, Volume 38, Issue 5–6, pp 389–395 | Cite as

Modulation of attention in healthy children using a course of EEG-feedback sessions

  • N. V. LutsyukEmail author
  • E. V. ÉismontEmail author
  • V. B. PavlenkoEmail author


We studied changes in the power spectra of EEG in the course of sessions of feedback by EEG characteristics (neurofeedback sessions) and estimated the effects of neurofeedback on psychological and EEG correlates of voluntary attention. Indices of the latter were estimated using Bourdon’s test (a correcture test) and Schulte’s tables. Twenty-nine reasonably healthy 10-to 13-year-old children took part in the study; they were divided into two groups, an experimental group (n = 12) and a control group (n = 15). The results obtained support the statement on noticeable changes in the functional state of the brain both immediately in the course of a neurofeedback session and after a course of such trainings. Changes in the ratios of the spectral powers of the beta1 vs theta rhythms and the low-frequency beta vs theta rhythms were found in EEG recorded from the sensorimotor zone of the right hemisphere (C4). The observed changes in the spectral characteristics of EEG induced by the course of neurofeedback sessions were accompanied by the improvement of a few indices of voluntary attention.


feedback by EEG characteristics (neurofeedback) EEG rhythms attention children 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    M. B. Shtark and A. B. Skok, “Using electroencephalographic biofeedback in clinical practice,” in: Biocontrol-3: Theory and Practice [in Russian], M. B. Shtark and A. B. Skok (eds.), Nauka, Novosibirsk (1998), pp. 131–141.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    M. Linden, T. Habib, and V. Radojevic, “A controlled study of the effects of EEG biofeedback on cognition and behavior of children with attention deficit disorder and learning disabilities,” Biofeedback Self-Regul., 21, No. 1, 35–49 (1996).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    T. Egner and J. H. Gruzelier, “EEG biofeedback of low beta band components: frequency-specific effects on variables of attention and event-related brain potentials,” Clin. Neurophysiol., 115, 131–139 (2004).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Yu. D. Kropotov, V. A. Grin-Yatsenko, L. S. Choutko, et al., “Treatment of children with attention disorder/hyperactivity syndrome using an EEG-biofeedback technique,” Ross. Vestn. Perinatol. Pediat., 47, No. 3, 37–40 (2002).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    M. B. Sterman and L. Friar, “Suppression of seizures in an epileptic following sensorimotor EEG feedback training,” Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol., 33, No. 1, 89–95 (1972).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    M. B. Sterman, “Sensorimotor EEG operant conditioning: Experimental and clinical effects,” Pavlov. J. Biol. Sci., 12, No. 2, 63–92 (1977).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    J. O. Lubar and J. F. Lubar, “Electroencephalographic biofeedback of SMR and beta for treatment of attention deficit disorders in a clinical setting,” Biofeedback Self-Regul., 9, No. 1, 1–23 (1984).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    D. F. Lyubar, “Biocontrol, attention deficit, and hyperactivity,” in: Biocontrol-3: Theory and Practice [in Russian], M. B. Shtark and A. B. Skok (eds.), Nauka, Novosibirsk (1998), pp. 142–162.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    V. J. Monastra, S. Lynn, M. Linden, et al., “Electroencephalographic biofeedback in the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder,” Appl. Psychophysiol. Biofeedback, 30, No. 2, 95–114 (2005).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    V. A. Grin’-Yatsenko, Yu. D. Kropotov, V. A. Ponomarev, et al., “Effect of biofeedback by the sensorimotor rhythm and beta1 rhythm of EEG on the parameters of attention,” Fiziol. Cheloveka, 27, No. 3, 5–13 (2001).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    T. Egner, T. F. Zech, and J. H. Gruzelier, “The effects of neurofeedback training on the spectral topography of the electroencephalogram,” Clin. Neurophysiol., 115, 2452–2460 (2004).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    D. Vernon, T. Egner, C. Nick, et al., “The effect of training distinct neurofeedback protocols on aspects of cognitive performance,” Int. J. Psychophysiol., 47, No. 1, 75–85 (2003).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    T. Egner and J. H. Gruzelier, “Learned self-regulation of EEG frequency components affects attention and eventrelated brain potentials,” NeuroReport, 12, No. 18, 4155–4159 (2001).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    L. N. Kuleshova, Attention. Manual for General, Experimental, and Applied Psychology [in Russian], Piter, Saint Petersburg (2000).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    E. I. Rogov, Manual for a Practicing Psychologist Working in the Education Sphere [in Russian], VLADOS, Moscow (1995).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    N. V. Lutsyuk, E. V. Éismont, and V. B. Pavlenko, “Correlations between characteristics of evoked EEG potentials recorded in a Go/No-Go paradigm and indices of attention in children,” Neurophysiology, 37, Nos. 5/6, 396–402 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    J. F. Lubar, “Discourse on the development of EEG diagnostics and biofeedback for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorders,” Biofeedback Self-Regul., 16, No. 3, 1–23 (1991).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    R. J. Barry, A. R. Clarke, and S. J. Johnstone, “A review of electrophysiology in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: I. Qualitative and quantitative electroencephalography,” Clin. Neurophysiol., 114, 171–183 (2003).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    R. J. Chabot and G. Serfontain, “Quantitative electroencephalographic profiles of children with attention deficit disorder,” Biol. Psychiat., 40, No. 10, 951–963 (1996).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    T. Janzen, K. Graap, S. Stephanson, et al., “Differences in baseline EEG measures for ADD and normally achieving preadolescent males,” Biofeedback Self-Regul., 20, No. 1, 65–82 (1995).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    C. A. Mann, J. F. Lubar, A. W. Zimmerman, et al., “Quantitative analysis of EEG in boys with attention-deficit-hyperactivity disorder: Controlled study with clinical implications,” Pediat. Neurol., 8, No. 1, 30–36 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    A.R. Clarke, R. J. Barry, R. McCarthy, and M. Selikowitz, “Electroencephalogram differences in two subtypes of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder,” Psychophysiology, 38, No. 2, 212–221 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    V. S. Rusinov, Functional Importance of the Cerebral Processes [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1977).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    V. S. Rusinov, O. M. Grindel’, G. N. Boldyrev, and E. M. Vakar, Biopotentials of the Human Brain: Mathematical Analysis [in Russian], Meditsina, Moscow (1987).Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    V. I. Gusel’nikov, Electrophysiology of the Brain [in Russian], Vysshaya Shkola, Moscow (1976).Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    C. M. Gomez, M. Vazquez, and E. Vaquero, “Frequency analysis of the EEG during spatial selective attention,” Int. J. Neurosci., 95, Nos. 1/2, 17–32 (1998).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    O. Jensen, P. Goel, N. Kopell, et al., “On the human sensorimotor-cortex beta rhythm: Sources and modeling,” NeuroImage, 26, No. 2, 347–355 (2005).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    M. B. Sterman, “Physiological origins and functional correlates of EEG rhythmic activities: Implications for self-regulation,” Biofeedback Self-Regul., 21, No. 1, 3–33 (1996).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    E. S. Egorova, Electroencephalography [in Russian], Meditsina, Moscow (1973).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Vernadskii Tavricheskii National UniversitySimferopol’, Autonomic Republic of CrimeaUkraine

Personalised recommendations