Advertisement

Networks and Spatial Economics

, Volume 18, Issue 1, pp 145–180 | Cite as

Retail Equilibrium with Switching Consumers in Electricity Markets

  • C. RuizEmail author
  • F. J. Nogales
  • F. J. Prieto
Article

Abstract

The ongoing transformations of power systems worldwide pose important challenges, both economic and technical, for their appropriate planning and operation. A key approach to improve the efficiency of these systems is through demand-side management, i.e., to promote the active involvement of consumers in the system. In particular, the current trend is to conceive systems where electricity consumers can vary their load according to real-time price incentives, offered by retailing companies. Under this setting, retail competition plays an important role as inadequate prices or services may entail consumers switching to a rival retailer. In this work we consider a game theoretical model where asymmetric retailers compete in prices to increase their profits by accounting for the utility function of consumers. Consumer preferences for retailers are uncertain and distributed within a Hotelling line. We analytically characterize the equilibrium of a retailer duopoly, establishing its existence and uniqueness conditions for a wide class of utility functions. Furthermore, sensitivities of the equilibrium prices with respect to relevant model parameters are also provided. The duopoly model is extended to a network that includes multiple retailers with capacity constraints for which we perform static and dynamic numerical simulations. Results indicate that, depending on the retailer costs, loyalty rewards and initial market shares, the resulting equilibrium can range from complete competition to one in which a retailer has a leading or even a dominant position in the market, decreasing the consumers’ utility significantly. Moreover, the retailer network configuration also plays an important role in the competitiveness of the system.

Keywords

Electricity market Game theory Retail competition Switching consumers 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge financial support from the Spanish government through project MTM2013-44902-P

References

  1. Acquisti A, Varian H R (2005) Conditioning prices on purchase history. Mark Sci 24(3):367–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Armstrong M (1998) Network interconnection in telecommunications. Econ J 108(448):545–564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bu S, Yu F R (2013) A game-theoretical scheme in the smart grid with demand-side management: towards a smart cyber-physical power infrastructure. IEEE Trans Emerging Topics Comput 1(1):22–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Csercsik D (2016) Competition and cooperation in a bidding model of electrical energy trade. Netw Spatial Econ 2016:1–31Google Scholar
  5. Chen Y, Bhardwaj P, Balasubramanian S (2014) The strategic implications of switching costs under customized pricing. Custom Needs Solut 1(3):188–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen Y, Riordan M H (2007) Price and variety in the spokes model. Econ J 117(522):897–921CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Di Giorgio A, Liberati F (2014) Near real time load shifting control for residential electricity prosumers under designed and market indexed pricing models. Appl Energy 128:119–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Doganoglu T (2010) Switching costs, experience goods and dynamic price competition. QME 8(2):167–205Google Scholar
  9. Farrell J, Klemperer P (2007) Coordination and lock-in: competition with switching costs and network effects. In: Armstrong M, Porter R (eds) Handbook of industrial organization. chapter 31, vol 3. Elsevier, pp 1967–2072Google Scholar
  10. Gabriel S A, Kiet S, Balakrishnan S (2004) A mixed integer stochastic optimization model for settlement risk in retail electric power markets. Netw Spatial Econ 4(4):323–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gallay O, Hongler M (2008) Market sharing dynamics between two service providers. Eur J Oper Res 190(1):241–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. García-Bertrand R (2013) Sale prices setting tool for retailers. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 4(4):2028–2035CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. He F, Yin Y, Wang J, Yang Y (2016) Sustainability SI: optimal prices of electricity at public charging stations for plug-in electric vehicles. Netw Spat Econ 16(1):131–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hotelling H (1929) Stability in competition. Econ J 39:41–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jiménez J L, Perdiguero J (2011) Does accessibility affect retail prices and competition? An empirical application. Netw Spatial Econ 11(4):677–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Joskow P, Tirole J (2006) Retail electricity competition. Rand J Econ 37 (4):799–815CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kirschen D S (2003) Demand-side view of electricity markets. IEEE Trans Power Syst 18(2):520–527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Laffont J -J, Rey P, Tirole J (1998) Network competition: I. Overview and nondiscriminatory pricing. RAND J Econ 29(1):1–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Leyffer S, Munson T (2010) Solving multi-leader-common-follower games. Optim Methods Softw 25:601–623CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mallet P, Granstrom P O, Hallberg P, Lorenz G, Mandatova P (2014) Power to the People!: European perspectives on the future of electric distribution. IEEE Power Energy Mag 12(2):51–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Müller M, Sensfuß F, Wietschel M (2007) Simulation of current pricing-tendencies in the German electricity market for private consumption. Energy Policy 35(8):4283–4294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Neto P A, Friesz T L, Han K (2016) Electric power network oligopoly as a dynamic Stackelberg game. Netw Spatial Econ 16(4):1211–1241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Oliveira F S, Ruiz C, Conejo A J (2013) Contract design and supply chain coordination in the electricity industry. Eur J Oper Res 227(3):527–537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. OMIE (2016) Electric spanish market operator. http://www.omie.es/en/inicio
  25. Qian L P, Zhang Y J A, Huang J, Wu Y (2013) Demand response management via real-time electricity price control in smart grids. IEEE J Selected Areas Commun 31(7):1268–1280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rhodes A (2014) Re-examining the effects of switching costs. Econ Theory 57 (1):161–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Shaffer G, Zhang Z J (1995) Competitive coupon targeting. Market Sci 14 (4):395:1986–1998CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Somaini P, Einav L (2013) A model of market power in customer markets. J Ind Econ 61(4):938–986CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. U.S. Goverment (2015) Energy policy act of 2005, Publ. L. 109-58. [Online] Available: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/PLAW-109publ58/pdf/PLAW-109publ58.pdf
  30. Waterson M (2003) The role of consumers in competition and competition policy. Int J Ind Organ 21(2):129–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wei W, Liu F, Mei S (2015) Energy pricing and dispatch for smart grid retailers under demand response and market price uncertainty. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 6(3):1364–1374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wilson C M, Price C W (2010) Do consumers switch to the best supplier? Oxford Economic Papers, gpq006Google Scholar
  33. Xia Y (2011) Competitive strategies and market segmentation for suppliers with substitutable products. European J Oper Res 210(2):194–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Zerrahn A, Huppmann D (2017) Network expansion to mitigate market power. Netw Spatial Econ 17(2):611–644CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of StatisticsUniversidad Carlos III de MadridLeganésSpain
  2. 2.UC3M-BS Institute of Financial Big DataLeganésSpain

Personalised recommendations