Natural Hazards

, Volume 61, Issue 1, pp 247–256 | Cite as

Modelling the rainfall-induced mobilization of a large slope movement in northern Calabria

  • Giovanna Capparelli
  • Pasquale Iaquinta
  • Giulio G. R. Iovine
  • Oreste G. Terranova
  • Pasquale Versace
Original Paper


Two recent phases of mobilization of a large, rainfall-induced debris slide are analysed in terms of relationships between rains and phases of displacement. The first activation at San Rocco (San Benedetto Ullano, Calabria) occurred on 28 January 2009, after extraordinary rains had stricken the region for a couple of months. Detailed geomorphologic field surveys, combined with measurements of superficial displacements at datum points, were performed to properly recognize the evolution of the phenomenon. In addition, a real-time control system of rains and superficial displacements measured at extensometers was implemented, to better analyse the evolution of the phenomenon. In early May 2009, the activity reduced to very slow displacements, persisting in the same condition for the following 8 months. On 1 February 2010, premonitory signs of a new phase of activation were noticed, again following 2 months of extraordinary rainfalls. After few days of further precipitations, the middle sector of the landslide activated since 11 February, disrupting the road network and threatening the major lifelines and some buildings. A hydrological analysis aimed at simulating the dates of activation and the main phases of acceleration of the phenomenon was carried out, by calibrating the empirical model FLaIR against the daily rainfalls and the history of known phases of mobilization since 1970. Calibration allowed to successfully simulate both the cited phases of activity of the San Rocco landslide, by predicting the beginning of the movements as well as the following paroxysmal stages, as testified by the measurements at datum points and extensometers. The set of parameters obtained through calibration reflects the influence of both prolonged antecedent rains, and of high-intensity rainfalls of shorter duration, which slightly preceded the major displacements. Once calibrated the model, a suitable threshold could be defined, by analysing the trend of the mobility function against the history of activations of the considered slope movement, and by excluding false alarms. Accordingly, a reliable tool for predicting the phases of activity of a large slope movement could therefore be obtained.


Rainfall-induced landslide Geomorphological survey Superficial displacements Hydrological modelling 



Authors are grateful to S. L. Gariano for drawing some of the illustrations and to the anonymous referees who helped through precious suggestions to improve the original manuscript. The study was partly funded by the Administration of San Benedetto Ullano. The in situ monitoring system was implemented by the Advanced Devices S.p.A.


  1. Amodio Morelli L, Bonardi G, Colonna V, Dietrich D, Giunta G, Ippolito F, Liguori V, Lorenzoni S, Paglionico A, Perrone V, Piccarreta G, Russo M, Scandone P, Zanettin Lorenzoni E, Zuppetta A (1976) L’arco calabro–peloritano nell’orogene appenninico–maghrebide. Mem Soc Geol Italy 17:1–60 (in Italian)Google Scholar
  2. Campbell RK (1975) Soil slips, debris flows and rainstorms in the Santa Monica Mountains and vicinity, Southern California. U.S. Geol. Survey, Professional Paper 851, 51 ppGoogle Scholar
  3. Capparelli G, Tiranti D (2010) Application of the MoniFLaIR early warning system for rainfall-induced landslides in Piedmont region (Italy). Landslides. doi: 10.1007/s10346–009–0189–9
  4. Cascini L, Versace P (1988) Relationship between rainfall and landslide in a gneissic cover. In: Bonnard C (ed) Proceedings of V international symposium on landslides, 10–15 July, Lausanne, Switzerland. A. A. Balkema, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, pp 565–570Google Scholar
  5. CASMEZ (1967) Carta Geologica della Calabria, F.229IIINE “Lattarico” (in scale 1/25000). Poligrafica & Carte Valori, Ercolano (Napoli), Italy (in Italian)Google Scholar
  6. Crosta GB, Agliardi F (2003) Failure forecast for large rock slides by surface displacement measurements. Can Geotech J 40:176–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. De Vita P, Reichenbach P (1998) Rainfall-triggered landslides: a reference list. Env Geol 35(2–3):219–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Glade T, Crozier M, Smith P (2000) Applying probability determination to refine landslide-triggering rainfall thresholds using empirical “antecedent daily rainfall model”. Pure Appl Geophys 157:1059–1079CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Iiritano G, Versace P, Sirangelo B (1998) Real-time estimation of hazard for landslides triggered by rainfall. Env Geol 35(2–3):175–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Iovine G, Iaquinta P, Terranova O (2009) Emergency management of landslide risk during Autumn–Winter 2008/2009 in Calabria (Italy). The example of San Benedetto Ullano. In: Anderssen RS, Braddock RD, Newham LTH (eds) Proceedings of 18th World IMACS Congress and MODSIM09 Int. Congress on Modelling and Simulation, pp 2686–2693Google Scholar
  11. Iovine G, Lollino P, Gariano SL, Terranova O (2010) Coupling limit equilibrium analyses and real-time monitoring to refine a landslide surveillance system in Calabria (southern Italy). NHESS 10. In: Iovine GGR, Huebl J, Pastor M, Sheridan MF (eds) special issue on “approaches to hazard evaluation, mapping, and mitigation”. doi: 10.5194/nhess-10-1-2010
  12. Keefer DK, Wilson RC, Mark RK, Brabb EE, Brown WM III, Ellen SD, Harp EL, Wieczorek GF, Alger CS, Zatkin RS (1987) Real-time landslide warning during heavy rainfall. Science 238:921–925CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Monaco C, Tortorici L (2000) Active faulting in the Calabrian arc and eastern Sicily. J Geodyn 29:407–424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Muntohar AS, Liao HJ (2009) Analysis of rainfall-induced infinite slope failure during typhoon using a hydrological-geotechnical model. Env Geol 56:1145–1159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ramesh MV (2009) Real-time wireless sensor network for landslide detection. In: The third international conference on sensor technologies and applications. SENSORCOMM 2009, Athens/Glyfada, Greece, 18–23 June 2009, pp 405–409Google Scholar
  16. Rose ND, Hungr O (2007) Forecasting potential rock failure in open pit mines using the inverse-velocity method. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 44:308–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Simoni S, Zanoti F, Bertoldi G, Rigon R (2007) Modelling the probability of occurrence of shallow landslides and channelized debris flow using GEOtop_FS. Hydrol Process 22(4):532–545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Sirangelo B, Versace P (1992) Modelli stocastici di precipitazione e soglie pluviometriche di innesco dei movimenti franosi. In: Proceedings of XXIII Convegno Nazionale di Idraulica e Costruzioni Idrauliche, Firenze, Italy, III, pp D361–D373 (in Italian)Google Scholar
  19. Sirangelo B, Versace P (1996) A real time forecasting for landslides triggered by rainfall. Meccanica 31:1–13Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Giovanna Capparelli
    • 1
  • Pasquale Iaquinta
    • 2
  • Giulio G. R. Iovine
    • 2
  • Oreste G. Terranova
    • 2
  • Pasquale Versace
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Soil Defence “V. Marone”, Faculty of EngineeringUniversity of CalabriaCosenzaItaly
  2. 2.CNR–IRPINational Research Council, Institute of research for geo–hydrologic protectionRendeItaly

Personalised recommendations