Advertisement

Natural Hazards

, Volume 54, Issue 2, pp 497–518 | Cite as

News coverage of drought impacts and vulnerability in the US Carolinas, 1998–2007

  • Kirstin DowEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

Regional newspaper coverage from 1998 to 2007 is examined to expand our understanding of the complexity of drought impacts and vulnerability in the Carolinas. Coverage at the height of two droughts reports drought effects extending beyond first-order impacts on broadly recognized sectors, such as agriculture, livestock, and water supplies to recreation and tourism and impacts on businesses, manufacturing, and households. Impacts were accompanied by social controversies with near-term and long-term planning and development implications. Key concepts in vulnerability analysis were used to structure the review of vulnerability reporting. The coverage of differential vulnerability, although limited, identified individual, household, local, and cross-scale factors that influenced the severity of impacts. Articles also highlighted additional interacting stresses in some sectors contributing to the severity of impacts experienced. An elaborated understanding of drought impacts and vulnerabilities is a necessary, early step in advancing efforts to developing a risk-based drought management approach.

Keywords

Drought Vulnerability Impacts Southeastern US 

Notes

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank the reviewers for their helpful suggestions and my colleagues Greg Carbone, Kirsten Lackstrom, and Sara Yorty for the discussions that helped me integrate these issues. The work is supported by a grant from NOAA’s Climate Program Office, Regional Integrated Sciences and Assessments Program Award number NA06OAR4310007.

References

  1. Adger WN (2006) Vulnerability. Glob Environ Change 16:268–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. AP, Associated Press (1998) Prepare for drought, forecasters warn. The Post and Courier, Charleston, SCGoogle Scholar
  3. AP, Associated Press State & Local Wire (2005) No rain in N.C. means drought conditions spread, worsen, November 15, 2005 TuesdayGoogle Scholar
  4. Baldwin A (2007) Lawn care industry thirsty for business: with fewer appointments, companies hiring fewer workers. The Charlotte Observer, Charlotte, NC, September 13, 2007 ThursdayGoogle Scholar
  5. Biesecker M (2002) Triad is wasting water, study says researchers find urban sprawl increasing effects of drought. Winston-Salem Journal, Winston Salem, NC, August 30, 2002 FridayGoogle Scholar
  6. Binker M (2002) Landscapers complain rules wilt business. News & Record Greensboro, North Carolina, September 4, 2002 WednesdayGoogle Scholar
  7. Carbone GJ, Rhee J, Mizzell H et al (2008) A regional-scale drought monitor for the Carolinas. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 88(12):20–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chambers R (1989) Vulnerability, coping and policy. IDS Bull 20(2):1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Changnon SA, Easterling WE (1989) Measuring drought impacts—the Illinois case. Water Resour Bull 25(1):27–42Google Scholar
  10. Clary E (2002) With land dry, some Charlotte, N.C.-area businesses blossom. The Charlotte Observer, August 16, 2002 FridayGoogle Scholar
  11. Collins J (2002) Drought causes upstate streams to disappear. The State, Columbia, SC, August 20, 2002 TuesdayGoogle Scholar
  12. Collins TW, Bolin B (2007) Characterizing vulnerability to water scarcity: the case of a groundwater-dependent, rapidly urbanizing region. Environ Hazards 7:399–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cross JA (1994) Agroclimatic hazards and dairy farming in wisconsin. Geogr Rev 84(3):277–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. DeGaetano AT (1999) A temporal comparison of drought impacts and responses in the New York city metropolitan area. Clim Change 42(3):539–560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dow K (1992) Exploring differences in our common future(s): the meaning of vulnerability to global environmental change. Geoforum 23:417–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Eakin H, Luers AL (2006) Assessing the vulnerability of social-environmental systems. Ann Rev Environ Resour 31:365–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Earl J, Martin A, McCarthy JD et al (2004) The use of newspaper data in the study of collective action. Ann Rev Soc 30:65–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Eisley M, Bracken D (2007) Ban possible on new water tie-ins; Raleigh and Durham are weighing tougher water restrictions as supplies inch down. The News & Observer Raleigh, North Carolina, December 5, 2007 WednesdayGoogle Scholar
  19. FEMA, Federal Emergency Management Agency (1995) National mitigation strategy: partnerships for building safer communities. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  20. Finan TJ, West CT, Austin D et al (2002) Processes of adaptation to climate vulnerability: a case study from the US Southwest. Clim Res 21:299–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fussel HM, Klein RJT (2006) Climate change vulnerability assessments: an evolution of conceptual thinking. Clim Change 75:301–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Goldberg D (2007) Farmers worry over dry weather; gas prices, demand for ethanol affect corn prices negatively and positively. Chapel Hill Herald, Durham, NC, July 8, 2007Google Scholar
  23. Hayes MJ, Svoboda MD, Knutson CL et al (2004) Estimating the economic impacts of drought. I 2004. American Meteorological AssociationGoogle Scholar
  24. Hill TD, Polsky C (2007) Suburbanization and drought: a mixed methods vulnerability assessment in rainy. Mass Environ Hazards 7:291–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Holleman J (2007) Drought level sinks to severe: declaration sends signal to state that water conservation is. The State, Columbia, SC, September 6, 2007 ThursdayGoogle Scholar
  26. IPCC, Working Group II (2007) Summary for policy makers. IPCC, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  27. Karl TR, Melillo JM, Peterson TC (eds) (2009) Global climate change impacts in the United States. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  28. Kasperson RE (1983) Acceptability of human risk. Environ Health Perspect 52:15–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kasperson RE, Dow K et al (2006) Vulnerable peoples and places. In: Hassan R, Scholes R, Ash N (eds) Millennium ecosystem assessment: conditions and trends. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp 143–164Google Scholar
  30. Keenan SP, Krannich RS (1997) The social context of perceived drought vulnerability. Rural Soc 62(1):69–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Knutson CL, Hayes MJ (2001) South Carolina drought mitigation and response assessment: 1998–2002 drought. Natural Hazards Research Center, Boulder, COGoogle Scholar
  32. Lott N, Ross T (2006) Tracking and evaluating US billion dollar weather disasters, 1980–2005. 86th AMS annual meeting, preprints CD [cited Sept. 20, 2009]. Available from http://www1.ncdc.noaa.gov/pub/data/papers/200686ams1.2nlfree.pdf
  33. Martinez A (2003) Better season for farmers. The News & Observer, Raleigh, North Carolina, July 11, 2003 FridayGoogle Scholar
  34. Mitchell H (2005) Hickory has more than enough water. The Charlotte Observer, Charlotte, NC, June 5, 2005 SundayGoogle Scholar
  35. Mitchell H (2007) Farmers suffering as crops wither: soybeans and apples are stunted; pastures and grain for cattle are dying. The Charlotte Observer, Charlotte, NC, August 19, 2007 SundayGoogle Scholar
  36. NCDC, National Climate Data Center (2008) National Climate Data CenterGoogle Scholar
  37. NDMC, National Drought Mitigation Center (2006) Understanding and defining drought. National Drought Mitigation Center 2006 [cited August 7 2009]. Available from http://drought.unl.edu/whatis/concept.htm
  38. Neuendorf KA (2002) The content analysis guidebook. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CAGoogle Scholar
  39. Norman D (2002) A livelihood threatened: cattlemen lose money as drought limits feed. Spartanburg Herald—Journal, Spartanburg, SC, August 28, 2002Google Scholar
  40. Norris FH, Stevens SP, Pfefferbaum B et al (2008) Community resilience as a metaphor, theory, set of capacities, and strategy for disaster readiness. Am J Commun Psychol 41:127–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Norwood A (2007) Cracked earth, foundations: drought conditions causing clay to give way, which can damage the homes above. The Charlotte Observer, Charlotte, North Carolina, October 25, 2007 ThursdayGoogle Scholar
  42. NSF ACERE, Advisory Committee for Environmental Research and Education (2009) Transitions and Tipping points in complex environmental systems. National Science Foundation, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  43. Ortiz DG, Myers DJ, Walls NE et al (2005) Where do we stand with newspaper data? Mobilization 10:397–419Google Scholar
  44. Price M (2007) Drilling to save lawns: residents pay to preserve landscaping but counties say groundwater supplies also suffering amid drought. The Charlotte Observer, Charlotte, North Carolina, October 11, 2007 ThursdayGoogle Scholar
  45. Price J, Hennessy-Fiske M (2002) Towns desperate for water. News and Observer, Raleigh, North Carolina, August 11, 2002 SundayGoogle Scholar
  46. Ramsey C (2003) Rain puts damper on South Carolina golf industry. The State, Columbia, SC, May 25, 2003Google Scholar
  47. Rayner S, Cantor R (1987) How fair is safe enough—the cultural approach to societal technology choice. Risk Anal 7:3–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Renn O (2004) Perception of risks. Toxicol Lett 149:405–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Romoser J (2007) Weather, price weed out more western NC burley tobacco farmers. AP local and regional, November 26, 2007 MondayGoogle Scholar
  50. Rose A (2007) Economic resilience to natural and man-made disasters: multidisciplinary origins and contextual dimensions. Environ Hazards 7:383–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Schreiner M (2003) Chancellor’s documentary focuses on water shortage. Morning Star, Wilmington, NC, January 14, 2003 TuesdayGoogle Scholar
  52. Sen A (1981) Poverty and famines: an essay on entitlement and deprivation. Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  53. Smit B, Wandel J (2006) Adaptation, adaptive capacity and vulnerability. Glob Environ Change Hum Policy Dimens 16:282–292Google Scholar
  54. Steinnemann AC, Hayes MJ, Cavalcanti LFN (2005) Drought indicators and triggers. In: Wilhite DA (ed) Drought and water crises. Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton, pp 71–92Google Scholar
  55. Swensen E (2005) Drying up. News & Record, Greensboro, NC, November 15, 2005 TuesdayGoogle Scholar
  56. Tänzler D, Feil M, Kromker D et al (2008) The challenge of validating vulnerability estimates: the option of media content analysis for identifying drought-related crises. Reg Environ Change 8:187–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Turner BL, Kasperson RE, Matson PA et al (2003) A framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100(14):8074–8079CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. US Drought Monitor (2009) Drought monitor archives. National drought mitigation center 2009 [cited August 7, 2009]. Available from http://drought.unl.edu/dm/archive.html
  59. US Supreme Court (2009) South Carolina, Plaintiff v. North Carolina [cited September 20, 2009]. Available from http://origin.www.supremecourtus.gov/docket/22o138.htm
  60. USDA, US Dept. of Agriculture, Economic Research Service (2007a) North Carolina state fact sheet [cited September 20, 2009]. Available from http://www.ers.usda.gov/Statefacts/NC.htm
  61. USDA, US Dept. of Agriculture, Economic Research Service (2007b) South Carolina State fact sheet [cited September 20, 2009]. Available from http://www.ers.usda.gov/Statefacts/SC.htm
  62. Vásquez-León M, West CT, Finan TJ (2003) A comparative assessment of climate vulnerability: agriculture and ranching on both sides of the US-Mexico border. Glob Environ Change 13:159–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Velliquette B (2002) Free water to pour for those whose wells run dry; donations to help low-income people hit hard by drought. Chapel Hill Herald, Chapel Hill, NC, September 14, 2002 SaturdayGoogle Scholar
  64. Wilhelmi OV, Wilhite DA (2002) Assessing vulnerability to agricultural drought: a Nebraska case study. Nat Hazards 25(1):37–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Wilhite DA, Buchanan-Smith M (2005) Drought as hazard: understanding the natural and social context. In: Wilhite DA (ed) Drought and water crises. Taylor and Francis, Boca Raton, FL, pp 3–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Wilhite DA, Pulwarty RS (2005) Drought and water crises: lessons learned and the road ahead. In: Wilhite DA (ed) Drought and water crises. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp 389–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Wilhite DA, Hayes MJ et al (2000) Planning for drought: moving from crisis to risk management. J Am Water Resour As 36(4):697–710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Wilhite DA, Svoboda MD, Hayes MJ (2007) Understanding the complex impacts of drought: a key to enhancing drought mitigation and preparedness. Water Resour Manage 21(5):763–774CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Williams B (2001) Drought grips western half of state. News and Observer, March 17, 2001 SaturdayGoogle Scholar
  70. Wisner B, Blaikie P, Cannon T, Davis I (2004) At risk: natural Hazards, people’s vulnerability and disasters. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  71. Withers L (2002) Woes impact wallets; residents’ attitudes about the years-long drought vary depending on whether rain helps or hurts their businesses. News & Record, Greensboro, NC, June 3, 2002 MondayGoogle Scholar
  72. Zhang Y, Lindell MK, Prater CS (2009) Vulnerability of community businesses to environmental disasters. Disasters 33:38–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of GeographyUniversity of South CarolinaColumbiaUSA

Personalised recommendations