Natural Hazards

, Volume 63, Issue 2, pp 325–347 | Cite as

Social vulnerability indices: a comparative assessment using uncertainty and sensitivity analysis

Original Paper

Abstract

Social vulnerability indices have emerged over the past decade as quantitative measures of the social dimensions of natural hazards vulnerability. But how reliable are the index rankings? Validation of indices with external reference data has posed a persistent challenge in large part because social vulnerability is multidimensional and not directly observable. This article applies global sensitivity analyses to internally validate the methods used in the most common social vulnerability index designs: deductive, hierarchical, and inductive. Uncertainty analysis is performed to assess the robustness of index ranks when reasonable alternative index configurations are modeled. The hierarchical design was found to be the most accurate, while the inductive model was the most precise. Sensitivity analysis is employed to understand which decisions in the vulnerability index construction process have the greatest influence on the stability of output rankings. The deductive index ranks are found to be the most sensitive to the choice of transformation method, hierarchical models to the selection of weighting scheme, and inductive indices to the indicator set and scale of analysis. Specific recommendations for each stage of index construction are provided so that the next generation of social vulnerability indices can be developed with a greater degree of transparency, robustness, and reliability.

Keywords

Social vulnerability Uncertainty Sensitivity analysis Vulnerability Index Indicators 

References

  1. Aguña, C. G. and M. Kovacevic (2011) Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis of the human development index. United Nations Development Programme, Research Paper 2010/47Google Scholar
  2. Birkmann J (2006a) Indicators and criteria. Measuring vulnerability to natural hazards: towards disaster resilient societies. J. Birkmann. Tokyo: United Nations University Press: 55–77Google Scholar
  3. Birkmann J (2006b) Measuring vulnerability to natural hazards: towards disaster resilient societies. United Nations University Press, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  4. Borden KA, Schmidtlein MC, Emrich CT, Piegorsch WW, Cutter SL (2007) Vulnerability of US cities to environmental hazards. J Homel Secur Emerg Manage 4(2):1–21Google Scholar
  5. Burton CG (2010) Social vulnerability and hurricane impact modeling. Nat Hazards Rev 11(2):58–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Burton C, Cutter SL (2008) Levee failures and social vulnerability in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta area, California. Nat Hazards Rev 9(3):136–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. California OES (2010) State of California multi-hazard mitigation plan. Governor’s Office of Emergency Services, Sacramento, CAGoogle Scholar
  8. Chakraborty J, Tobin GA, Montz BE (2005) Population evacuation: assessing spatial variability in geophysical risk and social vulnerability to natural hazards. Nat Hazards Rev 6(1):23–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cherchye L, Lovell K, Moesena W, Puyenbroecka TV (2007) One market, one number? A composite indicator assessment of EU internal market dynamics. Eur Econ Rev 51:749–779CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. City of Cedar Rapids (2010) Other social effects report: city of Cedar Rapids, Iowa - Flood of 2008. Cedar RapidsGoogle Scholar
  11. Clark JR, Moul D (2003) Coverage improvement in Census 2000 Enumeration. US Census Bureau, Census 2000 testing, experimentation and evaluation programGoogle Scholar
  12. Clark G, Moser S, Ratick S, Dow K, Meyer W, Emani S, Jin W, Kasperson J, Kasperson R, Schwarz H (1998) Assessing the vulnerability of coastal communities to extreme storms: the case of revere, MA, USA. Mitig Adapt Strat Glob Change 3(1):59–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Collins TW, Grineski SE, Aguilar M (2009) Vulnerability to environmental hazards in the Ciudad Juárez (Mexico)-El Paso (USA) metropolis: A model for spatial risk assessment in transnational context. Appl Geogr 29(3):448–461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cutter SL (1996) Vulnerability to environmental hazards. Prog Hum Geogr 20:529–539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cutter SL, Mitchell JT, Scott MS (2000) Revealing the vulnerability of people and places: a case study of Georgetown County, South Carolina. Ann As Am Geogr 90(4):713–737CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cutter SL, Boruff BJ, Shirley WL (2003) Social vulnerability to environmental hazards. Soc Sci Q 84(1):242–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cutter SL, Burton CG, Emrich CT (2010) Disaster resilience indicators for benchmarking baseline conditions. J Homel Secur Emerg Manage 7:1–24Google Scholar
  18. Damm M (2010) Mapping social-ecological vulnerability to flooding: a sub-national approach for Germany. University of Bonn, PhD DissertationGoogle Scholar
  19. de Oliveira Mendes JM (2009) Social vulnerability indexes as planning tools: beyond the preparedness paradigm. J Risk Res 12(1):43–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. DP UN (2004) Reducing disaster risk: a challenge for development. In: Pelling M, Maskrev A, Ruiz P, Hall L (eds) United Nations development programme. Bureau for Crisis Prevention and Recovery, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. Dunning MC, Durden S (2011) Social vulnerability analysis methods for corps planning. I. f. W. resources. US Army Corps of Engineers, Institute for Water Resources, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  22. Dwyer A, Zoppou C, Nielsen O, Day S, Roberts S (2004) Quantifying social vulnerability: a methodology for identifying those at risk to natural hazards. Canberra, Geoscience AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  23. Emrich CT (2005) Social vulnerability in US metropolitan areas: improvements in hazard vulnerability assessment. University of South Carolina, PhD DissertationGoogle Scholar
  24. EPA (2009) Guidance on the development, evaluation, and application of environmental models. Office of the Science Advisor: Council for Regulatory Environmental Modeling, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  25. Esty DC, Levy M, Srebotnjak T, Alexander de Sherbinin (2005). 2005 Environmental Sustainability Index: Benchmarking National Environmental Stewardship. New Haven, Yale Center for Environmental Law & PolicyGoogle Scholar
  26. Fair Data (2003) “Undercount mapper: statistically adjusted PL94 data.” Nationwide dataset of block-level data extracted from the statistically adjusted 2000 census PL94-171 Retrieved April 18, 2009, from http://www.fairdata2000.com/Adjusted/index.html
  27. Fekete A (2009) Validation of a social vulnerability index in context to river-floods in Germany. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 9(2):393–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Fekete A (2011) Spatial disaster vulnerability and risk assessments: challenges in their quality and acceptance. Natural hazards: 1–18Google Scholar
  29. Finch C, Emrich CT, Cutter SL (2010) Disaster disparities and differential recovery in New Orleans. Popul Environ 31(4):179–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Flanagan BE, Gregory EW, Hallisey EJ, Heitgerd JL, Lewis B (2011) A social vulnerability index for disaster management. J Homel Secur Emerg Manage 8(1):1–22Google Scholar
  31. Gall M (2007) Indices of social vulnerability to natural hazards: a comparative evaluation. University of South Carolina, PhD DissertationGoogle Scholar
  32. Hebb A, Mortsch L (2007) Floods: mapping vulnerability in the upper Thames Watershed under a changing climate. University of Waterloo, Project Report XI, pp 1–53Google Scholar
  33. Holand IS, Lujala P, Rød JK (2011) Social vulnerability assessment for Norway: a quantitative approach. Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift - Norwegian Journal of Geography 65(1):1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. HVRI (2008) The SoVI Recipe from http://webra.cas.sc.edu/hvri/docs/SoVIRecipe.pdf
  35. Jones B, Andrey J (2007) Vulnerability index construction: methodological choices and their influence on identifying vulnerable neighborhoods. Int J Emerg Manag 4(2):269–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. JRC (2011) Simlab. Software package for uncertainty and sensitivity analysis. Joint Research Centre of the European Commission, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  37. King D, MacGregor C (2000) Using social indicators to measure community vulnerability to natural hazards. Australian J Emerg Manag 15(3):52–57Google Scholar
  38. Ledesma RD, Valero-Mora P (2007) Determining the number of factors to retain in EFA: an easy-to-use computer program for carrying out parallel analysis. Pract Assess, Res Eval 12(2):1–11Google Scholar
  39. Lein JK, Abel LE (2010) Hazard vulnerability assessment: how well does nature follow our rules? Environ Hazards 9(2):147–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mileti D (1999) Disasters by design: A reassessment of natural hazards in the United States. D.C., Joseph Henry Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  41. Montz BE, Evans TA (2001) GIS and social vulnerability analysis. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Coping with Flash Floods. E. Gruntfest and J. Handmer. Netherlands, pp 37–48Google Scholar
  42. Mustafa D, Ahmed S, Saroch E, Bell H (2011) Pinning down vulnerability: from narratives to numbers. Disasters 35(1):62–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Myers CA, Slack T, Singelmann J (2008) Social vulnerability and migration in the wake of disaster: the case of Hurricanes Katrina and Rita. Popul Environ 29(6):271–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. O’Connor BP (2000) SPSS and SAS programs for determining the number of components using parallel analysis and Velicer’s MAP test. Behav Res Methods Instr Comput 32(3):396–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. OECD (2008) Handbook on constructing composite indicators: methodology and user’s guide. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, ParisGoogle Scholar
  46. Parris TM, Kates RW (2003) Characterizing and measuring sustainable development. Annu Rev Environ Resour 28(1):559–586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Passel JS (2005) Estimates of the size and characteristics of the undocumented population. Pew Hispanic Center, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  48. Patil VH, Singh SN, Mishra S, Donavan DT (2007) “Parallel analysis engine to aid in determining the number of factors to retain.” Retrieved January 11, 2011, from http://ires.ku.edu/~smishra/parallelengine.htm
  49. Patil VH, Singh SN, Mishra S, Todd Donavan D (2008) Efficient theory development and factor retention criteria: Abandon the [] eigenvalue greater than one’criterion. J Bus Res 61(2):162–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Rygel L, O’Sullivan D, Yarnal B (2006) A Method for constructing a social vulnerability index: an application to hurricane storm surges in a developed country. Mitig Adapt Strat Glob Change 11(3):741–764CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Saisana M, Saltelli A (2008) Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis of the 2008 environmental performance index. Joint Research Centre of the European Commission, IspraGoogle Scholar
  52. Saisana M, Nardo M, Srebotnjak T (2005a) Robustness analysis of the 2005 environmental sustainability index. Joint Research Centre of the European Commission and the Yale Center for Environmental Law and Policy, IspraGoogle Scholar
  53. Saisana M, Saltelli A, Tarantola S (2005b) Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis techniques as tools for the quality assessment of composite indicators. J Roy Stat Soc 168(2):307–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Saltelli A, Tarantola S (2002) On the relative importance of input factors in mathematical models: safety assessment for nuclear waste disposal. J Am Stat As 97(459):702–709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Saltelli A, Ratto M, Andres T, Campolongo F, Cariboni J, Gatelli D, Saisana M, Tarantola S (2008) Global sensitivity analysis: the primer. Wiley, West SussexGoogle Scholar
  56. Schmidtlein MC, Deutsch RC, Piegorsch WW, Cutter SL (2008) A sensitivity analysis of the social vulnerability index. Risk Anal 28(4):1099–1114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Schmidtlein MC, Shafer JM, Berry M, Cutter SL (2010) Modeled earthquake losses and social vulnerability in Charleston, South Carolina. Appl Geogr 31(1):269–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Schneiderbauer S, Ehrlich D (2006) Social levels and hazard (in) dependence in determining vulnerability. In: Birkmann J (ed) Measuring vulnerability to natural hazards: towards disaster resilient societies. United Nations University Press, Tokyo, pp 78–102Google Scholar
  59. Tate E (2011) Indices of social vulnerability to hazards: model uncertainty and sensitivity. Department of Geography, University of South Carolina, PhD DissertationGoogle Scholar
  60. Tate E (forthcoming) Uncertainty analysis for a social vulnerability index. Annals of the association of American geographersGoogle Scholar
  61. Tate E, Cutter SL, Berry M (2010) Integrated multihazard mapping. Environ Plan B: Plan Des 37(4):646–663CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. UNDP (2010) The real wealth of nations: pathways to human development. Human development report. United Nations Development Programme, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  63. Villa F, McLeod H (2002) Environmental vulnerability indicators for environmental planning and decision-making: guidelines and applications. Environ Manage 29(3):335–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Vincent K (2004) Creating an index of social vulnerability to climate change in Africa. Working paper 56. London: Tyndall Centre for Climate Change ResearchGoogle Scholar
  65. Wisner B, Blaikie P, Cannon T, Davis I (2004) At risk: natural hazards. People’s Vulnerability and Disasters, New York, NY, RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  66. Wood NJ, Burton CG, Cutter SL (2010) Community variations in social vulnerability to Cascadia-related tsunamis in the US Pacific Northwest. Nat Hazards 52(2):369–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Wu SY, Yarnal B, Fisher A (2002) Vulnerability of coastal communities to sea level rise: a case study of Cape May County, New Jersey, USA. Clim Res 22:255–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Xu C, Gertner GZ (2008) A general first-order global sensitivity analysis method. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 93(7):1060–1071CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of GeographyUniversity of IowaIowa CityUSA

Personalised recommendations