Natural Hazards

, Volume 43, Issue 3, pp 303–317 | Cite as

Health risk analysis of volcanic SO2 hazard on Vulcano Island (Italy)

Original Paper

Abstract

Since the last eruption of the Fossa crater in 1888–1890, intense volcanic degassing has been remaining on Vulcano Island of Sicily (Italy). Toxic sulfur dioxide (SO2) of the solfataric action in this area represents, when inhaled, a permanent natural hazard harming humans. Approximately 500 permanent residents live and 15,000 tourists visit during the summer time the Porto village in the North of Vulcano Island. A cross-disciplinary fuzzy logic risk assessment has been conducted to evaluate health risks of human individuals exposed to higher SO2-concentrations C over certain exposure times t. The simple approach, based on fuzzy set theory, explains health risks semantically by words rather than by numbers. Advantages of this approach are, first, experts, non-experts, decision makers, or the public are able to understand and communicate risk degrees by words without using numbers. Second, in comparison to other risk definitions, the risk is not equal to the vulnerability; it is based on the hazard (SO2-gas clouds) and vulnerability (health effects) in combination. Third, risk levels can be still estimated even when limited or no statistical information is available, e.g., high SO2-concentrations or long exposure times. Moreover, human health risks were determined for Ct-scenarios based on threshold values of the European Union and the World Health Organization. Independently, two additional methods were used to determine the proportions of the population who are exposed to levels of SO2 at which health effects may be expected and also safety zones for civil protection around the degassing fields. In conclusion, SO2-gas concentrations in many parts of Vulcano Island go beyond the proclaimed alert threshold of the European Union and the World Health Organization. For example, the results show that sensitive individuals, such as asthmatics, young children, or elderly people, should not be exposed at any time to the degassing areas in Porto di Levante and at the NE-rim of the Fossa crater. In contrast, healthy non-sensitive individuals should be exposed less than 10 min to the SO2-clouds at these degassing areas, while hiking on the crater rim.

Keywords

Sulfur dioxide Volcanic gas hazard Human vulnerability Human health risk Fuzzy logic Expert system Risk theory Cross-disciplinary analysis Sustainability 

References

  1. AICE (1989) Guidelines for chemical process quantitative risk analysis, American Institute of Chemical Engineers. Center for Chemical Process Safety, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Amdur MO, Melvin WW, Drinker P (1953) Effects of inhalation of sulphur dioxide by man. Lancet 2:758–759CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andersen I, Lundqvist GJ, Jensen PL (1974) Human response to controlled levels of sulfur dioxide. Arch Environ Health 28:31–39Google Scholar
  4. Amdur MO, Doull J, Klaassen C (1991) Casarett and Doull’s toxicology: the basic sciences of poisons, 4th edn. Pergamon Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. ATSDR (1998) Toxological profile for sulfur dioxide. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. Division of Toxicology, AtlantaGoogle Scholar
  6. Badalamenti B, Gurrieri S, Nuccio PM, Velenza M (1991) Gas hazard on Vulcano Island. Nature 350:26–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Baubron JC, Allard P, Toutain JP (1990) Diffuse volcanic emissions of carbon dioxide from Vulcano Island, Italy. Nature 344:51–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bethel RA, Sheppard D, Geffroy B (1985) Effects of 0.25 ppm sulfur dioxide on airway resistance in freely breathing, heavily exercising, asthmatic subjects. Am Rev Respir Dis 13(1):659–661Google Scholar
  9. Blaikie P, Cannon T, Davis I, Wisner B (1994) At risk: natural hazards, peoples vulnerability, and disasters. London, RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  10. Bruno N, Caltaniano T, Grasso MF, Porto M, Romano R (1994) SO2 flux COSPEC measurements (Vulcano). Acta Vulcanol 6:32Google Scholar
  11. Bukumirovic T, Italiano F, Nuccio PM (1997) Evolucione della attivita di esalazione fumarolica al cratere di Fossa di Vulcano, in Progetto Vulcano, Felici Ed Pisa:70–77Google Scholar
  12. Ellenhorn MJ, Barceloux DG (1988) Medical toxicology: diagnosis and treatment of human poisoning. Elsevier Science Publishing Co. Inc., New York, pp 874–875Google Scholar
  13. EU (1999) Council Directive 1999/30/EC of 22 April 1999 relating to limit values for sulphur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide and oxides of nitrogen, particulate matter and lead in ambient air. Eur Union Official J L163:41–60Google Scholar
  14. Faivre-Pierret R, Le Guen F (1983) Health risks with inhalation of volcanic gases and aerosols. In: Tazieff H, Sabroux JC (eds) Forecasting volcanic events. Elsevier, pp 69–81Google Scholar
  15. Frank NR, Amdur MO, Worcester J (1962) Effects of acute controlled exposure to sulfur dioxide on respiratory mechanics in healthy male adults. J Appl Physiol 17:252–258Google Scholar
  16. Graziani G, Martilli A, Pareschi MT, Valenza M (1997) Atmospheric dispersion of natural gases at Vulcano island. J Volcanol Geothermal Res 75:283–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Harris AJL and Stevenson DS (1997) Thermal observations of degassing open conduits and fumaroles at Stromboli and Vulcano using remotely sensed data. J Volcanol Geothermal Res 76:175–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. HSDB (1998) Hazardous substances data bank. National Library of Medicine, National Toxicology Information Program, Bethesda, MD, USAGoogle Scholar
  19. Huber AL, Loving TJ (1991) Fatal asthma attack after inhaling sulfur fumes. JAMA 266(16): 2225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. IAEA (1993) Manual for the Classification and Prioritization of Risks due to Major Accidents in Process and Related Industries, International Atomic Energy Agency, LAEA-TECDOC-727, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  21. IAEA (1998) Guidelines for integrated risk assessment and management in large industrial areas, International Atomic Energy Agency, IAEA-TECDOC-994, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  22. Islam MS, Neuhann HF, Grzegowski E (1992) Bronchomotoric effect of low concentration of sulfur dioxide in young healthy volunteers. Fresenius Euvir Bull II:541–546Google Scholar
  23. Italiano F, Nuccio PM (1992) Volcanic steam output directly measured in fumaroles: the observed variations at Vulcano Island, Italy, between 1983 and 1987. Bull Vulcano 54:623–630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jorres R, Magnussen H (1990) Airway response of asthmatics after a 30 min exposure at resting ventilation, to 0.25 ppm NO, or 0.5 ppm sulfur dioxide. Eur Respir J 3:132–137Google Scholar
  25. Koenig JQ, Covert DS, Hanley QS (1990) Prior exposure to ozone potentiates subsequent responses to sulfur dioxide in adolescent asthmatic subjects. Am Rev Respir Dis 141:377–380Google Scholar
  26. Lawther PJ, Macfarlane AJ, Waller RE (1975) Pulmonary function and sulfur dioxide, some preliminary findings. Environ Res 10:355–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Linn WS, Avol EL, Shamoo DA (1984) Asthmatics’ responses to 6-hr sulfur dioxide exposures on two successive days. Arch Environ Health 39:313–319Google Scholar
  28. Linn WS, Shamoo DA, Spier CE (1983) Respiratory effects of 0.75 ppm sulfur dioxide in exercising asthmatics: Influence of upper respiratory defenses. Environ Res 30:340–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mazumdar S, Schimmel H, Higgins ITT (1982) Relation of daily mortality to air pollution: an analysis of 14 London winters, 1958/59–1971/72. Arch Environ Health 37:213–220Google Scholar
