Natural Hazards

, Volume 71, Issue 3, pp 2207–2229 | Cite as

Unnoticed but important: revealing the hidden contribution of community-based religious institution of the mosque in disasters

  • Abdur Rehman Cheema
  • Regina Scheyvens
  • Bruce Glavovic
  • Muhammad Imran
Original Paper

Abstract

The role of community-based religious institutions has been largely undocumented, underestimated and overshadowed in the disaster studies literature. This paper explores the role of the mosque, a community-based religious institution, in disaster management by documenting and analysing its role in rural settings in the aftermath of the 2005 earthquake in Pakistan. The study examines the role of the mosque in relation to key actors from the state, civil society and private sector during response, relief, recovery, reconstruction and rehabilitation phases of the Pakistan earthquake. Using qualitative research methods and a case study design, this article analyses primary data collected through 5 months of fieldwork (in 2009 and 2010). The findings demonstrate the multifaceted and distinct contribution of the mosque in cultural, economic, social and political aspects of the lives of the earthquake-affected communities. Possible challenges to engagement with the mosque, both gender inclusiveness and political controversy around its role, are also raised. This research suggests that state, civil society and private sector actors involved in disaster management need to understand complex relationships involving people and their religious institutions, and their impact on the social dimension of recovery. The findings of the study contribute to the scarce knowledge about the role of community-based religious institutions including churches, mosques, synagogues and temples and call for engagement: that is, acknowledging and valuing their role for building a synergy between secular and religious efforts for disaster risk reduction and post-disaster recovery.

Keywords

Allah Community Development Disaster Earthquake Mosque Pakistan Religious institutions 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The grant of doctoral scholarship to the corresponding author from the Higher Education Commission of Pakistan is greatly acknowledged. Also, the authors thank the two anonymous reviewers for their comments on the earlier manuscript.

References

  1. Amaney J (2005) The political participation and engagement of Muslim Americans: mosque involvement and group Consciousness. Am Polit Res 33(4):521–544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Atallah S, Khan MZA, Malkawi M (2001) Water conservation through public awareness based on Islamic teachings in the Eastern Mediterranean region. In: Faruqui NI, Biswas AK, Bino MJ (eds) Water Management in Islam. United Nations University Press, Tokyo, pp 49–60Google Scholar
  3. Bamforth T, Qureshi JH (2007) Political complexities of humanitarian intervention in the Pakistan earthquake. J Humanit Assit 14(1):1–16 Google Scholar
  4. Bano M, Nair P (2007) Faith-based organizations in South Asia: historical evolution, current status and nature of interaction with the state. University of Birmingham, International Development Department, BirminghamGoogle Scholar
  5. Belshaw D, Calderisi R, Sugden C (eds) (2001) Faith in Development: Partnership between the World Bank and the churches of Africa. Regnum Books InternationalGoogle Scholar
  6. Berger J (2003) Religious nongovernmental organizations: an exploratory analysis. Voluntas 14(1):15–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bhutto B (2008) Reconciliation: Islam, democracy and the West. Simon and Schuster, LondonGoogle Scholar
  8. Bouma GD, Ling R (2008) Religion and social cohesion. Dialogue 27(2):41–50Google Scholar
  9. Brockington D, Sullivan S (2003) Qualitative research. In: Scheyvens R, Storey D (eds) Development fieldwork. Sage Publications, London, pp 57–72Google Scholar
  10. Burton I, Kates R, White GF (1993) The environment as hazard. The Guilford Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Cain DS, Barthelemy J (2008) Tangible and spiritual relief after the storm: the religious community responds to Katrina. J Soc Serv Res 34(3):29–42. doi:10.1080/01488370802086005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Candland C (2000) Faith as social capital: religion and community development in Southern Asia. Policy Sci 33(3):355–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chester D (2005) Theology and disaster studies: the need for dialogue. J Volcanol Geoth Res 146(4):319–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chester DK, Duncan AM (2010) Responding to disasters within the Christian tradition, with reference to volcanic eruptions and earthquakes. Religion 40(2):85–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chester DK, Duncan AM, Dibben CJL (2008) The importance of religion in shaping volcanic risk perception in Italy, with special reference to Vesuvius and Etna. J Volcanol Geoth Res 172(3–4):216–228. doi:10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2007.12.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Clarke G (2006) Faith matters: faith-based organisations, civil society and international development. J Int Dev 18(6):835–848CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Clarke G (2007) Agents of transformation? Donors, faith-based organisations and international development. Third World Q 28(1):77–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Clarke M (2013) Handbook of research on development and religion. Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, NorthamptonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cuny F (1983) Disasters and development. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. De Cordier B (2010) On the thin line between good intentions and creating tensions: a view on gender programmes in Muslim contexts and the (potential) position of Islamic aid organisations. Eur J Dev Res 22(2):234–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Department for International Development (2005) DFID–CAFOD partnership programme agreement 2005–2011. Department for International Development (DFID) and Catholic Agency for Overseas Development (CAFOD), LondonGoogle Scholar
  22. Direct Relief (2005) Direct Relief International provides $6 million to Pakistan earthquake recovery efforts in six weeks. Direct Relief. http://www.directrelief.org/EmergencyResponse/2005/EarthquakePakistan/ArchiveNovember2005.aspx?terms=Pakistan+earthquake. Accessed December 1 2008
  23. Drabek T (1986) Human system responses to disaster: An inventory of sociological findings. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dunn KM (2001) Representations of Islam in the politics of mosque development in Sydney. Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie 92(3):291–308. doi:10.1111/1467-9663.00158 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Dynes RR (1994) Disasters, collective behaviour and social organisation. University of Delaware press, NewarkGoogle Scholar
  26. Earthquake Reconstruction and Rehabilitation Authority (2005) Earthquake Reconstruction and Rehabilitation Authority (ERRA) OrdinanceGoogle Scholar
  27. Earthquake Reconstruction and Rehabilitation Authority (2006b) Livelihood Support Cash Grant Umbrella Project Document: Earthquake Emergency Recovery Project. Earthquake Reconstruction and Rehabilitation Authority (ERRA), IslamabadGoogle Scholar
  28. Gaillard JC, Texier P (2010) Religions, natural hazards, and disasters: an introduction. Religion 40(2):81–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gupta DK, Mundra K (2005) Suicide bombing as a strategic weapon: an empirical investigation of Hamas and Islamic Jihad. Terror Polit Violence 17(4):573–598. doi:10.1080/09546550500189895 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Haddad YY, Balz MJ (2008) Taming the Imams: European governments and Islamic preachers since 9/11. Islam Christ Muslim Rel 19(2):215–235Google Scholar
  31. Haleem I (2003) Ethnic and sectarian violence and the propensity towards praetorianism in Pakistan. Third World Q 24(3):463–477. doi:10.1080/0143659032000084410 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Haqqani H (2005) Pakistan between mosque and military. Vanguard, LahoreGoogle Scholar
  33. Hewitt K (1983) The idea of calamity in a technocratic age. In: Hewitt K (ed) Interpretations of calamity. Allen & Unwin Inc., Boston, pp 3–32, 123–139Google Scholar
  34. Hewitt K (1997) Regions of risk: a geographical introduction to disasters. Longman, HarrowGoogle Scholar
  35. Hilhorst D (2004) Complexity and diversity: Unlocking social domains of disaster response. In: Bankoff G, Frerks G, Hilhorst D (eds) Mapping vulnerability: disaster, development and people. Earthscan, London, pp 52–66Google Scholar
  36. Innes M (2006) Policing uncertainty: countering terror through community intelligence and democratic policing. Ann Am Acad Polit Social Sci 605(1):222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. IRRC (2005) Editorial. Int Rev Red Cross 858:237–241Google Scholar
  38. Jacobs B, Price N (2003) Community participation in externally funded health projects: lessons from Cambodia. Health Policy Plann 18(4):399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Jamal A (2005) The political participation and engagement of muslim americans. Am Polit Res 33(4):521–544. doi:10.1177/1532673x04271385 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Leftwich A, Sen K (2010) Beyond Institutions. Institutions and organizations in the politics and economics of poverty reduction—a thematic synthesis of research evidence. DFID-funded Research Programme Consortium on improving Institutions for Pro-Poor Growth (IPPG), ManchesterGoogle Scholar
  41. Lewis J (1999) Development in disaster prone places: Studies of vulnerability. Intermediate Technology Publications, LondonGoogle Scholar
  42. Martens K (2002) Mission impossible? Defining nongovernmental organizations. Voluntas: Int J Volunt Non-profit Organ 13(3):271–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. McEntire D (2001) Triggering agents, vulnerabilities and disaster reduction: towards a holistic paradigm. Disaster Prev Manag 10(3):189–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. McEntire DA (2007) Disaster response and recovery: strategies and tactics for resilience. Wiley, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  45. McGregor A (2010) Geographies of religion and development: rebuilding sacred spaces in Aceh, Indonesia, after the tsunami. Environ Plan A 42(3):729–746CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Neal DM (1997) Reconsidering the phases of disaster. Int J Mass Emerg Disasters 15(2):239–264Google Scholar
  47. Oliver-Smith A, Hoffman SM (1999) The angry earth: disaster in anthropological perspective. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  48. Oxfam GB (2012) Crises in a New world order: challenging the humanitarian project. Oxfam International, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  49. Platteau J (2010) Political instrumentalization of Islam and the risk of obscurantist deadlock. World Dev 39(2):243–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Quarantelli EL (1988) Disaster crisis management: a summary of research findings. J Manag Stud 25(4):373–385. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.1988.tb00043.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Quarantelli EL (1997) Ten criteria for evaluating the management of community disasters. Disasters 21(1):39–56. doi:10.1111/1467-7717.00043 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Rodriguez H, Quarantelli EL, Dynes RR (2006) Handbook of disaster research. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  53. Schipper L, Pelling M (2006) Disaster risk, climate change and international development: scope for, and challenges to, integration. Disasters 30(1):19–38. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9523.2006.00304.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Seguino S (2011) Help or hindrance? Religion’s impact on gender inequality in attitudes and outcomes. World Dev 39(8):1308–1321. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2010.12.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Stern G (2007) Can God intervene?: How religion explains natural disasters. Praeger, Westport, ConnGoogle Scholar
  56. Strauss AL, Corbin JM (1998) Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Sage Publications Inc, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  57. Tomalin E (2013) Religion and development. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  58. Twigg J (2004) Good practice review: Disaster risk reduction, mitigation and preparedness in development and emergency programming. Disaster risk reduction: mitigation and preparedness in development and emergency programming. Overseas Development Institute, LondonGoogle Scholar
  59. UNDP (2006) Sustainable livelihoods and emergencies. United Nations Development Programme. United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) http://www.undp.org/cpr/iasc/content/docs/Working_Docs/FAO_Sustainable_Livelihoods_Emergency_Framework.doc. Accessed March 1 2008
  60. UNISDR (2002) Living with risk: A global review of disaster reduction initiatives. United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction (UNISDR), GenevaGoogle Scholar
  61. UNISDR (2004) Terminology: Basic terms of disaster risk reduction.United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNISDR).   http://www.unisdr.org/eng/library/lib-terminology-eng%20home.htm. Accessed March 18, 2008
  62. UNISDR (2005) World conference on disaster reduction: 18–22 January. United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction (UNISDR)Google Scholar
  63. UNISDR (2009) UNISDR terminology on disaster risk reduction. United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction (UNISDR). http://www.unisdr.org/eng/library/UNISDR-terminology-2009-eng.pdf. Accessed September 19 2009
  64. UNISDR (2010) Connect and convince. United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction (UNISDR), GenevaGoogle Scholar
  65. Usmani ZU, Imana EY, Kirk D (2010) Escaping death—geometrical recommendations for high value targets. In: Sobh T (ed) Innovations and advances in computer sciences and engineering. Springer, Berlin, pp 503–508. doi:10.1007/978-90-481-3658-2_88 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. White G, Haas JE (1975) Assessment of research on natural hazards. The MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  67. Wisner B (2010) Untapped potential of the world’s religious communities for disaster reduction in an age of accelerated climate change: an epilogue & prologue. Religion 40(2):128–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Wisner B, Blaikie P, Cannon T, Davis I (2004) At risk: natural hazards, peoples’ vulnerabilities and disasters, 2nd edn. Rutledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  69. Wong LP (2010) Information needs, preferred educational messages and channel of delivery, and opinion on strategies to promote organ donation: a multicultural perspective. Singap Med J 51(10):790–795Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Abdur Rehman Cheema
    • 1
  • Regina Scheyvens
    • 2
  • Bruce Glavovic
    • 2
  • Muhammad Imran
    • 2
  1. 1.Shaheed Zulifkar Ali Bhutto Institute of Science and Technology (SZABIST)IslamabadPakistan
  2. 2.School of People, Environment and PlanningMassey UniversityPalmerston NorthNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations