Advertisement

Natural Hazards

, Volume 66, Issue 2, pp 271–289 | Cite as

Measuring the initial economic effects of hurricanes on commercial fish production: the US Gulf of Mexico grouper (Serranidae) fishery

  • Daniel SolísEmail author
  • Larry Perruso
  • Julio del Corral
  • Brent Stoffle
  • David Letson
Original Paper

Abstract

A stochastic production frontier was used to measure the initial (i.e., bi-weekly) economic effects of hurricanes on commercial grouper (Serranidae) production in the Exclusive Economic Zone of the United States Gulf of Mexico from 2005 to 2009. We estimated the economic effects of productivity losses associated with specific hurricanes on the commercial grouper fleet. We also calculated the economic effects due to productivity losses during an entire hurricane season at the regional level. The empirical model controls for input levels as well as other factors affecting production to isolate the initial economic effect caused by hurricanes from other non-weather-related factors. The empirical results revealed that hurricanes striking the Gulf of Mexico coastline from 2005 to 2009 had a negative effect on the production of the commercial grouper fleet. The results also demonstrated the relative importance of inputs and regulations on fish production.

Keywords

Hurricanes Economic damage Commercial fisheries Stochastic production frontier US Gulf of Mexico 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge helpful comments from Juan Agar, Stephen Holiman, two anonymous reviewers, and participants at the 10th Annual Climate Prediction Applications Science Workshop (CPASW), Miami, FL, and the 2011 Southeast Climate Consortium Annual Review Meeting, Tallahassee, FL. The authors also acknowledge the technical support provided by Paul Baertlein, Alexandra Bozec, Mark Powell, and Austin Todd.

References

  1. Aigner D, Lovell K, Schmidt P (1977) Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models. J Econom 6:21–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alvarez A, Schmidt P (2006) Is skill more important than luck in explaining fish catches? J Prod Anal 26:15–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Box G, Tiao G (1975) Intervention analysis with applications to economic and environmental problems. J Amer Statist As 70:70–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bravo-Ureta B, Solís D, Moreira V, Maripani J, Thiam A, Rivas T (2007) Technical efficiency in farming: a meta-regression analysis. J Prod Anal 27:57–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Buck E (2005) Hurricanes Katrina and Rita: fishing and aquaculture industries—damage and recovery. Congressional Research Service, Report for Congress No. RL34209Google Scholar
  6. Burgess C, Bianchi A, Murauskas J, Crosson S (2007) Impacts of hurricanes on North Carolina fisheries. North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Division of Marine Fisheries. p 233Google Scholar
  7. Caffey R, Kazmierczak R, Diop H, Keithly W (2006) Estimating the economic damage of Hurricanes Katrina and Rita on commercial and recreational fishing industries. Paper presented at the American Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting, Portland, Oregon, July 29-August 4th, 2007Google Scholar
  8. Cai J, Leung P, Pan M, Pooley S (2005) Economic linkage impacts of Hawaii’s longline fishing regulations. Fish Res 74:232–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Conner W, Day J, Baumann R, Randall J (1989) Influence of hurricanes on coastal ecosystems along the northern Gulf of Mexico. Wetlands Ecol Manage 1:45–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dolloff C, Flebbe P, Owen M (1994) Fish habitat and fish populations in a southern Appalachian watershed before and after Hurricane Hugo. Trans Am Fish Soc 123:668–678CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dukhovskoy D, Morey S (2011) Simulation of the Hurricane Dennis storm surge and considerations for vertical resolution. Nat Hazards 58:511–540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Greene W (2008) The econometric approach to efficiency analysis. In: Fried H, Knox Lovell C, Schmidt S (eds) The measurement of productive efficiency and productivity growth. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 100–103Google Scholar
  13. Herrero I, Pascoe S (2003) Value versus volume in the catch of the Spanish South-Atlantic trawl fishery. J Agric Econ 54:325–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kirkley J, Walden J, Ward J (2007) The status of USA’s commercial fisheries and management and crystal-balling the future. Int J Global Environ Issues 7:119–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kompas T, Che T (2005) Efficiency gains and cost reductions from individual transferable quotas: a stochastic cost frontier for the Australian South East fishery. J Prod Anal 23:285–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kumbhakar S, Lovell K (2000) Stochastic frontier analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 72–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Nidhiprabha B (2007) Adjustment and recovery in Thailand two years after the tsunami. ADBI Discussion Paper 72. Tokyo: Asian Development Bank InstituteGoogle Scholar
  18. NMFS (National Marine Fisheries Service) (2007) Report to congress on the impact of hurricanes Katrina, Rita, and Wilma on commercial and recreational fishery habitat of Alabama, Florida, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas. Silver Spring, MarylandGoogle Scholar
  19. Schmidt P, Lin T (1984) Simple tests of alternative specifications in stochastic frontier models. J Econom 24:349–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sharma KR, Leung P (1999) Technical efficiency of the longline fishery in Hawaii: an application of a stochastic production frontier. Marine Res Econ 13:259–274Google Scholar
  21. Solís D, Letson D (2013) Assessing the value of climate information and forecasts for the agricultural sector in the Southeastern United States: multi-output stochastic frontier approach. Reg Environ Change. doi: 10.1007/s10113-012-0354-x
  22. Solís D, Bravo-Ureta B, Quiroga R (2007) Soil conservation and technical efficiency among hillside farmers in Central America: a switching regression model. Aust J Agr Resour Econ 51:491–510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Squires D, Kirkley J (1999) Skipper skill and panel data in fishing industries. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 56:2011–2018CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniel Solís
    • 1
    Email author
  • Larry Perruso
    • 2
  • Julio del Corral
    • 3
  • Brent Stoffle
    • 2
  • David Letson
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Marine Affairs and Policy, Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric ScienceUniversity of MiamiMiamiUSA
  2. 2.Social Science Research Group, Southeast Fisheries Science CenterNational Marine Fisheries ServiceMiamiUSA
  3. 3.Department of Economics and FinanceUniversity of Castilla-La ManchaCiudad RealSpain

Personalised recommendations