Advertisement

Towards 5G: Techno-economic analysis of suitable use cases

  • Juan Riol Martín
  • Raquel Pérez-Leal
  • Julio Navío-MarcoEmail author
Article

Abstract

The evolution of mobile networks towards the Fifth Generation (5G) introduces many concerns from the technical and economic points of view. Expected new applications exceed mobile networks’ current capabilities, and 4G networks will have to evolve into 5G networks to provide some with a proper service. With regard to the ambitious intended performance of 5G networks, a huge process is required which will need to be faced both technically and economically. The 5G “ready system” standard is scheduled for 2020. However, only a few studies have carried out techno-economic evaluation of 5G. This paper presents a techno-economic analysis to foresee some feasible technical architectures leading to suitable and affordable use cases. The paper presents a new approach based on different evolving technical scenarios, establishing combined 4G/5G technical solutions and a roadmap that could provide useful insights about the most suitable use cases by scenario. Moreover, it analyses these possible use cases to determine their feasibility by optimizing their deployment costs. The study is based on the standardization process, integration of different views of key industrial players and mathematical modelling to address the new applications that 5G will provide. Finally, conclusions are drawn from the analysis and a recommendation score is established, providing useful advice to support the strategic decisions of the different stakeholders, technologists and investors involved in deployment of 5G networks.

Keywords

5G Techno-economic analysis Use cases Deployment Recommendation score 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work has been partly supported by Spanish National Projects TERESA-ADA (TEC2017-90093-C3-2-R) (MINECO/AEI/FEDER, UE).

References

  1. 1.
    Alnoman, A., & Anpalagan, A. (2017). Towards the fulfillment of 5G network requirements: Technologies and challenges. Telecommunication Systems, 65(1), 101–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Alsharif, M. H., & Nordin, R. (2017). Evolution towards fifth generation (5G) wireless networks: Current trends and challenges in the deployment of millimetre wave, massive MIMO, and small cells. Telecommunication Systems, 64(4), 617–637.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11235-016-0195-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bai, Y,. Zhou, J., Chen, L. (2009) Hybrid spectrum usage for overlaying LTE macrocell and femtocell, IEEE GLOBECOM.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bartelt, J., Vucic, N., Camps-Mur, D., Garcia-Villegas, E., Demirkol, I., Fehske, A., Grieger, M., Tzanakaki, A., Gutiérrez, J., Grass, E., Lyberopoulos, G., & Fettweis, G. (2017). 5G transport network requirements for the next generation fronthaul interface. EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking, 89.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s13638-017-0874-7.
  5. 5.
    Basilier, H., Frid, L., Hall, G., Nilsson, G., Roeland, D., Ruine, G., Stuempert, M.A., (2016). A vision of the 5G Core: Flexibility for new business opportunities. Ericsson 2016. https://www.ericsson.com/49eac7/assets/local/publications/ericsson-technology-review/docs/2016/etr-5g-core-vision.pdf.
  6. 6.
    Bouras, C., Kokkinos, V., Kollia, A., & Papazois, A. (2015). Techno-economic analysis of ultra-dense and DAS deployments in mobile 5G (pp. 241–245). Brussels: International Symposium on Wireless Communication Systems (ISWCS).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bouras, C., Ntarzanos, P., & Papazois, A. (2016). Cost modeling for SDN/NFV based mobile 5G networks (pp. 56–61). Lisbon: 8th International Congress on Ultra Modern Telecommunications and Control Systems and Workshops (ICUMT).  https://doi.org/10.1109/ICUMT.2016.7765232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Breuer, D., Weis, E., Grobe, K., Krauß, S., Musumeci, F., Torrijos Gijon, J., Skubic, B. (2016) 5G transport in future access networks. ECOC 2016; 42nd European Conference on Optical Communication, Düsseldorf, 1–3.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Costanzo, S., Xenakis, D., Passas, N., Merakos, L.. (2014) OpeNB: A framework for virtualizing base stations in LTE networks. Communications (ICC), 2014 IEEE International Conference, 3148–3153.  https://doi.org/10.1109/ICC.2014.6883805.
  10. 10.
    Ericsson (2015) 5G Radio Access: Technologies and Capabilities. https://www.ericsson.com/49ebb7/assets/local/news/2015/2/wp-5g.pdf.
  11. 11.
    Ericsson (2016). Western Europe Ericsson Mobility Report. https://www.ericsson.com/assets/local/mobility-report/documents/2016/ericsson-mobility-report-november-2016-rwe.pdf (Last access on 31st July, 2017).
  12. 12.
    GSMA Intelligence (2017). The 5G era: Age of boundless connectivity and intelligent automation. https://www.gsmaintelligence.com/research/2017/02/the-5g-era-age-of-boundless-connectivity-and-intelligent-automation/614/.
  13. 13.
    Gunasekaran, V., Harmantzis, F. C., & Ryan, K. (2008). Strategic investment analysis for migration beyond 3G wireless networks. NETNOMICS: Economic Research and Electronic Networking, 9(1), 47–75.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11066-008-9031-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Harno, J., Kumar, K. R., Eskedal, T. G., Venturin, R., Katsianis, D., & Varoutas, D. (2007). Techno-economic evaluation of 3G and beyond mobile business alternatives. NETNOMICS: Economic Research and Electronic Networking, 8(1–2), 5–23.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11066-008-9026-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    ITU, Focus Group on IMT-2020, (Established 2015-05; Terminated 2016-12). https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-T/focusgroups/imt-2020/Pages/default.aspx (Accessed on 31st August 2018).
  16. 16.
    ITU, ITU-T Y.3302 (2017). Functional architecture of software-defined networking. Recommendation.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    ITU (2012). ITU-T Y.3011, Framework of network virtualization for future networks. Recommendation.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    ITU (2016). Geneva Mission Briefing Series, Emerging Trends in 5G/IMT-2020. https://www.itu.int/en/membership/Documents/missions/GVA-mission-briefing-5G-28Sept2016.pdf (Last access on 31st July, 2017).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jiang, M., Xenakis, D., Costanzo, S., Passas, N., Mahmoodi, T. (2017). Radio resource sharing as a service in 5G: A software-defined networking approach. Computer Communications 107, 13–29.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comcom.2017.03.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kaleem, Z., Ahmad, A., & Rehmani, M. H. (2018). Neighbors’ interference situation-aware power control scheme for dense 5G mobile communication system. Telecommunication Systems, 67(3), 443–450.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11235-017-0350-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Katsigiannis, M., Smura, T., Casey, T., & Sorri, A. (2013). Techno-economic modeling of value network configurations for public wireless local area access. NETNOMICS: Economic Research and Electronic Networking, 14(1–2), 27–46.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11066-013-9077-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kliks, A., Musznicki, B., Kowalik, K., & Kryszkiewicz, P. (2018). Perspectives for resource sharing in 5G networks. Telecommunication Systems, 68(4), 605–619.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Magdalinos, P., Barmpounakis, S., Spapis, P., Kaloxylos, A., Kyprianidis, G., Kousaridas, A., Alonistioti, N., & Zhou, C. (2017). A context extraction and profiling engine for 5G network resource mapping. Computer Communications, 109, 184–201.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comcom.2017.06.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Neokosmidis, I., Rokkas, T., Parker, M., Koczian. G., Walker, S., Shuaib Siddiqui, M., Escalona. E. (2016) Assessment of socio-techno-economic factors affecting the market adoption and evolution of 5G networks: Evidence from the 5G-PPP CHARISMA project. Telematics and Informatics: Volume 34, Issue 5, 2017, Pages 572–589.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Oughton, E. J., & Frias, Z. (2018). The cost, coverage and rollout implications of 5G infrastructure in Britain. Telecommunications Policy, 42(8), 636–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Qualcomm Technologies, Inc (2016). Making 5G NR a reality. https://www.qualcomm.com/media/documents/files/whitepaper-making-5g-nr-a-reality.pdf.
  27. 27.
    Smail, G. and Weijia, J. (2017) Techno-economic analysis and prediction for the deployment of 5G mobile network, 20th conference on innovations in clouds, internet and networks (ICIN), Paris. 9–16.  https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIN.2017.7899243.
  28. 28.
    Sutton, A. (2017). 5G Network Architecture And Design. British Telecom (BT). https://www.slideshare.net/3G4GLtd/5g-network-architecture-and-design (Last access on 31st July, 2017).
  29. 29.
    Tech4i2 (2016). Real wireless CONNECT, Trinity College Dublin and InterDigital for the European Commission. Identification and quantification of key socio-economic data to support strategic planning for the introduction of 5G in Europe.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    3GPP. Release 15, http://www.3gpp.org/release-15 (Accessed on 31st August, 2018).
  31. 31.
    3GPP. Release 16, http://www.3gpp.org/release-16 (Accessed on 31st August, 2018).
  32. 32.
    3GPP TS 36.331 V14.9.0 (2018). Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access (E-UTRAN), Radio Resource Control (RRC); Protocol specification (Release 13).Google Scholar
  33. 33.
  34. 34.
    5G Americas (2017) Wireless Technology Evolution Towards 5G: 3GPP Release 13 to 15 and beyond.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    5G Americas (2017). 5G Services & Use Cases. https://www.5gamericas.org/5g-services-use-cases/.
  36. 36.
    5G PPP (2015). 5G infrastructure Public Private Partnership: the next generation of communication networks and services. Section 7.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Signal Theory and CommunicationsUniversidad Carlos III de MadridLeganésSpain
  2. 2.UNED UniversityMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations