Estimating probable maximum loss from a Cascadia tsunami
- 749 Downloads
The Cascadia margin is capable of generating large magnitude seismic-tsunami. We use a 1:500 year tsunami hazard flood layer produced during a probabilistic tsunami hazard assessment as the input to a pilot study of the vulnerability of residential and commercial buildings in Seaside, OR, USA. We map building exposure, apply the Papathoma Tsunami Vulnerability Assessment Model to calculate building vulnerability and estimate probable maximum loss (PML) associated with a 1:500 year tsunami flood. Almost US$0.5 billion worth of buildings would be inundated, 95% of single story residential and 23% of commercial buildings would be destroyed with PML’s exceeding US$116 million. These figures only represent a tiny fraction of the total values of exposed assets and loss that would be associated with a Cascadia tsunami impacting the NW Pacific coast. Not withstanding the various issues associated with our approach, this study represents the first time that PML’s have ever been calculated for a Cascadia type tsunami, and these results have serious implications for tsunami disaster risk management in the region. This method has the potential to be rolled out across the United States and elsewhere for estimating building vulnerability and loss to tsunami.
KeywordsTsunami Cascadia Building vulnerability assessment Loss PTVA model
NOAA/NGDC is thanked for providing the resources to enable Dale Dominey-Howes and Papathoma-Köhle to participate in this study. Two anonymous referees and Filippo Dall’Osso are thanked for making numerous helpful comments on an earlier version of this manuscript all of which significantly improved the final version.
- Bernard B, Dengler L, Yim S (2007) National Tsunami Research Plan: report of a workshop sponsored by NSF/NOAA. NOAA Technical Memorandum OAR PMEL-133, 135 p. http://nctr.pmel.noaa.gov/pubs.html
- Grundy P, Thurairaja A, Walker G (2005) Some reflections on the structural engineering aspects of tsunami. In: Lam NTK, Wilson JL, Butler B (eds) Proceedings, Australian Earthquake Engineering Society, Albury, New South Wales, p 7-1-7-4Google Scholar
- Papathoma M (2003) Tsunami vulnerability assessment using a geographic information system with special reference to Greece. Unpublished PhD Thesis, Coventry University, UK, 289 pGoogle Scholar
- Papathoma M, Dominey-Howes D (2003) Tsunami vulnerability assessment and its implications for coastal hazard analysis and disaster management planning, Gulf of Corinth, Greece. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 3:733–744Google Scholar
- The Tsunami Pilot Study Working Group (2006) Seaside, oregon tsunami pilot study—modernization of FEMA Flood Hazard Maps, Joint NOAA/USGS/FEMA special report, 94 p, 7 appendices. http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2006/1234/
- Wood N (2002) Vulnerability of port and harbor communities to earthquake and tsunami hazards in the Pacific Northwest. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Department of Geosciences, Oregon State UniversityGoogle Scholar
- Wood N, Good J, Goodwin R (2002a) Reducing vulnerability of ports and harbors to earthquake and tsunami hazards. In: Proceedings, solutions to coastal disasters, American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, Virginia, pp 949–963Google Scholar