Advertisement

Natural Hazards

, Volume 52, Issue 3, pp 639–668 | Cite as

Atlanta’s urban heat island under extreme heat conditions and potential mitigation strategies

  • Yan Zhou
  • J. Marshall ShepherdEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

The urban heat island (UHI), together with summertime heat waves, foster’s biophysical hazards such as heat stress, air pollution, and associated public health problems. Mitigation strategies such as increased vegetative cover and higher albedo surface materials have been proposed. Atlanta, Georgia, is often affected by extreme heat, and has recently been investigated to better understand its heat island and related weather modifications. The objectives of this research were to (1) characterize temporal variations in the magnitude of UHI around Metro Atlanta area, (2) identify climatological attributes of the UHI under extremely high temperature conditions during Atlanta’s summer (June, July, and August) period, and (3) conduct theoretical numerical simulations to quantify the first-order effects of proposed mitigation strategies. Over the period 1984–2007, the climatological mean UHI magnitude for Atlanta-Athens and Athens-Monticello was 1.31 and 1.71°C, respectively. There were statistically significant minimum temperature trends of 0.70°C per decade at Athens and −1.79°C per decade at Monticello while Atlanta’s minimum temperature remained unchanged. The largest (smallest) UHI magnitudes were in spring (summer) and may be coupled to cloud-radiative cycles. Heat waves in Atlanta occurred during 50% of the years spanning 1984–2007 and were exclusively summertime phenomena. The mean number of heat wave events in Atlanta during a given heat wave year was 1.83. On average, Atlanta heat waves lasted 14.18 days, although there was quite a bit of variability (standard deviation of 9.89). The mean maximum temperature during Atlanta’s heat waves was 35.85°C. The Atlanta-Athens UHI was not statistically larger during a heat wave although the Atlanta-Monticello UHI was. Model simulations captured daytime and nocturnal UHIs under heat wave conditions. Sensitivity results suggested that a 100% increase in Atlanta’s surface vegetation or a tripling of its albedo effectively reduced UHI surface temperature. However, from a mitigation and technological standpoint, there is low feasibility of tripling albedo in the foreseeable future. Increased vegetation seems to be a more likely choice for mitigating surface temperature.

Keywords

Urban heat island Heat wave Mitigation strategies Anthropogenic climate change 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the support of the NASA PMM program for funding that partially supported this research. The authors would like to thank Drs. Thomas L. Mote and Andrew Grundstein for useful comments and suggestions.

References

  1. Beniston M (2004) The 2003 heat wave in Europe: a shape of things to come? An analysis based on Swiss climatological data and model simulations. Geophys Res Lett 31:2022–2026. doi: 10.1029/2003GL018857 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bornstein RD, Oke T (1980) Influence of pollution on urban climatology. Adv Environ Sci Eng 3:171–202Google Scholar
  3. Bornstein R, Lin Q (2000) Urban heat islands and summertime convective thunderstorms in Atlanta: three case studies. Atmos Environ 34:507–516. doi: 10.1016/S1352-2310(99)00374-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bornstein R, Balmori RTF, Taha H, Byun D, Cheng B, Nielsen-Gammon J, Burian S, Stetson S, Estes M, Nowak D, Smith P (2006) Modeling the effects of land-use/land-cover modifications on the urban heat island phenomena in Houston, Texas. Final report to David Hitchcock Houston Advanced Research Center, 100 ppGoogle Scholar
  5. Brazel A, Gober P, Lee SJ, Grossman-Clarke S, Zehnder J, Hedquist B, Comparri E (2007) Determinants of changes in the regional urban heat island in metropolitan Phoenix (Arizona, USA) between 1990 and 2004. Clim Res 33:171–182. doi: 10.3354/cr033171 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Changnon SA, Kunkel KE, Reinke BC (1996) Impacts and responses to the 1995 heat wave: a call to action. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 77:1497–1506. doi: 10.1175/1520-0477(1996)077<1497:IARTTH>2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dixon PG, Mote TL (2003) Patterns and causes of Atlanta’s urban heat island—initiated precipitation. J Appl Meteorol 42:1273–1284. doi: 10.1175/1520-0450(2003)042<1273:PACOAU>2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Estes M Jr, Quattrochi D, Stasiak E (2003) The urban heat island phenomenon: how its effects can influence environmental decision making in your community. Public Manage 85(00333611):8Google Scholar
  9. Ezber Y, Lutfi Sen O, Kindap T, Karaca M (2007) Climatic effects of urbanization in Istanbul: a statistical and modeling analysis. Int J Climatol 27:667. doi: 10.1002/joc.1420 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Grimmond CSB, Oke TR (1999) Heat storage in urban areas: local-scale observations and evaluation of a simple model. J Appl Meteorol 38:922–940. doi: 10.1175/1520-0450(1999)038<0922:HSIUAL>2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Haffner J, Kidder SQ (1999) Urban heat island modeling in conjunction with satellite-derived surface/soil parameters. J Appl Meteorol 38:448–465. doi: 10.1175/1520-0450(1999)038<0448:UHIMIC>2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ignatov A, Minnis P, Loeb N, Wielicki B, Miller W, Sun-Mack S, Tanré D, Remer L, Laszlo I, Geier E (2005) Two MODIS aerosol products over ocean on the Terra and Aqua CERES SSF datasets. J Atmos Sci 62:1008–1031. doi: 10.1175/JAS3383.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jin M, Dickinson RE, Zhang D (2005) The footprint of urban areas on global climate as characterized by MODIS. J Clim 18:1551–1565. doi: 10.1175/JCLI3334.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jin M, Shepherd JM, Peters-Lidard C (2007) Development of a parameterization for simulating the urban temperature hazard using satellite observations in climate model. Nat Hazards 43:257–271. doi: 10.1007/s11069-007-9117-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kalkstein LS (1993) Direct impacts in cities. Lancet 342(8884):1397–1399. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)92757-K CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kim YH, Baik JJ (2002) Maximum urban heat island intensity in Seoul. J Appl Meteorol 41:651–659. doi: 10.1175/1520-0450(2002)041<0651:MUHIII>2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kunkel KE, Changnon SA, Reinke BC, Arritt RW (1996) The July 1995 heat wave in the Midwest: a climatic perspective and critical weather factors. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 77:1507–1518. doi: 10.1175/1520-0477(1996)077<1507:TJHWIT>2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kusaka H, Kimura F, Hirakuchi H, Mizutori M (2000) The effects of land-use alteration on the sea breeze and daytime heat island in the Tokyo metropolitan area. J Meteorol Soc Jpn 78:405–420Google Scholar
  19. Liptan T, Miller T, Roy A (2004) Portland Ecoroof Vision: quantitative study to support policy decisions. Greening rooftops for sustainable communities, PortlandGoogle Scholar
  20. Liu Y, Chen F, Warner T, Swerdlin S, Bowers J, Halvorson S (2004) Improvements to surface flux computations in a non-local-mixing PBL scheme, and refinements on urban processes in the Noah land-surface model with the NCAR/ATEC real-time FDDA and forecast system. 20th conference on weather analysis and forecasting/16th conference on numerical weather prediction, Seattle, Washington, 11–15 January, 2004Google Scholar
  21. Lynn BH, Carlson TN, Rosenzweig C, Goldberg R, Druyan L et al (2009) A modification to the NOAH LSM to simulate heat mitigation strategies in the New York City metropolitan area. J Appl Meteorol Climatol 48:199–216. doi: 10.1175/2008JAMC1774.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Manley G (1958) On the frequency of snowfall in metropolitan England. Q J R Meteorol Soc 84:70–72. doi: 10.1002/qj.49708435910 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. McKee TB, Doesken NJ, Davey CA, Pielke RA Sr (2000) Climate data continuity with ASOS, report for period April 1996 through June 2000. Climatology report 00-3, Department of Atmospheric Science, CSU, Fort Collins, CO, 82 ppGoogle Scholar
  24. McPherson EG (1994) Energy-saving potential of trees in Chicago. Chicago’s urban forest ecosystem: results of the Chicago urban forest climate project, pp 95–114Google Scholar
  25. Meehl GA, Tebaldi C (2004) More intense, more frequent, and longer lasting heat waves in the 21st century. Science 305:994–997. doi: 10.1126/science.1098704 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Menne B (2003) The health impacts of 2003 summer heat-waves. Briefing note for the delegations of the fifty-third session of the WHO regional committee for Europe. WHO Europe, 12 ppGoogle Scholar
  27. Mote TL, Lacke MC, Shepherd JM (2007) Radar signatures of the urban effect on precipitation distribution. A case study for Atlanta, Georgia. Geophys Res Lett 34:L20710. doi: 10.1029/2007GL031903 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. NWS (1995) Natural disaster survey report: July 1995 heat wave. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Weather Service, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  29. Ohashi Y, Kida H (2002) Local circulations developed in the vicinity of both coastal and inland urban areas: a numerical study with a mesoscale atmospheric model. J Appl Meteorol 41:30–45. doi: 10.1175/1520-0450(2002)041<0030:LCDITV>2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Oke TR (1981) Canyon geometry and the nocturnal urban heat island: comparison of scale model and field observations. J Climatol 1:237–254. doi: 10.1002/joc.3370010304 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Oke TR (1982) The energetic basis of the urban heat island. Q J R Meteorol Soc 108:1–24Google Scholar
  32. Palecki MA, Changnon SA, Kunkel KE (2001) The nature and impacts of the July 1999 heat wave in the midwestern United States: learning from the lessons of 1995. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 82:1353–1368. doi: 10.1175/1520-0477(2001)082<1353:TNAIOT>2.3.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Quattrochi DA, Luvall JC, Estes MG Jr (1999) Project ATLANTA (Atlanta land use analysis: temperature and air quality): use of remote sensing and modeling to analyze how urban land use change affects meteorology and air quality through time. NASA/TP-2147483647Google Scholar
  34. Quattrochi DA, Lapenta W, Crosson W, Estes M, Limaye A, Khan M (2006) The application of satellite-derived, high-resolution land use/land cover data to improve urban air quality model forecasts, NASA/TP-2006-214710Google Scholar
  35. Robinson PJ (2001) On the definition of a heat wave. J Appl Meteorol 40:762–775. doi: 10.1175/1520-0450(2001)040<0762:OTDOAH>2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rosenzweig C, Solecki WD, Parshall L, Chopping M, Pope G, Goldberg R (2005) Characterizing the urban heat island in current and future climates in New Jersey. Global Environ Change B. Environ Hazards 6:51–62. doi: 10.1016/j.hazards.2004.12.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sailor DJ (1995) Simulated urban climate response to modifications in surface albedo and vegetative cover. J Appl Meteorol 34:1694–1704Google Scholar
  38. Sailor DJ (2003) Streamlined mesoscale modeling of air temperature impacts of heat island mitigation strategies. Final report. Portland State University, 31 ppGoogle Scholar
  39. Sailor DJ, Kalkstein LS, Wong E (2002) The potential of urban heat island mitigation to alleviate heat-related mortality: methodological overview and preliminary modeling results for Philadelphia. In: Proceedings of the 4th symposium on the urban environment. May 2002, Norfolk, VA, 4:68–69Google Scholar
  40. Schrumpf AD (1996) Temperature data continuity with the automatic surface observing system. Thesis for the Degree of Master of Science, Department of Atmospheric Science, Colorado State University, 256 ppGoogle Scholar
  41. Shem W, Shepherd JM (2008) On the impact of urbanization on summertime thunderstorms in Atlanta: two numerical model case studies. Atmos Res 92:172–189. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosres.2008.09.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Shepherd JM (2005) A review of current investigations of urban-induced rainfall and recommendations for the future. Earth Interact 9:1–27. doi: 10.1175/EI156.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Shepherd JM, Pierce H, Negri AJ (2002) Rainfall modification by major urban areas: observations from spaceborne rain radar on the TRMM satellite. J Appl Meteorol 41:689–701. doi: 10.1175/1520-0450(2002)041<0689:RMBMUA>2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Skamarock WC, Klemp JB, Dudhia J (2001) Prototypes for the WRF (Weather Research and Forecasting) model. Preprints. Ninth conference on mesoscale processes, 5 ppGoogle Scholar
  45. Souch C, Grimmond S (2006) Applied climatology: urban climate. Prog Phys Geogr 30:270–279. doi: 10.1191/0309133306pp484pr CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sterl A, Severijns C, Dijkstra H, Hazeleger W, Oldenborgh G, Broeke M, Burgers G, Hurk B, Leeuwen P, Velthoven P (2008) When can we expect extremely high surface temperatures? Geophys Res Lett. doi: 10.1029/2008GL034071 Google Scholar
  47. Synnefa A, Dandou A, Santamouris M, Tombrou M, Soulakellis N (2008) On the use of cool materials as a heat island mitigation strategy. J Appl Meteorol Climatol 47:2846–2856. doi: 10.1175/2008JAMC1830.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Taha H (1996) Modeling impacts of increased urban vegetation on ozone air quality in the South Coast Air Basin. Atmos Environ 30:3423–3430. doi: 10.1016/1352-2310(96)00035-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Taha H (1997) Modeling the impacts of large-scale albedo changes on ozone air quality in the South Coast Air Basin. Atmos Environ 31:1667–1676. doi: 10.1016/S1352-2310(96)00336-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Taha H (1999) Modifying a mesoscale meteorological model to better incorporate urban heat storage: a bulk-parameterization approach. J Appl Meteorol 38:466–473. doi: 10.1175/1520-0450(1999)038<0466:MAMMMT>2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Taha H, Douglas S, Haney J (1997) Mesoscale meteorological and air quality impacts of increased urban albedo and vegetation. Energy Build 25:169–177. doi: 10.1016/S0378-7788(96)01006-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Tewari M, Chen F, Wang W (2004) Implementation and verification of the unified NOAH land surface model in the WRF model. 20th conference on weather analysis and forecasting/16th conference on numerical weather prediction, 11–15Google Scholar
  53. Unger J, S¨umeghy Z, Zoboki J (2001) Temperature cross-section features in an urban area. Atmos Res 58:117–127. doi: 10.1016/S0169-8095(01)00087-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Yang X, Lo CP (2003) Modeling urban growth and landscape change for Atlanta metropolitan region. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 17:463–488. doi: 10.1080/1365881031000086965 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Yoshino M (1975) Climate in a small area. University of Tokyo Press, Tokyo 549 ppGoogle Scholar
  56. Yow DM (2007) Urban heat islands: observations, impacts, and adaptation. Geogr Compass 1(6):1227–1251. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-8198.2007.00063.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic SciencesUniversity of MarylandCollege ParkUSA
  2. 2.Department of Geography/Atmospheric SciencesUniversity of GeorgiaAthensUSA

Personalised recommendations