geomechanics of failures advanced topics. Springer, Berlin, pp 3–32Google Scholar
  2. Atzeni C, Barla M, Pieraccini M, Antolini F (2015) Early warning monitoring of natural and engineered slopes with ground-based synthetic-aperture radar. Rock Mech Rock Eng 48:235–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bishop NF, Evans SG, Petley DJ, Unger AJA (2008) The geotechnics of glaciolacustrine and associated landslides near Ashcroft (British Columbia) and the Grand Coulee Dam (Washington). In: Proceedings of the 4th Canadian conference on geohazards. Presse se l’Université Laval, QuebecGoogle Scholar
  4. Bobrowsky PT, Sladen W, Huntley D, Zhang Q, Bunce C, Edwards T, Hendry M, Martin D, Choi E (2014). Multi-parameter monitoring of a slow landslide: Ripley Slide, British Columbia. In: Proceedings of the 12th IAEG Congress, 13–19 Sep 2014, Torino, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  5. Brooker EW, Peck RB (1993) Rational treatment of slides in overconsolidated clays and clay shales. Can Geotech J 30:526–544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bunce C, Chadwick I (2012) GPS monitoring of a landslide for railways. In: Proceedings of the 11th international and 2nd North America symposium on landslides, Banff, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  7. Clague JJ, Evans SG (2003) Geologic framework of large historic landslides in Thompson River Valley, British Columbia. J Environ Eng Geosci 9(3):201–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cloutier C, Agliardi F, Crosta GB, Frattini P, Froese C, Jaboyedoff M, Locat J, Michoud C, Marui H (2014) The First International Workshop on Warning Criteria for Active Slides: technical issues, problems and solutions for managing early warning systems. Landslides 12(1):205–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cruden DM, Varnes DJ (1996) Landslide types and processes. In: Turner AK, Schuster RL (eds) Landslides: investigation and mitigation. National Research Council (US) Transportation Research Board Special Report 247, pp 36–75Google Scholar
  10. Eshraghian A, Martin CD, Cruden DM (2007) Complex earth slides in the Thompson River Valley, Ashcroft, British Columbia. Environ Eng Geosci 13(2):161–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Eshraghian A, Martin CD, Morgenstern NR (2008) Movement triggers and mechanisms of two earth slides in the Thompson River Valley, British Columbia, Canada. Can Geotech J 45:1189–1209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Froese CR (2007) Peace River Landslide Project: hazard and risk assessment for urban landsliding. In: Proceedings of the 60th Canadian Geotechnical Conference, Ottawa, Canada, pp. 699–704Google Scholar
  13. Hendry MT, Martin CD, Choi E, Chadwick I, Edwards T (2013) Safe train operations over a moving slide. In: Proceedings of the 10th world conference on railway research, 25–28 Nov 2013, Sydney, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  14. Hendry MT, Macciotta R, Martin CD, Reich B (2015) The effect of the Thompson River elevation on the velocity and instability of the Ripley Slide. Can Geotech J. doi: 10.1139/cgj-2013-0364 Google Scholar
  15. Huntley DH, Bobrowsky PT (2014) Surficial geology and monitoring of the Ripley Slide, near Ashcroft, British Columbia, Canada. Geological Survey of Canada Open File 7531. http://geoscan.ess.nrcan.gc.ca. Accessed 30 April 2015
  16. Huntley DH, Bobrowsky PT, Zhang Q, Sladen W, Bunce C, Edwards T, Hendry M, Martin D, Choi E (2014). Fiber optic strain monitoring and evaluation of a slow-moving landslide near Ashcroft, British Columbia, Canada. In: Proceedings of the World Landslide Forum 3, 2–6 Jun 2014, Beijing, ChinaGoogle Scholar
  17. Intrieri E, Gigli G, Mugnai F, Fanti R, Casagli N (2012) Design and implementation of a landslide early warning system. Eng Geol 147–148:124–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Leonoff C, Ltd Klohn Leonoff (1994) A dedicated team: Klohn Leonoff consulting engineers 1951–1991. Klohn Leonoff, RichmondGoogle Scholar
  19. Macciotta R, Hendry M, Martin CD, Elwood D, Lan H, Huntley D, Bobrowsky P, Sladen W, Bunce C, Choi E, Edwards T (2014) Monitoring of the Ripley Landslide in the Thompson River valley, B.C. In: Proceedings of geohazards 6, June 15–18, 2014, Kingston, Ontario, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  20. Mansour MF, Morgenstern NR, Martin CD (2011) Expected damage from displacement of slow-moving slides. Landslides 8:117–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Margottini C, Canuti P, Sassa K (2013) Landslide science and practice, vol 2., Early warning, instrumentation and monitoringSpringer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Oyagi N, Makino H, Mori S (1996) Landslide structure and control works at Nishitani landslide, Wakayama Prefecture, Japan. In: Chacón J, Irigaray C, Fernández T (eds) Landslides. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 247–254Google Scholar
  23. Picarelli L (2007) Considerations about the mechanics of slow active landslides in clay. In: Sassa K, Fukuoka H, Wang F, Wang G (eds) Progress in Landslide Science. Springer, Berlin, pp 27–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sarkar S, Ghosh A, Prasanna-Kanungo D, Ahmad Z (2013) Slope stability assessment and monitoring of a vulnerable site on Rishikesh–Uttarkashi highway, India. In: Margottini C, Canuti P, Sassa K (eds) Landslide science and practice, vol 2., Early warning, instrumentation and monitoringSpringer, Berlin, pp 67–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Stanton RB (1898) The great land-slides on the Canadian Pacific Railway in British Columbia. In: Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, Session 1897–1898, Part II, Section 1, pp 1–46Google Scholar
  26. Thiebes B, Bell R, Glade T, Jäger S, Mayer J, Anderson M, Holcombe L (2014) Integration of a limit-equilibrium model into a landslide early warning system. Landslides 11:859–875CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Transport Canada (2011) Rules respecting track safety (TC E-54). https://www.tc.gc.ca/eng/railsafety/rules-tce54-830.htm. Accessed 28 April 2015
  28. USGS (2014) USGS global positioning applications and practice. http://water.usgs.gov/osw/gps. Accessed 18 Sept 2015
  29. Vaziri A, Moore L, Ali H (2010) Monitoring systems for warning impending failures in slopes and open pit mines. Nat Hazards 55:501–512CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Renato Macciotta
    • 1
  • Michael Hendry
    • 2
  • C. Derek Martin
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringUniversity of AlbertaEdmontonCanada
  2. 2.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringUniversity of AlbertaEdmontonCanada
  3. 3.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringUniversity of AlbertaEdmontonCanada

Personalised recommendations