The Multiregional Core-periphery Model: The Role of the Spatial Topology
We use the multiregional core-periphery model of the new economic geography to analyze and compare the agglomeration and dispersion forces shaping the location of economic activity for a continuum of network topologies — spatial or geographic configuration — characterized by their degree of centrality, and comprised between two extremes represented by the homogenous (ring) and the heterogeneous (star) configurations. Resorting to graph theory, we systematically extend the analytical tools and graphical representations of the core-periphery model for alternative spatial configuration, and study the sustain and break points. We study new phenomena such as the infeasibility of the dispersed equilibrium in the heterogeneous space, resulting in the introduction of the concept pseudo flat-earth as a long-run equilibrium corresponding to an uneven distribution of economic activity between regions.
KeywordsNew economic geography Space topology Transport costs Networks
We are grateful to Martijn Smit, Andrés Rodriguez-Pose, Kristian Behrens and two anonymous referee for useful comments and suggestions. A previous version of this paper was presented at the 52nd European Congress of the RSAI (Bratislavia, Slovakia), the 59th Annual Northe Amatican meetings of the RSAI, (Ottawa, Canada) and in the seminar series at New York University. This work was supported by Madrid’s Directorate-General of Universities and Research (S2007-HUM-0467), the Spanish Ministry of Education (AP2010-1401), and the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (ECO2010-21643 and ECO2013-46980-P).
- Akamatsu T, Takayama Y (2009) Simplified approach to analyzing multi-regional core-periphery models. Tech. rep., Munich Personal RePEc Archive, mPRA PaperGoogle Scholar
- Baldwin R, Forslid R, Martin P, Ottaviano G (2005) Economic Geography & Public Policy. Princeton University Press, Robert-Nicoud FGoogle Scholar
- Castro SB, da Silva JC, Mossay P (2012) The core-periphery model with three regions and more. Pap Reg Sci 91:401–418Google Scholar
- Cronon W (1991) Nature’s Metropolis: Chicago and the Great West. W.W. Norton, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Fujita M, Krugman P, Venables A (1999) The Spatial Economy: Cities, Regions, and International Trade. MIT PressGoogle Scholar
- Harary F (1969) Graph Theory. Addison-WesleyGoogle Scholar
- Krugman P, Obstfeld M (2011) Melitz M. Pearson Addison-Wesley, International Economics: Theory & PolicyGoogle Scholar
- Kuroda T (2014) A model of stratified production process and spatial risk. Networks and Spatial Economics ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
- Puga D, Venables A (1995) Preferential trading arrangements and industrial location. Discussion paper 267, Centre for Economic Performance, London School of EconomicsGoogle Scholar
- Tabuchi T, Thisse JF, Zhu X (2014) Technological Progress and Economic Geography. CIRJE F-Series CIRJE-F-915, CIRJE, Faculty of Economics, University of TokyoGoogle Scholar