Natural Hazards

, Volume 63, Issue 2, pp 909–937

Earthquake hazards and community resilience in Baluchistan

Original Paper

Abstract

Resilience is widely used from a variety of research perspectives; however, community resilience in particular is applied to a number of natural hazards and disasters-related studies, programs, and activities. It is also acknowledged that its measurement is cumbersome but not impossible. The prime objective of this paper is to measure the community resilience of an earthquake-prone area in Baluchistan. The article presents the concept of resilience, its approaches, selection of indicators, formulation of subjective assessment method for weighting the indicators, and finally, developing the community resilience index. For the community resilience measurement, a survey was conducted among 200 households in two earthquake risk zones of Quetta city, using simple random sampling method. The overall composite community resilience index revealed that the resilience is low in both the zones—A and B. However, it is revealed that there is a significant difference between the zones when compared against the components and indicators. Community resilience components such as economic, institutional, and physical have received higher index values in Zone B as compared to Zone A. Based on the findings, it is recommended to improve the socioeconomic, institutional, and structural (housing) conditions of the community by raising the community awareness and preparedness, implementing building codes, and providing income-generating activities in order to enhance the community resilience to cope up with earthquake hazards in the future.

Keywords

Earthquake Community resilience Disasters Baluchistan 

References

  1. Adger WN (1997) Sustainability and social resilience in coastal resource use. CSERGE working paper series, Center for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment, University of East Anglia, UKGoogle Scholar
  2. Adger WN (2000) Social and ecological resilience: are they related? Prog Hum Geogr 24(3):347–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Adger WN (2006) Vulnerability. Glob Environ Chang 16:268–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Adger WN, Kelly PM, Winkles A, Huy LQ, Locke C (2002) Nested and teleconnected vulnerabilities to environmental change. Front Ecol Environ 31(4):358–366Google Scholar
  5. Aldrich DP (2010) The power of people: social capital’s role in recovery from 1995 Kobe earthquake. Nat Hazards 56(3):595–611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Allen KM (2006) Community-based disaster preparedness and climate adaptation: local capacity-building in the Philippines. Disasters 30(1):81–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Baker A (2002) Creating an empirically derived community resilience index of the Gulf of Mexico. Master thesis, Louisiana State University, USAGoogle Scholar
  8. Bilham R (2009) The seismic future of cities. Bull Earthq Eng 7:839–887CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bilham R, Hough S (2006) Future earthquakes on the Indian subcontinent: inevitable hazard. Prev Risk South Asian J 12:1–9Google Scholar
  10. Birkmann J, Wisner B (2006) Measuring the un-measurable. The challenge of vulnerability. United Nations Univ 5:1–58Google Scholar
  11. Blaikie P, Cannon T, Davis I, Wisner B (1994) At risk. Natural hazards, people’s vulnerability, and disasters. Rutledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  12. Bruneau M, Chang SE, Eguchi RT, Lee GC, Rourke TD, Reinhorn AM et al (2003) A framework to quantitatively assess and enhance the seismic resilience of communities. Earthq Spectra 19(4):733–752CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Buckle P, Marsh G, Smale S (2001) Assessing resilience and vulnerability: principles, strategies and actions. Victorian Government Publishing Services, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  14. Carpenter SR, Walker B, Anderies JM, Abel N (2001) From metaphor to measurement: resilience of what to what? Ecosystems 4:765–781CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cash DW, Moser SC (2000) Linking global and local scales: designing dynamic assessment and management processes. Glob Environ Chang 10:109–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chapin FS, Walker BH, Hobbs RJ, Hooper DU, Lawton JH, Sala OE, Tilman D (1997) Biotic control over the functioning of ecosystems. Science 277:500–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Churiwala BL, Churiwala S (2007) Disaster management for hazardous chemicals: a realistic approach. Indian Chem Eng 49(1):54–62Google Scholar
  18. Coburn A, Spence R (1992) Earthquake protection. Wiley, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  19. Cutter SL, Mitchell JT, Scoot MS (2000) Revealing the vulnerability of people and places: a case study of Georgetown Country, South Carolina. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 90(4):713–737CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cutter SL, Boruff BJ, Shirley WL (2003) Social vulnerability to environmental hazards. Soc Sci Q 84(2):242–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cutter LS, Barnes L, Berry M, Burton C, Evans E, Tate E, Webb J (2008a) Community and regional resilience to natural disasters: perspective from hazards, disasters and emergency management, CARRI research report 1. Community and Regional Resilience Institute, Oak RidgeGoogle Scholar
  22. Cutter LS, Barnes L, Berry M, Burton C, Evans E, Tate E, Webb J (2008b) A place-based model for understanding community resilience to natural disasters. Glob Environ Chang 18:598–606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Cutter LS, Burton GC, Emrich TC (2010) Disaster resilience indicators for benchmarking baseline conditions. J Homel Secur Emerg Manage 7(1):1–22Google Scholar
  24. Davidson MA (2006) Designing for disasters. Massachusetts coastal hazards commission, NOAA coastal service centerGoogle Scholar
  25. Dufty N (2009) Natural hazards education in Australian schools: how can we make it more effective? Aust J Emerg Manag 24(13):13–16Google Scholar
  26. EM-DAT online databases on Disasters (Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters) (2011) http://www.cred.be/. Accessed 20 Jan
  27. ESCAP (2010) Disability at a glance 2010: a profile of 36 Countries and areas in Asia and the Pacific. Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP), BangkokGoogle Scholar
  28. Esty DC, Levy A, Srebotnjak T, Sherbinin A (2005) Environmental Sustainability Index: benchmarking national environmental stewardship. Yale Center for Environmental Law and Policy, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  29. FEMA (2000) Rebuilding for a more sustainable future, an operational framework. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington D.C, USAGoogle Scholar
  30. Fleischhauer MI (2008) The role of spatial planning in strengthening urban resilience. Resilience Cities Terror Other Threat 10:273–298Google Scholar
  31. Folke C (2006) Resilience: the emergence of a perspective for social-ecological system analysis. Glob Environ Chang 16:253–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Folke C, Carpenter SR, Walker BH, Scheffer M, Elmqvist T, Gunderson LH, Holling CS (2004) Regime shifts, resilience and biodiversity in ecosystem management. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 35:557–581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Freudenburg WR (1992) Addictive economics: extractive industries and vulnerable localities in a changing world economy. Rural Sociol 57:305–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Gaillard J, Texier P (2010) Religions, natural hazards, and disasters: an introduction. Religion 40(special issue):81–84Google Scholar
  35. Gallopin G (2006) Linkage between vulnerability, resilience and adaptative capacity. Glob Environ Chang 16:293–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Godschalk DR (2002) Urban hazard mitigation: creating resilient cities. Plenary paper presented at the Urban Hazard Forum, John Jay College, University of New YorkGoogle Scholar
  37. Godschalk DR (2003) Urban hazard mitigation: creating resilient cities. Nat Hazard Rev 3(4):136–143Google Scholar
  38. Godschalk DR (2007) Functions and phases of emergency management. In: William L, Waugh Jr, Kathleen T (eds) Emergency management: principles and practice for local government. International City Manager Association, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  39. Guha-Spair D, Vos F (2010) Earthquakes: epidemiological perspective on patterns and trends. A draft paper submitted to Human casualties in natural disasters: progress in modeling and mitigation, pp 1–18Google Scholar
  40. Gunderson LH (2000) Ecological resilience: in theory and application. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 31:425–439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Gunderson L (2009) Comparing Ecological and Human Community Resilience. CARRI Research Report 5. Oak Ridge. Community and Regional Resilience InstituteGoogle Scholar
  42. Gupta I, Sinvhal A, Shankar R (2006) Himalayan population at earthquake risk: strategies for preparedness. Disaster Prev Manag 15(4):608–620CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Heinz JH (2002) Human links to coastal disasters. H. John Heniz Center for Science Economics and Environment, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  44. Hewitt K (1997) Regions of risk: a geographical introduction to disasters. Longman, EssexGoogle Scholar
  45. Holling CS (1973) Resilience and stability of ecological system. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 4:1–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Holling CS, Schindler DW, Walker BW, Roughgarden J (1995) Biodiversity in the functioning of eco-systems: an ecological synthesis. In: Perrings C et al (eds) Biodiversity loss: economic and ecological issues. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 44–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Hossain MS (2002) Vulnerability due to natural hazards in South Asia: a GIS aided characterization of arsenic contamination in Bangladesh. Master thesis, Agricultural University, NorwayGoogle Scholar
  48. Jackson J (2006) Fatal attraction: living with earthquakes, the growth of villages into mega cities, and earthquake vulnerability in modern world. Royal Soc 364:1911–1925Google Scholar
