Advertisement

Natural Hazards

, Volume 56, Issue 2, pp 451–464 | Cite as

Avalanche hazard mapping over large undocumented areas

  • M. Barbolini
  • M. Pagliardi
  • F. Ferro
  • P. Corradeghini
Original Paper

Abstract

An innovative methodology to perform avalanche hazard mapping over large undocumented areas is herewith presented and discussed. The method combines GIS tools, computational routines, and statistical analysis in order to provide a “semi-automatic” definition of areas potentially affected by avalanche release and motion. The method includes two main modules. The first module is used to define zones of potential avalanche release, based on the consolidated relations on slope, morphology, and vegetation. For each of the identified zones of potential release, a second module, named Avalanche Flow and Run-out Algorithm (AFRA), provides an automatic definition of the areas potentially affected by avalanche motion and run-out. The definition is generated by a specifically implemented “flow-routing algorithm” which allows for the determination of flow behaviour in the track and in the run-out zone. In order to estimate the avalanche outline in the run-out zone, AFRA uses a “run-out cone”, which is a 3D projection of the angle of reach α. The α-value is evaluated by statistical analysis of historical data regarding extreme avalanches. Pre- and post-processing of the AFRA input/output data is done in an open source GIS environment (GRASS GIS). The method requires only a digital terrain model and an indication of the areas covered by forest as input parameters. The procedure, which allows rapid mapping of large areas, does not in principle require any site-specific historical information. Furthermore, it has proven to be effective in all cases where a preliminary cost-efficient analysis of the territories potentially affected by snow avalanche was needed.

Keywords

Snow avalanche Hazard mapping GRASS GIS Flow-routing algorithm Run-out angle 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would gratefully thank Luca Sittoni (BARR Engineering Company) and Chiara Ozzola for their valuable contribution, two anonymous reviewers for their great effort in the manuscript evaluation, and the Avalanche Office of Aosta Valley Autonomous Region for the image of Fig. 9.

References

  1. Adjel G (1995) Methodes statistiques pour la determination de la distance d’arret maximale des avalanches. La Houille Blanche 7:100–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Armstrong B, Williams K (1986) The avalanche book. Fulcrum Inc, GoldenGoogle Scholar
  3. Borrel G (1999) Realisation, usage et limites de la Carte de Localisation Probable des Avalanches. Neige et Avalanche 85Google Scholar
  4. Bovis MJ, Mears A (1976) Statistical prediction of snow avalanche runout from terrain variables in Colorado. Arctic Alpine Res 8:145–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. De Blasio FV, Elverhøi A, Engvik L, Issler D, Gauer P, Harbitz C (2006) Understanding the high mobility of subaqueous debris flows. Norwegian J Geol, special issue: second international symposium on submarine mass movements and their consequences, A. Solheim (editor) 86:275–284Google Scholar
  6. Delparte D, Jamieson B, Waters N (2008) Statistical runout modeling of snow avalanches using GIS in Glacier National Park, Canada. Cold Reg Sci Technol 54(3):183–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Desmet PJJ, Govers G (1996) Comparison of routing algorithms for digital elevation models and their implications for predicting ephemeral gullies. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 10(3):311–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gleason JA (1995) Terrain parameters of avalanche starting zones and their effect on avalanche frequency. Proceedings of the International Snow Science Workshop, Snowbird, 30 October–3 November 1994, pp 393–404. Int Snow Sci Workshop 1994 Organ Comm, SnowbirdGoogle Scholar
  9. Gubler H, Rychetnik J (1991) Effects of forests near the timberline on avalanche formation. In: H. Bergmann, H. Lang, W. Frey, D. Issler, B. Salm (ed) Snow, hydrology, and forests in high alpine areas, International Association of Hydrological Sciences, Wallingford, 205:19–38Google Scholar
  10. Gruber S, Peckham S (2008) Land surface parameters and objects specific to hydrology. In: Hengl T, Reuter HI (eds) Geomorphometry: geomorphometry: concepts, Software, Applications. Developments in Soil Science 33. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  11. Gruber U, Bartelt P, Haefner H (1998) Avalanche hazard mapping using numerical voellmy-fluid models. Proceedings of the anniversary conference for the 25 Years of Snow avalanche research at NGI, Voss, Norway, 1216 May 1998, NGI Publications 203: 117–121Google Scholar
  12. Lied K, Bakkehøi S (1980) Empirical calculations of snow avalanche run-out distance based on topographic parameters. J Glaciol 26(94):165–177Google Scholar
  13. Maggioni M (2004) Avalanche release areas and their influence on uncertainty in avalanche hazard mapping, PhD thesisGoogle Scholar
  14. Maggioni M, Gruber U (2003) The influence of topographic parameters on avalanche release dimension and frequency. Cold Reg Sci Technol 37(3):407–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. McClung DM (2001) Characteristics of terrain, snow supply and forest cover for avalanche initiation by logging. Ann Glaciol 32:223–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. McClung DM (2005) Risk-based definition of zones for land-use planning in snow avalanche terrain. Can Geotech J 42(4):1030–1038CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. McClung DM, Mears AI (1991) Extreme value prediction of snow avalanche runout. Cold Reg Sci Technol 19(2):163–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. McClung D, Schaerer P (1993) The avalanche handbook. The Mountaineers, SeattleGoogle Scholar
  19. Quinn P, Beven K, Chevalier P, Planchon O (1991) The prediction of hillslope flow paths for distributed hydrological modelling using digital terrain models. Hydrol Process 5:59–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sauermoser S (2006) Avalanche hazard mapping—30 years experience in Austria. Proceedings the 2006 international snow science workshop, Telluride, ISSW USA, USA, 314–321Google Scholar
  21. Tarboton DG (1997) A new method for the determination of flow directions and upslope areas in grid digital elevation models. Water Resour Res 33(2):309–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Weir P (2002) Snow Avalanche Management in Forested Terrain. Res. Br., BC. Min. For., Victoria, BC. Land Manage, Handb 55Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Barbolini
    • 1
  • M. Pagliardi
    • 1
  • F. Ferro
    • 1
  • P. Corradeghini
    • 1
  1. 1.FLOW-ING EngineeringLa SpeziaItaly

Personalised recommendations