Natural Hazards

, Volume 70, Issue 2, pp 1181–1195 | Cite as

Hurricane wind risk in Louisiana

Original Paper
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:

Abstract

A statistical procedure for estimating the risk of strong winds from hurricanes, known as the Hurricane Risk Calculator, is demonstrated and applied to several major cities in Louisiana. The procedure provides an estimate of wind risk over different length periods and can be applied to any location experiencing this hazard. Results show that an area 100 km around the city of New Orleans can expect to see hurricane winds blowing at 49 ms−1 (44.3–53.7) [90 % confidence interval (CI)] or stronger, on average, once every 20 years. In comparison, for the same time period, the capital city of Baton Rouge and the surrounding area can expect to see hurricane winds of 43 ms−1 (38.2–47.8) (90 % CI) or stronger. Hurricane track direction is also analyzed at the cities of interest. For Morgan City, Lafayette, Lake Charles, and Alexandria, tropical cyclones with winds at least 18 ms−1 travel from the southeast to northwest. New Orleans and Baton Rouge tropical cyclones have a greater tendency to turn toward the east while within 100 km of the city, historically giving them a southwesterly approach. Tropical cyclones within 350 km off the south-central Louisiana coast occur most often in September, and the most extreme of these events are becoming stronger through time as shown with quantile regression.

Keywords

Hurricane Risk Extreme value Hurricane tracks 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank James Elsner and Thomas Jagger for the use of their R code.

References

  1. Chu P, Wang J (1998) Modeling return periods of tropical cyclone intensities in the vicinity of Hawaii. J Appl Meteorol Climatol 37:951–960CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Coles S (2001) An introduction to statistical modeling of extreme values. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Coles S, Powell E (1996) Bayesian methods in extreme value modelling: a review and new developments. Int Stat Rev 64:119–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Elsner J, Jagger T, Liu K (2008) Comparison of hurricane return levels using historical and geological records. J Appl Meteorol Climatol 47:368–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Elsner J, Kossin J, Jagger T (2008) The increasing intensity of the strongest tropical cyclones. Nature 455:92–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Elsner JB, Jagger TH (2013) Hurricane climatology: a modern statistical guide using R. Oxford University Press, New York, p 430Google Scholar
  7. Embrechts P, Resnick S, Samorodnitsky G (1999) Extreme value theory as a risk management tool. N Am Actuar J 3:30–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fernandez-Partagas J, Diaz H (1996) Atlantic hurricanes in the second half of the nineteenth century. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 77:2899–2906CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fisher R, Tippett L (1928) Limiting forms of the frequency distribution of the largest or smallest member of a sample. Process Camb Philos Soc 24:180–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Heckert N, Simiu E, Whalen T (1998) Estimates of hurricane wind speeds by ‘peaks over threshold’ method. J Struct Eng ASCE 124:445–449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jagger T, Elsner J (2006) Climatology models for extreme hurricane winds in the United States. J Clim 19:3220–3236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jagger T, Elsner J, Niu X (2001) A dynamic probability model of hurricane winds in coastal counties of the United States. J Appl Meteorol 40:853–863CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Keim B, Muller R, Stone G (2007) Spatiotemporal patterns and return periods of tropical storm and hurricane strikes from Texas to Maine. J Clim 20:3498–3509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Knutson T, McBride J, Chan J, Emanuel K, Holland G, Landsea C, Held I, Kossin J, Srivastava A, Sugi M (2010) Tropical cyclones and climate change. Nat Geosci. doi: 10.1038/NGEO779
  15. Kotz S, Nadarajah S (2000) Extreme value distributions: theory and applications. Imperial College Press, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Landsea C, Anderson C, Charles N, Clark G, Dunion J, Fernandez-Partagas J, Hungerford P, Neumann C, Zimmer M (2004) The Atlantic hurricane database reanalysis project: documentation for the 1851–1910 alterations and additions to the HURDAT database. In: Murnane R, Liu K (eds) Hurricanes and Typhoons: past, present, and future. Columbia University Press, New York, pp 177–221Google Scholar
  17. Malmstadt J, Elsner J, Jagger T (2010) Risk of strong hurricane winds to Florida cities. J Appl Meteorol Climatol 49:2121–2132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Malmstadt J, Scheitlin K, Elsner J (2009) Florida hurricanes and damage costs. Southeast Geogr 49:108–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Neumann CJ, Jarvinen BR, McAdie CJ, Elms JD (1993) Tropical cyclones of the North Atlantic Ocean, 1871–1992. National Climatic Center, Asheville, North Carolina, p 193Google Scholar
  20. Parisi F, Lund R (2008) Return periods of continental U.S. hurricanes. J Clim 21:403–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pielke R Jr, Gratz J, Landsea C, Collins D, Saunders M, Musulin R (2008) Normalized hurricane damage in the United States: 1900–2005. Nat Hazards Rev 9:29–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. R Development Core Team (2010) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org. ISBN 3-900051-07-0
  23. Stone GW, Grymes III JMG, Dingler JR, Pepper DA (1997) Overview and significance of hurricanes on the Louisiana coast, U.S.A. J Coast Res 13:656–669Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Louisiana State UniversityBaton RougeUSA
  2. 2.University of TennesseeKnoxvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations