Natural Hazards

, Volume 72, Issue 1, pp 63–85

Adapting rail and road networks to weather extremes: case studies for southern Germany and Austria

  • Claus Doll
  • Christian Trinks
  • Norbert Sedlacek
  • Verena Pelikan
  • Tina Comes
  • Frank Schultmann
Original Paper

Abstract

The assessment of the current impacts of extreme weather conditions on transport systems reveals high costs in specific locations. Prominent examples for Europe are the economic consequences of the harsh winter periods 2009/2010 and 2010/2011 and the floods in Austria, Eastern Europe, Germany and the United Kingdom in 2005 and 2007. Departing from the EC-funded project WEATHER, this paper delves into the subject of adaptation strategies by revisiting the project’s general findings on adaptation strategies and by adding two specific cases: (1) advanced winter maintenance on roads in southwest Germany and (2) technical and organizational measures in Alpine rail transport. For these two cases, feasible adaptation strategies are elaborated and their potential is discussed in light of damage cost forecasts up to 2050. For the road sector, we find a high potential to mitigate weather-related costs, although damages here are expected to decline. In contrast, rail systems face strongly increasing damages and the mitigation options offered by improved information and communication systems seem to be largely exploited. Consequently, it is easier to justify expensive adaptation measures for high-cost rail infrastructures than for road transport. A generic analysis of 14 damage cases worldwide, however, revealed that generally awareness raising, cooperation and communication strategies are sufficient to mitigate the most severe damages by natural disasters.

Keywords

Road networks Railway operations Extreme weather events Climate change Adaptation Weather information systems Investments Forecasts 

References

  1. Altvater S, Block D de, Bouwma I, Dworak T, Frelih-Larsen A, Görlach B, Hermeling C, Klostermann J, König M, Leitner M, Marinova N, McCallum S, Naumann S, Osberghaus D, Prutsch A, Reif C, Sandt K van de, Swart R, Tröltzsch J (2012) Adaptation measures in the EU: policies, costs, and economic assessment. ‘climate proofing’ of key EU policies. Study for the European Commission. Ecologic, Alterra, Umweltbundesamt (AT), ZEW, Fresh Thoughts Consulting, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  2. Andrey J (2010) Long-term trends in weather-related crash risks. J Transp Geogr 18(2):247–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andrey J, Mills B, Vandermolen J (2001) Weather information and road safety. Institute for Catastrophic Loss Reduction, Paper Series No. 15Google Scholar
  4. Baker CJ, Chapman L, Quinn A, Dobney K (2010) Climate change and the railway industry: a review. J Mech Eng Sci. doi:10.1243/09544062JMES1558 Google Scholar
  5. Beniston M, Stephenson DB, Christensen OB, Ferro CAT, Frei C, Goyette S, Halsnaes K, Holt T, Jylha K, Koffi B, Palutikof J, Scholl R, Semmler T, Woth K (2007) Future extreme events in Europeans climate: an exploration of regional climate model projections. Clim Change 81:71–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boon CB, Cluett C (2002) Road weather information systems: enabling proactive maintenance practices in Washington State. Washington State Transportation Center, Research ReportGoogle Scholar
  7. Boselly SE (2001) Benefit/cost study of RWIS and anti-icing technologies. Transportation Research Board, Final ReportGoogle Scholar
  8. Cooper BR, Sawyer HE (1993) Assessment of M25 automatic fog-warning system. Transport Research Laboratory, Final ReportGoogle Scholar
  9. Doll C, Enei R, Köhler J (2010) General assessment framework (GAF), WEATHER (Weather extremes: impacts on transport systems and hazards for European Regions). EC FP7 (European Commission’s 7th framework programme). Fraunhofer ISI, KarlsruheGoogle Scholar
  10. Doll C, Klug S, Köhler J, Partzsch I, Enei R, Pelikan V, Sedlacek N, Maurer H, Rudzikaite L, Papanikolaou A, Mitsakis V (2011) Adaptation strategies in the transport sector. WEATHER Deliverable 4. EC FP7. Fraunhofer ISI, KarlsruheGoogle Scholar
  11. Doré G, Drouin P, Pierre P, Desrochers P (2005) Estimation of the relationships of road deterioration to traffic and weather in Canada. Transport Canada, Final ReportGoogle Scholar
  12. DWD (Deutscher Wetterdienst) (2011) Jahresrückblick 2011 des Deutschen Wetterdienstes, Gefährliche Wetterereignisse und Wetterschäden in Deutschland. Offenbach, Germany (and previous versions for 2010, 2009)Google Scholar
  13. EC (European Commission) (2007) Adapting to climate change in Europe—options for EU action. Green Paper From The Commission To The Council, The European Parliament, The European Economic and Social Committee and The Committee Of The Regions. SEC(2007) 849Google Scholar
  14. EEA (European Environment Agency) (2010) Mapping the impacts of natural hazards and technological accidents in Europe—an overview of the last decade, EEA Technical report No 13/2010, Copenhagen. doi:10.2800/62638
  15. Enei R, Doll C, Sedlacek N, Kiel J, Nesterova N, Rudzikaite L, Papanikolaou A, Mitsakis V (2011) Vulnerability of transport systems. WEATHER Deliverable 2. EC FP7. Fraunhofer ISI, KarlsruheGoogle Scholar
  16. FHWA (Federal Highway Administration) (2010) Road weather management program. US Department of Transportation, Washington DC. http://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/Weather/index.asp. Accessed 12 Oct 2012
  17. Fiorello D, Akkermans L, Krail M, Schade B, Schade W, Shepherd S (2012) Results of the technoeconomic analysis of the R&D and transport policy packages for the time horizons 2020 and 2050. Deliverable D4.1, GHG-TransPoRD, EC FP7. TRT Trasporti e Territorio SRL, Milan, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  18. Giunipero L, Eltantawy R (2004) Securing the upstream supply chain: a risk management approach. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manag 34(9):698–713CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hallegatte S (2009) Strategies to adapt to an uncertain climate change. Glob Environ Change 19(2):240–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hendricks KB, Singhal VR (2005) Association between supply chain glitches and operating performance. Manag Sci 51(5):695–711CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hoffmann E; Rotter M; Welp M (2009) Arbeitspapier zur Vorbereitung des Stakeholderdialogs zu Chancen und Risiken des Klimawandels—Verkehrsinfrastruktur, Dialoge zur KlimaanpassungGoogle Scholar
  22. IPCC (2007) Climate change 2007—synthesis Report. IPCC, Geneva, 2007Google Scholar
  23. IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) (2001) Climate change 2001: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Third Assessment Report of the IPCC. In: McCarthy JJ, Canziani OF, Leary NA, Dokken DJ, White KS (eds) Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, New York, USAGoogle Scholar
  24. Kempe C (1990) An estimation of the value of special weather forecasts in a pilot project for road authorities in Sweden. In: Proceedings of the technical conference on economic and social benefits of meteorological and hydrological services, Geneva, Switzerland, March 26–30, 1990Google Scholar
  25. Kyte M, Shannon P, Kitchener F (2001) Idaho storm warning system operational test—Final Report, University of IdahoGoogle Scholar
  26. Lähesmaa J (1997) Kotka-Hamina sääohjatun tien yhteiskuntataloudellisuus. Tieliikenteen telematiikka–E18-kokeilualue. Publications of Finnish Road Administration 36Google Scholar
  27. Leviäkangas P, Hietajärvi AM (2010) Value of weather information for road management. VTT transport and logistics systemsGoogle Scholar
  28. Lindgren J, Jonsson DK, Carlsson-Kanyama A (2009) Climate adaptation of railways: lessons from Sweden. EJTIR 9(2):164–182Google Scholar
  29. Love G, Soares A, Püempel H (2010) Climate change, climate variability and transportation. Procedia Environ Sci 1(1):130–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Maibach M, Bertmann-Aeppli D, Peter M (2012) Vulnerability and adaptation strategies in alpine road and rail transport—Swiss case study, Report from the International Panel of WEATHER. EC FP7, ZürichGoogle Scholar
  31. Maurer H, Rudzikaite L, Kiel J et al (2012) WEATHER Case studies. EC FP7. Fraunhofer ISI, KarlsruheGoogle Scholar
  32. Munich RE (2011) TOPICS GEO. Natural catastrophes, 2010—analyses, assessments, positions. Münchner Rückversicherungsgesellschaft, MunichGoogle Scholar
  33. Nokkala M, Hietajärvi AM, Leviäkangas P, Oiva K, Ludvigsen J, Klæboe R, Kreuz M, Mühlhausen T, Schweighofer J, Siedl N, Athanasatos S, Michaelides S, Papadakis M, Vajda A (2012) Summary report on the costs of extreme weather for the European transport system. Deliverable 4, EWENT, EC FP7. VTT, TOI, DLR, via Donau, CYMET, FMIGoogle Scholar
  34. Osberghaus D, Reif C (2010) Total costs and budgetary effects of adaptation to climate change: an assessment for the European Union. Discussion Paper No. 10-046, ZEW (Zentrum für Europäische Wirtschaftsforschung), MannheimGoogle Scholar
  35. Papanikolaou A, Mitsakis V, Chrysostomou K, Trinks C, Partzsch I (2011) Innovative emergency management strategies. Deliverable 3 of the research project WEATHER. EC FP7. Fraunhofer ISI, KarlsruheGoogle Scholar
  36. Patt A, Reckien D, Klein RJT, van Vuuren D, Worbel M, Bauer N, Eskeland GS, Downing TE (2010) What can social science tell us about meeting the challenge of climate change? Five insights from five years that might make a difference. In: Hulme M, Neufeldt N (eds) Making climate change work for us. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  37. PIARC (World Road Association) (2008) Roadway winter maintenance support systems and information exchange. Technical Committee 3.4 Winter MaintenanceGoogle Scholar
  38. Pilli-Sihvola Y, Toivonen K, J Kantonen (1993) Road weather service system in finland and savings in driving costs. Transportation Research Record 1387. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international symposium on snow removal and ice control technology. Minneapolis, USA, pp 196–200, 14–18 Sept 1992Google Scholar
  39. Przyluski V, Hallegatte S, Romozeiu R et al (2011) Weather trends and economy-wide impacts. Deliverable 1, WEATHER. EC FP7. Fraunhofer ISI, KarlsruheGoogle Scholar
  40. Qiu N (2007) Effects of adverse weather on traffic crashes: systematic review and meta-analysis. 87th Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting, University of IowaGoogle Scholar
  41. Rämä P (2001) Effects of weather-controlled message signing on driver behavior, VTT Publications 447Google Scholar
  42. Regmi MB, Hanaoka S (2009) Impacts of climate change on transport and adaptation in Asia. In: Proceedings of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, vol 7, 2009Google Scholar
  43. Rowland BD, Davey JD, Freeman JE, Wishart DE (2007) Road transport sensitivities to weather and climate change in Australia. In: Proceedings 30th Australasian transport research forum, Melbourne, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  44. Sedlacek N and Pelikan V (Herry Consult) (2011): Vulnerability assessment for RAIL transport. contribution to deliverable 2: transport sector vulnerabilities within the research project WEATHER (Weather extremes: impacts on transport systems and hazards for European Regions) funded under the 7th framework program of the European Commission. Project co-ordinator: Fraunhofer-ISIGoogle Scholar
  45. Skarpness B, Kitchener F, Boselly E, Thomas A (2003) Final report of the FORETELL consortium operational test: weather information for surface transportation, BattelleGoogle Scholar
  46. Solvic P (1987) Perception of risk. Science 236:280–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Statistical Office Baden-Württemberg (2011a) Güterverkehrsleistung in Baden-Württemberg und Deutschland. Stuttgart, Germany. http://www.statistik-bw.de/UmweltVerkehr/Landesdaten/v5b05.asp. Accessed 15 Oct 2012
  48. Statistical Office Baden-Württemberg (2011b) Öffentliche Straßen und Straßenverkehrsunfälle in Baden-Württemberg. Stuttgart, Germany. http://www.statistik.baden-wuerttemberg.de/UmweltVerkehr/Landesdaten/LRt1501.asp. Accessed 15 Oct 2012
  49. Stern N (2006) The economics of climate change. The Stern review. University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  50. Stiers T (2005) Studie van de impact van weercondities op de verkeersveiligheid op uurniveau. Limburgs Universitair Centrum, Faculteit Toegepaste Economische Wetenschappen, LeuvenGoogle Scholar
  51. Strong CK, Zhirui Y, Shi X (2010) Safety effects of winter weather: the state of knowledge and remaining challenges. Transp Rev 30(6):677–699CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Thornes JE (1990) The development and status of road weather information systems in Europe and North America. In: Proceedings of the WMO technical conference, Geneva, Switzerland, pp 204–214Google Scholar
  53. Trinks C, Hiete M, Comes T, Schultmann F (2012) Extreme weather events and road and rail transportation in Germany. Int J Emerg Manag 8(3):207–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Schirokoff A, Rämä P, Tuominen, A (2005) Vaihtuvien nopeusrajoitusten laajamittainen käyttö Suomessa (Large-scale use of variable message signs in Finland). Publications of the Finnish Ministry of Transport and CommunicationsGoogle Scholar
  55. UVM, LUBW (2010) Klimawandel in Baden-Württemberg. Ministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz und Verkehr Baden-Württemberg (UVM), Landesanstalt für Umwelt, Messungen und Naturschutz Baden-Württemberg (LUBW), Karlsruhe, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  56. Wass S (1990) Benefits of weather services for highway authorities. 733—Economic and social benefits of meteorological and hydrological services. In: Proceedings of the technical conference, Geneva, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  57. WHO 2010) Climate change, extreme weather events and public health—meeting report. World Health Organization (WH), Federal Environment Agency (UBA), German Weather Service (DWD) and Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety. Bonn, Germany, 28–30 Nov 2010Google Scholar
  58. Wilson MC (2007) The impact of transportation disruptions on supply chain performance. Transp Res E Logist Transp Rev 43(4):295–320. doi:10.1016/j.tre.2005.09.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Ye Z, Shi X, Strong CK, Greenfield TH (2009) Evaluation of effects of weather information on winter maintenance costs. J Transp Res Board 2107:104–110. doi:10.3141/2107-11 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Zhu Y, Toth Z (2001) Extreme weather events and their probabilistic prediction by the NCEP ensemble forecast system. Preprints of the symposium on precipitation extremes: prediction, impact, and responses, 14–19 January, Albuquerque, USAGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Claus Doll
    • 1
  • Christian Trinks
    • 2
  • Norbert Sedlacek
    • 5
  • Verena Pelikan
    • 5
  • Tina Comes
    • 4
  • Frank Schultmann
    • 3
  1. 1.Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research ISIKarlsruheGermany
  2. 2.Fraunhofer-Institute for EnvironmentalSafety, and Energy Technology UMSICHTOberhausenGermany
  3. 3.Institute for Industrial Production IIPKarlsruhe Institute of Technology KITKarlsruheGermany
  4. 4.University of AgderAgderNorway
  5. 5.HERRY Consult GmbHViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations