Advertisement

Neural Processing Letters

, Volume 45, Issue 3, pp 807–824 | Cite as

Directed Connectivity Analysis of Functional Brain Networks during Cognitive Activity Using Transfer Entropy

  • Md. Hedayetul Islam ShovonEmail author
  • Nanda Nandagopal
  • Ramasamy Vijayalakshmi
  • Jia Tina Du
  • Bernadine Cocks
Article

Abstract

Most previous studies of functional brain networks have been conducted on undirected networks despite the fact that direction of information flow is able to provide additional information on how one brain region influences another. The current study explores the application of normalized transfer entropy (NTE) to detect and identify the patterns of information flow in the functional brain networks derived from EEG data during cognitive activity. Using a combination of signal processing, information and graph-theoretic techniques, this study has identified and characterized the changing connectivity patterns of the directed functional brain networks during different cognitive tasks. The functional brain networks constructed from EEG data using non-linear measure NTE also exhibit small-world property. An exponential truncated power-law fits the in-degree and out-degree distribution of directed functional brain networks. The empirical results demonstrate not only the application of transfer entropy in evaluating the directed functional brain networks, but also in determining the information flow patterns and thus provide more insights into the dynamics of the neuronal clusters underpinning cognitive function.

Keywords

Transfer entropy Information flow Directed functional brain networks EEG Cognitive load Graph theory 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to acknowledge the partial support provided by the Defence Science and Technology (DST) Group, Australia.

References

  1. 1.
    Rubinov M, Sporns O (2010) Complex network measures of brain connectivity: uses and interpretations. Neuroimage 52(3):1059–1069CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bullmore E, Sporns O (2009) Complex brain networks: graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems. Nat Rev Neurosci 10(3):186–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Nandagopal DN, Vijayalakshmi R, Cocks B, Dahal N, Dasari N, Thilaga M, Dharwez SS (2013) Computational techniques for characterizing cognition using EEG data-new approaches. Proc Comput Sci 22:699–708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Shovon MHI, Nandagopal DN, Vijayalakshmi R, Du JT, Cocks B (2014) Transfer Entropy and Information Flow Patterns in Functional Brain Networks during Cognitive Activity. In: Neural information processing. Lecture notes in computer science (LNCS 8834), Part I., Springer, New York, pp 1–10Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Leicht EA, Newman ME (2008) Community structure in directed networks. Phys Rev Lett 100(11):118703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fagiolo G (2007) Clustering in complex directed networks. Phys Rev E 76(2):026107MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Vicente R, Wibral M, Lindner M, Pipa G (2011) Transfer entropy—a model-free measure of effective connectivity for the neurosciences. J Comput Neurosci 30(1):45–67MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Schreiber T (2000) Measuring information transfer. Phys Rev Lett 85(2):461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wibral M, Vicente R, Lindner M (2014) Transfer entropy in neuroscience. In: Wibral M, Vicente R, Lizier JT (eds) Directed information measures in neuroscience. Springer, Berlin, pp 3–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chávez M, Martinerie J, Le Van QM (2003) Statistical assessment of nonlinear causality: application to epileptic EEG signals. J Neurosci Methods 124(2):113–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gourévitch B, Eggermont JJ (2007) Evaluating information transfer between auditory cortical neurons. J Neurophysiol 97(3):2533–2543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sabesan S, Narayanan K, Prasad A, Iasemidis L, Spanias A, Tsakalis K (2007) Information flow in coupled nonlinear systems: Application to the epileptic human brain. In: Pardalos PM, Boginski VL, Alkis V (eds) Data mining in biomedicine. Springer, Berlin, pp 483–503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kaiser A, Schreiber T (2002) Information transfer in continuous processes. Physica D 166(1):43–62MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lindner M, Vicente R, Priesemann V, Wibral M (2011) TRENTOOL: a Matlab open source toolbox to analyse information flow in time series data with transfer entropy. BMC Neurosci 12(1):119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Neymotin SA, Jacobs KM, Fenton AA, Lytton WW (2011) Synaptic information transfer in computer models of neocortical columns. J Comput Neurosci 30(1):69–84MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kim MK, Kim M, Oh E, Kim SP (2013) A review on the computational methods for emotional state estimation from the human EEG. Comput Math Methods Med 2013:573734Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Boccaletti S, Latora V, Moreno Y, Chavez M, Hwang D-U (2006) Complex networks: structure and dynamics. Phys Rep 424(4):175–308MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Newman ME (2003) The structure and function of complex networks. SIAM Rev 45(2):167–256MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Milo R, Shen-Orr S, Itzkovitz S, Kashtan N, Chklovskii D, Alon U (2002) Network motifs: simple building blocks of complex networks. Science 298(5594):824–827CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    McDonnell MD, Yaveroğlu ÖN, Schmerl BA, Iannella N, Ward LM (2014) Motif-role-fingerprints: the building-blocks of motifs, clustering-coefficients and transitivities in directed networks. PloS One 9(12):e114503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sporns O, Kötter R (2004) Motifs in brain networks. PLoS Biol 2(11):e369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Achard S, Salvador R, Whitcher B, Suckling J, Bullmore E (2006) A resilient, low-frequency, small-world human brain functional network with highly connected association cortical hubs. J Neurosci 26(1):63–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Liao W, Ding J, Marinazzo D, Xu Q, Wang Z, Yuan C, Zhang Z, Lu G, Chen H (2011) Small-world directed networks in the human brain: multivariate Granger causality analysis of resting-state fMRI. Neuroimage 54(4):2683–2694CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Yan C, He Y (2011) Driving and driven architectures of directed small-world human brain functional networks. PLoS One 6(8):e23460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Watts DJ, Strogatz SH (1998) Collective dynamics of ’small-world’ networks. Nature 393(6684):440–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Latora V, Marchiori M (2003) Economic small-world behavior in weighted networks. Eur Phys J B 32(2):249–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Humphries MD, Gurney K (2008) Network ‘small-world-ness’: a quantitative method for determining canonical network equivalence. PloS One 3(4):e0002051CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    CURRY 7 EEG Acquisition and Analysis Software. Compumedics Neuroscan USA LtdGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Nuamps EEG Amplifier (Model 7181). Compumedics Neuroscan USA LtdGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    STIM 2 Stimulus Delivery and Experiment Control Solution. Compumedics Neuroscan USA LtdGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Hosseini SH, Hoeft F, Kesler SR (2012) GAT: a graph-theoretical analysis toolbox for analyzing between-group differences in large-scale structural and functional brain networks. PloS One 7(7):e40709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Delorme A, Makeig S (2004) EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. J Neurosci Methods 134(1):9–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Stam CJ (2004) Functional connectivity patterns of human magnetoencephalographic recordings: a ‘small-world’network? Neurosci Lett 355(1):25–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Bassett DS, Bullmore E (2006) Small-world brain networks. Neuroscientist 12(6):512–523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Micheloyannis S, Pachou E, Stam CJ, Vourkas M, Erimaki S, Tsirka V (2006) Using graph theoretical analysis of multi channel EEG to evaluate the neural efficiency hypothesis. Neurosci Lett 402(3):273–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Md. Hedayetul Islam Shovon
    • 1
    Email author
  • Nanda Nandagopal
    • 1
  • Ramasamy Vijayalakshmi
    • 2
  • Jia Tina Du
    • 1
  • Bernadine Cocks
    • 1
  1. 1.Cognitive Neuroengineering and Computational Neuroscience Laboratory, School of Information Technology and Mathematical SciencesUniversity of South AustraliaAdelaideAustralia
  2. 2.Computational Neuroscience Laboratory, Department of Applied Mathematics and Computational SciencesPSG College of TechnologyCoimbatoreIndia

Personalised recommendations