Advertisement

MiR-124 Enriched Exosomes Promoted the M2 Polarization of Microglia and Enhanced Hippocampus Neurogenesis After Traumatic Brain Injury by Inhibiting TLR4 Pathway

  • Yongxiang Yang
  • Yuqin Ye
  • Chuiguang Kong
  • Xinhong Su
  • Xin Zhang
  • Wei Bai
  • Xiaosheng He
Original Paper
  • 44 Downloads

Abstract

MicroRNA-124 (miR-124) is a brain specific miRNA that is highly expressed in microglia. The upregulation of miR-124 contributes to M2 polarization of microglia, which is beneficial to neurogenesis. Exosomes are lipid membrane vesicles that can deliver miR-124 into the brain. However, whether miR-124 enriched exosomes (Exo-miR-124) can regulate the polarization of microglia and affect hippocampus neurogenesis after traumatic brain injury (TBI) is unknown. To clarify this, the Exo-miR-124 was first constructed, and then was intravenously administrated into rats via tail vein with the dose of 3 × 109 particles/each rat at 24 h post TBI. The polarization of microglia in hippocampus was evaluated through measuring the signature genes and cytokines of M1/M2 phenotype by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and enzyme-linked immune sorbent assay (ELISA) at 7/14/21/28 days after TBI. Hippocampus neurogenesis was evaluated through detecting the proliferation marker BrdU/SOX2 and differentiation marker BrdU/NeuN by immunofluorescence (IF) at 7 and 28 days after TBI respectively. Neurological function was evaluated by neurological severity score (NSS) and morris water maze (MWM) at 7/14/21/28 and 24–28 days after TBI respectively. To explore the underlying mechanisms, the mRNA expression of TLR4 pathway molecules in hippocampus were measured by RT-PCR, and the polarization of microglia and the activation of TLR4 pathway in BV2 cells were measured after exosome treatment as well. Results demonstrated that Exo-miR-124 treatment promoted the M2 polarization of microglia, enhanced neurogenesis in hippocampus, and improved function recovery after TBI. The M2 polarization effect of Exo-miR-124 was produced through inhibiting TLR4 pathway, which was verified in hippocampus and BV2 microglia. In conclusion, Exo-miR-124 treatment promoted M2 polarization of microglia and improved hippocampal neurogenesis and functional recovery after brain injury, which might be a strategy to improve the outcome of TBI.

Keywords

Traumatic brain injury Exosome MiR-124 Microglia Neurogenesis TLR4 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The present work was supported by Grants from National Natural Science Foundation of China (81471264 to XH), Science and Technology Development Fund of Airforce Military Medical University (Fourth Military Medical University) (2016XC178 and 2016XC210 to XH).

Author Contributions

XH designed the experiments and guided the writing of this article. YY, YY, CK and XS were responsible for performing experiments and writing the manuscript. XZ and WB contributed to acquire and analyze the data. Authors included in this article agreed with the final manuscript.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Menon DK, Schwab K, Wright DW, Maas AI (2010) Position statement: definition of traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 91:1637–1640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Xiong Y, Mahmood A, Chopp M (2017) Emerging potential of exosomes for treatment of traumatic brain injury. Neural Regen Res 12:19–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sun D (2016) Endogenous neurogenic cell response in the mature mammalian brain following traumatic injury. Exp Neurol 275(Pt 3):405–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    de Miranda AS, Zhang CJ, Katsumoto A, Teixeira AL (2017) Hippocampal adult neurogenesis: does the immune system matter? J Neurol Sci 372:482–495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Monje ML, Toda H, Palmer TD (2003) Inflammatory blockade restores adult hippocampal neurogenesis. Science 302:1760–1765CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wu MD, Hein AM, Moravan MJ, Shaftel SS, Olschowka JA, O’Banion MK (2012) Adult murine hippocampal neurogenesis is inhibited by sustained IL-1beta and not rescued by voluntary running. Brain Behav Immun 26:292–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Iosif RE, Ekdahl CT, Ahlenius H, Pronk CJ, Bonde S, Kokaia Z, Jacobsen SE, Lindvall O (2006) Tumor necrosis factor receptor 1 is a negative regulator of progenitor proliferation in adult hippocampal neurogenesis. J Neurosci 26:9703–9712CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kiyota T, Ingraham KL, Swan RJ, Jacobsen MT, Andrews SJ, Ikezu T (2012) AAV serotype 2/1-mediated gene delivery of anti-inflammatory interleukin-10 enhances neurogenesis and cognitive function in APP + PS1 mice. Gene Ther 19:724–733CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Butovsky O, Ziv Y, Schwartz A, Landa G, Talpalar AE, Pluchino S, Martino G, Schwartz M (2006) Microglia activated by IL-4 or IFN-gamma differentially induce neurogenesis and oligodendrogenesis from adult stem/progenitor cells. Mol Cell Neurosci 31:149–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Battista D, Ferrari CC, Gage FH, Pitossi FJ (2006) Neurogenic niche modulation by activated microglia: transforming growth factor beta increases neurogenesis in the adult dentate gyrus. Eur J Neurosci 23:83–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Moore CS, Rao VT, Durafourt BA, Bedell BJ, Ludwin SK, Bar-Or A, Antel JP (2013) miR-155 as a multiple sclerosis-relevant regulator of myeloid cell polarization. Ann Neurol 74:709–720CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Veremeyko T, Siddiqui S, Sotnikov I, Yung A, Ponomarev ED (2013) IL-4/IL-13-dependent and independent expression of miR-124 and its contribution to M2 phenotype of monocytic cells in normal conditions and during allergic inflammation. PLoS ONE 8:e81774CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ponomarev ED, Veremeyko T, Weiner HL (2013) MicroRNAs are universal regulators of differentiation, activation, and polarization of microglia and macrophages in normal and diseased CNS. Glia 61:91–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Svahn AJ, Giacomotto J, Graeber MB, Rinkwitz S, Becker TS (2016) miR-124 Contributes to the functional maturity of microglia. Dev Neurobiol 76:507–518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ponomarev ED, Veremeyko T, Barteneva N, Krichevsky AM, Weiner HL (2011) MicroRNA-124 promotes microglia quiescence and suppresses EAE by deactivating macrophages via the C/EBP-alpha-PU.1 pathway. Nat Med 17:64–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Periyasamy P, Liao K, Kook YH, Niu F, Callen SE, Guo ML, Buch S (2018) Cocaine-mediated downregulation of miR-124 activates microglia by targeting KLF4 and TLR4 signaling. Mol Neurobiol 55:3196–3210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ning R, Venkat P, Chopp M, Zacharek A, Yan T, Cui X, Seyfried D, Chen J (2017) D-4F increases microRNA-124a and reduces neuroinflammation in diabetic stroke rats. Oncotarget 8:95481–95494Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Yu A, Zhang T, Duan H, Pan Y, Zhang X, Yang G, Wang J, Deng Y, Yang Z (2017) MiR-124 contributes to M2 polarization of microglia and confers brain inflammatory protection via the C/EBP-alpha pathway in intracerebral hemorrhage. Immunol Lett 182:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Yang Y, Ye Y, Su X, He J, Bai W, He X (2017) MSCs-derived exosomes and neuroinflammation, neurogenesis and therapy of traumatic brain injury. Front Cell Neurosci 11:55Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zhang Y, Chopp M, Meng Y, Katakowski M, Xin H, Mahmood A, Xiong Y (2015) Effect of exosomes derived from multipluripotent mesenchymal stromal cells on functional recovery and neurovascular plasticity in rats after traumatic brain injury. J Neurosurg 122:856–867CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zhang Y, Chopp M, Zhang ZG, Katakowski M, Xin H, Qu C, Ali M, Mahmood A, Xiong Y (2017) Systemic administration of cell-free exosomes generated by human bone marrow derived mesenchymal stem cells cultured under 2D and 3D conditions improves functional recovery in rats after traumatic brain injury. Neurochem Int 111:69–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lee ST, Im W, Ban JJ, Lee M, Jung KH, Lee SK, Chu K, Kim M (2017) Exosome-Based Delivery of miR-124 in a Huntington’s Disease Model. J Mov Disord 10:45–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Pinto S, Cunha C, Barbosa M, Vaz AR, Brites D (2017) Exosomes from NSC-34 Cells transfected with hSOD1-G93A are enriched in miR-124 and drive alterations in microglia phenotype. Front Neurosci 11:273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Yang J, Zhang X, Chen X, Wang L, Yang G (2017) Exosome mediated delivery of miR-124 promotes neurogenesis after ischemia. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids 7:278–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Mouihate A (2016) Prenatal activation of toll-like receptor-4 dampens adult hippocampal neurogenesis in An IL-6 dependent manner. Front Cell Neurosci 10:173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Seong KJ, Lee HG, Kook MS, Ko HM, Jung JY, Kim WJ (2016) Epigallocatechin-3-gallate rescues LPS-impaired adult hippocampal neurogenesis through suppressing the TLR4-NF-kappaB signaling pathway in mice. Korean J Physiol Pharmacol 20:41–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Keene CD, Chang R, Stephen C, Nivison M, Nutt SE, Look A, Breyer RM, Horner PJ, Hevner R, Montine TJ (2009) Protection of hippocampal neurogenesis from toll-like receptor 4-dependent innate immune activation by ablation of prostaglandin E2 receptor subtype EP1 or EP2. Am J Pathol 174:2300–2309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ahmad A, Crupi R, Campolo M, Genovese T, Esposito E, Cuzzocrea S (2013) Absence of TLR4 reduces neurovascular unit and secondary inflammatory process after traumatic brain injury in mice. PLoS ONE 8:e57208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Yao X, Liu S, Ding W, Yue P, Jiang Q, Zhao M, Hu F, Zhang H (2017) TLR4 signal ablation attenuated neurological deficits by regulating microglial M1/M2 phenotype after traumatic brain injury in mice. J Neuroimmunol 310:38–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Huang S, Ge X, Yu J, Han Z, Yin Z, Li Y, Chen F, Wang H, Zhang J, Lei P (2018) Increased miR-124-3p in microglial exosomes following traumatic brain injury inhibits neuronal inflammation and contributes to neurite outgrowth via their transfer into neurons. FASEB J 32:512–528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Xin H, Katakowski M, Wang F, Qian JY, Liu XS, Ali MM, Buller B, Zhang ZG, Chopp M (2017) MicroRNA cluster miR-17-92 cluster in exosomes enhance neuroplasticity and functional recovery after stroke in rats. Stroke 48:747–753CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Taupin P (2007) BrdU immunohistochemistry for studying adult neurogenesis: paradigms, pitfalls, limitations, and validation. Brain Res Rev 53:198–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Wojtowicz JM, Kee N (2006) BrdU assay for neurogenesis in rodents. Nat Protoc 1:1399–1405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Ye Y, Zhao Z, Xu H, Zhang X, Su X, Yang Y, Yu X, He X (2016) Activation of sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor 1 enhances hippocampus neurogenesis in a rat model of traumatic brain injury: an involvement of MEK/Erk signaling pathway. Neural Plast 2016:8072156Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Ye Y, Yang Y, Chen C, Li Z, Jia Y, Su X, Wang C, He X (2017) Electroacupuncture improved hippocampal neurogenesis following traumatic brain injury in mice through inhibition of TLR4 signaling pathway. Stem Cells Int 2017:5841814Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Beni-Adani L, Gozes I, Cohen Y, Assaf Y, Steingart RA, Brenneman DE, Eizenberg O, Trembolver V, Shohami E (2001) A peptide derived from activity-dependent neuroprotective protein (ADNP) ameliorates injury response in closed head injury in mice. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 296:57–63Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Albert-Weissenberger C, Varrallyay C, Raslan F, Kleinschnitz C, Siren AL (2012) An experimental protocol for mimicking pathomechanisms of traumatic brain injury in mice. Exp Transl Stroke Med 4:1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Vorhees CV, Williams MT (2006) Morris water maze: procedures for assessing spatial and related forms of learning and memory. Nat Protoc 1:848–858CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Vorhees CV, Williams MT (2014) Value of water mazes for assessing spatial and egocentric learning and memory in rodent basic research and regulatory studies. Neurotoxicol Teratol 45:75–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Raposo G, Stoorvogel W (2013) Extracellular vesicles: exosomes, microvesicles, and friends. J Cell Biol 200:373–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Braicu C, Tomuleasa C, Monroig P, Cucuianu A, Berindan-Neagoe I, Calin GA (2015) Exosomes as divine messengers: are they the Hermes of modern molecular oncology? Cell Death Differ 22:34–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Kalani A, Tyagi A, Tyagi N (2014) Exosomes: mediators of neurodegeneration, neuroprotection and therapeutics. Mol Neurobiol 49:590–600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Xue F, Shen R, Chen X (2015) Analysis of gene profiles in glioma cells identifies potential genes, miRNAs, and target sites of migratory cells. Tumori 101:542–548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Amici SA, Dong J, Guerau-de-Arellano M (2017) Molecular mechanisms modulating the phenotype of macrophages and microglia. Front Immunol 8:1520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Sun M, Brady RD, Wright DK, Kim HA, Zhang SR, Sobey CG, Johnstone MR, O’Brien TJ, Semple BD, McDonald SJ, Shultz SR (2017) Treatment with an interleukin-1 receptor antagonist mitigates neuroinflammation and brain damage after polytrauma. Brain Behav Immun 66:359–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Helmy A, Guilfoyle MR, Carpenter KL, Pickard JD, Menon DK, Hutchinson PJ (2014) Recombinant human interleukin-1 receptor antagonist in severe traumatic brain injury: a phase II randomized control trial. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 34:845–851CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Richardson RM, Sun D, Bullock MR (2007) Neurogenesis after traumatic brain injury. Neurosurg Clin N Am 18:169–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Sun Y, Li Q, Gui H, Xu DP, Yang YL, Su DF, Liu X (2013) MicroRNA-124 mediates the cholinergic anti-inflammatory action through inhibiting the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines. Cell Res 23:1270–1283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Alvarez-Erviti L, Seow Y, Yin H, Betts C, Lakhal S, Wood MJ (2011) Delivery of siRNA to the mouse brain by systemic injection of targeted exosomes. Nat Biotechnol 29:341–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Braccioli L, van Velthoven C, Heijnen CJ (2014) Exosomes: a new weapon to treat the central nervous system. Mol Neurobiol 49:113–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    McDonald SJ, Sun M, Agoston DV, Shultz SR (2016) The effect of concomitant peripheral injury on traumatic brain injury pathobiology and outcome. J Neuroinflam 13:90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Sun M, McDonald SJ, Brady RD, O’Brien TJ, Shultz SR (2018) The influence of immunological stressors on traumatic brain injury. Brain Behav Immun 69:618–628CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yongxiang Yang
    • 1
    • 2
  • Yuqin Ye
    • 1
    • 3
  • Chuiguang Kong
    • 1
  • Xinhong Su
    • 1
  • Xin Zhang
    • 1
  • Wei Bai
    • 1
  • Xiaosheng He
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of NeurosurgeryXijing Hospital, Airforce Military Medical University (Fourth Military Medical University)Xi’anChina
  2. 2.Department of NeurosurgeryPLA 422nd HospitalZhanjiangChina
  3. 3.Department of NeurosurgeryPLA 163rd Hospital (Second Affiliated Hospital of Hunan Normal University)ChangshaChina

Personalised recommendations