Advertisement

Natural Hazards

, Volume 80, Issue 3, pp 1729–1747 | Cite as

Investigating the presence of the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis in Kenya: an autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) approach

  • Usama Al-MulaliEmail author
  • Sakiru Adebola Solarin
  • Ilhan Ozturk
Original Paper

Abstract

This study investigates the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis in Kenya using the time period of 1980–2012. To achieve the objective of this study, the ARDL approach was utilized. To prevent any estimation errors and unreliability in the model, the Narayan and Narayan (Energy Policy 38:661–666, 2010) approach was used to control the multicollinearity problems in the regression. The outcome of this research revealed that fossil fuel energy consumption, GDP, urbanization, and trade openness increase air pollution mutually in the long run and short run. However, renewable energy consumption mitigates air pollution in the long run and the short run. Moreover, financial development also reduces air pollution, but only in the long run. Based on the results, the EKC hypothesis does exist in Kenya. From the findings of this research, few policy recommendations were provided to help Kenya for reducing its air pollution levels.

Keywords

Kenya EKC hypothesis ARDL approach 

References

  1. Al-Mulali U, Ozturk I (2015) The effect of energy consumption, urbanization, trade openness, industrial output, and the political stability on the environmental degradation in the MENA region. Energy 84:382–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Al-mulali U, Saboori B, Ozturk I (2015a) Investigating the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in Vietnam. Energy Policy 76:123–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Al-mulali U, Weng-Wai C, Sheau-Ting L, Mohammed AH (2015b) Investigating the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis by utilizing the ecological footprint as an indicator of environmental degradation. Ecol Ind 48:315–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Al-Mulali U, Ozturk I, Lean HH (2015c) The influence of economic growth, urbanization, trade openness, financial development, and renewable energy on pollution in Europe. Nat Hazards. doi: 10.1007/s11069-015-1865-9 Google Scholar
  5. Apergis N, Ozturk I (2015) Testing environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in Asian countries. Ecol Ind 52:16–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Arouri MEH, Youssef AB, M’henni H, Rault C (2012) Energy consumption, economic growth and CO2 emissions in Middle East and North African countries. Energy Policy 45:342–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Atici C (2009) Carbon emissions in Central and Eastern Europe: environmental Kuznets curve and implications for sustainable development. Sustain Dev 17:155–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Baek J (2015) A panel cointegration analysis of CO2 emissions, nuclear energy and income in major nuclear generating countries. Appl Energy 145:133–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chandran VGR, Tang CF (2013) The impacts of transport energy consumption, foreign direct investment and income on CO2 emissions in ASEAN-5 economies. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 24:445–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cho C-H, Chu Y-P, Yang H-Y (2014) An environment Kuznets curve for GHG emissions: a panel cointegration analysis. Energy Sources Part B 9:120–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chow GC, Li J (2014) Environmental Kuznets curve: conclusive econometric evidence for CO2. Pac Econ Rev 19:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Day KM, Grafton RQ (2003) Growth and the environment in Canada: an empirical analysis. Can J Agric Econ 51:197–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Duran J (2004) Kenyan droughts: a community based approach with Microcredits, published by UN/ISDR In: Invest to prevent disaster. Available from http://www.unisdr.org/eng/public_aware/world_camp/2004/docs/case-study-Kenya.pdfS. Accessed 20 June 2014
  14. Energy Information Administration (2015) International Energy Statistics. Washington, DC. Available from http://www.eia.gov/countries/data.cfm. Accessed 19 March 2015
  15. Farhani S, Ozturk I (2015) Causal relationship between CO2 emissions, real GDP, energy consumption, financial development, trade openness and urbanization in Tunisia. Environ Sci Pollut Res. doi: 10.1007/s11356-015-4767-1 Google Scholar
  16. Farhani S, Chaibi A, Rault C (2014) CO2 emissions, output, energy consumption, and trade in Tunisia. Econ Model 38:426–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Govindaraju VGRC, Tang CF (2013) The dynamic links between CO2 emissions, economic growth and coal consumption in China and India. Appl Energy 104:310–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Haisheng Y, Jia J, Yongzhang Z, Shugong W (2005) The impact on environmental Kuznets curve by trade and foreign direct investment in China. Chin J Popul Res Environ 3:14–19Google Scholar
  19. Jayanthakumaran K, Liu Y (2012) Openness and the environmental Kuznets curve: evidence from China. Econ Model 29(3):566–576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jayanthakumaran K, Verma R, Liu Y (2012) CO2 emissions, energy consumption, trade and income: a comparative analysis of China and India. Energy Policy 42:450–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kasman A, Duman YS (2015) CO2 emissions, economic growth, energy consumption, trade and urbanization in new EU member and candidate countries: a panel data analysis. Econ Model 44:97–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kendall Maurice, Gibbons Jean Dickinson (1990) Rank correlation methods, 5th edn. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. Kivyiro P, Arminen H (2014) Carbon dioxide emissions, energy consumption, economic growth, and foreign direct investment: causality analysis for Sub-Saharan Africa. Energy 74:595–606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kohler M (2013) CO2 emissions, energy consumption, income and foreign trade: a South African perspective. Energy Policy 63:1042–1050CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lau LS, Choong CK, Eng YK (2014) Investigation of the environmental Kuznets curve for carbon emissions in Malaysia: do foreign direct investment and trade matter? Energy Policy 68:490–497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lee J, Strazicich M (2003) Minimum Lagrange multiplier unit root test with two structural breaks. Rev Econ Stat 85:1082–1089CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lee J, Strazicich M (2004) Minimum Lagrange multiplier unit root test with one structural break. Department of Economics, Appalachian State University, North CarolinaGoogle Scholar
  28. Liu Y-M, Hao Y (2015) Has the development of FDI and foreign trade contributed to China’s CO2 emissions? An empirical study with provincial panel data. Nat Hazards 76(2):1079–1091CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Narayan PK (2005) The saving and investment nexus for China: evidence from cointegration tests. Appl Econ 37(17):1979–1990CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Narayan PK, Narayan S (2010) Carbon dioxide emissions and economic growth: panel data evidence from developing countries. Energy Policy 38:661–666CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ohlan R (2015) The impact of population density, energy consumption, economic growth and trade openness on CO2 emissions in India. Nat Hazards. doi: 10.1007/s11069-015-1898-0 Google Scholar
  32. Onafowora OA, Owoye O (2014) Bounds testing approach to analysis of the environment Kuznets curve hypothesis. Energy Econ 44:47–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Osabuohien ES, Efobi UR, Gitau CMW (2014) Beyond the environmental Kuznets curve in Africa: evidence from panel cointegration. J Environ Plan Policy Manage 16:517–538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ozturk I, Acaravci A (2013) The long-run and causal analysis of energy, growth, openness and financial development on carbon emissions in Turkey. Energy Econ 36:262–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pao H-T, Tsai C-M (2010) CO2 emissions, energy consumption and economic growth in BRIC countries. Energy Policy 38:7850–7860CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pao HT, Tsai CM (2011) Multivariate Granger causality between CO2 emissions, energy consumption, FDI (foreign direct investment) and GDP (gross domestic product): evidence from a panel of BRIC (Brazil, Russian Federation, India, and China) countries. Energy 36:685–693CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pesaran H, Pesaran B (1997) Microfit 4.0. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  38. Pesaran M, Shin Y, Smith R (2001) Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. J Appl Econom 16:289–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Phillips P, Perron P (1988) Testing for a unit root in time series regressions. Biometrika 75:335–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Saboori B, Sulaiman J (2013) CO2 emissions, energy consumption and economic growth in Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) countries: a cointegration approach. Energy 55:813–822CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Saboori B, Sulaiman J, Mohd S (2012) Economic growth and CO2 emissions in Malaysia: a cointegration analysis of the environmental Kuznets curve. Energy Policy 51:184–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Said E, Dickey D (1984) Testing for unit roots in autoregressive moving average models of unknown order. Biometrika 71:599–607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Shafiei S, Salim RA (2014) Non-renewable and renewable energy consumption and CO2 emissions in OECD countries: a comparative analysis. Energy Policy 66:547–556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Shahbaz M, Lean HH, Shabbir MS (2012) Environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in Pakistan: cointegration and Granger causality. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 16:2947–2953CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Shahbaz M, Kumar Tiwari A, Nasir M (2013a) The effects of financial development, economic growth, coal consumption and trade openness on CO2 emissions in South Africa. Energy Policy 61:1452–1459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Shahbaz M, Solarin SA, Mahmood H, Arouri M (2013b) Does financial development reduce CO2 emissions in Malaysian economy? A time series analysis. Econ Model 35:145–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Shahbaz M, Ozturk I, Afza T, Ali A (2013c) Revisiting the environmental Kuznets curve in a global economy. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 25:494–502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Shahbaz M, Khraief N, Uddin GS, Ozturk I (2014) Environmental Kuznets curve in an open economy: a bounds testing and causality analysis for Tunisia. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 34:325–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Shahbaz M, Solarin SA, Sbia R, Bibi S (2015) Does energy intensity contribute to CO2 emissions? A trivariate analysis in selected African countries. Ecol Ind 50:215–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Tang CF, Tan BW (2015) The impact of energy consumption, income and foreign direct investment on carbon dioxide emissions in Vietnam. Energy 79:447–454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. The World Bank (2015a) Kenya overview. Washington, DC. http://www.worldbank.org/en/country/kenya/overview. Accessed 06 Mar 2015
  52. The World Bank (2015b) World development indicators. Washington, DC. http://data.worldbank.org/data-catalog/worlddevelopment-indicators. Accessed 14 Feb 2015
  53. Tiwari AK, Shahbaz M, Adnan Hye QM (2013) The environmental Kuznets curve and the role of coal consumption in India: cointegration and causality analysis in an open economy. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 18:519–527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Waweru N, Kalani VM (2009) Commercial banking crises in Kenya: causes and remedies. Afr J Account Econ Finance Bank Res 4:12–33Google Scholar
  55. Zhang Y-J, Da Ya-Bin (2013) Decomposing the changes of energy-related carbon emissions in China: evidence from the PDA approach. Nat Hazards 69(1):1109–1122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Zhang YJ, Liu Z, Zhang H, Tan Tai-Den (2014) The impact of economic growth, industrial structure and urbanization on carbon emission intensity in China. Nat Hazards 73(2):579–595CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Usama Al-Mulali
    • 1
    Email author
  • Sakiru Adebola Solarin
    • 1
  • Ilhan Ozturk
    • 2
  1. 1.Faculty of BusinessMultimedia UniversityMelakaMalaysia
  2. 2.Faculty of Economics and Administrative SciencesCag UniversityMersinTurkey

Personalised recommendations