Advertisement

Networks and Spatial Economics

, Volume 9, Issue 3, pp 459–483 | Cite as

Jurisdictional Control and Network Growth

  • Feng Xie
  • David Levinson
Article

Abstract

Transport infrastructure evolves over time in a complex process as part of a dynamic and open system including travel demand, land use, as well as economic and political initiatives. As transport infrastructure changes, each traveler may adopt a new schedule, frequency, destination, mode, and/or route, and in the long term may change the location of their activities. These new behaviors create demand for a new round of modifications of infrastructure. In the long run, we observe the collective change in the capacity, service, connectivity, and connection patterns (topology) of networks. This paper examines how a fixed set of places incrementally gets connected as transport networks are constructed and upgraded over time. A simulator of network incremental connection (SONIC) is constructed to model the process of incremental connections and examines how networks evolve differently under centralized versus decentralized jurisdictional initiatives. Exploring the mechanism underlying this dynamic process can answer questions such as how urban networks have developed into various topologies, which network patterns are more efficient, and whether and how transport engineers, planners, and decision makers can guide the dynamics of land uses and infrastructure in a desired direction.

Keywords

Network growth Transport economics Incremental connection Jurisdictional control 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson D, Mohring H (1997) Congestion costs and congestion pricing. In: Greene D, Jones D, Delucchi M (eds) The full costs and benefits of transportation: contributions, theory and measurement. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Barabási A (2002) Linked: the new science of networks. Perseus PublicationGoogle Scholar
  3. Besley T, Coate S (2003) Central versus local provision of public goods: a political economy analysis. J Public Econ 87(4):2611–2637CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bureau of Public Roads (1964) Traffic assignment manual. US Dept. of Commerce, Urban Planning Division, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  5. de Dios Ortuzar J, Willumsen LG (2001) Modeling transport. WileyGoogle Scholar
  6. El-Geneidy AM, Levinson D (2006) Access to destinations: development of accessibility measures. Technical Report, Center for Transportation Research, University of MinnesotaGoogle Scholar
  7. Epple D, Nechyba T (2004) Handbook of regional and urban economics. Elsevier, Chapter 55, pp 2423–2480Google Scholar
  8. Gomez-Ibanez J, Tye WB, Winston C (1999) Essays in transportation economics and policy. The Brookings Institution, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  9. Hargett P (1966) Locational analysis in human geography. St. Martin’s Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. Harggett P, Chorley JC (1969) Network analysis in geography. Butler and TannerGoogle Scholar
  11. Helbing D, Keltsch J, Molnár P (1997) Modeling the evolution of human trail systems. Nature 388:47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Humplick F, Moini-Araghi A (1996a) Decentralized structures for providing roads: a cross-country comparison. Policy Research Working Paper 1658. World Bank, Policy Research Department, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  13. Humplick F, Moini-Araghi A (1996b) Is there an optimal structure for decentralized provision of roads? Policy Research Working Paper 1657. World Bank, Policy Research Department, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  14. Knight B (2002) Endogenous federal grants and crowd-out of state government spending: theory and evidence from the federal highway aid program. Amer Econ Rev 92(1):71–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lachene R (1965) Networks and the location of economic activities. Regional Sci Association Papers 14:183–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Levinson D (2002) Financing transportation networks. Edward Elgar, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  17. Levinson D, Karamalaputi R (2003) Induced supply: a model of highway network expansion at the microscopic level. J Trans Econ Policy 37:297–318Google Scholar
  18. Levinson D, Xie F (2007) Modeling the growth of transportation networks: a comprehensive review. Networks, Economics & Urban Systems (NEXUS) working paperGoogle Scholar
  19. Levinson D, Xie F, de Oca NM (2007) Forecasting and evaluating network growth. University of CalgaryGoogle Scholar
  20. Levinson D, Xie F, Zhu S (2007) The co-evolution of land use and road networks. In: Allsop RE, Bell MG, Heydecker BG (eds) Transportation and traffic theory 2007. Papers selected for presentation at the 17th International Symposium on Transportation and Traffic Theory, a peer reviewed series since 1959. ElsevierGoogle Scholar
  21. Levinson D, Yerra B (2006) Self organization of surface transportation networks. Trans Sci 40:179–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mohring H, Harwitz M (1962) Highway benefits: an analytical framework. Northwestern University PressGoogle Scholar
  23. Montes de Oca N, Levinson D (2006) Network expansion decision-making in the twin cities. Trans Res Rec 1981:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Neuberger H (1971) User benefit in the evaluation of transport and land use plans. J Trans Econ Policy 52–77Google Scholar
  25. Oates WE (1972) Fiscal federalism. New York: Harcourt Brace JovanovichGoogle Scholar
  26. Powell WB, Sheffi Y (1982) Convergence of equilibrium algorithms with predetermined step sizes. Trans Sci 16(1):45–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pred A (1966) The spatial dynamics of U.S. urban–industrial growth, 1900–1914. Cambridge: The MIT PressGoogle Scholar
  28. Rimmer P (1967) The changing status of new zealand seaports. Ann Assoc Amer Geogr 57:88–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Safirova E, Gillingham K, Houde S (2007) Measuring marginal congestion costs of urban transportation: Do networks matter? Trans Res A 41(8):734–749Google Scholar
  30. Sheffi Y (1985) Urban Transportation networks: equilibrium analysis with mathematical programming methods. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJGoogle Scholar
  31. Suwansirikul C, Friesz TL, Tobin R (1987) Equilibrium decomposed optimization: a heuristic for the continuous equilibrium network design problem. Trans Sci 21(4):261Google Scholar
  32. Taaffe E, Gauthier H, OKelly M (1996) Geography of transportation. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJGoogle Scholar
  33. Taaffe E, Morrill RL, Gould PR (1963) Transportation expansion in underdeveloped countries: a comparative analysis. Geogr Rev 53:503–529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Verhoef E, Rouwendal J (2004) Pricing, capacity choice, and financing in transportation networks. J Reg Sci 44(3):405–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Xie F, Levinson D (2007) The weakest link: a model of the decline of surface transportation networks. Trans Res part E (in press)Google Scholar
  36. Yamins D, Rasmussen S, Fogel D (2003) Growing urban roads. Netw Spat Econ 3:69–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Yerra B, Levinson D (2005) The emergence of hierarchy in transportation networks. Ann Reg Sci 39:541–553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Zhang L, Levinson D (2005a) The economics of transportation network growth. In: Milln PC, Inglada V (eds) Essays in transportation economics. SpringerGoogle Scholar
  39. Zhang L, Levinson D (2005b) Road pricing with autonomous links. Trans Res Rec 147–155Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolisUSA

Personalised recommendations