Natural Hazards

, Volume 63, Issue 3, pp 1451–1470 | Cite as

Performance of nested WRF model in typhoon simulations over West Pacific and South China Sea

  • Jayaraman Potty
  • S. M. Oo
  • P. V. S. Raju
  • U. C. Mohanty
Original Paper

Abstract

Forecasting skill of weather research and forecasting (WRF) model in simulating typhoons over the West Pacific and South China Sea with different trajectories has been studied in terms of track direction and intensity. Four distinct types of typhoons are chosen for this study in such a way that one of them turns toward left during its motion and had landfall, while the second took a right turn before landfall. The third typhoon followed almost a straight line path during its course of motion, while the fourth typhoon tracked toward the coast and just before landfall, ceased its motion and travelled in reverse direction. WRF model has been nested in one way with a coarse resolution of 9 km and a fine resolution of 3 km for this study, and the experiments are performed with National Center for Environmental Prediction-Global Forecasting System (NCEP-GFS) analyses and forecast fields. The model has been integrated up to 96 h and the simulation results are compared with observed and analyzed fields. The results show that the WRF model could satisfactorily simulate the typhoons in terms of time and location of landfall, mean sea-level pressure, maximum wind speed, etc. Results also show that the sensitivity of model resolution is less in predicting the track, while the fine-resolution model component predicted slightly better in terms of central pressure drop and maximum wind. In the case of typhoon motion speed, the coarse-resolution component of the model predicted the landfall time ahead of the actual, whereas the finer one produced either very close to the best track or lagging little behind the best track though the difference in forecast between the model components is minimal. The general tendency of track error forecast is that it increases almost linearly up to 48 h of model simulations and then it diverges quickly. The results also show that the salient features of typhoons such as warm central core, radial increase of wind speed, etc. are simulated well by both the coarse and fine domains of the WRF model.

