Dynamic Accessibility using Big Data: The Role of the Changing Conditions of Network Congestion and Destination Attractiveness
Accessibility is essentially a dynamic concept. However, most studies on urban accessibility take a static approach, overlooking the fact that accessibility conditions change dramatically throughout the day. Due to their high spatial and temporal resolution, the new data sources (Big Data) offer new possibilities for the study of accessibility. The aim of this paper is to analyse urban accessibility considering its two components –the performance of the transport network and the attractiveness of the destinations– using a dynamic approach using data from TomTom and Twitter respectively. This allows us to obtain profiles that highlight the daily variations in accessibility in the city of Madrid, and identify the influence of congestion and the changes in location of the population. These profiles reveal significant variations according to transport zones. Each transport zone has its own accessibility profile, and thus its own specific problems, which require solutions that are also specific.
KeywordsTime-sensitive accessibility Urban transport TomTom Twitter Geographic information systems (GIS)
The authors gratefully acknowledge funding from the ICT Theme of the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme (INSIGHT project - Innovative Policy Modelling and Governance Tools for Sustainable Post-Crisis Urban Development, GA 611307), the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness and the European Regional Development Fund (TRA2015-65283-R and FPDI 2013/17001), and the Madrid Regional Government (SOCIALBIGDATA-CM, S2015/HUM-3427).
- Ciuccarelli P, Lupi G, Simeone L (2014) Visualizing the Data City, First. Springer International Publishing, Cham. http://www.springer.com/la/book/9783319021942. Accessed 27 Apr 2017
- Geurs KT, Patuelli R, Dentinho TP (2016) Accessibility, Equity and Efficiency: Challenges for Transport and Public Services. Edward Elgar Publishing LimitedGoogle Scholar
- Grauwin S, Sobolevsky S, Moritz S, et al (2015) Towards a comparative science of cities: using mobile traffic records in New York, London, and Hong Kong. In: Helbich M, Jokar Arsanjani J, Leitner M (eds) Computational approaches for urban environments, First. Springer International Publishing, pp 363–387Google Scholar
- Kaddoura I, Kröger L, Nagel K (2016) User-specific and dynamic internalization of road traffic noise exposures. Networks Spat Econ :1–20. doi: 10.1007/s11067-016-9321-2
- Mascia M, Hu S, Han K, et al (2016) Impact of traffic management on black carbon emissions: a microsimulation study. Networks Spat Econ :1–23. doi: 10.1007/s11067-016-9326-x
- Murthy D (2013) Twitter: social communication in twitter age, first. John Wiley & Sons, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Netto VM, Pinheiro M, Meirelles JV, Leite H (2015) Digital footprints in the cityscape: finding networks of segregation through big data. In: International Conference on Location-Based Social Media Data. Athens, pp 1–15Google Scholar
- Salas-Olmedo MH, Rojas-Quezada C (2016) Mapping mobility patterns to public spaces in a medium-sized city using geolocated tweets. arXiv, Phys Soc 10Google Scholar