  49. James E (2008) Getting ahead of the next disaster: recent preparedness efforts in Indonesia. Dev Pract 18(3):424–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Janssen M, Ostrom E (2006a) Resilience, vulnerability, and adaptation: a cross-cutting theme of International Human Dimension Programme on global Environmental Change. Glob Environ Chang 16:237–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Janssen MA, Ostrom E (2006b) Resilience, vulnerability, and adaptation: a cross-cutting theme of the International Human Dimensions Programme on Global Environmental Change. Glob Environ Chang 16:237–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Japan Census Data (2010) Statistical handbook of Japan, Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications. Statistics Bureau, Director-General of Policy Planning and Statistical Research and Training Institute, available at http://www.stat.go.jp/english/data/handbook/index.htm. Accessed 10 Mar 2011
  53. Johnston DM, Tipier K, Pedersen S (2010) An earthquake emergency response and evacuation exercise in a New Zealand school. Institute of Geological and Nuclear Science Limited, Zurich, Switzerland, pp 1–9Google Scholar
  54. Kasperson JX, Kasperson RE, Turner BL II, Schiller A, Hsieh W-H (2005) Vulnerability of global environmental change. In: Kasperson JX, Kasperson RE (eds) Social contours of risk. Earthscan, London, pp 245–285Google Scholar
  55. Khan AM (2008) Disaster preparedness for sustainable development in Bangladesh. Disaster Prevention and Management 17(5):662–671CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Knight C (2007) A resilience framework for educators. Health Educ 107(6):543–555CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Kulig JC, Edge DS, Joyce B (2008) Understanding community resilience in rural communities through multimethod research. Community Dev 3(3):77–94Google Scholar
  58. Leon D, Villagran JC (2006) Vulnerability: a conceptual and methodological review institute of environment and human security. United Nations University—EHS, Tokyo, JapanGoogle Scholar
  59. Maguire B, Hagan P (2007) Disasters and communities: understanding social resilience. Emerg Manag 22(1):16–20Google Scholar
  60. Manyena SB (2006) The concept of resilience revisited. Disasters 30(4):433–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Maqsood ST, Schwarz J (2010) Building vulnerability and damage during the 2008 Baluchistan earthquake in Pakistan and past experiences. Seism Res Lett 81(3):514–525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Masozera M, Bailey M, Kerchner C (2007) Distribution of impacts of natural disasters across income groups: a case of New Orleans. Ecol Econ 63:299–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Mayunga JS (2007) Understanding and applying the concept of community disaster resilience: a capital-based approach. A draft working paper prepared for social vulnerability and resilience building, Munich, Germany, pp 1–16Google Scholar
  64. McCarthy JJ, Canziani OF, Leary NA, Dokken DJ, White KS (2001) Climate change 2001: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. In: Adger W (ed) Vulnerability global environmental change, vol 16. Cambridge University Press, UK, pp 268–281Google Scholar
  65. MCEER (2007) Engineering resilience solutions from earthquake engineering to extreme events. Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, USAGoogle Scholar
  66. MECSST (2007) Japan’s education at a glance. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, JapanGoogle Scholar
  67. Miller F, Osbahr H, Boyd E, Thomalla F, Bharwani S, Ziervogel G, Walker B, Birkmann J, Van der Leeuw S, Rockström J, Hinkel J, Downing T, Folke C (2010) Resilience and vulnerability: complementary or conflicting concepts? Ecol Soc 15(3):1–11Google Scholar
  68. Morrow BH (1999) Identifying and mapping vulnerability. Disasters 23(1):1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Morrow B (2008) Community resilience: a societal justice perspective. CARRI research report 4, Oak RidgeGoogle Scholar
  70. Nakashima M, Chusilp P (2003) A partial view of Japanese post-kobe seismic design and construction practices. Earthq Eng Eng Seismol 4(1):3–12Google Scholar
  71. Nardo M, Saisana M, Saltelli A, Tarantola S (2008) Handbook on constructing composite indicators: methodology and user guide. OECD Publishing, Paris, FranceGoogle Scholar
  72. Nevin A (2006) Homwownership in California: a CBIA economic treatice. California Building Industry Association, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  73. Noble M, Babita M, Barnes H, Dibben C, Magasela W, Noble S, Ntshongwana P, Phillips H, Raman S, Roberts B, Wright G, Zungu S (2006) The principle indices of multiple deprivations for South Africa 2001. OxfordGoogle Scholar
  74. Norris FH, Stevens SP, Pfefferbaum B, Wyche KF, Pfefferbaum RL (2008) Community resilience as a metaphor, theory, set of capacities and strategy for disaster readiness. Community Psychol 41:127–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. NRC (2010) Private-public sector collaboration to enhance community disaster resilience: a workshop report. National Research Council, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  76. Olick JK, Robbins J (1998) Social memory studies: from “collective memory” to historical sociology of mnemonic practices. Annu Rev Sociol 24:105–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Olsson P, Folke C, Berkes F (2004) Adaptive co-management for building resilience in social-ecological systems. Environ Manag 34:75–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Olwig FM (2012) Multi-sited resilience: the mutual construction of “local” and “global” understandings and practices of adaptation and innovation. Appl Geogr 33:112–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Pakistan Census Organization (1998) Pakistan census organization. Government of Pakistan, available at http://www.census.gov.pk/index.htm. Accessed 14 Mar 2011
  80. Paton D, Fohnston D (2001) Disasters and communities: vulnerability, resilience and preparedness. Disaster Prev Manag 10(4):270–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. PDMA (2006) Provincial disaster management plan for Baluchistan. Provincial Disaster Management Authority, BaluchistanGoogle Scholar
  82. Peluso NL, Humphrey CR, Fortmann LP (1994) The rock, the beach and the tidal pool: people and poverty in natural resource department areas. Soc Nat Resour 34:23-38Google Scholar
  83. Pethick J, Crooks S (2000) Development of a Coastal Vulnerability Index: a geomorphological perspective. Environ Conserv 27:359–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. PMD (2007) Seismic hazard analysis and Zonation for Pakistan. Pakistan Meteorological Office, Azad Jammu and KashmirGoogle Scholar
  85. QDA (1985) Quetta urban plan, Quetta development authority in collaboration with National Engineering Services Pakistan QDA, NESPAKGoogle Scholar
  86. Saisana M, Cartwright F (2007) Composite indicators: science or artifacts? In: Biannual Conference, European Survey Research Association, PragueGoogle Scholar
  87. Shaw R, Kobayashi M (2001) Role of schools in creating earthquake-safer environment. Disaster Manag Educ Facil 6:1–7Google Scholar
  88. Shaw R, Kobayashi SH, Kobayashi M (2004) Linking experience, education, perception and earthquake preparedness. Disaster Prev Manag 13(1):39–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Simpson DM (2008) Disaster preparedness measures: a test case development and application. Disaster Prev Manag 17(5):645–661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Smit B, Wandal J (2006) Adaptation, adaptative capacity and vulnerability. Glob Chang Res Inst 16:282–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Smit B, Burton I, Klein RJT, Street R (1999) The science of adaptation: a framework for assessment. Mitig Adapt Strat Glob Chang 4:199–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Sylves R (2007) Budgeting for local emergency management and homeland security. In: William L, Waugh Jr, Kathleen T (eds) Emergency management: principles and practice for local government. International City Manager Association, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  93. Taubenbock H, Post J, Roth A, Zosseder K, Strunz G, Dech S (2008) A conceptual vulnerability and risk framework as outline to identify capabilities of remote sensing. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 8:409–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Tierney KJ, Lindell MK, Perry RW (2001) Facing the unexpected: disaster preparedness and response in the United States, Natural hazards and disasters. Joseph Henry Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  95. Tobin G (1999) Sustainability and community resilience: the holy grail of hazard planning? Environ Hazards 1:13–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Turner II BL (2010) Vulnerability and resilience: coalescing or paralleling approaches for sustainability science? Global Environmental Change, Article in Press, G Model JGEC-789, pp 1–7Google Scholar
  97. Turner BL, Kasperson RE, Maston P, McMarthy JJ, Corell RW, Christensen L et al (2003) A framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science. Proceedings National Academy of Sciences, vol 100, pp 8074–8079 Google Scholar
  98. Twigg J (2007) Characteristics of a disaster-resilient community. Hazard Res Cent 1:1–36Google Scholar
  99. Uitto JI (1998) The geography of disaster vulnerability in megacities. Appl Geogr 18(1):7–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. UNDP (2004) Reducing disaster risk: a challenge for development. United Nations Development Program, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  101. UNDP (2005) Human development report 2005. United Nations Development Program, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  102. UNISDR (2009a) Terminology on disaster risk reduction. Available on http://www.unisdr.org/we/inform/terminology
  103. UNISDR (2009b) Global assessment report on disaster risk reduction. United Nations International Strategy for Disaster ReductionGoogle Scholar
  104. United States Census Bureau (2010) United States census, Bureau, available at http://www.census.gov/. Accessed 3 Mar 2011
  105. USAID (2006) Concepts and practices of “resilience”: a compilation form various secondary sources. United States Agency for International DevelopmentGoogle Scholar
  106. Vincent K (2004) Creating an index of social vulnerability to climate change for Africa. Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research, NorwichGoogle Scholar
  107. Wisner B, Blaikie P, Cannon T, Davis I (2004) At risk: natural hazards, people’s vulnerability and disasters, 2nd edn. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  108. Yamane T (1967) Statistics, an introductory analysis, 2nd edn. Harper and Row, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  109. Zaman S, Warnitchai P (2010) Probabilistic seismic hazard maps for Pakistan. In: International conference of earthquake engineering, Bangkok, ThailandGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Earth and Environmental Sciences (Geography)University of BaluchistanQuettaPakistan
  2. 2.Asian Institute of TechnologyBangkokThailand

Personalised recommendations