Keywords

Typhoons West Pacific Ocean WRF nested model 

References

  1. Asnani GC (1993) Tropical meteorology. Published by Prof. G.C. AsnaniGoogle Scholar
  2. Carr LE, Elsberry RL (1994) Systematic and integrated approach to tropical cyclone track forecasting Part 1. Approach overview and description of meteorological basis. NPS-MR-94-002, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, CA 93943, 273 ppGoogle Scholar
  3. Carr LE III, Elseberry RL (1995) Monsoonal interactions leading to sudden tropical cyclone track changes. Mon Weather Rev 123:265–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carr LE, Elseberry RL (2000a) Dynamical tropical cyclone track forecast errors part I: tropical region error sources. Weather Forecast 15:641–661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carr LE, Elseberry RL (2000b) Dynamical tropical cyclone track forecast errors part II: midlatitude circulation influences. Weather Forecast 15:662–681CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chan JCL (1984) An observational study of the physical processes responsible for tropical cyclone motion. J Atmos Sci 41:1036–1048CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chan JCL (2009) Thermodynamic control on the climate of intense tropical cyclones. Proc R Soc A 465:3011–3021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chan CLC, Gray WM (1982) Tropical cyclone movement and surrounding flow relationships. Mon Weather Rev 110:1354–1374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chan CLC, Gray WM, Kiddder SQ (1980) Forecasting tropical cyclone turning motion from surrounding wind and temperature fields. Mon Weather Rev 108:778–792CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cheng WYY, Steenbyrgh WJ (2005) Evaluation of surface sensible weather forecasts by WRF and ETA models over the Western United states. Weather Forecast 20:812–821CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Davis C, Wang W, Chen SS, Chen Y, Corbosiero K, DeMaria M, Dudhia J, Holland G, Klemp J, Michalakes J, Reeves H, Rotunno R, Xiao Q (2008) Prediction of landfalling hurricanes with the advanced Hurricane WRF model. Mon Weather Rev 136:1990–2005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dudhia J (1989) Numerical study of convection observed during the winter monsoon experiment using a mesoscale two-dimensional model. J Atmos Sci 46:3077–3177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dudhia J (2004) The Weather Research and Forecasting Model (Version 2.0). In: 2nd International workshop on next generation NWP model. Seoul, Korea, Yonsei University, pp 19–23Google Scholar
  14. Fiorino M, Elsberry RL (1989) Some aspects of vortex structure related to tropical cyclone motion. J Atmos Sci 46:975–990CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fujiwhara S (1921) The natural tendency towards symmetry of motion and its application as principle in meteorology. Q J R Meteorol Soc 47:287–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hong SY, Noh Y, Dudhia J (2006) A new vertical diffusion package with an explicit treatment of entrainment processes. Mon Weather Rev 134:2318–2341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kain JS, Fritsch JM (1993) Convective parameterization for mesoscale models: the Kain–Fritsch Scheme, the representation of cumulus convection in numerical models. In: Emanual, KA, Raymond, DJ (eds) American Meteorological SocietyGoogle Scholar
  18. Krishnamurti TN, Bedi HS, Yap KS, Oosterhof D (1993) Hurricane Forecasts in the FSU models. Adv Atmos Sci 1:121–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Litta AJ, Mohanty UC (2008) Simulation of a severe thunderstorm event during the field experiment of STORM programme 2006, using WRF-NMM model. Curr Sci 95:204–215Google Scholar
  20. Mandal M, Mohanty UC, Raman S (2004) A study on the impact of parameterization of physical processes on prediction of tropical cyclones over the Bay of Bengal with NCAR/PSU mesoscale model. Nat Hazards 31:391–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Neumann CJ (1981) Trends in forecasting the tracks of Atlantic tropical cyclones. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 62:1473–1485Google Scholar
  22. Neumann CJ (1993) Global guide to tropical cyclone forecaster (Chapter 1) WMO technical document. WMO/TD-No. 560, Tropical Cyclone Programme, project no 16, report no TCP-31Google Scholar
  23. Patra PK, Santhanam MS, Potty KVJ, Tewari M, Rao PLS (2000) Simulation of tropical cyclones using regional weather prediction models. Curr Sci 79(1):70–78Google Scholar
  24. Pattanayak S, Mohanty UC (2008) A comparative study on performance of MM5 and WRF models in simulation of cyclones over Indian seas. Curr Sci 95:923–936Google Scholar
  25. Raju PVS, Jayaraman Potty, Mohanty UC (2011) Sensitivity of Physical Parameterisation on prediction of tropical cyclone Nargis over the Bay of Bengal using WRF Model. Meteorol Atmos Phys 113:125–137. doi:10.1007/s00703-011-0151-y
  26. Riehl H (1979) Climate and weather in the tropics. Academic Press, New York, p 611Google Scholar
  27. Routray A, Mohanty UC, Niyogi D, Rizvi SRH, Osuri KK (2010) Simulation of heavy rainfall events over Indian monsoon region using WRF-3DVAR data assimilation system. Meteorol Atmos Phys 106:107–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Segami A, Kurihara K, Nakamura H, Ueno M, Takano I, Tatsumi Y (1989) Operational meso scale weather prediction with Japan spectral model. J Meteorol Soc Jpn 67:907–924Google Scholar
  29. Sugi M, Noda A, Sato A (2002) Influence of global warming on tropical cyclone climatology: an experiment with the JMA global model. J Meteorol Soc Jpn 80:249–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Vijaya Kumar TSV, Krishnamurti TN, Fiorino Michael, Nagata Masashi (2003) Multimodel superensemble forecasting of tropical cyclones in the Pacific. Mon Weather Rev 131:574–583CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jayaraman Potty
    • 1
  • S. M. Oo
    • 2
  • P. V. S. Raju
    • 1
  • U. C. Mohanty
    • 3
  1. 1.Regional Integrated Multi Hazard Early Warning System (RIMES)Klong Luang, BangkokThailand
  2. 2.Department of Meteorology and HydrologyNay Pyi TawMyanmar
  3. 3.Centre for Atmospheric SciencesIndian Institute of TechnologyHauz Khas, New DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations