Natural Hazards

, Volume 75, Issue 2, pp 1883–1908 | Cite as

Mapping composite vulnerability to groundwater arsenic contamination: an analytical framework and a case study in India

Original Paper

Abstract

Groundwater arsenic (As) contamination affects millions of people in South Asia. In this paper, we propose a composite vulnerability framework to identify, for mitigation, the population who are at the highest risk of suffering adverse impacts from exposure to As and warrant mitigation measures. Bihar, India, which was selected for the case study, has large areas with As concentrations far exceeding the upper limits of acceptable level of As in drinking water. Drawing on the existing social science research, we identify a host of socioeconomic and demographic variables, in addition to As concentration in groundwater, which compound a community’s vulnerability to the adverse effects of As. The result is a “composite vulnerability index,” which consists of biophysical, socioeconomic, and demographic factors that collectively determine a community’s overall vulnerability to As. Additionally, using geographic information systems (GIS), we represent the composite vulnerability index visually through a set of maps, which highlight the interaction between different community characteristics to generate unique community vulnerability profiles. In summary, this paper outlines a systematic approach to understanding vulnerability to groundwater As, as both social and natural construct, which can be applied to different geographic areas, and to improving decision making and planning pertaining to diverse environmental problems.

Keywords

Vulnerability Arsenic Socioeconomic–demographic Biophysical environment Policy Decision making 

References

  1. Adger WN, Brooks N, Bentham G, Agnew M, Eriksen S (2004) New indicators of vulnerability and adaptive capacity. Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research NorwichGoogle Scholar
  2. BAMETI (2014) Agriculture profile of the state-Bihar. Bihar Agricultural Management and ExtensionTraining Institute (BAMETI)Google Scholar
  3. Banerjee M, Banerjee N, Bhattacharjee P, Mondal D, Lythgoe PR, Martínez M, Pan J, Polya DA, Giri AK (2013) High arsenic in rice is associated with elevated genotoxic effects in humans. Scientific reports 3Google Scholar
  4. Bates KA, Swan RS (2007) Through the eye of Katrina: social justice in the United States. Carolina Academic Press, DurhamGoogle Scholar
  5. Bihardays T (2011) How girls from arsenic-hit villages can’t get married: along the UP-Bihar border!. Bihardays, BiharGoogle Scholar
  6. Birkmann J, Cardona OD, Carreño ML, Barbat AH, Pelling M, Schneiderbauer S, Kienberger S, Keiler M, Alexander D, Zeil P, Welle T (2013) Framing vulnerability, risk and societal responses: the MOVE framework. Nat Hazards 67(2):193–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. BIS (2012) Indian standard DRINKING WATER—SPECIFICATION (second revision): is 10500: 2012, Bureau of Indian Standards, Manak Bhavan, 9 Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi 110002, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  8. Brinkel J, Khan MH, Kraemer A (2009) A systematic review of arsenic exposure and its social and mental health effects with special reference to Bangladesh. Int J Environ Res Public Health 6(5):1609–1619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. BRLPS (2007) Poverty and social assessment: a district wise study of Bihar. Bihar rural livelihood project Bihar rural livelihoods promotion society (BRLPS), State Rural Livelihoods Mission (SRLM), Bihar, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  10. BSPCB M (2007) State of environment report, Bihar, Bihar State Pollution Control Board, Patna and Ministry of Environment and Forest, Government of Bihar, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  11. Census (2013) Annual Health Survey 2011–2012 fact sheet, Vital Statistics Division, office of the Registrar General and Census Commissioner, New Delhi, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  12. Center H (2002) Human links to coastal disasters. The H. John Heinz III Center for Science, Economics and the Environment, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  13. Chakraborti D, Mukherjee SC, Pati S, Sengupta MK, Rahman MM, Chowdhury UK, Lodh D, Chanda CR, Chakraborti AK, Basu GK (2003) Arsenic groundwater contamination in Middle Ganga Plain, Bihar, India: a future danger? Environ Health Perspect 111(9):1194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chowdhury UK, Biswas BK, Chowdhury TR, Samanta G, Mandal BK, Basu GC, Chanda CR, Lodh D, Saha KC, Mukherjee SK (2000) Groundwater arsenic contamination in Bangladesh and West Bengal, India. Environ Health Perspect 108(5):393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cord L, Verhoeven M, Blomquist C, Rijkers B (2009) The global economic crisis: assessing vulnerability with a poverty lens. World Bank research note, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  16. Cox J, Rosenzweig C, Solecki W, Goldberg R, Kinney P (2006) Social vulnerability to climate change: a neighborhood analysis of the Northeast US megaregion. Draft white paper for Union of Concerned Scientists, Northeast Climate Change Impact Study. http://www.northeastclimateimpacts.org/pdf/tech/cox_et_al.pdf
  17. Cutter SL, Finch C (2008) Temporal and spatial changes in social vulnerability to natural hazards. Proc Natl Acad Sci 105(7):2301–2306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cutter SL, Barnes L, Berry M, Burton C, Evans E, Tate E, Webb J (2008) A place-based model for understanding community resilience to natural disasters. Glob Environ Change 18(4):598–606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cutter SL, Emrich CT, Webb JJ, Morath D (2009) Social vulnerability to climate variability hazards: a review of the literature. Final report to Oxfam America, pp 1–44Google Scholar
  20. Das RJ (1999) Geographical unevenness of India’s green revolution. J Contemp Asia 29(2):167–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Datta D, Kaul M (1976) Arsenic content of drinking water in villages in Northern India. A concept of arsenicosisGoogle Scholar
  22. ESRI (2012) ArcGIS for Desktop 10.1, Environmental Systems Research InstituteGoogle Scholar
  23. Ghosh A, Singh S, Bose N, Ramanathan A, Bhattacharya P, Keshari A (2005). Arsenic hot spots detected in the State of Bihar (India) a serious health hazard for estimated human population of 5.5 Lakhs. International Conference on Environmental Management, Hyderabad, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  24. Ghosh A, Singh S, Bose N, Chowdhary S (2007) Arsenic contaminated aquifers: a study of the Ganga levee zone in Bihar, India. Symposium on Arsenic: The Geography of a Global Problem, Royal Geographical Society, London. http://www.geog.cam.ac.uk/research/projects/arsenic
  25. Ghosh AK, Singh SK, Singh SK, Singh A, Roy N, Upadhyaya A, Bose N, Chaudhary S, Mishra R (2008) Study of arsenic contamination in ground water of Bihar, (India) along the river ganges. Water Energy Abstr 18(1):19–20Google Scholar
  26. GSI (2012) Geology and mineral resources of eastern region. Geological Survey of India (GSI), Kolkata, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  27. Guha Mazumder D, Dasgupta U (2011) Chronic arsenic toxicity: studies in West Bengal, India. Kaohsiung J Med Sci 27(9):360–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Guillard-Gonçalves C, Cutter SL, Emrich CT, Zêzere JL (2014) Application of social vulnerability index (SoVI) and delineation of natural risk zones in Greater Lisbon, Portugal. J Risk Res. doi:10.1080/13669877.2014.910689
  29. Hossain MA, Mukharjee A, Sengupta MK, Ahamed S, Das B, Nayak B, Pal A, Rahman MM, Chakraborti D (2006) Million dollar arsenic removal plants in West Bengal, India: useful or not? Water Qual Res J Can 41(2):216–225Google Scholar
  30. IPCC (2007) Assessing key vulnerabilities and the risk from climate change. In: Parry ML, Canziani OF, Palutikof JP, van der Linden PJ, Hanson CE (eds) Climate change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability, contribution of working group II to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 7–72Google Scholar
  31. Kienberger S, Lang S, Zeil P (2009) Spatial vulnerability units–expert-based spatial modelling of socio-economic vulnerability in the Salzach catchment, Austria. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 9(3)Google Scholar
  32. Lado LR, Polya D, Winkel L, Berg M, Hegan A (2008) Modelling arsenic hazard in Cambodia: a geostatistical approach using ancillary data. Appl Geochem 23(11):3010–3018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mandal BK, Suzuki KT (2002) Arsenic round the world: a review. Talanta 58(1):201–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mazumder DNG, Ghosh A, Majumdar KK, Ghosh N, Saha C, Mazumder RNG (2010) Arsenic contamination of ground water and its health impact on population of district of Nadia, West Bengal, India. Indian J Commun Med 35(2):331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mukherjee A, Sengupta MK, Hossain MA, Ahamed S, Das B, Nayak B, Lodh D, Rahman MM, Chakraborti D (2006) Arsenic contamination in groundwater: a global perspective with emphasis on the Asian scenario. J Health Popul Nutr 24(2):142–163Google Scholar
  36. Mukherjee A, Scanlon BR, Fryar AE, Saha D, Ghosh A, Chowdhuri S, Mishra R (2012) Solute chemistry and arsenic fate in aquifers between the Himalayan foothills and Indian craton (including central Gangetic plain): Influence of geology and geomorphology. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 90:283–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Nickson R, Sengupta C, Mitra P, Dave S, Banerjee A, Bhattacharya A, Basu S, Kakoti N, Moorthy N, Wasuja M (2007) Current knowledge on the distribution of arsenic in groundwater in five states of India. J Environ Sci Health Part A 42(12):1707–1718CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Nordstrom DK (2002) Worldwide occurrences of arsenic in ground water. Science (Washington) 296(5576):2143–2145Google Scholar
  39. Papathoma-Köhle M, Kappes M, Keiler M, Glade T (2011) Physical vulnerability assessment for alpine hazards: state of the art and future needs. Nat Hazards 58(2):645–680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Parry ML (2007) Climate change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability: contribution of Working Group II to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  41. Phillips B, Fordham M (2009) Introduction: chapter 1. Social vulnerability to disasters. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  42. Rahman MM, Mondal D, Das B, Sengupta MK, Ahamed S, Hossain MA, Samal AC, Saha KC, Mukherjee SC, Dutta RN (2013) Status of groundwater arsenic contamination in all 17 blocks of Nadia district in the state of West Bengal, India: A 23-year study report. J Hydrol. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.10.037
  43. Ravenscroft P, Brammer H, Richards K (2011) Arsenic pollution: a global synthesis. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  44. Saha D (2009) Arsenic groundwater contamination in parts of middle Ganga plain, Bihar. Curr Sci 97(6):753–755Google Scholar
  45. Saha D, Shukla R (2013) Genesis of Arsenic-Rich Groundwater and the Search for Alternative Safe Aquifers in the Gangetic Plain, India. Water Environ Res 85(12):2254–2264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Saha D, Dhar Y, Sikdar P (2008) Geochemical evolution of groundwater in the Pleistocene aquifers of south Ganga plain, Bihar. J Geol Soc India 71(4):473Google Scholar
  47. Saha D, Dwivedi S, Sahu S (2009) Arsenic in ground water in parts of middle ganga plain in Bihar-an appraisal. Editor Board 24(2&3):82–94Google Scholar
  48. Saha D, Sarangam SS, Dwivedi SN, Bhartariya KG (2010) Evaluation of hydrogeochemical processes in arsenic-contaminated alluvial aquifers in parts of Mid-Ganga Basin, Bihar, Eastern India. Environ Earth Sci 61(4):799–811CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Saha D, Sahu S, Chandra P (2011) Arsenic-safe alternate aquifers and their hydraulic characteristics in contaminated areas of Middle Ganga Plain, Eastern India. Environ Monit Assess 175(1–4):331–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Schmidtlein MC, Deutsch RC, Piegorsch WW, Cutter SL (2008) A sensitivity analysis of the social vulnerability index. Risk Anal 28(4):1099–1114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Singh S (2011) Arsenic contamination in water, soil, and food materials in Bihar. LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  52. Singh SK, Ghosh AK (2012) Health risk assessment due to groundwater arsenic contamination: children are at high risk. Human Ecol Risk Assess Int J 18(4):751–766CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Singh KM, Jha A (2012) Innovative approaches in technology dissemination: experiences of ATMA model in Bihar. Available at SSRN 2168646Google Scholar
  54. Singh S, Ghosh A, Kumar A, Kislay K, Kumar C, Tiwari R, Parwez R, Kumar N, Imam M (2014) Groundwater arsenic contamination and associated health risks in Bihar, India. Int J Environ Res 8(1):49–60Google Scholar
  55. SOES (2006) Groundwater arsenic contamination in West Bengal, India (20 years study). Retrieved June 6, 2014, from http://www.soesju.org/arsenic/wb.htm
  56. SPSS I (2012) IBM SPSS statistics version 21. International Business Machines Corp, Boston, MassGoogle Scholar
  57. Tierney KJ (2001) Facing hazards and disasters: understanding human dimensions. National Academy Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  58. Tierney KJ, Lindell MK, Perry RW (2001) Facing the unexpected: disaster preparedness and response in the United States, Joseph Henry Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  59. UNEP (2003) Assessing human vulnerability due to environmental change: concepts, issues, methods and case studies, United Nations Environment Program (UNEP)Google Scholar
  60. Warner RM (2012) Applied statistics: from bivariate through multivariate techniques: from bivariate through multivariate techniques, SageGoogle Scholar
  61. WHO (2004) Guidelines for drinking water quality. 1, RecommendationsGoogle Scholar
  62. Winkel L, Berg M, Amini M, Hug SJ, Johnson CA (2008) Predicting groundwater arsenic contamination in Southeast Asia from surface parameters. Nat Geosci 1(8):536–542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Wisner B (2004) At risk: natural hazards, people’s vulnerability and disasters. Psychology Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Earth and Environmental StudiesMontclair State UniversityMontclairUSA
  2. 2.Department of Anthropology, Dickson Hall-141Montclair State UniversityMontclairUSA

Personalised recommendations