Natural Hazards

, Volume 59, Issue 3, pp 1619–1634 | Cite as

The effects of transportation network failure on people’s accessibility to hurricane disaster relief goods: a modeling approach and application to a Florida case study

  • Mark W. HornerEmail author
  • Michael J. Widener
Original Paper


Following the catastrophic and devastating Atlantic Hurricane seasons in 2004 and 2005, there has been increased interest in formulating planning directives and policy aimed at minimizing the societal impacts of future storms. Not all populations will evacuate an area forecast to be affected by a hurricane, so emergency managers must plan for these people who remain behind. Such planning includes making food, water, ice, and other provisions available at strategic locations throughout an affected area. Recent research has tackled problems related to humanitarian and relief goods distribution with respect to hurricanes. Experience shows that the torrential rains and heavy winds associated with hurricanes can severely damage transportation network infrastructure rendering it unusable. Scanning the literature on hurricane disaster relief provision, there are no studies that expressly consider the potential damage that may be caused to a transportation network by strong storms. This paper examines the impacts of simulated network failures on hurricane disaster relief planning strategies, using a smaller Florida City as an example. A relief distribution protocol is assumed where goods distribution points are set up in pre-determined locations following the passage of a storm. Simulation results reveal that modest disruptions to the transportation network produce marked changes in the number and spatial configuration of relief facilities. At the same time, the transportation network appears to be robust and is able to support relief service provision even at elevated levels of hypothesized disruption.


Disaster relief Hurricanes Networks Transportation Computation Simulation GIS 



This paper is partially based on work supported by the US National Science Foundation under Grant No. (BCS-0550330) awarded to the first author (Mark W. Horner). Any opinions, findings, and/or results expressed in this manuscript are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.


