Natural Hazards

, Volume 77, Issue 2, pp 1183–1203 | Cite as

Vulnerability of an industrial corridor in Texas to storm surge

  • Daniel W. Burleson
  • Hanadi S. Rifai
  • Jennifer K. Proft
  • Clint N. Dawson
  • Philip B. Bedient
Original Paper

Abstract

A conceptual framework for evaluating the vulnerability of industrialized coastal regions to storm surge was developed and implemented to evaluate the vulnerability of the Houston Ship Channel Industrial Corridor (HSC-IC) in Texas to storm surge. In the study, Hurricane Ike scenarios were modeled with SWAN + ADCIRC that involved changing the landfall location of the hurricane along the coast and incorporating the effect of increased wind speed. The storm surge data from the various landfall scenarios were cross-linked with geospatial and environmental data associated with facilities within the industrial region. This work uniquely combines the potential releases from storage tanks, records of past historical releases, and risk management planning to characterize environmental vulnerabilities using storage information and geospatial data. The resulting framework for vulnerability implemented within the HSC-IC found a relationship between storm surge and the total area inundated at a given storm surge level and between storm surge and the total number of storage tanks. Using the developed framework, it was possible to combine releases from storage tanks, records of past historical releases, and risk management planning to characterize environmental vulnerabilities on a facility by facility basis and for the modeled surge levels.

Keywords

GIS Hurricane Risk management Environmental impact 

References

  1. Adger WN (2006) Vulnerability. Glob Environ Change 16(3):268–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson-Berry LJ (2003) Community vulnerability to tropical cyclones: cairns, 1996–2000. Nat Hazards 30(2):209–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bonvicini S, Antonioni G, Morra P, Cozzani V (2015) Quantitative assessment of environmental risk due to accidental spills from onshore pipelines. Process Saf Environ Prot 93:31–49Google Scholar
  4. Brody S, Blessing R, Sebastian A, Bedient P (2012) Delineating the reality of flood risk and loss in Southeast Texas. Nat Hazards Rev 14(2):89–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cauffman SA, Phan LT, Sadek F, Fritz WP, Duthinh D, Rossiter WJ (2006) Performance of physical structures in Hurricane Katrina and Hurricane Rita: A reconnaissance report (NIST TN 1476). National Institute of Standards and Technology: 222Google Scholar
  6. Chakraborty J, Tobin G, Montz B (2005) Population evacuation: assessing spatial variability in geophysical risk and social vulnerability to natural hazards. Nat Hazards Rev 6(1):23–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cigler B (2009) Post-Katrina hazard mitigation on the Gulf Coast. Public Organ Rev 9(4):325–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cutter SL (1996) Vulnerability to environmental hazards. Prog Hum Geogr 20(4):529–539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cutter SL, Barnes L, Berry M, Burton C, Evans E, Tate E, Webb J (2008) A place-based model for understanding community resilience to natural disasters. Glob Environ Chang 18(4):598–606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dietrich JC, Bunya S, Westerink JJ, Ebersole BA, Smith JM, Atkinson JH, Jensen RE, Resio DT, Luettich RA Jr, Dawson CN, Cardone VJ, Cox AT, Powell MD, Westerink HJ, Roberts HJ (2010) A high resolution coupled riverine flow, tide, wind, wind wave and storm surge model for Southern Louisiana and Mississippi: part II—synoptic description and analyses of hurricanes Katrina and Rita. Mon Weather Rev 138:378–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dietrich JC, Zijlema M, Westerink JJ, Holthuijsen LH, Dawson CN, Luettich RA Jr, Jensen RE, Smith JM, Stelling GS, Stone GW (2011a) Modeling hurricane waves and storm surge using integrally-coupled, scalable computations. Coast Eng 58:45–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dietrich JC, Westerink JJ, Kennedy AB, Smith JM, Jensen RE, Zijlema M, Holthuijsen LH, Dawson CN, Luettich RA Jr, Powell MD, Cardone VJ, Cox AT, Stone GW, Pourtaheri H, Hope ME, Tanaka S, Westerink LG, Westerink HJ, Cobell Z (2011b) Hurricane Gustav (2008) waves and storm surge: hindcast, synoptic analysis, and validation in Southern Louisiana. Mon Weather Rev 139(8):2488–2522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dietrich JC, Tanaka S, Westerink JJ, Dawson CN, Luettich RA Jr, Zijlema M, Holthuijsen LH, Smith JM, Westerink LG, Westerink HJ (2012) Performance of the unstructured-mesh, SWAN + ADCIRC model in computing hurricane waves and surge. J Sci Comput 52(2):468–497. doi:10.1007/s10915-011-9555-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ding A, White J, Ullman P, Fashokun A (2008) Evaluation of HAZUS-MH flood model with local data and other program. Nat Hazards Rev 9(1):20–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hope ME, Westerink JJ, Kennedy AB, Kerr PC, Dietrich JC, Dawson C, Bender C, Smith JM, Jensen RM, Zijlema M, Holthuijsen LH, Luettich RA Jr, Powell MD, Cardone VJ, Cox AT, Pourtaheri H, Roberts HJ, Atkinson JH, Tanaka S, Westerink HJ, Westerink LG (2013) Hindcast and validation of Hurricane Ike (2008) waves, forerunner, and storm surge. J Geophys Res Ocean 118:4424–4460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Irish JL, Resio DT, Ratcliff JJ (2008) The influence of storm size on hurricane surge. J Phys Oceanogr 38(9):2003–2013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kerr PC, Donahue AS, Westerink JJ, Luettich RA, Zheng LY, Weisberg RH, Huang Y, Wang HV, Teng Y, Forrest DR, Roland A, Haase AT, Kramer AW, Taylor AA, Rhome JR, Feyen JC, Signell RP, Hanson JL, Hope ME, Estes RM, Dominguez RA, Dunbar RP, Semeraro LN, Westerink HJ, Kennedy AB, Smith JM, Powell MD, Cardone VJ, Cox AT (2013) U.S. IOOS coastal and ocean modeling testbed: inter-model evaluation of tides, waves, and hurricane surge in the Gulf of Mexico. J Geophys Res Ocean 118(10):5129–5172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kleinosky L, Yarnal B, Fisher A (2007) Vulnerability of Hampton Roads, Virginia to storm-surge flooding and sea-level rise. Nat Hazards 40(1):43–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Link LE (2010) The anatomy of a disaster, an overview of Hurricane Katrina and New Orleans. Ocean Eng 37(1):4–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Maio CV, Gontz AM, Tenenbaum DE, Berkland EP (2012) Coastal hazard vulnerability assessment of sensitive historical sites on Rainsford Island, Boston Harbor, Massachusetts. J Coastal Res 28(1A):20Google Scholar
  21. Marc L, Carol H (2005) Development of vulnerability functions for industrial/petrochemical facilities due to extreme winds and Hurricanes. Solut Coast Disasters. doi:10.1061/40774(176)50
  22. Metzger M, Schröter D, Leemans R, Cramer W (2008) A spatially explicit and quantitative vulnerability assessment of ecosystem service change in Europe. Reg Environ Change 8(3):91–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Morrow BH (1999) Identifying and mapping community vulnerability. Disasters 23(1):1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Petrova E (2006) Vulnerability of Russian regions to natural risk: experience of quantitative assessment. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 6(1):49–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pine J (2006) Hurricane Katrina and oil spills: impacts on coastal and ocean environment. Oceanography 19(2):37–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rao AD, Chittibabu P, Murty TS, Dube SK, Mohanty UC (2007) Vulnerability from storm surges and cyclone wind fields on the coast of Andhra Pradesh, India. Nat Hazards 41(3):515–529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sebastian A, Proft J, Dietrich JC, Du W, Bedient PB, Dawson CN (2014) Characterizing hurricane storm surge behavior in Galveston Bay using the SWAN and ADCIRC model. Coast Eng 88:171–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sengul H, Santella N, Steinberg LJ, Cruz AM (2012) Analysis of hazardous material releases due to natural hazards in the United States. Disasters 36(4):723–743CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sharma U, Patwardhan A (2008) Methodology for identifying vulnerability hotspots to tropical cyclone hazard in India. Mitig Adapt Strat Glob Chang 13(7):703–717CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sheng YP, JR Davis, Figueriredo R, Liu B, Liu H, Luettich R, Paramygin VA, Weaver R, Weisberg R, Xie L, Zheng L (2012) Regional testbed for storm surge and coastal inundation models—an overview. In: Proceedings of the 12th international conference on estuarine and coastal modeling. St. Augustine, Fl, ASCE, pp 476–495Google Scholar
  31. Shuang-Ye W, Brent Y, Fisher A (2002) Vulnerability of coastal communities to sea-level rise: a case study of Cape May County, New Jersey, USA. Clim Res 22(3):255–270Google Scholar
  32. Stearns M, Padgett J (2011) Impact of 2008 Hurricane Ike on bridge infrastructure in the Houston/Galveston region. J Perform Constr Facil 26(4):441–452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Stewart MG (2003) Cyclone damage and temporal changes to building vulnerability and economic risks for residential construction. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 91(5):671–691CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Topuz E, Talinli I, Aydin E (2011) Integration of environmental and human health risk assessment for industries using hazardous materials: a quantitative multi criteria approach for environmental decision makers. Environ Int 37(2):393–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Unanwa CO, McDonald JR, Mehta KC, Smith DA (2000) The development of wind damage bands for buildings. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 84(1):119–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Vickery PJ, Lin J, Skerlj PF, Twisdale LA Jr, Huang K (2006) HAZUS-MH hurricane model methodology. II: damage and loss estimation. Nat Hazards Rev 7(2):94–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wang C, Yarnal B (2012) The vulnerability of the elderly to hurricane hazards in Sarasota, Florida. Nat Hazards 63(2):349–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Weisberg R, Zheng L (2006) Hurricane storm surge simulations for Tampa Bay. Estuar Coasts 29(6):899–913CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Westerink JJ, Luettich RA, Feyen JC, Atkinson JH, Dawson C, Roberts HJ, Powell MD, Dunion JP, Kubatko EJ, Pourtaheri H (2008) A basin- to channel-scale unstructured grid hurricane storm surge model applied to Southern Louisiana. Mon Weather Rev 136(3):833–864CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Zijlema M (2010) Computation of wind-wave spectra in coastal waters with swan on unstructured grids. Coast Eng 57:267–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Zio E, Kroger W (2009) Vulnerability assessment of critical infrastructures. IEEE Reliability Society 2009 Annual Technology ReportGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniel W. Burleson
    • 1
  • Hanadi S. Rifai
    • 1
  • Jennifer K. Proft
    • 2
  • Clint N. Dawson
    • 2
  • Philip B. Bedient
    • 3
  1. 1.Civil and Environmental EngineeringUniversity of HoustonHoustonUSA
  2. 2.Department of Aerospace Engineering and Engineering MechanicsUniversity of Texas-AustinAustinUSA
  3. 3.Civil and Environmental Engineering, Severe Storm Prevention, Education, and Evacuation from Disasters CenterRice UniversityHoustonUSA

Personalised recommendations