Natural Hazards

, Volume 64, Issue 3, pp 2057–2082

Assessing multifaceted vulnerability and resilience in order to design risk-mitigation strategies

  • Scira Menoni
  • Daniela Molinari
  • Dennis Parker
  • Francesco Ballio
  • Sue Tapsell
Original Paper

DOI: 10.1007/s11069-012-0134-4

Cite this article as:
Menoni, S., Molinari, D., Parker, D. et al. Nat Hazards (2012) 64: 2057. doi:10.1007/s11069-012-0134-4

Abstract

Vulnerability studies have evolved significantly in recent decades. Although not overly theoretical compared with some other fields of science, some important conceptual progress has been made. At the practical level, vulnerability indicators have been used either at a generic level or for particular hazard contexts. However, these indicators are often predictably too narrow in their coverage of aspects of vulnerability. An important need remains to produce more conceptually informed vulnerability indicators or parameters and more satisfactory operational tools to assess weaknesses and resilience in coping with natural risks. In this paper, we present the methodology developed in the context of a recently concluded EU funded project, ENSURE (Enhancing resilience of communities and territories facing natural and na-tech hazards). The resulting vulnerability and resilience assessment framework tool adopts a systemic approach embedding and integrating as much as possible the multifaceted and articulated nature of concepts such as vulnerability and resilience. The tool guides evaluators towards a comprehensive and context-related understanding of strengths and fragilities of a given territory and community with respect to natural extremes. In this paper, both the framework tool and its application to Sondrio in Italy, which is exposed to flash floods, are presented and discussed. The merits and demerits of the new tool are discussed, and the results of the application to Sondrio indicate where data are currently missing, suggesting the kind of data, which will need to be gathered in future to achieve more complete assessments. The results also suggest vulnerability reduction policies and actions and further ways of revising the existing framework tool in the future.

Keywords

Vulnerability Resilience Integrated vulnerability assessment Resilience assessment Flash floods 

Supplementary material

11069_2012_134_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (31 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 30 kb)
11069_2012_134_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (23 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (PDF 23 kb)
11069_2012_134_MOESM3_ESM.pdf (27 kb)
Supplementary material 3 (PDF 26 kb)
11069_2012_134_MOESM4_ESM.pdf (50 kb)
Supplementary material 4 (PDF 49 kb)

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Scira Menoni
    • 1
  • Daniela Molinari
    • 2
  • Dennis Parker
    • 3
  • Francesco Ballio
    • 2
  • Sue Tapsell
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Architecture and PlanningPolitecnico di MilanoMilanItaly
  2. 2.Department of Environmental, Hydraulic, Infrastructures and Surveying EngineeringPolitecnico di MilanoMilanItaly
  3. 3.Flood Hazard Research CentreMiddlesex UniversityQueensway, EnfieldUK

Personalised recommendations