, Volume 51, Issue 2, pp 126–131 | Cite as

Motor Recovery and the Fracture Risk in Patients during Post-Stroke Rehabilitation

  • S. Tomašević-TodorovićEmail author
  • T. Spasojević
  • K. Bošković
  • A. Knežević
  • S. Pantelinac
  • F. Hanna

Indices of motor recovery and the fracture risk were estimated in patients examined after stroke and suffering from osteoporosis or osteopenia. Our study included 57 patients (29 with osteoporosis and 28 with osteopenia) who received treatment at a rehabilitation clinic. The average age of patients was 69.62 ± 9.86 years. The data were based on anamneses, questionnaires, and bone mineral density (BMD) measured by the DXA method. The fracture risk was assessed by applying the FRAX index. The functional status was evaluated by the Barthel index (BI), and motor recovery was evaluated by the Signe Brunnström scale (SB). The prevalent impairment was left-sided hemiparesis (n = 30; 52.63%). Most patients with stroke and a reduced BMD (42, 73.68%) had low and intermediate risk estimates, while 15 (26.31%) patients had a high risk of major osteoporotic fractures. Patients with stroke and osteopenia had a significantly higher risk for major osteoporotic fractures, compared to patients with osteoporosis (P < 0.001). Concerning the hip fracture, more patients with a reduced BMD (34, 59.65%) had a lower fracture risk than those with an intermediate (15, 26.31%) or high risk (8, 14.03%). The majority of patients had significantly higher scores on the SB scale in lower segments of the extremities. No statistically significant difference in motor recovery between left- and right-sided patients with stroke and reduced BMD was found (P ˃ 0.01). Thus, an association between the high risk level for major osteoporotic fractures and osteopenia was found. Patients with right-sided hemiparesis and osteopenia had more significant reduction in the BMD on the femur, when compared to patients with left-sided hemiparesis. Patients with stroke and an increased fracture risk require preventive individual therapeutic programs in order to avoid fractures.


motor recovery stroke bone mineral density BMD fracture risk factors 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    S. Marzolini, W. McIlroy, A. Tang, et al., “Predictors of low bone mineral density of the stroke-affected hip among ambulatory individuals with chronic stroke,” Osteoporosis Int., 25, 2631–2638 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    J. Marsden, L. M. Gibson, C. E. Lightbody, et al., “Can early onset bone loss be effectively managed in poststroke patients? An integrative review of the evidence,” Age Ageing, 37, 142–150 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    L. Jorgensen, N. J. Crabtree, J. Reeve, and B. K. Jacobsen, “Ambulatory level and asymmetrical weight bearing after stroke affects bone loss in the upper and lower part of the femoral neck differently: bone adaptation after decreased mechanical loading,” Bone, 27, No. 5, 701–707 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    J. Hippisley-Cox and C.Coupland, “Predicting risk of osteoporotic fracture in men and women in England and Wales: prospective derivation and validation of QFractureScores,” BMJ, 339, b4229 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    R. Wiklund, A. Toots, M. Conradsson, et al., “Risk factors for hip fracture in very old people: a populationbased study,” Osteoporosis Int., 27, No. 3, 923–931 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    M. K. Kapral, J. Fang, S. M. Alibhai, et al., “Risk of fractures after stroke. Results from the Ontario Stroke Registry,” Neurology, 88, No. 1, 57–64 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    T. Y. Lan, S. M. Hou, C. Y. Chen, et al., “Risk factors for hip fracture in older adults: a case-control study in Taiwan,” Osteoporos Int., 21, 773–784 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    E. Hernlund, A. Svedbom, M. Ivergard, et al., “Osteoporosis in European Union: medical management, epidemiology and economic burden,” Arch. Osteoporosis, 8, 136 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    J. A. Kanis, Assessment of Osteoporosis at Primary Health Care Level. WHO Scientific Group Technical Report, World Health Organization, Geneva (2007).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    J. Compston, A. Cooper, C. Cooper, et al., “Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women and men from the age of 50 years in the UK,” Maturitas, 62, No. 2, 105–108 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    S. Tomasevic-Todorovic, K. Boskovic, K. Filipovic, et al., “Bone mineral density in patients with stroke,” Osteoporosis Int., 25, 192 (2014).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    P. K. Myint, A. B. Clark, C. S. Kwok, et al., “Bone mineral density and incidence of stroke: European prospective investigation into cancer-Norfolk populationbased study, systematic review, and meta-analysis,” Stroke, 45, 373–382 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    A. N. Tosteston, L. J. Melton, B. Dawson-Hughes, et al., “National osteoporosis foundation guide committee, cost-effective osteoporosis treatment thresholds: the United States prespective,” Osteoporosis Int., 19, 437–447 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    G. Yavuzer, S. Ataman, N. Suldur, and M. Atay, “Bone mineral density in patients with stroke,” Int. J. Rehabil. Res., 25, 235–239 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    L. Jorgensen, T. Engstad, and B. K. Jacobsen, “Bone mineral density in acute stroke patients: low bone mineral density may predict first stroke in women,” Stroke, 32, No. 1, 47–51 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    M. C. Nevitt and S. R. Cummings, “Type of fall and risk of hip and wrist fractures: the study of osteoporotic fractures. The study of osteoporotic fractures research group,” J. Am. Geriat. Soc., 41, No. 11, 1226–1234 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Tomašević-Todorović
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • T. Spasojević
    • 2
  • K. Bošković
    • 1
    • 2
  • A. Knežević
    • 1
    • 2
  • S. Pantelinac
    • 1
    • 2
  • F. Hanna
    • 3
  1. 1.University of Novi Sad, Faculty of MedicineNovi SadSerbia
  2. 2.Medical Rehabilitation Clinic, Clinical Centre of VojvodinaNovi SadSerbia
  3. 3.Public Health Program, Department of Health SciencesTorrens University AustraliaMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations