Advertisement

Uptake of Intact Copper Oxide Nanoparticles Causes Acute Toxicity in Cultured Glial Cells

  • Arundhati Joshi
  • Karsten Thiel
  • Kshitija Jog
  • Ralf DringenEmail author
Original Paper
  • 19 Downloads

Abstract

Copper oxide nanoparticles (CuO-NPs) dispersions are known for their high cell toxic potential but contaminating copper ions in such dispersions are a major hurdle in the investigation of specific nanoparticle-mediated toxicity. In order to distinguish between the adverse effects exhibited by CuO-NPs and/or by contaminating ionic copper, the membrane-impermeable copper chelator bathocuproine disulfonate (BCS) was added in a low molar ratio (20% of the total copper applied) in order to chelate the copper ions that had been released extracellularly from the CuO-NPs before or during the incubation. Physicochemical characterization of synthesized CuO-NPs revealed that the presence of this low concentration of BCS did not alter the size or zeta potential of the CuO-NPs. Application of CuO-NPs to C6 glioma cells and primary astrocytes induced a concentration- and temperature-dependent copper accumulation which was accompanied by a severe loss in cell viability. The adverse consequences of the CuO-NP application were not affected by the presence of 20% BCS, while the copper accumulation and cell toxicity observed after application of ionic copper were significantly lowered in the presence of BCS. These results demonstrate that for the experimental conditions applied the adverse consequences of an exposure of cultured glial cells to dispersions of CuO-NPs are mediated by accumulated NPs and not caused by the uptake of contaminating copper ions.

Keywords

Astrocytes Copper Glia Nanoparticles Toxicity 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Arundhati Joshi would like to thank the Hans-Böckler Foundation for a PhD fellowship at the Graduate School NanoCompetence at the University of Bremen, Germany.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Chauhan M, Sharma B, Kumar R, Chaudhary GR, Hassan AA, Kumar S (2019) Green synthesis of CuO nanomaterials and their proficient use for organic waste removal and antimicrobial application. Environ Res 168:85–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Khatami M, Alijani HQ, Sharifi I (2018) Biosynthesis of bimetallic and core–shell nanoparticles: their biomedical applications–a review. IET Nanobiotechnol 12:879–887CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kadiyala U, Kotov NA, VanEpps JS (2018) Antibacterial metal oxide nanoparticles: challenges in interpreting the literature. Curr Pharm Des 24:896–903CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Titma T, Shimmo R, Siigur J, Kahru A (2016) Toxicity of antimony, copper, cobalt, manganese, titanium and zinc oxide nanoparticles for the alveolar and intestinal epithelial barrier cells in vitro. Cytotechnology 68:2363–2377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Líbalová H, Costa PM, Olsson M, Farcal L, Ortelli S, Blosi M, Topinka J, Costa AL, Fadeel B (2018) Toxicity of surface-modified copper oxide nanoparticles in a mouse macrophage cell line: Interplay of particles, surface coating and particle dissolution. Chemosphere 196:482–493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zhang J, Zou Z, Wang B, Xu G, Wu Q, Zhang Y, Yuan Z, Yang X, Yu C (2018) Lysosomal deposition of copper oxide nanoparticles triggers HUVEC cells death. Biomaterials 161:228–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bulcke F, Thiel K, Dringen R (2014) Uptake and toxicity of copper oxide nanoparticles in cultured primary brain astrocytes. Nanotoxicology 8:775–785Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kukia NR, Abbasi A, Froushani SMA (2018) Copper oxide nanoparticles stimulate cytotoxicity and apoptosis in glial cancer cell line. Dhaka Univ J Pharm Sci 17:105–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Vinardell M, Mitjans M (2018) Metal/metal oxide nanoparticles for cancer therapy. In: Goncalves G, Tobias G (eds) Nanooncology. Springer, Cham, pp 341–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zhou Y, Peng Z, Seven ES, Leblanc RM (2018) Crossing the blood-brain barrier with nanoparticles. J Control Release 270:290–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Khalid S, Afzal N, Khan JA, Hussain Z, Qureshi AS, Anwar H, Jamil Y (2018) Antioxidant resveratrol protects against copper oxide nanoparticle toxicity in vivo. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Arch Pharmacol 391:1053–1062CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Li X, Sun W, An L (2018) Nano-CuO impairs spatial cognition associated with inhibiting hippocampal long-term potentiation via affecting glutamatergic neurotransmission in rats. Toxicol Ind Health 34:409–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lian D, Chonghua Z, Wen G, Hongwei Z, Xuetao B (2017) Label-free and dynamic monitoring of cytotoxicity to the blood–brain barrier cells treated with nanometre copper oxide. IET Nanobiotechnol 11:948–956CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Prabhu BM, Ali SF, Murdock RC, Hussain SM, Srivatsan M (2010) Copper nanoparticles exert size and concentration dependent toxicity on somatosensory neurons of rat. Nanotoxicology 4:150–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mahmoud A, Elif GE, Gül O (2016) Copper (II) Oxide nanoparticles induce high toxicity in human neuronal cell. Glob J Med Res 16:7–14Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Conway JR, Adeleye AS, Gardea-Torresdey J, Keller AA (2015) Aggregation, dissolution, and transformation of copper nanoparticles in natural waters. Environ Sci Technol 49:2749–2756CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Midander K, Wallinder IO, Leygraf C (2007) In vitro studies of copper release from powder particles in synthetic biological media. Environ Pollut 145:51–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Midander K, Cronholm P, Karlsson HL, Elihn K, Möller L, Leygraf C, Wallinder IO (2009) Surface characteristics, copper release, and toxicity of nano-and micrometer-sized copper and copper (II) oxide particles: a cross-disciplinary study. Small 5:389–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Semisch A, Ohle J, Witt B, Hartwig A (2014) Cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of nano-and microparticulate copper oxide: role of solubility and intracellular bioavailability. Part Fibre Toxicol 11:10–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Jeong J, Kim S-H, Lee S, Lee D-K, Han Y, Jeon S, Cho W-S (2018) Differential contribution of constituent metal ions to the cytotoxic effects of fast-dissolving metal-oxide nanoparticles. Front Pharmacol 9:15–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wang D, Lin Z, Wang T, Yao Z, Qin M, Zheng S, Lu W (2016) Where does the toxicity of metal oxide nanoparticles come from: the nanoparticles, the ions, or a combination of both? J Hazard Mater 308:328–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Joshi A, Rastedt W, Faber K, Schultz AG, Bulcke F, Dringen R (2016) Uptake and toxicity of copper oxide nanoparticles in C6 glioma cells. Neurochem Res 41:3004–3019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Cho W-S, Duffin R, Poland CA, Duschl A, Oostingh GJ, MacNee W, Bradley M, Megson IL, Donaldson K (2012) Differential pro-inflammatory effects of metal oxide nanoparticles and their soluble ions in vitro and in vivo; zinc and copper nanoparticles, but not their ions, recruit eosinophils to the lungs. Nanotoxicology 6:22–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Chen S-H, Lin J-K, Liu S-H, Liang Y-C, Lin-Shiau S-Y (2007) Apoptosis of cultured astrocytes induced by the copper and neocuproine complex through oxidative stress and JNK activation. Toxicol Sci 102:138–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kim BH, Yang J, Lee D, Choi BK, Hyeon T, Park J (2018) Liquid-phase transmission electron microscopy for studying colloidal inorganic nanoparticles. Adv Mater 30:1703316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Michen B, Geers C, Vanhecke D, Endes C, Rothen-Rutishauser B, Balog S, Petri-Fink A (2015) Avoiding drying-artifacts in transmission electron microscopy: Characterizing the size and colloidal state of nanoparticles. Sci Rep 5:9793CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Benda P, Lightbody J, Sato G, Levine L, Sweet W (1968) Differentiated rat glial cell strain in tissue culture. Science 161:370–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Stapelfeldt K, Ehrke E, Steinmeier J, Rastedt W, Dringen R (2017) Menadione-mediated WST1 reduction assay for the determination of metabolic activity of cultured neural cells. Anal Biochem 538:42–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Tulpule K, Hohnholt MC, Hirrlinger J, Dringen R (2014) Primary cultures of astrocytes and neurons as model systems to study the metabolism and metabolite export from brain cells. In: Hirrlinger J, Waagepetersen H (eds) Neuromethods: brain energy metabolism. Springer, New York, pp 45–72Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL, Randall RJ (1951) Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem 193:265–275Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Chen L, Xue X, Jiang D, Yang J, Zhao B, Han XX, Mee Jung Y (2016) A turn-on resonance Raman scattering (BCS/Cu+) sensor for quantitative determination of proteins. Appl Spectrosc 70:355–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Bulcke F, Santofimia-Castaño P, Gonzalez-Mateos A, Dringen R (2015) Modulation of copper accumulation and copper-induced toxicity by antioxidants and copper chelators in cultured primary brain astrocytes. J Trace Elem Med Biol 32:168–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Stark WJ (2011) Nanoparticles in biological systems. Angew Chem 50:1242–1258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Chen D, Darabedian N, Li Z, Kai T, Jiang D, Zhou F (2016) An improved Bathocuproine assay for accurate valence identification and quantification of copper bound by biomolecules. Anal Biochem 497:27–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Arratia F, Olivares-Ferretti P, García-Rodríguez A, Marcos R, Carmona ER (2019) Comparative toxic effects of copper-based nanoparticles and their microparticles in Daphnia magna by using natural freshwater media. New Zeal J Mar Fresh 53:460–469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Henson TE, Navratilova J, Tennant AH, Bradham KD, Rogers KR, Hughes MF (2019) In vitro intestinal toxicity of copper oxide nanoparticles in rat and human cell models. Nanotoxicology 13:795–811CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Jurašin DD, Ćurlin M, Capjak I, Crnković T, Lovrić M, Babič M, Horák D, Vrček IV, Gajović S (2016) Surface coating affects behavior of metallic nanoparticles in a biological environment. Beilstein J Nanotechnol 7:246–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Ortelli S, Costa AL, Blosi M, Brunelli A, Badetti E, Bonetto A, Hristozov D, Marcomini A (2017) Colloidal characterization of CuO nanoparticles in biological and environmental media. Environ Sci Nano 4:1264–1272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Geppert M, Petters C, Thiel K, Dringen R (2013) The presence of serum alters the properties of iron oxide nanoparticles and lowers their accumulation by cultured brain astrocytes. J Nanopart Res 15:1349–1364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Scheiber IF, Mercer JF, Dringen R (2010) Copper accumulation by cultured astrocytes. Neurochem Int 56:451–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Tiffany-Castiglioni E, Qian Y (2001) Astroglia as metal depots: molecular mechanisms for metal accumulation, storage and release. Neurotoxicology 22:577–592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Bulcke F, Dringen R (2016) Handling of copper and copper oxide nanoparticles by astrocytes. Neurochem Res 41:33–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Behzadi S, Serpooshan V, Tao W, Hamaly MA, Alkawareek MY, Dreaden EC, Brown D, Alkilany AM, Farokhzad OC, Mahmoudi M (2017) Cellular uptake of nanoparticles: journey inside the cell. Chem Soc Rev 46:4218–4244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Willmann W, Dringen R (2018) Monitoring of the cytoskeleton-dependent intracellular trafficking of fluorescent iron oxide nanoparticles by nanoparticle pulse-chase experiments in C6 glioma cells. Neurochem Res 43:2055–2071CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Geppert M, Hohnholt MC, Thiel K, Nürnberger S, Grunwald I, Rezwan K, Dringen R (2011) Uptake of dimercaptosuccinate-coated magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles by cultured brain astrocytes. Nanotechnology 22:145101–145111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Masuoka J, Saltman P (1994) Zinc (II) and copper (II) binding to serum albumin. A comparative study of dog, bovine, and human albumin. J Biol Chem 269:25557–25561Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Peters T, Blumenstock FA (1967) Copper-binding properties of bovine serum albumin and its amino-terminal peptide fragment. J Biol Chem 242:1574–1578Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Scheiber IF, Mercer JF, Dringen R (2014) Metabolism and functions of copper in brain. Prog Neurobiol 116:33–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Akhtar MJ, Kumar S, Alhadlaq HA, Alrokayan SA, Abu-Salah KM, Ahamed M (2016) Dose-dependent genotoxicity of copper oxide nanoparticles stimulated by reactive oxygen species in human lung epithelial cells. Toxicol Ind Health 32:809–821CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Angelé-Martínez C, Nguyen KVT, Ameer FS, Anker JN, Brumaghim JL (2017) Reactive oxygen species generation by copper (II) oxide nanoparticles determined by DNA damage assays and EPR spectroscopy. Nanotoxicology 11:278–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Huang Y-W, Cambre M, Lee H-J (2017) The toxicity of nanoparticles depends on multiple molecular and physicochemical mechanisms. Int J Mol Sci 18:2702–2715CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Chang Y-N, Zhang M, Xia L, Zhang J, Xing G (2012) The toxic effects and mechanisms of CuO and ZnO nanoparticles. Materials 5:2850–2871CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Macomber L, Imlay JA (2009) The iron-sulfur clusters of dehydratases are primary intracellular targets of copper toxicity. Proc Natl Acad Sci 106:8344–8349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Saporito-Magriñá CM, Musacco-Sebio RN, Andrieux G, Kook L, Orrego MT, Tuttolomondo MV, Desimone MF, Boerries M, Borner C, Repetto MG (2018) Copper-induced cell death and the protective role of glutathione: the implication of impaired protein folding rather than oxidative stress. Metallomics 10:1743–1754CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Noventa S, Hacker C, Rowe D, Elgy C, Galloway T (2018) Dissolution and bandgap paradigms for predicting the toxicity of metal oxide nanoparticles in the marine environment: an in vivo study with oyster embryos. Nanotoxicology 12:63–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Djurišić AB, Leung YH, Ng AM, Xu XY, Lee PK, Degger N, Wu R (2015) Toxicity of metal oxide nanoparticles: mechanisms, characterization, and avoiding experimental artefacts. Small 11:26–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Biomolecular Interactions Bremen, Faculty 2 (Biology/Chemistry)University of BremenBremenGermany
  2. 2.Center for Environmental Research and Sustainable TechnologyBremenGermany
  3. 3.Fraunhofer Institute for Manufacturing Technology and Advanced MaterialsBremenGermany

Personalised recommendations