Advertisement

Networks and Spatial Economics

, Volume 6, Issue 3–4, pp 267–291 | Cite as

Application of Accessibility Based Methods for Vulnerability Analysis of Strategic Road Networks

  • Michael A. P. TaylorEmail author
  • Somenahalli V. C. Sekhar
  • Glen M. D'Este
Article

Abstract

This paper describes the development of a method for strategic assessment of vulnerability in road networks. Our vulnerability analysis considers the socio-economic impacts of network degradation, on the basis of changes in the levels of accessibility provided by the degraded network. A number of standard indices of accessibility are considered, including generalised travel cost, the Hansen integral accessibility index, and the ARIA index used in Australia to assess levels of remoteness in rural areas. Simple case studies of a national strategic road network and a regional road network are used to illustrate both the general approach and specific implementations.

Keywords

Network vulnerability Network reliability Accessibility Road network Regional development 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Asakura Y (1999) Evaluation of network reliability using stochastic user equilibrium. J Adv Transp 33(2):147–158Google Scholar
  2. Attorney-General's Department (2003, March 10) Trusted information sharing network for critical infrastructure protection. Attorney-General's Department, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  3. Bell MGH, Cassir C (eds) (2000) Reliability of transport networks. Research Studies, Baldock, HertsGoogle Scholar
  4. Bell MGH, Iida Y (1997) Transportation network analysis. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  5. Berdica K (2002) An introduction to road vulnerability: what has been done, is done and should be done. Transp Policy 9:117–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bonsall PW (2000) Travellers' response to uncertainty. In: Bell MGH, Cassir C (eds) Reliability of transport networks. Research Studies, Baldock, Herts, pp 1–10Google Scholar
  7. BTRE (2002) Benefits of flood mitigation in Australia. Report 106. Bureau of Transport and Regional Economics, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  8. Chen A, Yang H, Lo HK, Tang WH (1999) A capacity related reliability for transportation networks. J Adv Transp 33(2):183–200Google Scholar
  9. D'Este GM, Taylor MAP (2001) Modelling network vulnerability at the level of the national strategic transport network. J East Asia Soc Transp Stud 4(2):1–14Google Scholar
  10. D'Este GM, Taylor MAP (2003) Network vulnerability: an approach to reliability analysis at the level of national strategic transport networks. In: Iida Y, Bell MGH (eds) The network reliability of transport. Pergamon-Elsevier, Oxford, pp 23–44Google Scholar
  11. DHAC (2001) Measuring remoteness: Accessibility/remoteness index of Australia (ARIA) (Revised edition). Occasional Paper, New Series no 14. Department of Health and Aged Cared, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  12. DOTARS (2004) AusLink white paper. Department of Transport and Regional Services, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  13. Evans AW (1994) Evaluating public transport and road safety measures. Accident Anal Prev 26:411–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gargett D., Sidebottom A (2003) Freight between Australian cities 1972 to 2001. BTRE Information Sheet 22. Bureau of Transport and Regional Economics, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  15. Hansen WG (1959) How accessibility shapes land use. J Am Inst Plann 25:73–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Iida Y (1999) Basic concepts and future directions of road network reliability analysis. J Adv Transp 33(2):125–134Google Scholar
  17. Iida Y, Bell MGH (eds) (2003) The network reliability of transport. Pergamon-Elsevier, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  18. Koenig JG (1980) Indicators of urban accessibility: theory and application. Transportation 9:145–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lam WHK (ed) (1999) Special issue on transport network reliability. J Adv Transp 33(2):121-251Google Scholar
  20. Lam WHK, Xu G (2000) Calibration of traffic flow simulator for network reliability assessment. In: Bell MGH, Cassir C (eds) Reliability of transport networks. Research Studies, Baldock, Herts, pp 139–157Google Scholar
  21. Lee CE (1946, May/June) New works for wartime traffic. Railway Mag 92:177–183Google Scholar
  22. Morris JM, Dumble PL, Wigan MR (1979) Accessibility indicators for transport planning. Transp Res 13A:91–109Google Scholar
  23. Nicholson AJ, Dalziell E (2003) Risk evaluation and management: a road network reliability study. In: Iida Y, Bell MGH (eds) The network reliability of transport. Pergamon-Elsevier, Oxford, pp 45–59Google Scholar
  24. Nicholson AJ, Dante A (eds) (2004) Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Transportation Network Reliability (INSTR04). Department of Civil Engineering, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
  25. Niemeier DA (1997) Accessibility: an evaluation using consumer welfare. Transportation 24:377–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Primerano F (2003) Towards a policy-sensitive accessibility measure. Papers of the Australasian Transport Research Forum 27, CD-ROM paper no 35Google Scholar
  27. Primerano F, Taylor MAP (2005) An accessibility framework for evaluating transport policies. In: Levinson DM, Krizek KJ (eds) Access to destinations. Elsevier, Oxford, pp 325–346Google Scholar
  28. Richardson AJ, Taylor MAP (1978) A study of travel time variability on commuter journeys. High Speed Ground Transp J 12(1):77–99Google Scholar
  29. Sekhar SVC, Taylor MAP (2005, November 8–10) GIS approach to understanding the relationship between road network accessibility and socio-economic indicators. Proc 4th Asia-Pacific Transport and the Environment Conference, Xian, P R ChinaGoogle Scholar
  30. Taylor MAP (1982) Travel time variability—the case of two public modes. Transp Sci 16(2):517–521Google Scholar
  31. Taylor MAP (1999) Dense network traffic models, travel time reliability and traffic management II: application to reliability. J Adv Transp 33(2):235–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Taylor MAP (2000) Using network reliability concepts for traffic calming—permeability, approachability and tortuosity—in network design. In: Bell MGH, Cassir C (eds) Reliability of transport networks. Research Studies, Baldock, Herts, pp 217–242Google Scholar
  33. Taylor MAP, D'Este GM (2004a) Critical infrastructure and transport network vulnerability: developing a method for diagnosis and assessment. Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Transportation Network Reliability (INSTR04). Department of Civil Engineering, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, pp 96–102Google Scholar
  34. Taylor MAP, D'Este GM (2004b) Safeguarding transport networks: assessment of network vulnerability and development of remedial measures. Australian Journal of Multidisciplinary Engineering, Special Edition on Engineering a Secure Australia, pp 13–22Google Scholar
  35. Van Zuylen HJ (2004) The effect of irregularity of travel times on departure time choice. Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Transportation Network Reliability (INSTR04) Department of Civil Engineering, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, pp 253–259Google Scholar
  36. Yang H, Lo HK, Tang WH (2000) Travel time versus capacity reliability of a road network. In: Bell MGH, Cassir C (eds) Reliability of transport networks. Research Studies, Baldock, Herts, pp 119–138Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael A. P. Taylor
    • 1
    Email author
  • Somenahalli V. C. Sekhar
    • 1
  • Glen M. D'Este
    • 1
  1. 1.Transport Systems CentreUniversity of South AustraliaAdelaideAustralia

Personalised recommendations