Advertisement

Natural Hazards

, Volume 39, Issue 1, pp 15–29 | Cite as

The Earthquake Readiness Scale: The Development of a Valid and Reliable Unifactorial Measure

  • Matthew J. Spittal
  • Frank H. Walkey
  • John McClure
  • Richard J. Siegert
  • Kimberley E. Ballantyne
Article

Abstract

Preparedness is a key dependent variable in many studies examining people’s response to disasters such as earthquakes. A feature of many studies on this issue, however, is the lack of attention given to psychometric issues when constructing measures of preparedness. With regard to earthquake preparation, for example, many studies could be greatly improved by the use of a valid and reliable measure of preparedness. This research developed such a measure that assessed both low-level preparedness, such as having an emergency kit, and high-level preparedness, such as altering home structures to mitigate damage. Studies of Wellington (New Zealand) residents using two samples totalling n=652 showed that 23 items measuring these different aspects of earthquake preparation could be combined into a reliable, valid, unifactorial scale. This brief scale should have utility in multivariate studies of earthquake preparation, either as a dependent variable, where preparation is the outcome variable of primary interest, or as one of several independent variables, where preparation and other measures predict another outcome variable.

Key words

earthquake readiness measure mitigation preparedness calibration scale scores 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Cortina, J. M. 1993What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applicationJ. Appl. Psychol.7898104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Man, A., Simpson-Housley, P. 1987Factors in the perception of earthquake hazardPercept. Motor Skills64815820Google Scholar
  3. Dooley, D., Catalano, R., Mishra, S., Serxner, S. 1992Earthquake preparedness: predictors in a community surveyJ. Appl. Social Psychol.22451470Google Scholar
  4. Edwards, M. E. 1993Social location and self-protective behavior: implications for earthquake preparednessInt. J. Mass Emergencies Disasters11293303Google Scholar
  5. Farley, J. E., Barlow, H. D., Finklestein, M. S., Riley, L. 1993Earthquake hysteria, before and after: a survey and follow-up on public response to the Browning forecastInt. J. Mass Emergencies Disasters11305322Google Scholar
  6. Hattie, J. 1985Methodology review: assessing unidimensionality of tests and itemsAppl. Psychol. Meas.9139164Google Scholar
  7. Hirose, H. 1986The psychological impact of the Tokai earthquake prediction: individual’s responses and the mass media coverageJpn. Psychol. Res.266476Google Scholar
  8. Hirose, H., Ishizuka, T. 1983Causal analysis of earthquake concern and preparing behavior in the North Izu PeninsulaJpn. Psychol. Res.25103111Google Scholar
  9. Hurnen, F. R. 1997Perceived Damage Preventability, Knowledge, and Preparation for EarthquakesVictoria University of WellingtonWellingtonUnpublished MA thesisGoogle Scholar
  10. Hurnen, F. R. and McClure, J.: 1997, The effect of increased earthquake knowledge on perceived preventability of earthquake damage. Aust. J. Disaster Trauma Stud. 1, Massey University, New Zealand, http://www.massey.ac.nz/-trauma
  11. Jackson, E. L. 1981Response to earthquake hazard: the West Coast of North AmericaEnviron. Behav.14387416Google Scholar
  12. Jackson, E. L., Mukerjee, T. 1974Human adjustment to the earthquake hazard in San Francisco, CaliforniaWhite, G. F. eds. Natural Hazards: Local, National and GlobalOxford University PressNew York160166Google Scholar
  13. Jensen, J., Spittal, M., Crichton, S., Sathyandra, S., Krishnan, V. 2002The Direct Measurement of Living Standards: The New Zealand ELSI ScaleMinistry of Social DevelopmentWellingtonGoogle Scholar
  14. Kiecolt, K. J., Nigg, J. M. 1982Mobility and perceptions of a hazardous environmentEnviron. Behav.14131154Google Scholar
  15. Kishton, J. M., Widaman, K. F. 1994Unidimensional versus domain representative parceling of questionnaire items: an empirical exampleEduc. Psychol. Meas.54757765Google Scholar
  16. Lindell, M. K., Perry, R. W. 2000Household adjustment to earthquake hazard: a review of researchEnviron. Behav.32461501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. McClure, J., Walkey, F., Allen, M. 1999When earthquake damage is seen as preventable: attributions, locus of control and attitudes to riskAppl. Psychol. Int. Rev.48239256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. McGeary, J.: August 30, 1999, Buried alive, Time 16–21Google Scholar
  19. Mileti, D., Darlington, J. D. 1997The role of searching in shaping reactions to earthquake risk informationSoc. Probl.4489103Google Scholar
  20. Mileti, D., Fitzpatrick, C. 1992The causal sequence of risk communication in the Parkfield earthquake prediction experimentRisk Anal.12393400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mileti, D., Fitzpatrick, C.: 1993, The great earthquake experiment: Risk communication and public action. Boulder, CO: WestviewGoogle Scholar
  22. Mileti, D., O’Brien, P. W. 1992Warnings during disasters: normalizing communicating riskSoc. Probl.384057Google Scholar
  23. Mulilis, J. P., Lippa, R. 1990Behavioral change in earthquake preparedness due to negative threat appeals: a test of protection motivation theoryJ. Appl. Soc. Psychol.20619638Google Scholar
  24. Mulilis, J. P., Duval, T. S., Bovalino, K. 2000Tornado preparedness of students, non-student renters, and non-student owners: issues of PrE theoryJ. Appl. Soc. Psychol.3013101329Google Scholar
  25. Mulilis, J. P., Duval, T. S., Lippa, R. 1990The effects of a large destructive local earthquake on earthquake preparedness as assessed by the Earthquake Preparedness ScaleNat. Hazards3357371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Russell, L. A., Goltz, J. D., Bourque, L. B. 1995Preparedness and hazard mitigation actions before and after two earthquakesEnviron. Behav.27744770Google Scholar
  27. Schmitt, N. 1996Uses and abuses of coefficient alphaPsychol. Assess.8350353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Showalter, P. S. 1993Prognostication of doom: an earthquake prediction’s effect on four small communitiesInt. J. Mass Emergencies Disasters11279292Google Scholar
  29. Sullivan, R., Mustart, D. A., Galehouse, J. S. 1977Living in earthquake countryCalif. Geol.338Google Scholar
  30. Turner, R. H., Nigg, J. M., Paz, D. H. 1986Waiting for Disaster: Earthquake Watch in CaliforniaUniversity of California PressLos AngelesGoogle Scholar
  31. Weinstein, N., Lyon, J. E., Rothman, A. J., Cuite, C. L. 2000Preoccupation and affect as predictors of protective action following natural disasterBrit. J. Health Psychol.5351363CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Matthew J. Spittal
    • 1
    • 2
  • Frank H. Walkey
    • 1
  • John McClure
    • 1
  • Richard J. Siegert
    • 1
  • Kimberley E. Ballantyne
    • 1
  1. 1.Victoria University of WellingtonNew Zealand
  2. 2.Centre for Behavioural Research in CancerThe Cancer Council of VictoriaCarlton VICAustralia

Personalised recommendations