Advertisement

Natural Hazards

, Volume 42, Issue 3, pp 481–491 | Cite as

Megacities – megarisks

  • Friedemann WenzelEmail author
  • Fouad Bendimerad
  • Ravi Sinha
Original Paper

Abstract

We review the definitions, population trends, and characteristics of megacities. Characteristics of megacities are, apart from their size, their complexity in terms of administration, infrastructure, traffic, etc., and at the same time the speed of change. Vulnerabilities and risk potential are discussed using the examples of Mexico City and Mumbai. We present the experience accumulated in the 6 years work of the Earthquakes and Megacities Initiative (EMI, http://www-megacities.physik.uni-karlsruhe.de/) with more than 20 large cities around the world, mostly located in the developing world. On this background we analyze obstacles that keep megacities from developing an efficient approach towards disaster mitigation and define a strategy that might overcome these problems. The key element of this strategy is the development of a Disaster Risk Management Master Plan (DRMMP) for cities. Currently the Istanbul Earthquake Master Plan (IEMP) serves as best example for an appropriate strategy for disaster reduction in megacities.

Keywords

Megacity Urbanization Vulnerability Disaster mitigation Risk management master plan 

References

  1. Bilham R (1988) Earthquakes and urban growth. Nature 336:625–626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bilham R (1995) Global fatalities in the past 2000 years: prognosis for the next 30. In: Rundle J, Klein F, Turcotte D (eds) Reduction and predictability of natural disasters, Santa Fe Institute Studies in the Sciences of Complexity, vol XXV. Addison WesleyGoogle Scholar
  3. Bilham R (2004) Urban earthquake fatalities: a safer world, or worse to come? Seismol Res Lett 75(6):706–712CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chernov Yu K, Sokolov V Yu (1999) Correlation of seismic intensity with Fourier acceleration spectra. Phys Chem Earth 24(6):523–528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gelbard A, Haub C, Kent M (1999) World population beyond six billion. Popul Bull 54(1):3–40Google Scholar
  6. Hough SE, Martin S, Bilham R, Atkinson GM (2002) The 26 January 2001 M 7.6 Bhuj, India. Earthquake: observed and predicted ground motion. Bull Seism Soc Am 92:2061–2079CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Husa K, Wohlschlägl H (1999) Megastädte der Dritten Welt im Globalisierungsprozess. Mexico City, Jakarta, Bombay – Vergleichende Fallstudien in ausgewählten Kulturkreisen, Abhandlungen zur Geographie und Regionalforschung, Band 6, Institut für Geographie der Universität Wien, ISBN 3-900830-40-1Google Scholar
  8. Jaiswal K, Sokolov V, Sinha R, Wenzel F, Chernov Y (2004) Probabilistic seismic hazard assessment for Mumbai (western India) area. In: Chen YT, Panza GF, Wu ZL (eds) IUGG special volume: earthquake hazard, risk, and strong ground motion. Seismological Press, Beijing, pp 7–30Google Scholar
  9. Panza GF, Paskaleva I, Nunziata C (2004) Seismic ground motion in large urban areas. Pageoph Topical Volumes, Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel-Boston-Berlin, ISBN: 3-7643-7042-4, vol 161, No. 5/6, pp 943–1300Google Scholar
  10. Puente S (1999) Social vulnerability to disasters in Mexico city: an assessment method. In: Mitchell JK (ed) Crucibles of hazard: mega-cities and disasters in transition. United Nations University Press, Tokyo, New York, Paris, ISBN 92-808-0987-3, pp 295–334Google Scholar
  11. Sinha R, Adrash N (1999) A postulated earthquake damage scenario for Mumbai. Indian Soc Earthquake Technol 36(3):1Google Scholar
  12. Sokolov VYu (2002) Seismic intensity and Fourier acceleration spectra: revised relationship. Earthquake Spectra 18(1):161–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Telford Th (1995) Megacities: reducing vulnerability to natural disasters. Institution of Civil Engineers, Thomas Telford Publications, London, ISBN 0-7277-2068-6Google Scholar
  14. UN [United Nations Population Division] (2000) World urbanization prospects: the 1999 revision. United Nations Population Division, New York, 128 ppGoogle Scholar
  15. Yong C, Tsoi KL, Fehbi C, Zhenhuan G, Oija Z, Zhangli C (1988) The Great Tangshan earthquake of 1976: an anatomy of disaster. Pergamon Press, ISBN 0-080-344875-0, 162 ppGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Friedemann Wenzel
    • 1
    Email author
  • Fouad Bendimerad
    • 2
  • Ravi Sinha
    • 3
  1. 1.Geophysical InstituteKarlsruhe UniversityKarlsruheGermany
  2. 2.Risk Management Solutions, Inc.NewarkUSA
  3. 3.Department of Civil EngineeringIITMumbaiIndia

Personalised recommendations