Natural Hazards

, Volume 54, Issue 3, pp 707–723

A severe sea-effect snow episode over the city of Istanbul

Original Paper

Abstract

In February 2005, unexpected heavy snowstorms lasted a couple of days with changing intensities, producing significant snowfall that eventually paralyzed the life of Istanbul metropolis. Surprisingly, there was no caution announcement prior to the onset of this unusual weather phenomenon. What was the reason behind this wrong prediction? In this case study, using a meteorological model, a heavy sea-effect snowfall, the reason of this phenomenon, was simulated and researched. With a persistent surface high-pressure center over western Russia, a surface low-pressure positioned in the center of southern Turkey was the dominant feature of the formation of the sea-effect snow over the city. In addition to strong northerly winds (19 m/s), low directional vertical wind shear (<30o) and extremely long fetch distance (~600 km) feature; environmental conditions during the event were characterized by a sea-surface 850-hPa temperature difference of up to 14°C and a sea–land temperature difference as high as 24°C.

Keywords

Sea-effect snow The black sea MM5 Synoptic-mesoscale conditions 

References

  1. Ballentine RJ (1982) Numerical simulation of land-breeze-induced snowbands along the western shore of Lake Michigan. Mon Wea Rev 110:1544–1553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ballentine RJ, Stamm AJ, Chermack EE, Byrd GP, Schleede D (1998) Mesoscale model simulation of the 4–5 January 1995 lake-effect snowstorm. Mon Wea Rev 13:892–920Google Scholar
  3. Braham RR Jr (1983) The midwest snow storm of 8–11 December 1977. Mon Wea Rev 111:253–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carpenter DM (1993) The lake effect of the Great Salt Lake: overview and forecast problems. Wea Forecast 8:181–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cooper KA, Hjelmfelt MR, Kristovich DAR, Derickson RG, Laird NF (2000) Numerical simulations of an observed lake effect snow storm with transitions between linear and cellular convective structures. Mon Wea Rev 128:3283–3295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Douglas MW, Stensrud DJ (1996) Upgrading the North American upper-air observing network: what are the possibilities? Bull Amer Meteor Soc 77:907–924CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dudhia J (1989) Numerical study of convection observed during winter monsoon experiment using a mesoscale two-dimensional model. J Atmos Sci 46:3077–3107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ezber Y, Sen OL, Kindap T, Karaca M (2007) Climatic effects of urbanization in Istanbul: a statistical and modeling analysis. Int J Climatol 27:667–679CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Grell GA, Dudhia J, Stauffer DR (1994) A description of the fifth-generation penn state/NCAR mesoscale model (MM5). National center for atmospheric research, Boulder, CO, NCAR/TN-389+STRGoogle Scholar
  10. Gustafsson N, Kallen E, Thorsteinsson S (1998) Sensitivity of forecast errors to initial and lateral boundary conditions. Tellus 50A:167–185Google Scholar
  11. Hjelmfelt MR (1990) Numerical study of the influence of environmental conditions on lake-effect snowstorms on Lake Michigan. Mon Wea Rev 118:138–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hjelmfelt MR (1992) Orographic effects in simulated lake-effect snowstorms over Lake Michigan. Mon Wea Rev 120:373–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hjelmfelt MR, Braham RR Jr (1983) Numerical simulation of the airflow over Lake Michigan for a major lake-effect snow event. Mon Wea Rev 111:205–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Holyroyd EW III (1971) Lake effect cloud bands as seen from weather satellites. J Atmos Sci 28:1165–1170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hong SY, Pan HL (1996) Nonlocal boundary layer vertical diffusion in a medium range forecast model. Mon Wea Rev 124:2322–2339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jiusto JE, Kaplan ML (1972) Snowfall from lake-effect storms. Mon Wea Rev 100:62–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kain JS (2004) The kain-fritsch convective parameterization: an update. J Appl Meteor 43:170–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kindap T (2008) Identifying the trans-boundary transport of air pollutants to the city of Istanbul under specific weather conditions. Water Air Soil Pollut 189:279–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kindap T, Unal A, Chen S-H, Hu Y, Odman MT, Karaca M (2006) Long-range aerosol transport from Europe to Istanbul, Turkey. Atmos Environ 40:3536–3547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kristovich DAR, Laird NF, Hjelmfelt MR (2002) Convective evolution across Lake Michigan during a widespread lake-effect snow event. Mon Wea Rev 131:643–655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lavoie RL (1972) A mesoscale numerical model of lake-effect storms. J Atmos Sci 29:1025–1040CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lin YL, Smith RB (1986) Transient dynamics of airflow near a local heat source. J Atmos Sci 43:40–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Miner TJ, Fritsch JM (1997) Lake-effect rain events. Mon Wea Rev 125:3231–3248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mlawer EJ, Taubman SJ, Brown PD, Iacono MJ, Clough SA (1997) Radiative transfer for inhomogeneous atmospheres: RRTM, a validated correlated-k model for the longwave. J Geophys Res 102:16663–16682CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Niziol TA (1987) Operational forecasting of lake-effect snowfall in western and central New York. Wea Forecast 2:310–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Niziol TA, Snyder WR, Waldstreicher JS (1995) Winter weather forecasting throughout the eastern United States. Part IV: lake effect snow. Wea Forecast 10:61–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Onton DJ, Steenburgh WJ (2001) Diagnostic and sensitivity studies of the 7 December 1998 Great Salt Lake–effect snowstorm. Mon Wea Rev 129:1273–1293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Passarelli RE, Braham RR Jr (1981) The role of the winter land breeze in the formation of Great Lakes snowstorms. Bull Amer Meteor Soc 62:482–491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Peace RL, Sykes RB Jr (1966) Mesoscale study of a lake effect snowstorm. Mon Wea Rev 94:495–507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rabier F, Clinker E, Courtier P, Hollingsworth A (1996) Sensitivity of forecast errors to initial conditions. Q J R Meteorol Soc 122:121–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rothrock HJ (1969) An aid in forecasting significant lake snows. ESSA Tech Memo. WBTM CR-30, p 11 (Available from national weather service central region, Room 1836, 601 E. 12th St., Kansas City, MO 64106-2897)Google Scholar
  32. Scott CPJ, Sousounis PJ (2001) The utility of additional soundings for forecasting lake-effect snow in the great lakes region. Weather Forecast 16(4):448–462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sousounis PJ, Mann GE, Young GSR, Wagenmaker B, Hoggatt BD, Badini WJ (1999) Forecasting during the lake-ICE/SNOWBANDS field experiments. Wea Forecast 14:955–975CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Steenburgh WJ, Onton DJ (2000) Multiscale analysis of the 7 December 1998 great salt lake-effect snowstorm. Mon Wea Rev 129:1296–1313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Steenburgh WJ, Halvorson SF, Onton DJ (2000) Climatology of lake-effect snowstorms of the Great Salt Lake. Mon Wea Rev 128:709–727CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Warner TT, Key LE, Lario AM (1989) Sensitivity of mesoscale-model forecast skill to some initial-data characteristics, data density, data position, analysis procedure and measurement error. Mon Wea Rev 117:1281–1310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wiggin BL (1950) Great snows of the great lakes. Weatherwise 3:123–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Eurasia Institute of Earth SciencesIstanbul Technical UniversityMaslak, IstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations