, Volume 51, Issue 3, pp 209–222 | Cite as

Activity of Motor Units in Human Elbow Flexor and Extensor Muscles during Task-Dependent Unloading

  • A. V. MaznychenkoEmail author
  • G. V. Dovgalets
  • I. V. Vereshchaka
  • T. Tomiak
  • V. S. Mishchenko
  • M. Dornowski
  • A. N. Talnov

Surface EMGs and activity of 73 single motor units (MUs) of the m. triceps brachii caput laterale (TBcl) and 25 units of the m. biceps brachii caput longum (BBcl) were recorded in five adults during unloading within the ramp phase of the isotorque ramp-and-hold movements in the elbow joint (“movement” task) and during maintaining of a certain position (“position control” task). Analysis of the surface EMGs showed that patterns of the MU responses to unloading in different motor tasks are dissimilar. Depending on the responses to unloading, the examined MUs were classified into two groups. Motor units of the first group, including 14 TBcl MUs and 22 BBcl ones, were characterized as task-independent units. Their spiking was completely inhibited in response to unloading in both motor tasks. The second group (44 TBcl and 3 BBcl MUs) should be considered as a group of the task-dependent units. These MUs were active during unloading in the “movement” task but were fully inhibited in the “position control” task. This specificity in the reactions of MUs during movements may be related to their different functions. Presumably, the former group of MUs is mainly involved in the force control, while the latter one is associated with the control of the movement per se.


elbow joint isotorque movements unloading movement control motor units surface EMG 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    B. Kuraszkiewicz, G. Wilanowski, D. Młoźniak, et al., “Review: Selective electrodes for human motoneuron research,” J. Med. Biol. Eng., 34, 415–425 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    A. A. Tax, J. J. Denier van der Gon, C. C. Gielen, and C. M. van den Tempel, “Differences in the activation of m. biceps brachii in the control of slow isotonic movements and isometric contractions,” Exp. Brain Res.,76, 55–63 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    T. Ivanova, S. J. Garland, and K. J. Miller, “Motor unit recruitment and discharge behavior in movements and isometric contractions,” Muscle Nerve,20, 867–874 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    J. Kallio, K. Søgaard, J. Avela, et al., “Motor unit firing behaviour of soleus muscle in isometric and dynamic contractions,” PLoS One8(2), e53425 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    A. N. Tal’nov, T. Tomiak, A. V. Maznychenko, et al., “Firing patterns of human biceps brachii motor units during isotorque ramp-and-hold movements in the elbow joint,” Neurophysiolgy, 46, 212–220 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    A. N. Tal’nov, S. G. Serenko, S. S. Strafun, and A. I. Kostyukov, “Analysis of the electromyographic activity of human elbow joint muscles during slow linear flexion movements in isotorque conditions,” Neuroscience,90, 1123–1136 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    A. Nardone, C. Romano, and M. Schieppati, “Selective recruitment of high-threshold human motor units during voluntary isotonic lengthening of active muscles,” J. Physiol.,409, 451–471 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    A. A. Tax, J. J. Denier van der Gon, C. C. Gielen, and M. Kleyne, “Differences in central control of m. biceps brachii in movement tasks and force tasks,” Exp. Brain Res.,79, 138–142 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    A. A. Tax, J. J. Denier van der Gon, and C. J. Erkelens, “Differences in coordination of elbow flexor muscles in force tasks and in movement tasks,” Exp. Brain Res.,81, 567–572 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    M. Theeuwen, C. C. Gielen, and L. E. Miller, “The relative activation of muscles during isometric contractions and low-velocity movements against a load,” Exp. Brain Res.,101, 493–505 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    B. M. van Bolhuis, W. P. Medendorp, and C. C. Gielen, “Motor unit firing behavior in human arm flexor muscles during sinusoidal isometric contractions and movements,” Exp. Brain Res.,117, 120–130 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    J. Duchateau and R. M. Enoka, “Neural control of shortening and lengthening contractions: influence of task constraints,” J. Physiol.,586, 5853–5864 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    S. Baudry, T. Rudroff, L. A. Pierpoint, and R. M. Enoka, “Load type influences motor unit recruitment in biceps brachii during a sustained contraction,” J. Neurophysiol.,102, 1725–1735 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    T. S. Buchanan and D. G. Lloyd, “Muscle activity is different for humans performing static tasks which require force control and position control,” Neurosci. Lett.,194, 61–64 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    K. S. Maluf, B. K. Barry, Z. A. Riley, and R. M. Enoka, “Reflex responsiveness of a human hand muscle when controlling isometric force and joint position,” Clin. Neurophysiol., 118, 2063–2071 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    C. J. Mottram, E. A. Christou, F. G. Meyer, and R. M. Enoka, “Frequency modulation of motor unit discharge has task-dependent effects on fluctuations in motor output,” J. Neurophysiol.,94, 2878–2887 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    M. H. Schieber, and W. T. Thach, “Trained slow tracking. II. Bidirectional discharge patterns of cerebellar nuclear, motor cortex, and spindle afferent neurons,” J. Neurophysiol.,54, 1228–1270, (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    A. Prochazka, M. Hulliger, P. Zangger, and K. Appenteng, “‘Fusimotor set’: new evidence for alphaindependent control of gamma-motoneurones during movement in awake cat,” Brain Res.,339, 136–140, (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    P. A. Merton, “Speculations on the servo-control of movement,” in: The Spinal Cord, G. E. W. Wolstenholme (ed), John Wiley and Sons, Chichester (1953).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    B. Pasquet, A. Carpentier, and J. Duchateau, “Specific modulation of motor unit discharge for a similar change in fascicle length during shortening and lengthening contractions in humans,” J. Physiol.,577, 753–765 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    T. R. Nicols and J. C. Houk, “Improvement in linearity and regulation of stiffness that results from action of stretch reflex,” J. Neurophysiol.,39, 113–142 (1976).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    A. I. Kostyukov, “Muscle dynamics: dependence of muscle length on changes in external load,” Biol. Cybern.,56, 375–387 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    A. I. Kostyukov, “Muscle hysteresis and movement control: a theoretical study,” Neuroscience,83, 303–320 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    A. I. Kostyukov and A. N. Tal’nov, “Effects of torque disturbances on elbow joint movements evoked in unanesthetized cats by microstimulation of the motor cortex,” Exp. Brain Res.,84, 374–382 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    A. G. Feldman, “Once more on the equilibrium point hypothesis (λ-model) for motor control,” J. Mot. Behav.,18, 17–54 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    E. Bizzi, F. Mussa-Ivaldi, and S. Gistzer, “Does the nervous system use equilibrium-point control to guide single and multiple joint movements,” Behav. Brain Sci.,15, 603–613 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    A. I. Kostyukov and A. N. Talnov, “Stretch and unloading reflexes in the cortically evoked movements of unanesthetized cats,” Neurophysiology,24, 330–339 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    J. M. Wilson, C. K. Thompson, L. C. Miller, and C. J. Heckman, “Intrinsic excitability of human motoneurons in biceps brachii versus triceps brachii,” J. Neurophysiol.,113, 3692–3699 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    F. Cotel, M. Antri, J. Y. Barthe, and D. Orsal, “Identified ankle extensor and flexor motoneurons display different firing profiles in the neonatal rat,” J. Neurosci.,29, 2748–2753 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    M. Ishikawa, E. Niemelä, and P. V. Komi, “Interaction between fascicle and tendinous tissues in short-contact stretch-shortening cycle exercise with varying eccentric intensities,” J. Appl. Physiol.,99, 217–223 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Y. Kawakami and T. Fukunaga, “New insights into in vivo human skeletal muscle function,” Exerc. Sport Sci. Rev.,34, 16–21 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. V. Maznychenko
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • G. V. Dovgalets
    • 1
  • I. V. Vereshchaka
    • 2
  • T. Tomiak
    • 2
  • V. S. Mishchenko
    • 2
  • M. Dornowski
    • 2
  • A. N. Talnov
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Movement Physiology, Bogomolets Institute of PhysiologyNational Academy of SciencesKyivUkraine
  2. 2.Unit of the Theory of Sport and Motorics, Chair of Individual SportsGdansk University of Physical Education and SportGdańskPoland

Personalised recommendations