Natural Hazards

, Volume 75, Issue 1, pp 701–726 | Cite as

Assessment of Tsunami Hazard Vulnerability along the coastal environs of Andaman Islands

  • R. Prerna
  • T. Srinivasa Kumar
  • R. S. Mahendra
  • P. C. Mohanty
Original Paper

Abstract

The December 2004 Sumatra–Andaman earthquake emphasized consistent and comprehensive assessment of areas that are prone to the hazard of Tsunami. It also focused attention on the hazards that could be posed by large subduction zone earthquakes and the Tsunamis that could be further generated. Due to the extremely high vulnerability in the Andaman Islands in South East India, it is essential for planners to develop a comprehensive a priori information database in order to minimize the impact of these destructive situations. A similar effort has been done in this study wherein the entire Andaman Islands have been assessed to target “Tsunami Hazard Vulnerable areas” in accordance with the maximum wave run-up heights and topography. These areas have been extracted from the total area keeping in mind the run-up wave heights on the very day of the Sumatra–Andaman earthquake, i.e., on December 26, 2004. Also, the topographic variations in the region have been studied to establish a relation between the vulnerability of an area and its topography. The hazard of Tsunami puts at threat, the lives of approximately 314,084 people over an area of 5,833.1 km2 in the Andaman Islands. Out of the total area, 708.8 km2 is the hazardous portion which is 12.1 %. The islands have experienced a total of 386 earthquakes (above 5.0 magnitude) from the time of Sumatra–Andaman Tsunami till the end of 2009. These statistics clearly indicate the need for hazard preparedness and planning in order to minimize impact during unfortunate circumstances. This study thus aims at the preparation of Tsunami Hazard Vulnerability Map for the Andaman Islands which can be further used by administrative and disaster mitigation organizations as and when required.

Keywords

Maximum wave run-up heights TUNAMI N2 model Shuttle radar topography mission (SRTM) Sumatra–Andaman Tsunami Land-use/land-cover classification 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors are thankful to Dr. S. S. C. Shenoi, Dirtector, INCOIS for providing the facility to carry out this work at INCOIS. The authors would like to thank Global Observatory for Ecosystem Services (GOES), Michigan State University for making the Landsat data available and also NOAA’s National Geophysical Data Center (NGDC) for facilitating the Tsunami run-up data. This is INCOIS contribution No. 194.

References

  1. Anderson JR, Hardy EE, Roach JT, Witmer RE (1976) A land use and land cover classification system for use with remote sensor data. US Geol Surv Prof Pap 964:28Google Scholar
  2. Chittibabu K, Baskaran R (2009) Inundation mapping: a hazard study based on the December 26, 2004 Tsunami along the Karaikal coast of India. Sci Tsunami Haz 28:75Google Scholar
  3. Cluff LS (2007) Effect of the 2004 Sumatra–Andaman earthquake and Indian Ocean tsunami in Aceh Province, The bridge—linking engineering and society. Natl Acad Eng Natl Acad 37:12Google Scholar
  4. Cramer B (2005) Tsunami’s impact on India, part of waves of devastation, a class website on the Indian Ocean tsunami and global environmental injustice. Univ of Wisconsin-Eau Claire, USAGoogle Scholar
  5. Cummins PR, Laura SKL, Satake K (2009) Tsunami science four year after the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami: part i: modeling and hazard assessment. Pure Appl Geophys 165:1983–1989CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cutter LS (1996) Vulnerability to environmental hazards, Department of Geography, University of South Carolina, Columbia. Prog Human Geogr 20:529–539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gibbons H, Gelfenbaum G (2005) Astonishing wave heights among the findings of an international tsunami survey team on Sumatra, sound waves monthly newsletter. Coast Mar Res News Across USGS Google Scholar
  8. Islam R (2006) Pre-and post-tsunami coastal planning and land-use policies and issues in Bangladesh. Proceedings of the workshop on coastal area planning and management in Asian tsunami-affected countries, Bangkok, ThailandGoogle Scholar
  9. ITC (2006) Hazard, vulnerability and risk analysis. Faculty of Geo-information Science and Earth Observation of the University of TwenteGoogle Scholar
  10. ITEWC (2011) Indian Tsunami Early Warning Centre, User Guide Version 2. Indian National Centre for Ocean Information ServicesGoogle Scholar
  11. Mahendra RS, Mohanty PC, Srinivasa Kumar T, Shenoi SSC, Nayak S (2010) Coastal multi-hazard vulnerability mapping: a case study along the Coast of Nellore District, East coast of India. Italy J Remote Sens 42:67–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Mahendra RS, Mohanty PC, Bisoyi H, Srinivasa Kumar T, Nayak S (2011) Assessment and management of coastal multi-hazard vulnerability along the Cuddalore–Villupuram, East Coast of India using geospatial techniques. Ocean Coast Manag 54:302–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mohan K, Dangwal SGV, Sengupta S, Desai AG (2006) Keshava Deva Malaviya Institute of Petroleum Exploration, ONGC, Dehradun Andaman Basin: a future exploration target. Soc Explor Geophys, Digit Libr 25:964–967Google Scholar
  14. Murthy MVR, Usha T, Pari Y, Reddy NT (2011) Tsunami vulnerability assessment of Cuddalore using numerial model and GIS. Mar Geol 34:16–28Google Scholar
  15. Nayak S, Srinivasa Kumar T (2008) Addressing the risk of tsunami in the Indian Ocean. J South Asia Disaster Stud 1:45–57Google Scholar
  16. National Geophysical Data Center (NGDC/WDS) Global Historical Tsunami Database, Boulder, CO, USA. http://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/hazard/tsu_db.shtml
  17. Rajendran CP, Ramanamurthy MV, Reddy NT, Rajendran K (2008) Hazard implications of the late arrival of the 1945 Makran tsunami. Curr Sci 95:1739–1743Google Scholar
  18. Ram Mohan V, Krishnamurthy RR (2007) Early warning system development for Tsunami and storm surges in Indian Ocean, School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences. University of Madras, ChennaiGoogle Scholar
  19. Satake K (1988) Effects on bathymetry on tsunami propagation: application of ray tracing to tsunamis. Pure Appl Geophys 126:27–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Senani S (2004) Analysis of land use, crop productivity in Andaman and Nicobar Islands, Central Agricultural Research Institute. Geospatial World, Map AsiaGoogle Scholar
  21. Shuto N, Imamura F, Yalciner AC, Ozyurt G (2006) TUNAMI N2 Tsunami Modeling Manual, Iwate Prefectural University; Tohoku University, JapanGoogle Scholar
  22. Srinivasa Kumar T, Mahendra RS, Nayak S, Radhakrishnan K, Sahu KC (2010) Coastal vulnerability assessment for Orissa State, East Coast of India. J Coast Res 26:523–534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Thakur NK, Pradeep Kumar A (2007) Role of Bathymetry in tsunami devastation along the East Coast of India. Curr Sci 92:432–434Google Scholar
  24. Thio HK, Somerville P, Ichinose G (2007) Probabilistic analysis of strong ground motion and tsunami hazards in Southeast Asia. J Earthq Tsunami 1:119–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Tsunami Warning Centre Reference Guide (2011) Tsunami Warning Decision Support. Chapter 6Google Scholar
  26. Usha T, Murthy MVR, Reddy NT (2009) Vulnerability Assessment of Car Nicobar to tsunami hazard using numerical model. Int J Tsunami Soc 28:15–34Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. Prerna
    • 1
  • T. Srinivasa Kumar
    • 2
  • R. S. Mahendra
    • 2
  • P. C. Mohanty
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Natural ResourcesTERI UniversityVasant Kunj, New DelhiIndia
  2. 2.Indian National Center for Ocean Information ServicesHyderabadIndia

Personalised recommendations