Natural Hazards

, Volume 35, Issue 2, pp 243–264 | Cite as

An Analysis of Spatial and Temporal Dimension of Drought Vulnerability in Turkey Using the Standardized Precipitation Index

  • F. KEMAL. SÖNMEZ
  • ALI ÜMRAN KÖMÜSCÜ
  • AYHAN ERKAN
  • ERTAN TURGU
Article

Abstract

Drought has become a recurrent phenomenon in Turkey in the last few decades. Significant drought conditions were observed during years of late 1980s and the trend continued in the late 1990s. The country’s agricultural sector and water resources have been under severe constraints from the recurrent droughts. In this study, spatial and temporal dimensions of meteorological droughts in Turkey have been investigated from vulnerability concept. The Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI) method was used to detail geographical variations in the drought vulnerability based on frequency and severity of drought events at multiple time steps. Critical (threshold) rainfall values were derived for each station at multiple-time steps in varying drought categories to determine least amount of rainfall required to avoid from drought initiation. The study found that drought vulnerability portrays a very diverse but consistent picture with varying time steps. At regional scale, south-eastern and eastern Anatolia are characterized with moderate droughts at shorter time steps, while the occurrence of severe droughts at shorter time steps is observed at non-coastal parts of the country. A similar picture was observed with very severe droughts. The critical (threshold) values exhibited rising numbers during the growing season at 3-month step in the South-eastern Anatolia, which might have significant consequences considering presence of large irrigation projects under-development in the region. In general, rainfall amounts required for non-drought conditions decrease from the coastal parts toward the interiors with increasing time steps.

Keywords

drought drought vulnerability Turkey SPI critical (threshold) rainfall 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abramowitz, M.Stegun, A. eds. 1965Handbook of Mathematical Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical TablesDover PublicationsNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. American Meteorological Society: 2003, Meteorological drought, Bull. Am. Met. Soc.85, USA.Google Scholar
  3. Cullen, H. M., deMonecal, P. B. 1999North Atlantic influence on Tigris-Euphrates streamflowInt. J. Climatol.20853863Google Scholar
  4. Dracup, J. A., Lee, K. S., Paulson, E. G.,Jr. 1980On the definition of droughtsWater Resources Res.16297302Google Scholar
  5. Downing, T. E. and Bakker, K.: 2000, Drought discourse and vulnerability, In: D. A. Wilhite (ed), Drought: A Global Assessment,Natural Hazards and Disasters Series, Routledge Publishers, UK.Google Scholar
  6. Edwards, D. C. and McKee, T. B.: 1997, Characteristics of 20th century drought in the United States at multiple timescales, Colorado State University: Fort Collins. Climatology Report No. 97–2.Google Scholar
  7. Guttman, N. B. 1998Comparing the Palmer drought index and the standardized precipitation indexJ. Am. Water Resour. Assoc.34113121Google Scholar
  8. Guttman, N. B. 1999Accepting the standardized precipitation index: A calculation algorithmJ. Am. Water Resources Assoc.35311322Google Scholar
  9. Hayes, M. J., Svoboda, M. D., Wilhite, D. A., Vanyarkho, O. V. 1999Monitoring the 1999 drought using the standardized precipitation indexBull. Am. Meteorol. Soc.80429438Google Scholar
  10. Hurrell, J. W. 1995Decadal trends in the North Atlantic oscillation: Regional temperatures and precipitationScience269676679Google Scholar
  11. Keenan, S. P., Krannich, R. S. 1997The social context of perceived drought vulnerabilityRural Sociol.626988Google Scholar
  12. Komuscu, A. U. 2002An analysis of recent drought conditions in Turkey in relation to circulation PatternsDrought Network News1356Google Scholar
  13. Komuscu, A. U.: 2003, Weather Modification Activites in Turkey. Proceedings of Eight WMO Scientific Conference on Weather Modification.,casablanca, Morocco. WMO Report No. 39, Geneve, Switzerland, pp. 39–42Google Scholar
  14. Komuscu, A. U., Erkan, A., Oz, S. 1998Possible impacts of climate change on soil moisture variability in the Southeast Anatolian development project (GAP) region; An analysis from agricultural drought perspectiveClim. Change40519545Google Scholar
  15. Lloyd-Hughes, B., Saunders, M. 2002A drought climatology for EuropeInt. J. Climatol.2215711592Google Scholar
  16. McKee, T. B., Doesken, N. J., and Kleist, J.: 1993, The relationship of drought frequency and duration to time steps, Preprints, 8th Conference on Applied Climatology, January 17–22 Anaheim, California, pp. 179–184.Google Scholar
  17. Namias, J.: 1985, Hydrologic aspects of drought, In: Beran, M. A. and Rodier, J. A., (eds), Unesco-World Meteorological Organization, A Contribution to the International Hydrologic Programme, Paris, France, 27–64.Google Scholar
  18. Oladipio, E. O. 1985A comparative performance analysis of three meteorological drought indicesInt. J. Climatol.5655664Google Scholar
  19. Surfer1997Surfer Mapping System, Ver. 2 6.04Golden SoftwareGolden, CO, USAGoogle Scholar
  20. Thom, H. C. S. 1958A note on the gamma distributionMonthly Weather Rev.86117122Google Scholar
  21. Wilhelmi, O. V., Wilhite, D. A. 2002Assessing vulnerability to agricultural drought: A Nebraska case studyNatural Hazards253758Google Scholar
  22. Wilhite, D. A., Glantz, M. H. 1985Understanding the drought phenomenon: The role of Definitions, Water International10111120Google Scholar
  23. Wilhite, D. A. 1993

    The enigma of drought, Chapter 1

    Wilhite, D. A. eds. Drought Assessment, Management, and Planning: Theory and Case StudiesKluwer Academic PublishersBoston317
    Google Scholar
  24. Wilhite, D. A. 2000

    Drought as a natural hazard: Concepts and definitions, Chapter 1

    Wilhite, D. A. eds. Drought: A Global Assessment, Natural Hazards and Disasters SeriesRoutledge PublishersUK
    Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • F. KEMAL. SÖNMEZ
    • 1
  • ALI ÜMRAN KÖMÜSCÜ
    • 2
  • AYHAN ERKAN
    • 2
  • ERTAN TURGU
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Farm Structures and IrrigationUniversity of Ankara, Faculty of AgricultureDiskapiTurkey
  2. 2.Research and Data Processing DepartmentTurkish State Meteorological ServiceKalabaTurkey

Personalised recommendations