Resilience and Other Possible Outcomes After Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: a Systematic Review
- 1.1k Downloads
The relation between resilience and mild traumatic brain injury (TBI) outcome has been theorized but empirical studies have been scarce. This systematic review aimed to describe the research in this area. Electronic databases (Medline, CINAHL, PsychINFO, SPORTdiscus, and PILOTS) were searched from inception to August 2015 for studies in which resilience was measured following TBI. The search terms included ‘TBI’ ‘concussion’ ‘postconcussion’ ‘resilience’ and ‘hardiness’. Inclusion criteria were peer reviewed original research reports published in English, human participants aged 18 years and over with brain injury, and an accepted definition of mild TBI. Hand searching of identified articles was also undertaken. Of the 71 studies identified, five studies were accepted for review. These studies were formally assessed for risk of bias by two independent reviewers. Each study carried a risk of bias, most commonly a detection bias, but none were excluded on this basis. A narrative interpretation of the findings was used because the studies reflected fundamental differences in the conceptualization of resilience. No studies employed a trajectory based approach to measure a resilient outcome. In most cases, the eligible studies assessed trait resilience with a scale and used it as a predictor of outcome (postconcussion symptoms). Three of these studies showed that greater trait resilience was associated with better mild TBI outcomes (fewer symptoms). Future research of the adult mild TBI response that predicts a resilient outcome is encouraged. These studies could yield empirical evidence for a resilient, and other possible mild TBI outcomes.
KeywordsMild traumatic brain injury Resilience Concussion Persistent postconcussion symptoms
The authors acknowledge the assistance of S. Kate Devitt, PhD (QUT) for guidance on conducting systematic database searches. The authors thank Simon Smith, PhD (QUT) for assistance with the final production of Fig. 1.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
Sullivan, Kempe, Edmed and Bonanno declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. (1993). Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Committee of the Head Injury Interdisciplinary Special Interest Group of the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine: Definition of mild traumatic brain injury. The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 8, 86–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A., & Brown, G. K. (1996). Manual for the Beck Depression Inventory-II (Finnish version). San Antonio.Google Scholar
- Belanger, H. G., Vanderploeg, R. D., & Curtiss, G. (in press). TBC. In J. E. Morgan, & J. H. Ricker (Eds.), Textbook of clinical neurospcyhology: Second edition. Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
- Cassidy, J. D., Carroll, L. J., Peloso, P. M., Borg, J., von Holst, H., Holm, L., et al. (2004). Incidence, risk factors and prevention of mild traumatic brain injury: Results of the WHO collaborating centre task force on mild traumatic brain injury. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 36(1 supp 43), 28–60. doi: 10.1080/16501960410023732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Coronado, V. G., Haileyesus, T., Cheng, T. A., Bell, J. M., Haarbauer-Krupa, J., Lionbarger, M. R., et al. (2015). Trends in sports-and recreation-related traumatic brain injuries treated in US emergency departments: the national electronic injury surveillance system-all injury program (NEISS-AIP) 2001-2012. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 30(3), 185–197. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000156.
- Diaz-Arrastia, R., & Kenney, K. (2014). Epidemiology of traumatic brain injury. In Traumatic brain injury (pp. 181–191). Wiley.Google Scholar
- Graham, D. P., Helmer, D. A., Harding, M. J., Kosten, T. R., Petersen, N. J., & Nielsen, D. A. (2013). Serotonin transporter genotype and mild traumatic brain injury independently influence resilience and perception of limitations in veterans. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 47(6), 835–842.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Hyder, A. A., Wunderlich, C. A., Puvanachandra, P., Gururaj, G., & Kobusingye, O. C. (2007). The impact of traumatic brain injuries: A global perspective. NeuroRehabilitation-An Interdisciplinary Journal, 22(5), 341–354.Google Scholar
- Iverson, G. L. (2012). A biopsychosocial conceptualization of poor outcome from mild traumatic brain injury. In R. A. Vasterling, R. A. Bryant, & T. M. Keane (Eds.), PTSD and mild traumatic brain injury (pp. 37–60). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- King, N. S., Crawford, S., Wenden, F. J., Moss, N. E., & Wade, D. T. (1995). The Rivermead Post Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire: A measure of symptoms commonly experienced after head injury and its reliability. Journal of Neurology, 242(9), 587–592. doi: 10.1007/BF00868811.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lange, R. T., Brickell, T. A., Ivins, B., Vanderploeg, R. D., & French, L. M. (2013). Variable, not always persistent, postconcussion symptoms after mild TBI in U.S. military service members: A five-year cross-sectional outcome study. Journal of Neurotrauma, 30(11), 958–969. doi: 10.1089/neu.2012.2743.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- McCrea, M., Iverson, G. L., McAllister, T. W., Hammeke, T. A., Powell, M. R., Barr, W. B., et al. (2009). An integrated review of recovery after mild traumatic brain injury (MTBI): Implications for clinical management. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 23(8), 1368–1390. doi: 10.1080/13854040903074652.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- McMahon, P., Hricik, A., Yue, J. K., Puccio, A. M., Inoue, T., Lingsma, H. F., et al. (2014). Symptomatology and functional outcome in mild traumatic brain injury: Results from the prospective TRACK-TBI study. Journal of Neurotrauma, 31(1), 26–33. doi: 10.1089/neu.2013.2984.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Merritt, V. C., Lange, R. T., & French, L. M. (2015). Resilience and symptom reporting following mild traumatic brain injury in military service members. Brain Injury(ahead-of-print), 1–12.Google Scholar
- Ruff, R. M., & Hibbard, K. M. (2003). Ruff Neurobehavioral Inventory professional manual. Lutz.Google Scholar
- Vanderploeg, R., Belanger, H., & Curtiss, G. (2006). Mild traumatic brain injury: Neuropsychological causality modelling. In G. Young, K. Nicholson, & A. Kane (Eds.), Psychological knowledge in court (pp. 279–307). Springer US.Google Scholar
- Viswanathan, M., Berkman, N., Dryden, M., & Hartling, L. (2013). Assessng risk of bias and confounding in observational studies of interventions or exposures: Further development of the RTI Item Bank. Methods Research Report. Prepared by RTI-UNC Evidence-based Practice Center under Contract No. 290-2007-10056-1. Publication No. 13-EHC106-EF. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ).Google Scholar
- Wagnild, G. M. (2009). The resilience scale user’s guide: For the US english version of the resilience scale and the 14-item Resilience Scale (RS-14). Resilience center.Google Scholar
- Weathers, F., Litz B., Herman, D., Huska, J., & Keane, T. (1993). The PTSD Checklist (PCL): Reliability, validity, and diagnostic utility. In 9th Annual Convention of the International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies. San Antonio.Google Scholar
- Yeates, K. O., Taylor, H. G., Rusin, J., Bangert, B., Dietrich, A., Nuss, K., et al. (2009). Longitudinal trajectories of postconcussive symptoms in children with mild traumatic brain injuries and their relationship to acute clinical status. Pediatrics, 123(3), 735–743.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar