Natural Hazards

, Volume 78, Issue 1, pp 395–416 | Cite as

Disaster community resilience assessment method: a consensus-based Delphi and AHP approach

Original Paper

Abstract

Several studies have highlighted the importance of community resilience in disaster management. The paper focuses on Saudi Arabia and proposes a ‘community resilience to disaster’ framework. The dimensions of the framework have been developed using the consensus-based Delphi technique. A weighting system for each dimension and criteria is proposed using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP). Experts’ opinions were collected using pair-wise comparisons and then coded in AHP Expert Choice software to evaluate and give priorities to the possible outcomes of the process. The weighting system provides a quantitative and qualitative assessment tool to measure community resilience to disasters in Saudi Arabia and beyond. The findings emphasise the importance of a number of dimensions, including health and well-being (24.5 % of the total weight), governance (18 %), physical and environmental (17.4 %), economic (15.9 %), information and communication (14.3 %) and social (9.9 %).

Keywords

Weighting system Assessment Community resilience Delphi AHP 

References

  1. Ahrens J, Rudolph PM (2006) The importance of governance in risk reduction and disaster management. J Contingencies Crisis Manag 14:207–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ainuddin S, Routray JK (2012) Community resilience framework for an earthquake prone area in Baluchistan. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 2:25–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alshehri S, Rezgui Y, Li H (2013) Public perception of the risk of disasters in a developing economy: the case of Saudi Arabia. Nat Hazards 65:1813–1830CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alshehri SA, Rezgui Y, Li H (2014) Delphi-based consensus study into a framework of community resilience to disaster. Nat Hazards, 1–25Google Scholar
  5. Andijani AA (1998) A multi-criterion approach for Kanban allocations. Omega 26:483–493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. AWM Strategy Team (2010) Community economic resilience index. Birmingham, UKGoogle Scholar
  7. Babic Z, Plazibat N (1998) Ranking of enterprises based on multicriterial analysis. Int J Prod Econ 56–57:29–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bahurmoz AM (2006) The analytic hierarchy process: a methodology for win-win management. JKAU Econ Adm 20:3–16Google Scholar
  9. Bosher L, Dainty A (2011) Disaster risk reduction and ‘built-in’resilience: towards overarching principles for construction practice. Disasters 35:1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Buckle P (2006) Assessing social resilience. In: Paton D, Johnston D (eds) Disaster resilience. Charles Thomas, Springfield, pp 88–104Google Scholar
  11. Burton CG (2012) The development of metrics for community resilience to natural disasters. Doctoral dissertation. Retrieved from http://scholarcommons.sc.edu/etd/1275
  12. Castleden M (2011) Natural disasters and climate change. Chemical Hazards and Poisons Report, 37Google Scholar
  13. CDSI & INFORMATION, C. D. O. S. A. 2014. Estimates of population by sex and nationality [Online]. Available: http://www.cdsi.gov.sa/english/index.php?option=com_docman&Itemid=160. Accessed 10.03 2015
  14. Chan S-L, Wey W-M, Chang P-H (2014) Establishing disaster resilience indicators for Tan-sui river basin in Taiwan. Soc Indic Res 115:387–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Channa MI, Ahmed KM (2010) Emergency response communications and associated security challenges. arXiv preprint arXiv:1010.4887Google Scholar
  16. Cimellaro GP, Reinhorn AM, Bruneau M (2010) Framework for analytical quantification of disaster resilience. Eng Struct 32:3639–3649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Colussi M (1999) The community resilience manual: a new resource will link rural revitalization to CED best practiceGoogle Scholar
  18. Cutter SL, Boruff BJ, Shirley WL (2003) Social vulnerability to environmental hazards*. Soc Sci Q 84:242–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cutter SL, Barnes L, Berry M, Burton C, Evans E, Tate E, Webb J (2008) A place-based model for understanding community resilience to natural disasters. Glob Environ Change 18:598–606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cutter SL, Burton CG, Emrich CT (2010) Disaster resilience indicators for benchmarking baseline conditions. J Homel Secur Emerg Manag 7Google Scholar
  21. Dalziell EP, Mcmanus ST (2004) Resilience, vulnerability, and adaptive capacity: implications for system performance. International Forum for Engineering Decision Making (IFED), University of Canterbury, ChristchurchGoogle Scholar
  22. Davis R, Cook D, Cohen L (2005) A community resilience approach to reducing ethnic and racial disparities in health. Am J Public Health 95(12):2168Google Scholar
  23. De lange H, Sala S, Vighi M, Faber J (2010) Ecological vulnerability in risk assessment—a review and perspectives. Sci Total Environ 408:3871–3879CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Doyle JC (1996) Improving performance in emergency management. Disaster Prev Manag Int J 5:32–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Eakin H, Bojórquez-Tapia LA (2008) Insights into the composition of household vulnerability from multicriteria decision analysis. Glob Environ Change 18:112–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Engle N, De Bremond A, Malone E, Moss R (2013) Towards a resilience indicator framework for making climate-change adaptation decisions. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change, 1–18Google Scholar
  27. Ercoskun OY, Global I (2012) Green and ecological technologies for Urban planning: creating smart cities. Information Science ReferenceGoogle Scholar
  28. Ewing L, Synolakis C (2011) Coastal resilience: can we get beyond planning the last disaster? Solutions to coastal disasters 2011. ASCE, pp 936–947Google Scholar
  29. Frankenberger T, Mueller M, Spangler T, Alexander S (2013) Community resilience: conceptual framework and measurement feed the future learning Agenda. Westat, RockvilleGoogle Scholar
  30. Hallegatte S, Hourcade J-C, Dumas P (2007) Why economic dynamics matter in assessing climate change damages: illustration on extreme events. Ecol Econ 62:330–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Haynes K, Barclay J, Pidgeon N (2008) Whose reality counts? Factors affecting the perception of volcanic risk. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 172:259–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ho P, Fischer M, Kam C (2009) Prospective validation of virtual design and construction methods: framework, application, and implementation guidelines. In: An automated method to identify occupant interactions in renovations of occupied buildings, p 122Google Scholar
  33. Ishizaka A, Labib A (2009) Analytic hierarchy process and expert choice: benefits and limitations. OR Insight 22:201–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Jiang Z, Yu L (2013) Performance evaluation of emergency risk management under group decision making: an approach of incorporating fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS. J Converg Inf Technol 8:845–854Google Scholar
  35. Joerin J, Shaw R, Takeuchi Y, Krishnamurthy R (2012) Assessing community resilience to climate-related disasters in Chennai, India. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 1:44–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Jordan E, Javernick-Will A (2013) Indicators of community recovery: content analysis and Delphi approach. Nat Hazards Rev 14:21–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kirmayer LJ, Sehdev M, Whitley R, Dandeneau SF, Isaac C (2009) Community resilience: models, metaphors and measures. Int J Indig Health 5:62–117Google Scholar
  38. Kusel J (1996) Well-being in forest-dependent communities, part I: a new approach. University of California, Centers for Water and Wildland ResourcesGoogle Scholar
  39. Lebel L, Anderies JM, Campbell B, Folke C, Hatfield-Dodds S, Hughes TP, Wilson J (2006) Governance and the capacity to manage resilience in regional social-ecological systemsGoogle Scholar
  40. Lee S, Walsh P (2011) SWOT and AHP hybrid model for sport marketing outsourcing using a case of intercollegiate sport. Sport Manag Rev 14:361–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Leykin D, Lahad M, Cohen O, Goldberg A, Aharonson-Daniel L (2013) Conjoint community resiliency assessment measure-28/10 items (CCRAM28 and CCRAM10): a self-report tool for assessing community resilience. Am J Community Psychol 52:313–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Liedtka SL (2005) Analytic hierarchy process and multi-criteria performance management systems. J Cost Manag 19:30Google Scholar
  43. Lin H-Y, Lin S-H, Chiu C-Y, Hung W-T, Chen C-Y (2010) An AHP approach to industry-oriented management competence development in an institute of technology. World Trans Eng Technol Educ 8:339–343Google Scholar
  44. Litman T (2006) Lessons from Katrina and Rita: what major disasters can teach transportation planners. J Transp Eng 132:11–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Longstaff PH, Armstrong NJ, Perrin K, Parker WM, Hidek M (2010) Building resilient communities a preliminary framework for assessmentGoogle Scholar
  46. Manyena SB (2006) The concept of resilience revisited. Disasters 30:434–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Mayhorn CB, McLaughlin AC (2014) Warning the world of extreme events: a global perspective on risk communication for natural and technological disaster. Saf Sci 61:43–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Mayunga JS (2007) Understanding and applying the concept of community disaster resilience: a capital-based approach. Summer Academy for Social Vulnerability and Resilience Building, 1–16Google Scholar
  49. McDaniels T, Chang S, Cole D, Mikawoz J, Longstaff H (2008) Fostering resilience to extreme events within infrastructure systems: characterizing decision contexts for mitigation and adaptation. Glob Environ Change 18:310–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Melón MG, Aragonés Beltran P, Carmen González Cruz M (2008) An AHP-based evaluation procedure for innovative educational projects: a face-to-face versus computer-mediated case study. Omega 36: 754–765Google Scholar
  51. Memish ZA (2002) Infection control in Saudi Arabia: meeting the challenge. Am J Infect Control 30:57–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Memish Z (2010) The Hajj: communicable and non-communicable health hazards and current guidance for pilgrims. Euro Surveill 15:19671Google Scholar
  53. Morrissey SA, Reser JP (2007) Natural disasters, climate change and mental health considerations for rural Australia. Aust J Rural Health 15:120–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Norris F, Stevens S, Pfefferbaum B, Wyche K, Pfefferbaum R (2008) Community resilience as a metaphor, theory, set of capacities, and strategy for disaster readiness. Am J Community Psychol 41:127–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Omar HM, Jaafar A (2011) Usability of educational computer game (Usa_ECG): applying analytic hierarchy process. Visual Informatics: Sustaining Research and Innovations. SpringerGoogle Scholar
  56. Önüt S, Soner S (2008) Transshipment site selection using the AHP and TOPSIS approaches under fuzzy environment. Waste Manag 28:1552–1559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Paton D (2006) Disaster resilience: integrating individual, community, institutional and environmental perspectives. Disaster resilience: An integrated approach, 305–316Google Scholar
  58. Perera S, Alinden C, Amaratunga R (2010) Investigating the status of disaster management within a world-wide context: a case study analysisGoogle Scholar
  59. Saaty TL (1994) How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. Interfaces 24:19–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Saaty TL (1999) Basic theory of the analytic hierarchy process: how to make a decision. Rev de la Real Academia de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales 93:395–423Google Scholar
  61. Saaty TL (2008) Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. Int J Serv Sci 1:83–98Google Scholar
  62. Saaty T, Vargas LLG (2001) Models, methods, concepts, and applications of the analytic hierarchy process. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Saaty T, Vargas L (2012) The possibility of group choice: pairwise comparisons and merging functions. Soc Choice Welfare 38:481–496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Salmeron JL, Herrero I (2005) An AHP-based methodology to rank critical success factors of executive information systems. Comput Stand Interfaces 28:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Sanneh E, Hu A, Hsu C-W, Njie M (2013) Prioritization of climate change adaptation approaches in the Gambia. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 1–16Google Scholar
  66. Shapira A, Simcha M (2009) AHP-based weighting of factors affecting safety on construction sites with tower cranes. J Constr Eng Manag 135:307–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Sherrieb K, Norris F, Galea S (2010) Measuring capacities for community resilience. Soc Indic Res 99:227–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Smith H, Boruff B (2011) Recovery from the storm: resilience and the role of community capital in long-term disaster recovery in regional Western AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  69. Srdjevic B (2007) Linking analytic hierarchy process and social choice methods to support group decision-making in water management. Decis Support Syst 42:2261–2273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Stephenson A, Erica S, John VA, Derek R (2010) Benchmark resilience a study of the resilience of organisations in the Auckland Region. New ZealandGoogle Scholar
  71. Tahriri F, Osman MR, Ali A, Yusuff RM (2008) A review of supplier selection methods in manufacturing industries. Suranaree J Sci Technol 15:201–208Google Scholar
  72. Tam BY, Gough WA, Edwards V, Tsuji LJS (2013) The impact of climate change on the well-being and lifestyle of a First Nation community in the western James Bay region. Can Geogr Le Géographe Canadien 57:441–456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Thompson JA, Sempier T, Swann L (2012) Increasing risk awareness: the coastal community resilience index. J Ext, 50, 4TOT5Google Scholar
  74. Tianzhuo L, Linyan C (2014) Regional resilience based on natural disasters. Can Soc Sci 10:67–71Google Scholar
  75. Tierney KJ (2006) Social inequality, hazards and disasters. In: Daniels RJ, Kettl DF, Kunreuther H (eds) On risk and disaster: learning from Hurricane Katrina. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, pp 109–128Google Scholar
  76. Triantaphyllou E, Mann SH (1995) Using the analytic hierarchy process for decision making in engineering applications: some challenges. Int J Ind Eng Appl Pract 2:35–44Google Scholar
  77. Twigg J (2007) Characteristics of a disaster-resilient community: a guidance note. In: DFID disaster risk reduction interagency coordination groupGoogle Scholar
  78. UNISDR, U. N. O. F. D. R. R. 2009. Terminology on disaster risk reduction. Geneva, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  79. US Indian Ocean Tsunami Warning System Program (2007) How resilient is your coastal community? A guide for evaluating coastal community resilience to tsunamis and other coastal hazards. U.S. Indian Ocean Tsunami Warning System Program supported by the United States Agency for International Development and partners, Bangkok, Thailand, p 144Google Scholar
  80. Vaidya OS, Kumar S (2006) Analytic hierarchy process: an overview of applications. Eur J Oper Res 169:1–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Viswanadhan K (2005) How to get responses for multi-criteria decisions in engineering education—an AHP based approach for selection of measuring instrument. Financial Support 20Google Scholar
  82. Wedley WC (1990) Combining qualitative and quantitative factors—an analytic hierarchy approach. Socio-Econ Plan Sci 24:57–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Wilson GA (2012) Community resilience, globalization, and transitional pathways of decision-making. GeoforumGoogle Scholar
  84. Yang D-H, Kim S, Nam C, Min J-W (2007) Developing a decision model for business process outsourcing. Comput Oper Res 34:3769–3778CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Zhang J, Fu S (2012) An effective DEA-AHP algorithm for evaluation of emergency logistics performance. In: Advances in information sciences and service sciences, 4Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Saud Ali Alshehri
    • 1
    • 2
  • Yacine Rezgui
    • 3
  • Haijiang Li
    • 3
  1. 1.Cardiff School of EngineeringCardiff UniversityCardiffUK
  2. 2.RiyadhSaudi Arabia
  3. 3.Cardiff School of EngineeringCardiff UniversityCardiffUK

Personalised recommendations