  30. Myers DJ, Bigby BG, Boushey HA (1986a) The inhibition of sulfur dioxide-induced bronchoconstriction in asthmatic subjects by cromolyn is dose dependent. Am Rev Respir Dis 133:1150–l 153Google Scholar
  31. Myers DJ, Bigby BG, Calvayrac P (1986b) Interaction of cromolyn and a muscarinic antagonist in inhibiting bronchial reactivity to sulfur dioxide and to eucapnic hyperpnea alone. Am Rev Respir Dis 133:1154–1158Google Scholar
  32. Nadel JA, Salem H, Tamplin B (1965) Mechanism of bronchoconstriction during inhalation of sulfur dioxide. J Appl Physiol 20:164–167Google Scholar
  33. Pareschi MT, Ranci M, Valenza M, Graziani G (1999) The assessment of volcanic gas hazard by means of numerical models: an example from Vulcano Island (Sicily). Geophys Res Lett 26(10):1405–1408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pareschi MT, Ranci M, Valenza M, Graziani G (2001) Atmospheric dispersion of volcanic CO 2 at Vulcano island. J Volcanol Geothermal Res 108:219–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Roger LJ, Kehrl HR, Hazucha M (1985) Bronchoconstriction in asthmatics exposed to sulfur dioxide during repeated exercise. J Appl Physiol 59:L784–L791Google Scholar
  36. Sandstrom T, Stjernberg N, Andersson MC (1989a) Cell response in bronchioalveolar lavage fluid after exposure to sulfur dioxide: a time-response study. Am Rev Respir Dis 140:1828–1831Google Scholar
  37. Sandstrom T, Stjernberg N, Andersson MC (1989b) Is the short term limit value for sulphur dioxide exposure safe? Effects of controlled chamber exposure investigated with bronchoalveolar lavage. Br J Ind Med 461:200–203Google Scholar
  38. Schachter EN, Witek TJ, Beck GJ (1984) Airway effects of low concentrations of sulfur dioxide: dose-response characteristics. Arch Environ Health 39:34–42Google Scholar
  39. Sheppard D, Wong WS, Uehara CF (1980) Lower threshold and greater bronchomotor responsiveness of asthmatic subjects to sulfur dioxide. Am Rev Respir Dis 122:873–878Google Scholar
  40. Sheppard D, Saisho A, Nadel JA (1981) Exercise increases sulfur dioxide-induced bronchoconstriction in asthmatic subjects. Am Rev Respir Dis 123:486–491Google Scholar
  41. Sheppard D, Epstein J, Bethel RA (1983) Tolerance to sulfur dioxide-induced bronchoconstriction in subjects with asthma. Environ Res 30:412–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Spix C, Heinrich J, Dockey D, Schwartz J, Volksch G, Schwinkowski K, Collen C, Wichmann HE (1993) Air pollution and daily mortality in Erfurt, East Germany, 1980–1989. Environ Health Perspect 101:518–526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. TNO (1989) Methods for the determination of possible damage: to people and objects resulting from the releases of hazardous materials. Rep. CPR-16E (“The Green Book”), Committee for the Prevention of Disasters caused by Dangerous Substances, VoorburgGoogle Scholar
  44. UNDRO (1980) Natural disasters and vulnerability analysis, Office of the United Nations Disaster Relief Co-ordinator, Report of Expert Group Meeting (9–12 July 1979), United Nations, Geneva, 49 ppGoogle Scholar
  45. UNESCO (1972) Report of consultive meeting of experts on the statistical study of natural hazards and their consequences, UNESCO, Document SC/WS/500, p 11Google Scholar
  46. U.S. EPA (1994a) National Air Pollutant Emission Trends (1900–1993). Research Triangle Park, NC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and StandardsGoogle Scholar
  47. U.S. EPA (1994b) Review of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Sulfur Oxides: Assessment of Scientific and Technical Information. Supplement to the 1986 OAQPS Staff Paper Addendum (Final Report). Research Triangle Park, NC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and StandardsGoogle Scholar
  48. U.S. EPA (2005), Human Health Risk Assessment Protocol for Hazardous Waste Combustion Facilities (HHRAP), EPA520-R-05-006, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency ResponseGoogle Scholar
  49. WHO (1979) Environmental health criteria 8: sulfur oxides and suspended particulate matter. World Health Organization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  50. WHO (2000) Air quality guidelines for Europe, 2nd edn. World Health Organization Regional Publications, European Series, No. 91, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  51. Wolff RK (1986) Effects of airborne pollutants on mucociliary clearance. Environ Health Perspect 661:223–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Zadeh LA (1965) Fuzzy sets. In: Yager et al (eds) 1987. Information Control 8:338–353Google Scholar
  53. Zadeh LA (1975a) The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning FI. Information Sci 8:199–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Zadeh LA (1975b) The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning FII. Information Sci 8:301–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Zadeh LA (1978) Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility. Fuzzy Sets Syst 1:3–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Zadeh LA (1979) A theory of approximate reasoning. In: Hayes JE, Michie D, Mikulich LI (eds) Machine intelligence. Halstead Press, New York, pp 149–194Google Scholar
  57. Zadeh IA, Kacprzyk J, Zadeh LA (2006) Computing with words in information/intelligent systems 1: Foundations, 1st edn. Springer, Berlin, pp 517Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Hazards & Risk ResearchColumbia UniversityPalisadesUSA

Personalised recommendations