  1. Baker EJ (1991) Hurricane evacuation behavior. Int J Mass Emerg Disast 9(2):287–310Google Scholar
  2. Balakrishna R, Yang W, Ben-Akiva M, Antoniou C (2008) Simulation-based framework for transportation network management in emergencies. Transp Res Rec 2041:80–88Google Scholar
  3. Balcik B, Beamon BM (2008) Facility location in humanitarian relief. Int J Logist Res Appl 11(2):101–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barbarosoglu G, Arda Y (2004) A two-stage stochastic programming framework for transportation planning in disaster response. J Oper Res Soc 55(1):43–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brown G, Carlyle M, Diehl D, Kline J, Wood K (2005) A two-sided optimization for theater ballistic missile defense. Oper Res 53(5):745–763CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brown C, White W, van Slyke C, Benson JD (2009) Development of a strategic hurricane evacuation-dynamic traffic assignment model for the Houston, Texas, Region. Transp Res Rec 2137:46–53Google Scholar
  7. Chang M-S, Tseng Y-L, Chen J-W (2007) A scenario planning approach for the flood emergency logistics preparation problem under uncertainty. Transport Res E Logist Transport Rev 43(6):737CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Current J, Ratick S, ReVelle C (1998) Dynamic facility location when the total number of facilities is uncertain: a decision analysis approach. Eur J Oper Res 110(3):597–609CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cutter SL, Boruff BJ, Shirley WL (2003) Social vulnerability to environmental hazards. Soc Sci Q 84(2):242–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cutter SL, Emrich CT, Mitchell JT, Boruff BJ, Gall M, Schmidtlein MC, Burton CG, Melton G (2006) The long road home: race, class, and recovery from Hurricane Katrina. Environment 48(2):8–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dow K, Cutter SL (2002) Emerging hurricane evacuation issues: Hurricane Floyd and South Carolina. Nat Hazards Rev 3(1):12–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Drezner T (2009) Location of retail facilities under conditions of uncertainty. Ann Oper Res 167(1):107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Elsner JB, Jagger TH (2006) Comparison of hindcasts anticipating the 2004 Florida Hurricane season. Weather Forecast 21(2):182–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fu HQ, Wilmot CG (2006) Survival analysis-based dynamic travel demand models for hurricane evacuation. Transp Res Rec 1964:211–218Google Scholar
  15. Ghanmi A, Shaw R (2008) Modelling and analysis of Canadian Forces strategic lift and pre-positioning options. J Oper Res Soc 59(12):1591–1602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hale TS, Moberg CR (2003) Location science research: a review. Ann Oper Res 123(1–4):21–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hale T, Moberg C (2005) Improving supply chain disaster preparedness? A decision process for secure site location. Int J Phys Distribut Logist Manage 33(3):195–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Heng W, Zeng QA, Hong H, Wang XH, Kukreti AR (2008) Integrated urban evacuation planning framework for responding to human-caused disasters over a surface transportation network. Transp Res Rec 2041:29–37Google Scholar
  19. Hiatt LM, Simmons R (2007) Pre-positioning assets to increase execution efficiency. In: Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, vols 1–10. IEEE, New York, pp 324–329Google Scholar
  20. Holguin-Veras J, Perez N, Ukkusuri S, Wachtendorf T, Brown B (2007) Emergency logistics issues affecting the response to Katrina—a synthesis and preliminary suggestions for improvement. Transp Res Rec 2022:76–82Google Scholar
  21. Horner MW, Downs JA (2007) Testing a flexible GIS-based network flow model for routing hurricane disaster relief goods. Transp Res Rec 2022:47–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Horner MW, Downs JA (2008) An analysis of the effects of socio-economic status on hurricane disaster relief plans. Transp Res Rec 2067:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Horner MW, Downs JA (2010) Optimizing hurricane disaster relief goods distribution: model development and application with respect to planning strategies. Disasters 34(3):821–844CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kar B, Hodgson ME (2008) A GIS-based model to determine site suitability of emergency evacuation shelters. Trans GIS 12(2):227–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Larimer S (2008) Florida homes evacuated as waters rise in wake of fay. USA Today, 8/24/2008Google Scholar
  26. Lindell MK, Prater CS (2007) Critical behavioral assumptions in evacuation time estimate analysis for private vehicles: examples from hurricane research and planning. J Urban Plan Dev Asce 133(1):18–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Management FDoE (2004) Comprehensive emergency management plan, vol 2007.
  28. Management FDoE (2006) County logistics planning standard—operating guidelineGoogle Scholar
  29. Miller HJ, Shaw S-L (2001) Geographic information systems for transportation. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  30. Pielke R, Gratz J, Landsea C, Collins D, Saunders M, Musulin R (2008) Normalized hurricane damages to the United States. Nat Hazards Rev 9(1):29–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ratick S, Meacham B, Aoyama Y (2008) Locating backup facilities to enhance supply chain disaster resilience. Growth Change 39(4):642–666CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rawls CG, Turnquist MA (2010) Pre-positioning of emergency supplies for disaster response. Transport Res B Methodol 44(4):521–534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. ReVelle CS, Swain RW (1970) Central facilities location. Geogr Anal 2(1):30–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sheu JB (2010) Dynamic relief-demand management for emergency logistics operations under large-scale disasters. Transp Res Pt e-Logist Transp Rev 46(1):1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Snyder LV (2006) Facility location under uncertainty: a review. IIE Trans 38(7):537–554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Tanaka K, Nagatani T, Hanaura H (2007) Traffic congestion and dispersion in hurricane evacuation. Phys A Stat Mech Appl 376:617–627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Teixeira JC, Antunes AP (2008) A hierarchical location model for public facility planning. Eur J Oper Res 185(1):92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Widener MJ, Horner MW (2010) A hierarchical approach to modeling hurricane disaster relief goods distribution. J Transp Geogr. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2010.10.006
  39. Wolshon B (2006) Evacuation planning and engineering for hurricane Katrina. The Bridge 36(1):27–34Google Scholar
  40. Yuan F, Han LD (2009) Improving evacuation planning with sensible measure of effectiveness choices case study. Transp Res Rec 2137:54–62Google Scholar
  41. Zahran S, Brody SD, Peacock WG, Vedlitz A, Grover H (2008) Social vulnerability and the natural and built environment: a model of flood casualties in Texas. Disasters 32(4):537CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Florida State UniversityTallahasseeUSA
  2. 2.University at BuffaloBuffaloUSA

Personalised recommendations