Natural Hazards

, Volume 65, Issue 3, pp 2353–2374 | Cite as

Small-business demise and recovery after Katrina: rate of survival and demise

  • Holly L. Schrank
  • Maria I. Marshall
  • Adrienne Hall-Phillips
  • Renee F. Wiatt
  • Nicole E. Jones
Original Paper

Abstract

Post-disaster research is often plagued by displacement of subjects, loss of infrastructure, and the disruption of communication. Economic losses and business disruptions caused by a disaster tend to affect small businesses on a greater scale. With the majority of small businesses being operated out of a home, the inability to recover affects both economic and overall well-being of the business and the family. Specifically for small businesses, post-disaster research is important because it leads to increased preparedness and survival strategies for the sector and reduced economic vulnerabilities in owner-controlled areas. Historically, most of what is known about preparation, response, and recovery of small businesses from natural disasters is based on businesses that have recovered. However, there exists a need for understanding recovery also from the perspective of those that tried, but failed to recover. Grounded in a pragmatic approach, this study presents a methodology for tracking demised small businesses after Hurricane Katrina. Supported by empirical evidence, solutions to the problems of timing, generalizability, and access are presented, providing a systematic methodology for successfully studying small businesses after a disaster event. Rate of survival and demise data are presented, providing more useful numbers than prior estimates. Locating demised and recovered small businesses efficiently is the first step in understanding how business owners prepare, react, adjust, and strive to recover from disaster-driven events. A solution to this challenging issue of access makes the study of demised small businesses possible.

Keywords

Natural disaster Small business Demise rate Survival rate Hurricane Katrina Record linkage 

References

  1. Alesch DJ, Holly JN (2002) When disasters and small businesses collide. Nat Hazards Obs 26:1–3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alesch DJ, Holly JN, Mittler E, Nagy R (2001) Organizations at risk: what happens when small businesses and not-for-profits encounter natural disasters. Public Entity Risk Institute, Fairfax VAGoogle Scholar
  3. Blumberg SJ, Luke JV, Ganesh N, Davern ME, Boudreaux MH, Soderberg K (2011) Wireless substitution: state-level estimates from the National Health Interview Survey, January 2007–June 2010. Natl Health Stat Report Number 39, April 20. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhsr/nhsr039.pdf. Accessed 6 Jun 2011
  4. Bourque LB, Shoaf KL, Nguyen LH (2002) Survey research. In: Stallings RA (ed) Methods of disaster research. ExLibris Bradford on Avon, Wiltshire UK, pp 157–193Google Scholar
  5. BCG Certification (2007) http://www.bcgcertification.org/publications/onboard/evidence.html. Downloaded 12 Jun 2012
  6. Clayton RL, Spletzer JR (2009) Business employment dynamics. In: Dunne J, Jensen JB, Roberts MJ (eds) Producer dynamics: new evidence from micro data. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 125–147. Accessed 11 Aug 2011. From http://www.nber.org/chapters/c0484.pdf
  7. Corey SM, Deitch EA (2011) Factors affecting business recovery immediately after Hurricane Katrina. J Conting Crisis Manag 19:169–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dahlhamer JM, D’Souza MJ (1997) Determinants of business disaster preparedness in two U.S. metropolitan areas. Int J Mass Emerg Disasters 15:265–281Google Scholar
  9. Dahlhamer JM, Tierney KJ (1998) Rebounding from disruptive events: business recovery following the Northridge earthquake. Soc Spectr 18:121–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dahlhamer JM, Webb GR, Tierney KJ (1999) Predicting business financial losses in the 1989 Loma Prieta and 1994 Northridge earthquakes: implications for loss estimation research. University of Delaware Disaster Research Center preliminary paper 282. Downloaded 27 Jul 2012. From http://dspace.udel.edu:8080/dspace/handle/19716/664
  11. Danes S, Lee J, Stafford K, Heck R (2008) The effects of ethnicity, families and culture on entrepreneurial experience: an extension of sustainable family business theory. J Dev Entrep 13:229–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Danes S, Lee J, Amarapurkar S, Stafford K, Haynes G, Brewton K (2009) Determinants of family business resilience after a natural disaster by gender of owner. J Dev Entrep 14:333–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dennis WJ Jr (Ed) (2004) Disasters. NFIB National Small Business Poll, v4, issue 5. NFIB, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  14. Dunn HB (1946) Record linkage. Am J Public Health (reprint). http://ajph.aphapublications.org/cgi/reprint/36/12/1412.pdf. Accessed 11 Aug 2011
  15. Elfeky MG, Verykios VS, Elmagarmid AK (2002) TAILOR: a record linkage toolbox. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Data Engineering, San Jose, CA Feb. 26-March 1, 2002Google Scholar
  16. Fair M (2004) Generalized record linkage system-statistics Canada’s record linkage software. Austrian J Stat 33:37–53Google Scholar
  17. Glass PA, Oswalt SN (2006) Initial estimates of Hurricane Katrina impacts on Mississippi Gulf Coast forest resources. Mississippi Institute for Forest Inventory, Mississippi State University. http://www.mifi.ms.gov/documents/Katrin_Impacts_Gulf_Coast.pdf. Accessed 12 Aug 2011
  18. Haynes G, Danes SM, Stafford K (2011) Influence of federal disaster assistance on family business survival and success. J Conting Crisis Manag 19:86–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Howe PD (2011) Hurricane preparedness as anticipatory adaptation: a case study of community businesses. Global Environ Change 21:711–720CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jarmin RS, Miranda J (2002) The longitudinal business database. Econ studies 2. Washington, DC, U.S. Department of Census. http://lservices.ciser.cornell.edu/news/media/3/20050812-JarminMiranda2002.pdf. Accessed 11 Aug 2011
  21. Killian LM (2002) An introduction to methodological problems of field studies in disasters. In: Stallings RA (ed) Methods of disaster research. ExLibris Bradford on Avon, Wiltshire UK, pp 49–93Google Scholar
  22. Lyons S (2008) Why hurricane waves are lopsided. Weather insights: weather channel blog. Downloaded 26 Jul 2012. From http://www.weather.com/blog/weather/8_16562.html
  23. Mason MK (2011) Research on small businesses. http://www.moyak.com/papers/small-business-statistics.html. Accessed 10 Aug 2011
  24. Pan Q (2011) Economic losses from a hypothetical hurricane event in the Houston-Galveston area. Nat Hazards Rev 12:146–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pratt JH (2000) Homebased business: the hidden economy. Small Business Research Summary, 194; Office of Advocacy, United States Small Business Administration, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  26. Schiller AR (2011) The impact of a storm surge on business establishments in the Houston MSA. Nat Hazards 56:331–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Small Business Administration (2011) Funding highlights 2011. Downloaded 22 May 2012. From http://m.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/budget/fy2012/assets/business.pdf
  28. Small Business Administration Office of Advocacy (2012) Small business profile: Mississippi. Downloaded 24 Oct 2012. From www.sba.gov/sites/default/files/ms1_0.pdf
  29. Stafford K, Duncan K, Danes S, Winter M (1999) A research model of sustainable family businesses. Fam Bus Rev 17:197–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Stafford K, Bhargava V, Danes S, Haynes G, Brewton K (2010) Factors associated with long-term survival of family businesses: duration analysis. J Fam Econ Issue 31:442–457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Stallings RA (ed) (2002) Methods of disaster research. ExLibris Bradford on Avon, Wiltshire UKGoogle Scholar
  32. Stallings RA (2007) Methodological issues. In: Rodriguez H, Quarantelli EL, Dynes RR (eds) Handbook of disaster research. Springer, New York, pp 55–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Tierney KJ (1997) Business impacts of the Northridge earthquake. J Conting Crisis Manag 5:87–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Tierney K (2007) Businesses and disasters: vulnerability, impacts, and recovery. In: Rodriguez H, Quarantelli EL, Dynes RR (eds) Handbook of disaster research. Springer, New York, pp 275–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Tigges LM, Green GP (1994) Small business success among men- and women-owned firms in rural areas. Rural Soc 59:289–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. U.S. Bureau of Census (2011) Population estimates by state and county, 2000–2010. Downloaded 24 Oct 2012. From http://www.census.gov/popest/research/eval-estimates/CO-PEST2010-totals.csv
  37. U.S. Bureau of Census (2012) Business dynamics statistics data tables: establishment characteristics. Downloaded 24 Oct 2012. From http://www.census.gov/ces/dataproducts/bds/data_estab.html
  38. Webb GR, Tierney KJ, Dahlhamer JM (2003) Predicting long-term business recovery from disaster: a comparison of the Loma Prieta Earthquake and Hurricane Andrew. Environ Hazards 4:45–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Winkler WE (2006) Overview of record linkage and current research directions. Research report series, statistics #2006-2. Washington, DC: Statistical Research Division, U.S. Census BureauGoogle Scholar
  40. Winter M, Fitzgerald M, Heck R, Haynes G, Danes S (1998) Revisiting the study of family businesses: methodological challenges, dilemmas, and alternative approaches. Fam Bus Rev 11:239–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Winter M, Danes SM, Koh S, Fredericks K, Paul J (2004) Tracking family businesses and their owners over time: panel attrition, manager departure, and business demise. J Bus Ventur 19:535–559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Yoshida K, Deyle RE (2005) Determinants of small business hazard mitigation. Nat Hazards Rev 6:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Holly L. Schrank
    • 1
  • Maria I. Marshall
    • 1
  • Adrienne Hall-Phillips
    • 2
  • Renee F. Wiatt
    • 1
  • Nicole E. Jones
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Agricultural EconomicsPurdue UniversityWest LafayetteUSA
  2. 2.School of BusinessWorcester Polytechnic InstituteWorcesterUSA

Personalised recommendations